logo
WILLIAM BENNETT, LAMAR ALEXANDER: We both ran the Education Dept and there are 3 things we should keep

WILLIAM BENNETT, LAMAR ALEXANDER: We both ran the Education Dept and there are 3 things we should keep

Fox News20-03-2025

The United States survived for two centuries without a federal Department of Education and could do so again. In the 45 years the department has existed, students haven't made much progress. Nine-year-olds, for example, are reading no better today than they did when the department was created in 1979.
The truth is that having a cabinet-level agency devoted to education has not made our kids smarter, our schools better or our academic achievement stronger — and it has added to runaway growth in education spending.
Demoting it, perhaps integrating some functions into other departments, taking the sign off the door — any such move would need Congress's assent but wouldn't harm today's kids or the nation's future. We say this as former education secretaries — one for President Ronald Reagan and the other for President George H.W. Bush.
What would do serious damage — this is a live concern as DOGE swings its broad axe — is eliminating some vital programs and responsibilities currently housed in the Education Department.
That agency does three things that matter — all of which need overhauling but all of which are far too important to discard. Let's not throw these babies out with the bathwater.
First is "The Nation's Report Card." This regular accounting is put together by a unit called the National Center for Education Statistics, which gathers essential data, administers key tests of student performance, and informs the whole country as to how its kids are doing in the 3Rs as well as American history and civics and science. Without that data — gathered regularly, analyzed carefully and reported accurately — we wouldn't know much about the education responsibilities Congress first assigned the government in a law passed in 1867:
"…[C]ollecting such statistics and facts as shall show the condition and progress of education in the several States and Territories, and of diffusing such information respecting the organization and management of schools and school systems, and methods of teaching, as shall aid the people of the United States in the establishment and maintenance of efficient school systems, and otherwise promote the cause of education throughout the country."
More than a century and a half later, we still need all that!
Second is redressing violations of students' civil rights. We're talking here about actual violations, not the Orwellian search for "disparate impacts" that's too often been the focus of Education Department enforcers in recent years. But whether it's a child with disabilities who isn't getting the kind of schooling she needs, or a minority kid denied entry to a college he's qualified for, or a Jewish (or Muslim) student being harassed on campus, it's the Education Department's job to try to solve the problem. (Conceivably the Justice Department could handle this, but its hands are pretty full these days!)
Third, the Education Department distributes federal dollars for various programs and services in schools and colleges. This garden definitely needs weeding. Even better — as we've each proposed in the past — the money in most K-12 programs should be "block-granted" to states.
Senate legislation in 2014 recommended letting states turn 41% of federal elementary-secondary dollars into $2,100 scholarships that would follow 11 million children from low-income families to accredited schools of their choice. Similar legislation proposed such federal scholarships for children with disabilities — which many states are already doing.
As school choice spreads with state and (often) local dollars following kids to the schools they actually attend, big federal programs still use creaky formulas that distribute funds to schools in ways that may never reach the youngsters meant to benefit from them.
That agency does three things that matter — all of which need overhauling but all of which are far too important to discard. Let's not throw these babies out with the bathwater.
It's different in higher ed, where we give Pell Grants to needy college students that accompany them to the colleges they actually attend. If such vouchers — which is what Pell Grants are — helped to create the best colleges, why not use them to create the best schools?
That would eliminate layers of bureaucracy, inject needed competition into the education system, and shove Uncle Sam out of the way of state decision-makers and, especially, of parents making the best school choices for their children.
The Department of Education contains plenty of grimy bathwater that should be drained. But three babies are splashing around in it. Clean them up, for sure, but don't throw them out.
Lamar Alexander and Bill Bennett served as U.S. Secretary of Education for George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan, respectively.
Lamar Alexander was elected both governor and U.S. senator from the State of Tennessee. He also served as president of the University of Tennessee and U.S. Education secretary for President George H.W. Bush. He co-founded a Nashville law firm and two successful businesses.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Hamilton Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON - Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said Friday that the move signals a 'renewed commitment to open and fair trade' with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. Alberta's liquor stores are privately owned but must order stock through the provincial government. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Other premiers also announced bans on U.S. liquor along with other proposed penalties. Nally said in a statement that the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines 'sets the stage for more constructive negotiations' ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The agreement, known as CUSMA, was negotiated during the first Trump administration and is up for a mandatory review in 2026. 'Prime Minister Mark Carney has made a clear effort to reset the relationship with the U.S. administration, and Alberta's government supports this approach,' Nally said. 'We are focused on highlighting Alberta's role as a responsible and collaborative trading partner and will continue working alongside other provinces to advocate for a tariff-free relationship.' The minister said Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. In April, the province paused its policy around procurement from U.S. companies in what Nally called 'the spirit of diplomacy.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON — Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally says the move signals a "renewed commitment to open and fair trade" with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Nally says the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines "sets the stage for more constructive negotiations" ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The minister says Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. Nally said in April that the province was pausing its policy around procurement from U.S. companies "in the spirit of diplomacy." He said since the province's retaliatory measures were first announced in early March, the Trump administration had put a hold on further tariffs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store