
Was a Norwegian tourist denied entry to US over Vance meme? Authorities reveal real reason
Jun 25, 2025 07:16 AM IST
The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has denied viral reports claiming that a Norwegian tourist was denied entry to the United States over a JD Vance meme found on his phone. In a post shared on the social media platform X, the US agency revealed the real reason behind Mads Mikkelsen's detainment. Did a JD Vance meme land a Norwegian tourist in trouble? CBP says no(AP)
Mads Mikkelsen, a 21-year-old Norwegian tourist, told Norwegian news outlet Nordlys that he landed at Newark Airport in New Jersey on June 11. He claimed that he was detained and put in a cell and authorities eventually searched his phone, where they found two images, one featuring US Vice President JD Vance, that became the reason for the trouble.
'They threatened me with a minimum fine of $5,000 or five years in prison if I refused to provide the password to my phone,' he alleged.
One photo showed Vance sporting a bald, egg-like dome that went viral in March. The other was a photo of Mikkelsen featuring a wooden pipe he crafted ages ago. What US authorities say
The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took to X to clarify that Mikkelsen possessing a JD Vance meme on his phone was not the reason he was denied entry to the US. Instead, they attributed it to his admitted drug use.
'Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use,' the CBP posted.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Donald Trump believes both Israel and Iran ‘won' the war: ‘They have a…'
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he believes both Iran and Israel "won" the recent 'war' that erupted after Israel targeted Iran's nuclear facilities with missile strikes on June 13, triggering 12 days of intense conflict. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte as he arrives for a NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday, June 25, 2025. (AP) Explaining why Iran also emerged victorious, Trump stated, "This was a victory for Iran, too. They have a country." Referring to the destruction at Iran's nuclear sites, he said, "The flame is all underground. Everything above is burned black. They did not have a chance to get anything out." On US–Iran relations post-conflict, Trump added, "We are getting along with Iran right now very well." He stressed that the decisive strike marked the end of hostilities, saying, "The hit on Iran ended the war." Addressing Iran's nuclear ambitions, Trump said, "I think Iran will not do the nuke thing again. They will take their oil. They have been to hell." He also claimed the impact on Iran's nuclear program was long-lasting: "I think the Iran nuclear plans have been set back decades." Describing Iran's reaction to the attack site, Trump said, "Iran went down to the site. They said that it was so devastating. They would not have settled if not." Commenting on the quality of intelligence used in the operation, he acknowledged, "The intelligence was inconclusive on the Iran strike." He also said that the intelligence following the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites was inconclusive, but also suggested the damage could have been severe. "The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests," Trump told reporters ahead of a meeting with world leaders at a NATO summit. "It was very severe. There was obliteration," he added. He also hinted at a broader diplomatic outcome, stating, "The strike on Iran will help with getting hostages released from Gaza." Speaking about Israel's outcome from the war, Trump noted the impact of Iran's counterattack, saying, 'Israel was also hit very hard. Those ballistic missiles hit them hard. Bibi should be proud.' At the same time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a television address on Tuesday, declared that a historic victory had been secured and that the threat from Iran's nuclear and ballistic programs had been eliminated. Iran-Israel war Israel launched its bombing campaign with a surprise strike on June 13, targeting Iran's top military leadership, prominent nuclear scientists, missile infrastructure, and nuclear facilities. The assault reportedly eliminated much of Iran's high-ranking military command. In retaliation, Iran fired a large number of missiles that, for the first time, managed to breach Israel's air defence systems. According to Iranian officials, the attacks resulted in 610 deaths and nearly 5,000 injuries within Iran, although independent verification was not possible due to strict media controls. In Israel, 28 people were reported killed. The United States entered the conflict two days before it ended, deploying powerful bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities, including sites deeply buried beneath mountains. President Donald Trump claimed the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, asserting it had become incapable of producing an atomic bomb. He said the action had effectively removed the main obstacle from ongoing diplomatic talks. Iran, for its part, has consistently denied pursuing nuclear weapons. However, there was scepticism about the actual extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear capabilities. According to Reuters, a preliminary report by the US Defence Intelligence Agency, cited by three sources, suggested that the destruction may have been less severe than Trump claimed. One source noted that Iran's enriched uranium reserves remained intact and estimated the nuclear program may have only been delayed by a month or two. The White House rejected this assessment, calling it 'flat out wrong.'


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Zohran Mamdani, 33, billed as ‘America's Sharma ji ka beta' by internet after defeating Andrew Cuomo
Indian-American Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old lawmaker often described as an 'upstart' in front of rival Andrew Cuomo, has won the Democratic primary in the race to become mayor of New York City. Andrew Cuomo, who had both money and legacy on his side – he is a member of the politically powerful Cuomo family – conceded to Mamdani after the Queens lawmaker racked up commanding leads across Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan. Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani takes the stage at his primary election party, Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in New York. AP/PTI(AP06_25_2025_000028A)(AP) If Zohran Mamdani is elected, he will become the first Muslim and the first South Asian mayor of New York City – no mean feat for someone who is just 33. While his Democratic primary win has led to celebrations among supporters, it has also spelled a headache for Indian kids everywhere who fear they will now have to live up to the high standards set by Mamdani. One viral post, which lays bare this anxiety in a hilarious way, reads: 'If Zohran Mamdani becomes NYC mayor at the age of 33 it will be a death blow to millions of young south Asian men in this country. 'Every desi parent is gonna be like, 'Zohran was Mayor of New York City at 33! You haven't even bought a house yet! Why can't you be more like him?!?' Ohhhh dark days ahead for south Asian men. Smh.' America's very own 'Sharma ji ka beta' The comments under the viral post were equally hilarious. One person declared Mamdani as America's very own 'Sharma ji ka beta'. Another X user wrote: 'Zohran just became every desi mom's favorite son overnight the pressure just reached historic levels across the country'. 'LOL. Well hopefully it'll also encourage our families to not be disappointed when their immigrant kids don't always pursue STEM fields,' a user added. More about Mamdani Zohran Mamdani is a New York State Assembly member (36th District, Queens) and a Democratic Socialist known for championing rent freezes, free buses, public childcare, city‑run grocery stores, and robust housing and transit reforms. He is the son of Indian‑born filmmaker Mira Nair and Indian‑Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
What is Nato's new 5% defence spending target?
Nato leaders are set to meet on Wednesday (June 25) to endorse a new defence budget put forward by US President Donald Trump. Trump has been pressuring nations to increase Nato's defence spending from the current two per cent to five per cent amid growing global threats. What will the increase mean for nations? read more Nato chief Mark Rutte said it envisions a five-fold increase in the alliance's air defences and adding thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles to arsenals. File image/AP Nato leaders are set to sign off Wednesday (June 25) at their Hague summit on a defence spending pledge to satisfy US President Donald Trump's demand for a headline figure of five per cent of GDP. Here are the details of what Nato is signing up to: Five per cent? Not really Trump has insisted Nato countries hit the five per cent bar, well beyond the current two per cent baseline level required by the alliance. Only a handful of allies, such as Poland and the Baltic states, are coming close to five per cent at the moment, with the United States itself under 3.4 per cent in 2024. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nato's 32 nations have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5 per cent to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5 per cent to broader 'defence-related' areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. That gives Trump the win he craves while granting cash-strapped European governments some wiggle room. Nevertheless, it remains a significant ask for many governments and will add hundreds of billions to their budgets in the coming years. 3.5 per cent on what? The bulk of the spending is still required to go on Nato's key focus area: raw military might. Alliance members last month signed up for new targets for all the hardware they need to face off against the threat from Russia. The exact details are secret, but it will involve the biggest ramp-up in capabilities since the Cold War. Nato chief Mark Rutte said it envisions a five-fold increase in the alliance's air defences and adding thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles to arsenals. Countries will also likely keep counting the billions of dollars in military aid they give to Ukraine in this category. And the 1.5 per cent? The rest of the pledge covers a far broader array of areas, from bridges and roads to cybersecurity. Nato says these items, while not immediately evident, are also crucial to helping defend against any attack. 'If you can't get tanks to the front lines because the roads or bridges or rail can't handle those tanks and their weight, then obviously they're worthless,' US Nato ambassador Matthew Whitaker said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nato officials admit that much of this spending will already be on the books of national governments and will just need to be redesignated. Italy, for instance, has said it believes a long-planned bridge it wants to build linking Sicily to the mainland should fall under that category. Will anyone check? Ensuring countries stick to the deal is a key element, as previous Nato pledges have often not been respected. Officials had originally floated a plan to have Nato members commit to increases of 0.2 percentage points a year until they hit the target. That was eventually dropped in the face of opposition from governments who didn't want to put their feet to the fire. Now, countries will have to submit reports each year to Nato showing that they are stepping up and buying what is needed. There will also be a review of sorts in 2029 when Nato comes up with new targets for arms needed, and the demands could be adjusted. And looming over everyone's shoulders, if they don't make good on their promise, will be the unpleasant prospect of upsetting Trump. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is anyone exempt? It depends on who you ask. Spain, which has been one of Nato's lowest spenders, claims it won't have to hit the five per cent target after striking a side deal with Rutte. But the Nato chief has insisted that there is no 'opt-out' from the agreement and every country will have to step up to the levels set.