Indiana passes law threatening non-profit status of expensive hospitals
Indiana's governor, Mike Braun, has signed a landmark bill that would strip charity hospitals of their non-profit status if they continue to charge high prices.
The legislation, the first of its kind in the United States, followed uproar across the state after a Guardian series in October that investigated how one major Indiana non-profit hospital system bought up its competition, then hiked its prices, leaving businesses and patients struggling to pay their medical costs.
In the wake of the Guardian investigation, Braun, then the Republican gubernatorial candidate, and his Democratic rival both criticized the hospital system, Parkview Health, for its high prices, and lawmakers vowed to take action against the non-profit chain, which charged some of the highest prices in the country despite being based in Fort Wayne, Indiana, the US's most affordable metro area.
Braun signed the legislation into law on Tuesday. It comes at a time of growing concern across the US about healthcare costs and medical debt.
To implement the law, the Indiana office of management and budget will first study prices across the state and come up with a price benchmark for non-profit hospitals in consultation with the legislature, according to the bill's author, Martin Carbaugh, a Republican representative who represents a district that includes Fort Wayne. Non-profit hospitals will then have until 2029 to get their prices under that average, though Carbaugh hopes some will lower their prices before then as they negotiate with insurers.
'We'll start to see the downward pressure put on them right away,' he said. 'The hospitals know they can't just go for broke and raise costs, only to have to lower it again in 2029.'
According to data compiled by Hoosiers for Affordable Healthcare, an Indiana advocacy group, the legislation could result in average price reductions as large as 40% for Parkview, and similarly sized cuts for other large state hospital systems.
'It's gonna be beneficial to everybody,' said Doug Allen, a small business owner who has struggled to keep up with Parkview's healthcare costs for his employees. 'Maybe people won't be hurting so bad. Maybe they won't think twice before coming to the hospital. Almost everybody around here is on a payment plan with Parkview. Everybody owes money to Parkview.'
Parkview Health did not respond to requests for comment but has previously said it is committed to lowering healthcare costs.
In a statement, the Indiana Hospital Association said it was 'concerned by the potential loss of non-profit status for hospitals based on meeting an unknown statewide average commercial price in the future. This does not take into consideration the uncertainty of rising cost pressures such as tariffs, inflation, and other significant economic factors that will further threaten the financial stability of Indiana's health care ecosystem.'
The group added that it looks forward to 'continuing our work with legislators and Gov Braun's administration on future solutions that strike the right balance of lowering costs while maintaining access for Hoosier patients'.
The US spends far more on healthcare than other large, wealthy countries, a trend that has been exacerbated by decades of hospital consolidation limiting competition in the healthcare sector.
Carbaugh said he was aware of how high healthcare prices are across the country and said Indiana's legislation might be a model for other states too.
'It's great to be a leader,' he said. 'I'm happy to be part of leading that charge.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
NIH scientists go public to denounce Trump's deep cuts in health research
In his confirmation hearings to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya pledged his openness to views that might conflict with his own. 'Dissent,' he said, 'is the very essence of science.' That commitment is being put to the test. On Monday, scores of scientists at the agency sent their Trump-appointed leader a letter titled the Bethesda Declaration, a frontal challenge to 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe'. It says: 'We dissent.' In a capital where insiders often insist on anonymity to say such things publicly, more than 90 NIH researchers, program directors, branch chiefs and scientific review officers put their signatures on the letter – and their careers on the line. They went public in the face of a 'culture of fear and suppression' they say Donald Trump's administration has spread through the federal civil service. 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources,' the declaration says. Named for the agency's headquarters location in Maryland, the Bethesda Declaration details upheaval in the world's premier public health research institution over the course of mere months. It addresses the abrupt termination of 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12bn and some of the human costs that have resulted, such as cutting off medication regimens to participants in clinical trials or leaving them with unmonitored device implants. In one case, an NIH-supported study of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Haiti had to be stopped, ceasing antibiotic treatment mid-course for patients. In a number of cases, trials that were mostly completed were rendered useless without the money to finish and analyze the work, the letter says. 'Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million,' it says, 'it wastes $4 million.' The four-page letter, addressed to Bhattacharya but also sent to the health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr and members of Congress who oversee the NIH, was endorsed by 250 anonymous employees of the agency besides the 92 who signed. Jenna Norton, who oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, recently appeared at a forum by Senator Angela Alsobrooks to talk about what is happening at the NIH. At the event, she masked to conceal her identity. Now the mask is off. She was a lead organizer of the declaration. 'I want people to know how bad things are at NIH,' Norton told the Associated Press. The signers said they modeled their indictment after Bhattacharya's own Great Barrington Declaration of October 2020, when he was a professor at Stanford University Medical School. His declaration drew together like-minded infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists who dissented from what they saw as excessive Covid-19 lockdown policies and felt ostracized by the larger public health community that pushed those policies, including the NIH. 'He is proud of his statement, and we are proud of ours,' said Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute who signed the Bethesda Declaration. As chief of the health systems and interventions research branch, Kobrin provides scientific oversight of researchers across the country who have been funded by the cancer institute or want to be. But sudden cuts in personnel and money have shifted her work from improving cancer care research to what she sees as minimizing its destruction. 'So much of it is gone – my work,' she said. The 21-year NIH veteran said she signed because 'I don't want to be a collaborator' in the political manipulation of biomedical science. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, also signed the declaration. 'We have a saying in basic science,' he said. 'You go and become a physician if you want to treat thousands of patients. You go and become a researcher if you want to save billions of patients. 'We are doing the research that is going to go and create the cures of the future,' he added. But that will not happen, he said, if Trump's Republican administration prevails with its searing cuts to grants. The NIH employees interviewed by the AP emphasized they were speaking for themselves and not for their institutes or the NIH. Employees from all 27 NIH institutes and centers gave their support to the declaration. Most who signed are intimately involved with evaluating and overseeing extramural research grants. The letter asserts that 'NIH trials are being halted without regard to participant safety' and that the agency is shirking commitments to trial participants who 'braved personal risk to give the incredible gift of biological samples, understanding that their generosity would fuel scientific discovery and improve health'. The Trump administration has gone at public health research on several fronts, both directly, as part of its broad effort to root out diversity, equity and inclusion values throughout the bureaucracy, and as part of its drive to starve some universities of federal money. This has forced 'indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science', the declaration says. Some NIH employees have previously come forward in televised protests to air grievances, and many walked out of Bhattacharya's town hall with staff. The declaration is the first cohesive effort to register agency-wide dismay with the NIH's direction. A Signal group became the place for participants to sort through NIH chatter on Reddit, discern rumor from reality and offer mutual support. The declaration took shape in that group and as word spread neighbor to neighbor in NIH offices. The dissenters remind Bhattacharya in their letter of his oft-stated ethic that academic freedom must be a linchpin in science. With that in place, he said in a statement in April, 'NIH scientists can be certain they are afforded the ability to engage in open, academic discourse as part of their official duties and in their personal capacities without risk of official interference, professional disadvantage or workplace retaliation.' Now it will be seen whether that is enough to protect those NIH employees challenging the Trump administration and him. 'There's a book I read to my kids, and it talks about how you can't be brave if you're not scared,' said Norton, who has three young children. 'I am so scared about doing this, but I am trying to be brave for my kids because it's only going to get harder to speak up. 'Maybe I'm putting my kids at risk by doing this,' she added. 'And I'm doing it anyway because I couldn't live with myself otherwise.'
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
These top-rated $9.99 eye patches banish puffiness, dark circles, and crow's feet: 'I'm honestly obsessed'
There is something so refreshing and calming about starting my day with a pair of under-eye patches, and if you're the same way, it really doesn't get any better than the Plantifique Superfood Under Eye Patches, now under $10 — for a limited time only. At a massive 37 percent off at Amazon, you only have till June 22 to snag this deal. The set includes 12 pairs of eye patches in total, each packed with collagen and hyaluronic acid. PLANTIFIQUE Superfood Under Eye Patches (12 Pairs) For just $9.99, you'll get 12 pairs of eye patches packed with collagen and hyaluronic acid — that's 83 cents per pair. They depuff, hydrate, and nourish your under-eye region, all while making you look more awake and ready to take on the day. Pop them in the fridge for an extra boost. $9.99 (37% off) Shop It's specifically designed for dark circles and puffiness, giving you that dewy, bright-eyed look in the morning — even when you've gotten little to no sleep the night before. They pack a ton of other benefits, too — each eye mask should moisturize and nourish your under-eye area, improve skin elasticity, enhance your natural glow, and refresh tired eyes. Its superfood-packed formula makes this possible. The six ingredients include green tea, peach, flaxseeds, coconut, aloe vera, and blueberries — and even have anti-aging properties like reducing the appearance of crow's feet. Whether you're destressing in the bathtub, jetting off in a plane, or just waking up from a bad night's sleep, these under-eye patches from Plantifique are your best friend. Plus, at just 83 cents for a pair of eye patches, it's one of the cheapest and most effective skincare treatments on the market. The product is also vegan, and the brand does not test on animals — so you know you're buying from a brand that puts the voiceless first. Amazon customers seem to love it too, rating it a 4.5-star from more than 10,000 shoppers. 'Amazing product, skin under eye moisturizes and is very effective. No irritation at all. Even for sensitive skin,' says one reviewer. Another says putting them in her fridge enhances their depuffing abilities: 'These eye patches feel so good right out of the fridge. They reduce puffiness and leave my under-eyes smooth and hydrated.' 'These actually work!' adds a third. 'I've been using these eye patches for a few days now and I'm honestly obsessed. They feel super cool and refreshing, and they really help with puffiness when I haven't slept well (which is often as a mum).' She also says it's an easy way to look put together in the morning — especially when you don't have time for your entire skincare routine. At just $9.99 for a limited time, these top-rated Plantifique eye patches are a must-have for those always on the go. Stock up on a few packs because we're telling you, you'll be wanting to use them daily.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Colombia's Uribe shows little response to treatment after shooting, hospital says
BOGOTA, June 9 (Reuters) - Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe, a potential presidential contender, is in critical condition and has shown little response to treatment after being shot in Bogota on Saturday, the hospital treating him said in a statement on Monday.
