Five 'high-priority' pathogens discovered entering Australia via airplane toilets
Working with an international team of university scientists, the researchers found superbugs in every one of the 44 samples. Close to a third tested positive for a gene with resistance to last resort antibiotics that had not previously been found in Australia.
Dr Warish Ahmed, a principal research scientist at CSIRO, said the research indicates testing aircraft wastewater could be a significant tool for detecting the spread of new diseases. He said the data collected could be particularly important for protecting vulnerable communities.
'The samples could be delivered to labs, and we could simply run PCR tests, looking for antibiotic-resistant genes and bacteria and offer the results in a couple of days,' he told Yahoo News Australia.
'But it would need the collaboration with airlines, university research institutions and public health units to make it happen.'
Related: Alarm raised after strange backyard phenomenon worsens in Aussie region
Region with highest concentration of resistant microbes
Eighteen of the samples taken from flights originating in South Asia had a higher concentration of antibiotic-resistant genes than those from Europe.
In many parts of the continent, antibiotics can be purchased over the counter without a prescription, allowing resistance to quickly grow. Other contributors to the variation between parts of Asia and Europe could be water and sanitation, population density, and public health policies, according to lead author Dr Yawen Liu, a visiting scientist at CSIRO from China's Xiamen University.
'By monitoring aircraft wastewater, we can potentially detect and track antibiotic resistance genes before they become established in local environments,' Liu added.
🥣 Disturbing problem caused by placing five common items in dishwasher
☠️ Calls to ban 4,200 chemicals 'of concern' found in common products
😳 Beach walker stumbles up new Australian ocean predator
The study began during the Covid-19 pandemic, and the group's testing of aircraft wastewater has now concluded. They found pathogens were present in wastewater despite the use of strong disinfectants in treatment systems.
The study was a collaboration between CSIRO, Xiamen University, the University of South Australia and Michigan Technological University. It was published in the journal Microbiology Spectrum.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Credible scientists can't hold up Kennedy's charade for much longer
How much longer can responsible people work for President Trump's Department of Health and Human Services under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.? That question arises every time Kennedy pulls funding for vaccine research or purges respected scientists at the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force or the Food and Drug Administration. For a while, it looked like even vaccine critics weren't safe in the Trump administration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Vinay Prasad established his reputation as a contrarian, expressing reservations about pediatric vaccination and several common mitigation measures. It was thus no surprise when he was appointed director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which covers vaccine policy. Prasad didn't last three months on the job. He resigned abruptly in late July following attacks by right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer, who labeled him a 'progressive leftist saboteur.' A Health and Human Services statement cited Prasad's desire to spend more time with his family. It has been widely reported, however, that Trump himself forced Prasad's departure, despite the objection of FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. In another abrupt move, only 10 days later, Prasad abruptly returned to the FDA, evidently at Makary's request but otherwise without explanation. While some of Prasad's views remain quite controversial among many highly regarded physicians and scientists, it is certainly reassuring to see Loomer's malign influence diminished at the FDA. Nonetheless, Kennedy is still in charge of the entire department, and it is likely only a matter of time until he resumes appointing resolute anti-vaxxers, if not widely discredited would-be 'scientists,' to key committees. Makary and Prasad, and other well-credentialed scientists, no doubt believe they can overcome Kennedy's destabilization of medical research, while still contributing to public health. Maybe they are right, and the wisest course is to hold on as long as possible, trying to do good. After all, there is no telling who would replace them. On the other hand, it seems inevitable that Kennedy's pronouncements will increasingly become intolerable. Some CDC employees already worry that the recent deadly attack on their building in Atlanta was motivated by 'RFK Jr's lies about vax safety and CDC scientists.' Meanwhile, Trump has announced that political appointees will soon take over scientific research grant approval, displacing actual scientists, i n order to 'advance the President's policy priorities.' At some point in the degradation of science, there must be a line that ethical administrators will not cross. There is no single answer to whether an official should stay or withdraw from a compromising position, but history does provide cautionary tales. In 1854, a Massachusetts judge named Edward Loring reached a sincere but tragic decision. I described the events in my book, ' Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial.' Late that spring, a fugitive from slavery named Anthony Burns, was arrested in Boston and brought before Loring, a federal commissioner under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, as well as judge of the Massachusetts Probate Court. Burns's arrest sparked mass protests in Boston, where anti-slavery sentiment was strong. Many Bostonians called upon Loring to resign from the federal commissioner's position. As a probate judge, he administered the estates of widows and orphans, which required compassion, and it was intolerable for him to be involved in the heartless business of slave-hunting. Loring took the criticism to heart, responding with a published statement. 'It is said that the statute is so cruel and wicked that it should not be executed by good men,' he wrote. But that would create a paradox. If humane judges were all to resign, 'then into what hands should its administration fall? Will those who call the statute merciless commit it to a merciless judge?' Although he had deep misgivings about the Fugitive Slave Act, Loring believed he had a duty to preside. Otherwise, judging would 'be confined to those who are reckless of that right in others, or ignorant or careless of the means given for its legal defense, or dishonest in their use.' Those who wish this, Loring continued, 'are more cruel and wicked than the statute, for they would strip from the fugitive the best security and every alleviation the statute leaves them.' Despite his protestations, Loring ruled in favor of the slaveholder, holding that it was required under the law. He sent Burns to Virginia in chains, where he was starved and abused. Burns's supporters, meanwhile, demonstrated the true meaning of humanity by raising funds to obtain his freedom. Burns returned to Boston and later studied theology at Oberlin College, no thanks to Loring. It turned out that a 'good judge,' as Loring believed himself, could not honorably enforce a pitiless law in a racist regime. He was dismissed from the Harvard Law School faculty, and the Massachusetts legislature removed him from the Probate Court. Loring is remembered today, if at all, as an enabler of slavery. Perhaps health officials are currently echoing Loring's lament. 'If I resign, someone very bad will take my place.' But sometimes, complicity is complicity.

Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Australia's Top Healthcare IT Vendors Named by Black Book Research in 2025 Annual User Rankings
Live results announced today in Melbourne at HIC 2025, Australia's largest digital health and health informatics industry gathering MELBOURNE, AU / ACCESS Newswire / August 18, 2025 / Black Book Research today announced the 2025 top-rated healthcare IT vendors in Australia, recognizing leaders across 13 categories of digital health and hospital information systems. The results were unveiled live at the HIC 2025 conference and on the event website, as more than 1,500 healthcare leaders, clinicians, and technology suppliers gather at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre. The annual survey drew 864 validated responses from executives, clinicians, and IT leaders across 520 public and 344 private hospitals, representing a broad spectrum of Australia's health sector. Vendors were rated across 18 performance indicators. 2025 Top Vendors by Category - Australia Key Findings Australia's Public hospitals ranked Oracle Health, InterSystems, and Microsoft Azure highest for scalability and alignment with national digital health standards. Private hospitals favored Personify Care, CareMonitor, and Episoft for measurable ROI and Australian-focused patient experience improvement. Solventum earned top marks in coding and HIM, reflecting adoption of analytics and automated coding solutions. Salesforce was recognized for leadership in patient relationship management, supporting health cloud and CRM-driven engagement models. Hyland achieved top ratings in enterprise content and document management, particularly in imaging workflows and secure health records. Australian innovators Heidi Health, DC2Vue, and CareMonitor were noted for agility and responsiveness to evolving government digital health priorities. Australian Health IT Trends (Q2-Q3 2025 Update) From the flash survey in July and August 2025, 484 responses by Australian HIT professionals several trends emerged: Survey Confidence & Methodology With 864 hospitals responding, the survey sample represents two-thirds of all Australian inpatient healthcare facilities, providing a 95% confidence level with a margin of error under 3% for national benchmarking. The 2025 Australian Health Information Systems and Digital Health Survey assessed vendor performance across 18 KPIs, including compliance with Australian regulations, interoperability with My Health Record, cybersecurity and uptime, cloud sovereignty and data residency, clinical usability, ROI, sustainability, implementation support, telehealth capabilities, patient engagement outcomes, and delivery integrity. KPIs were weighted by hospital type and vendor category to reflect real-world priorities, ensuring comparability and accuracy. Access the Full Global HIT Report A complimentary copy of the 530-page 2025 Black Book of Global Healthcare IT, including Q3 updates, is available for download at: For additional data or media inquiries, contact: [email protected] or visit About Black Book Research Black Book Research is an independent global healthcare IT benchmarking firm. The company provides impartial, crowd-sourced vendor evaluations free from financial influences, helping hospitals, payers, and governments worldwide make informed technology decisions. Contact InformationPress Office 8008637590 SOURCE: Black Book Research press release
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Teladoc Health expands in Australia with Telecare acquisition
Teladoc Health has announced the acquisition of Telecare, which provides virtual allied and specialist healthcare services in Australia. This strategic move aims to expand Teladoc Health's footprint in the Australian healthcare market, providing broader access to virtual care for individuals in the country. Telecare operates a virtual care clinic and has a network of more than 300 specialists across over 30 specialities. The company has played a significant role in reducing wait times for patients and enhancing speciality care access, particularly in underserved areas. Its services cater to appointments referred by general practitioners (GPs) and public hospitals. The acquisition aligns with the enterprise strategy of Teladoc Health to grow its international business. The company has been operating in Australia for 15 years and offers virtual health services through partnerships with hospitals and insurers. Recently, Teladoc Health introduced virtual care solutions to the hospital sector in Australia, including virtual neonatology at Mater Misericordiae University Hospital. Teladoc Health International president Carlos Nueno said: 'Teladoc Health is improving access to care globally through virtual innovation and technology. 'We believe joining forces with Telecare will help us advance our mission—especially for those in regional and remote areas—by combining our technological solutions and services to support one of the leading health markets around the world.' In 2024, Teladoc Health reported revenues exceeding $2.5bn and facilitates access to care for over 100 million individuals. It has integrated its technology across many health systems and hospitals globally. This includes Charité in Germany and the NHS in the UK. Following the acquisition, Telecare will continue to operate under its brand, led by the management team and existing founders, ensuring continuity and local expertise for the Australian market. Financial terms of the transaction have not been disclosed. "Teladoc Health expands in Australia with Telecare acquisition" was originally created and published by Hospital Management, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data