logo
Bloody Church Massacre Condemned by World Leaders: 'Deeply Disturbing'

Bloody Church Massacre Condemned by World Leaders: 'Deeply Disturbing'

Newsweek4 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An attack against a church in the Democratic Republic of Congo over the weekend that killed nearly 50 civilians drew condemnation from global leaders.
Vicky Hartzler, who chairs the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), told Newsweek that the attack is "disturbing."
"The recent increase in attacks on Christians and other religious communities by the ISIS-affiliated Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) in the Democratic Republic of Congo is deeply alarming. The most recent attack is particularly disturbing as it targeted a place of worship during an evening service—individuals should have the freedom to worship without the fear of putting one's life at risk. USCIRF strongly condemns these attacks and calls on the U.S. government to provide all possible support to curtail this disturbing trend," Hartzler said.
Newsweek reached out to the U.S. State Department for comment via email.
The Context
The violence, attributed to Islamic State-linked Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), highlights the persistent threat that extremist militias pose to civilians in eastern Congo, a region that has faced decades of unrest. The deadly attack also underscored the escalating violence targeting Christian communities in the area.
What To Know
On Sunday, Islamic State-backed rebels attacked a Catholic church in Komanda, a city in the Ituri province. The United Nations reported that at least 49 civilians, including nine children, were killed during the attack. Several others were injured. The attackers burned down the church and several other nearby homes and businesses.
The attack drew condemnation from world leaders.
The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, also known as MONUSCO, a peacekeeping mission in the region, said in a statement that it held "deep outrage at these heinous acts of violence, which constitute serious violations of international humanitarian law and infringements on human rights."
"These targeted attacks against defenseless civilians, particularly in places of worship, are not only appalling, but also in violation of all human rights standards and international humanitarian law," Vivian van de Perre, acting head of MONUSCO, wrote.
Pope Leo XIV also condemned the attack.
"May the blood of these martyrs become a seed of peace, reconciliation, fraternity, and love for the Congolese people," he wrote.
The aftermath of an attack in Komanda, in the Ituri province of eastern Congo, on July 27, 2025.
The aftermath of an attack in Komanda, in the Ituri province of eastern Congo, on July 27, 2025.
Olivier Okande/UGC via AP
The French Foreign Affairs Ministry released a statement on the attack, as well:
"France expresses its solidarity with the Congolese government and offers its condolences to the victims' families and loved ones. France stands with the Congolese authorities in their effort to combat terrorist groups and protect the Congolese people," the statement reads.
The attack on the Catholic church began at about 1 a.m. on Sunday when armed members of the ADF stormed the church. Video footage from the aftermath showed burning structures and bodies scattered inside the church.
The ADF originated in Uganda in the 1990s and has been affiliated with the Islamic State since 2019. It largely operates around the Uganda-Congo border and has targeted civilians living in the area's villages, the Associated Press reported.
The ADF was believed to have beheaded 70 Christians in a church in the province of North Kivu.
What People Are Saying
Dieudonne Duranthabo, a civil society coordinator in Komanda, described the aftermath to the Associated Press: "The bodies of the victims are still at the scene of the tragedy, and volunteers are preparing how to bury them in a mass grave that we are preparing in a compound of the Catholic church."
UNICEF, in a statement: "The uptick in violence between armed groups in Ituri is worsening an already dire humanitarian situation. It is becoming increasingly difficult for UNICEF and partners to reach those most in need – and children, as ever, are bearing the brunt."
What Happens Next
Local and international pressure is mounting for stronger security interventions to protect civilians and religious minorities in eastern. The ADF remains active in the region.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Admin Pushing for New Judge in Green Card Lawsuit, Lawyer Says
Trump Admin Pushing for New Judge in Green Card Lawsuit, Lawyer Says

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Admin Pushing for New Judge in Green Card Lawsuit, Lawyer Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration's move to shift an immigration case involving foreign nationals to a new judge has resulted in new and urgent legal filings, a lawyer for the plaintiffs has told Newsweek. Newsweek reached out to the State Department via email for comment. Why It Matters A number of Afghans who had assisted American forces following the United States' two-decade military presence in the region were provided Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) or Temporary Protected Status (TPS). Policy changes under the Trump administration, however, have resulted in the termination of TPS for some people, raising concerns about potential deportations. The U.S. ended TPS for Afghans effective July 14, 2025, according to a Department of Homeland Security notice published in May. President Donald Trump has vowed to remove millions of migrants without legal status. This has left a number of foreign nationals unsure of their legal status. It translates to more than 9,000 people losing their protection from deportation and authorization to work, according to the International Rescue Committee. The White House said in January that anyone living in the country unlawfully is considered to be a "criminal." The U.S. Department of State building in Washington, D.C., on July 19, 2019. The U.S. Department of State building in Washington, D.C., on July 19, 2019. Getty Images What To Know On July 22, 102 nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Togo, Somalia, and Iran, including 55 Diversity Visa 2025 (DV-2025) program selectees and their 47 beneficiaries, filed a lawsuit challenging the lawfulness of Presidential Proclamation 10949, Restricting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats. Plaintiffs challenged the travel ban under a nondelegation theory, as well as challenging the State Department's policy of treating an entry ban as a visa issuance ban—which lawyers for the plaintiffs claim is beyond the scope of the president's authority. The case was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who already is overseeing two other lawsuits where Iranian visa applicants are seeking leave to amend their complaints to also challenge the travel ban. Chutkan, who has a past history with Trump due to her previously overseeing the president's federal election interference case, previously cited the aforementioned misinterpretation of law in a September 2021 opinion, Rai v Biden. On Friday, Curtis Morrison told Newsweek that he, on behalf of the plaintiffs in the case Thein v. Trump that challenges the lawfulness of travel ban, filed motions for both expedited discovery and preliminary injunction—saying that the Trump administration "is desperately trying to get this case transferred away from Judge Chutkan, using the exact opposite logic they used in similar case before her in 2020." The motion for preliminary injunction calls the defendants' actions delaying and withholding a proper adjudication of diversity visas "unlawful," and mandates that they "fulfill their nondiscretionary duty to process plaintiffs' immigrant visa applications; compel a proper adjudication of Plaintiffs' immigrant visa applications; and issue diversity visas to eligible plaintiffs before September 30, 2025, the end of fiscal year." Time is of the essence, according to Morrison. "The motion for preliminary injunction, that's necessary because we need a timely decision on whether or not the ban is lawful or not because for diversity visa applicants, their journey ends on September 30," Morrison said. "They don't get to immigrate if they don't overcome this ban by then, so that's why we're pushing for that. "The motion for expedited discovery—basically, [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio has sent a cable to the embassies; this is the way they implement proclamations with guidance on how to implement it, and since we're alleging that that guidance was a misinterpretation of law and unlawful, we need that cable." Morrison was an attorney who stood before Chutkan in a visa diversity lawsuit back in 2020, where the government argued that the case had to be taken from her and given to another judge who at the time was already handling cases regarding the government proclamation. "The irony of that is now they're arguing the opposite, and they're saying just because she has other cases challenging the proclamation, they're different visa categories and so this case should get reassigned," Morrison said. "So, it's just obvious that it's not in good faith. They're just trying to get away from her because they know her view on this legal issue. ...We're on track right now to get an order that causes a serious problem with the implementation of the travel ban." What People Are Saying President Donald Trump in his June 4 proclamation: "As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people. I remain committed to engaging with those countries willing to cooperate to improve information-sharing and identity-management procedures, and to address both terrorism-related and public-safety risks. Nationals of some countries also pose significant risks of overstaying their visas in the United States, which increases burdens on immigration and law enforcement components of the United States, and often exacerbates other risks related to national security and public safety." The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on May 5: "Green cards and visas will be revoked if an alien breaks the law." It said in a later post: "USCIS works alongside our @DHSgov and @StateDept partners each day to keep America, and Americans, safe. From designating foreign terrorist organizations to imposing sanctions, we're taking action to protect and secure our nation for your families, friends, and future." Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, previously told Newsweek: "The Trump administration's decision to turn its back on our Afghan allies who risked their lives and the lives of their families to support American troops in Afghanistan is unconscionable." What Happens Next Morrison expects to receive a response next week of whether Chutkan will proceed in overseeing this case or not.

Chuck Schumer Protest: Democratic Officials Arrested at Senator's Office
Chuck Schumer Protest: Democratic Officials Arrested at Senator's Office

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Chuck Schumer Protest: Democratic Officials Arrested at Senator's Office

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Pro-Palestinian protesters, including two sitting Democratic New York officials, were arrested by police outside the offices of New York Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand on Friday afternoon, according to video posted to social media. Newsweek reached out to the offices of Schumer, Gillibrand, New York State Assembly Member Claire Valdez, New York City Councilor Tiffany Cabán, and the New York Police Department via email for comment. Why It Matters A humanitarian crisis in Gaza has started to turn the tide in the politics of the Israel-Hamas conflict. Following the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023, many officials unequivocally backed Israel and its response; however, as images and video of mass starvation started to reach the West, many have questioned Israel and have spoken out in support of the Palestinian people. Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, one of President Donald Trump's allies, wrote on X this week that "genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation" are happening in Gaza. France last week announced that it plans to formally recognize a Palestinian state, and the United Kingdom threatened to do the same unless Israel agreed to take "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney also announced his country will recognize a Palestinian state, but Trump has made clear he does not intend to do the same. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators protest in the lobby of a Midtown Manhattan building that houses the offices of the two U.S. Democratic Senators from New York on August 1, 2025, in New York City. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators protest in the lobby of a Midtown Manhattan building that houses the offices of the two U.S. Democratic Senators from New York on August 1, 2025, in New York City. Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Protesters from the group Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) wearing shirts that said "Let Gaza Live" gathered in the lobby of the Manhattan office building that houses Schumer and Gillibrand's offices. The protesters, numbering in the dozens, sat on the floor with signs that read "Let Aid in NOW," "Never Again is Now," "Stop Arming Israel," and "Jews to Schumer: STOP Starving Gaza." They also chanted "Free Palestine" and "stop the genocide." As police started to detain the protesters with plastic zip ties, the protesters started chanting "Let Gaza Live" and "Stop Starving Gaza." Why Was There a Protest at Chuck Schumer's Office? The protesters gathered in response to the Senate's rejection of two resolutions introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an Independent, to block an arms deal to Israel. A majority of Democratic senators voted in support of the resolution, but neither Schumer, the Senate minority leader, nor Gillibrand joined them. One resolution that would block the sale of assault rifles to Israel received support from 27 Democrats, while one to block the sale of more than $675 million in arms sales received support from 24 Democrats. This marked record support from Democrats for the resolutions is an indication of shifting public opinion on Israel and the ongoing conflict with Hamas. HAPPENING NOW: Over 150 Jews and people of conscience are staging a sit-in at the offices of Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand in New York City to demand that the U.S. stop starving Gaza immediately. — Jewish Voice for Peace (@jvplive) August 1, 2025 State Assembly Member, City Councilor Arrested at Protest New York City Council Member Tiffany Cabán was among those detained at Schumer's office, with video capturing the moment police escorted her from the building. A reporter on the scene asked Cabán why she was choosing "today" to protest, to which she said: "Stop starving Gaza. The U.S. is paying for the starvation and bombing of Gaza. It's got to stop." The same video appeared to show New York State Assembly Member Claire Valdez escorted from the building, also with her hands tied behind her back. The NYPD told Newsweek that as of 3:20 p.m. ET, they had recorded 26 arrests but were not able to confirm that Cabán and Valdez were among those arrested. NYPD officers arrest Pro-Palestinian demonstrators outside the offices of Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand in Manhattan on August 1, 2025. NYPD officers arrest Pro-Palestinian demonstrators outside the offices of Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand in Manhattan on August 1, 2025. Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images What Has Chuck Schumer Said About the Israel-Palestine Conflict? Schumer, the highest-ranking Jewish official in the U.S. government, said in March 2024 that the "fourth major obstacle to peace is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu." "As a lifelong supporter of Israel, it has become clear to me, the Netanyahu coalition no longer fits the needs of Israel after October 7. The world has changed—radically—since then, and the Israeli people are being stifled right now by a governing vision that is stuck in the past," Schumer said. "Five months into this conflict, it is clear that Israelis need to take stock of the situation and ask, must we change course. At this critical juncture, I believe a new election is the only way to allow for a healthy and open decision-making process about the future of Israel," he added. However, Schumer has faced backlash for inviting Netanyahu to address Congress in 2024, and earlier this year for saying that his job is to "keep the left pro-Israel." He told a New York Times columnist in March that "the greatest danger to Israel, long-term, is if you lose half of America," and has insisted that his caucus "is overwhelmingly pro-Israel." What People Are Saying A White House official told Newsweek: "As the President stated, he would be rewarding Hamas if he recognizes a Palestinian state, and he doesn't think they should be rewarded. So he is not going to do that. President Trump's focus is on getting people fed." Jewish Voice for Peace, on X: "Senators Schumer and Gillibrand, it's time for you to stop the blank check for Israeli genocide and forced starvation of Palestinians. As Jews, many of our own families were murdered or starved to death in a different genocide. We know the price of silence. We will not be silent now. STOP ARMING ISRAEL. STOP STARVING GAZA." President Donald Trump told reporters on Monday that there was "real starvation" in Gaza, adding, "I see it, and you can't fake that." He promised the U.S. would do more to address it.

What we know about Camp Bryan, Ghislaine Maxwell's new minimum-security prison
What we know about Camp Bryan, Ghislaine Maxwell's new minimum-security prison

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

What we know about Camp Bryan, Ghislaine Maxwell's new minimum-security prison

Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell was moved to Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, her attorney confirmed to Axios Friday. The big picture: Camp Bryan is a minimum security prison facility that has hosted notable figure public figures, Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes and reality TV star Jen Shah. The facility was opened in 1988 and encompasses about 37 acres of land. Ghislaine Maxwell moved to Camp Bryan Driving the news: Maxwell was moved from a prison in Florida to the one in Texas, as multiple outlets reported Friday. The New York Sun was first to report the news. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence after she was found guilty on multiple counts of conspiring to sex traffic minors. She has continued to appeal her conviction and spoken to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for nine hours over two days last week. The once-girlfriend and associate of Epstein has regained the spotlight in recent weeks as investigators see her as a potential source of information on the disgraced financier. What to know about Camp Bryan Zoom in: The federal prison for female inmates is located in Bryan, Texas, which is roughly 100 miles outside of Houston. The prison has 635 total inmates, according to the prison's website. At Camp Bryan, inmates typically live in two-person bunk beds, which sit within four-to-eight person cubicles, per Pink Lady Prison Consultants, a prison consulting group. The facilities offer worship services and programs for Christian, Jewish, and Muslim inmates, the group said. There is a full-time medical staff on hand. If the medical staff can't help inmates, then prisoners are brought to the nearby Bryan Medical Center and St. Josephs Regional Hospital, the consulting group said. Elizabeth Holmes, Jen Shah also at Camp Bryan The FPC Bryan has made headlines for housing the Theranos founder Holmes, who was found guilty of conspiracy and fraud against investors by a California jury in 2022. "It's been hell and torture to be here," Holmes said in an interview with People magazine about her time at Camp Bryan. BBC News said her routine at the federal prison including wearing "khaki pants and a khaki shirt" and a 6 a.m. wakeup call every day. Worth noting: Former "Real Housewives of Salt Lake City" star Jen Shah, who pleaded guilty to a telemarking fraud scheme, has been living at Camp Bryan. In May, her reps posted an update on her website showing Shah exercising outside with a jump rope, wearing a gray sweat outfit. "I wanted to share a personal image that I mailed to my team of one of my shahmazing workouts," she said in the post. What to know about Federal Prison Camps Context: Federal prison camps are "minimum security institutions" that "have dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio, and limited or no perimeter fencing. These institutions are work- and program-oriented."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store