
Bangor University staff threaten industrial action over possible job losses
Bangor University has luanched a £15m savings consultation and has warned it cannot rule out compulsory redundancy
Bangor University
(Image:)
Bangor University staff are threatening industrial action, including a marking boycott, over possible compulsory redundancies. Last month the university, which has around 2,000 staff, announced a further 78 job losses on top of 200 already announced in February, saying it could not rule out compulsory redundancies as it tries to save £15m.
Now the Bangor branch of the UCU union has won a consultative industrial action ballot of its members describing the management cuts consultation as "a shambles.' Around 55% of the union's membership voted in the ballot, of which 88% of the union branch's academic and professional services staff voted in favour of strike action to avoid compulsory redundancies in 2025.
A consultative ballot, also known as an indicative ballot, is a pre-legal ballot conducted by a trade union to gauge member support for potential industrial action. Unlike a formal strike ballot, it's not legally required and does not mandate action. S i gn up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here.
But the UCU warned: "This strong showing in this consultative ballot will now mean that the branch can move forwards with a legal ballot of members. If the same results are achieved then they will comfortably win a mandate for strike action and action short of a strike (up to, and including, a marking boycott)."
Professor Edmund Burke, Vice Chancellor of Bangor University, which is running a £15m savings consultation, recently told a Commons committee that this action should mean the 140 year-old institution lasts another century and beyond. On the same day a Senedd committee was told by a union official that there was a real risk that a Welsh university "could collapse"..
The university ended the last academic year £13m in deficit according to its recently published and delayed financial report.
Article continues below
Staff at the university have spoken of being "worried sick about the forced loss of their livelihood", with hundreds of jobs going and some employees facing compulsory redundancy as university management tries to balance the books.
The university's financial report included warnings from Professor Burke of further financial problems ahead. Bangor University is not alone with a combined deficit of more than £70m expected to be reported by universities in Wales at the end of this academic year.
One staff member from Bangor University's the School of Arts, Culture, and Language said: 'This consultation has been a shambles. All four "business cases" were riddled with inaccuracies, missing data, and were completely inaccessible.
"Communication has been terrible, piling fear and stress on top of an already devastating time. While staff scramble for answers, fearing for their livelihoods, Vice Chancellor Edmund Burke enjoys a £273k salary after a recent pay rise. I voted YES in the UCU consultative ballot. We deserve better.'
A spokesperson for Bangor University UCU said: 'From the start, we told management that the consultation must be paused, the errors fixed, and the documents republished for meaningful engagement to take place. We even provided a collated list of specific issues to help them do this.
"Instead, we were just told that conversations had taken place and clarity had been provided to members at risk – a claim not reflected by our members' experiences.
'It appears that management seem intent on forging ahead with decisions that were made before consultation began. We have a decisive mandate to formally ballot for industrial action and the fact that we won this mandate during two weeks in late June is testament to the strength of anger amongst ordinary staff members. We are ready to defend our red line: no compulsory redundancies.'
The UCU said students have also raised concerns about the impact of the cuts process on their education and wellbeing.
Rose Pugh, Vice-President for Education (2024–25) at the students' union, Undeb Bangor, said: 'In our response to the consultation, we highlighted concerns about the timing and accessibility of the process. Holding it during the exam period meant that many students were unaware of the proposals or unable to engage meaningfully.
"The lack of accessible information and the rushed timeline undermined students' ability to contribute to decisions that will shape their university experience and has had a severe impact on the university's most vulnerable and marginalised students.'
Yakubu Jidda, President 2025–26 of Undeb Bangor, said:'Students deserve to be heard, especially when decisions are being made that could impact their future ... We're particularly concerned about the long-term effects on the quality of education, support services, and the Welsh language provision.
"As we move forward, we urge the university to commit to an inclusive, and student-focused approach to any changes.'
The UCU said If management refuse to rule out compulsory redundancies in 2025, Bangor UCU will decide next steps, which could include a formal industrial ballot and strike action. Unite and Unison branches at Bangor University have also indicated they will pursue ballots, if the university moves to compulsory redundancies, signalling the potential for further disruption.
Gareth Lloyd, UCU Cymru Wales Official said: 'I am proud that Bangor branch managed to win its indicative ballot at a time when many staff will be going on leave. This should give management serious pause for thought. We urge the Vice Chancellor to drop all threats of compulsory redundancy."
Bangor University has been asked to comment.
Article continues below

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
30 minutes ago
- Wales Online
The nuclear button has been pressed but WRU must now get out of the URC
The nuclear button has been pressed but WRU must now get out of the URC The WRU has laid its cards on the table with a radical plan. Steffan Thomas looks at the potential holes in it Picture shows (from left) Richard Collier-Keywood, WRU chairman, Dave Reddin, WRU director of rugby and elite performance and Abi Tierney, WRU chief executive (Image: Huw Evans Picture Agency Ltd) The Welsh Rugby Union hit the nuclear button yesterday when it put forward proposals to cut the number of professional teams in Wales by half. A formal consultation process will begin in September where the WRU will consult with a number of key stakeholders including the current four professional clubs - Cardiff, Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets - along with supporters, present and former players and the Welsh Rugby Players' Association. The WRU believe radical change is needed to drag the game in Wales out of the doldrums along with providing the platform to win the Six Nations and become "genuine wild-card World Cup winners" in the future. But a reduction to two teams is the WRU's optimal option; this could change during the consultation process where there is likely to be significant kick-back. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. After a press conference which lasted well over an hour at the Principality Stadium yesterday and a document of more than 100 pages there remain questions which need answering. Steffan Thomas has been through the document to pick out the key points, issues and questions, as he sees it. What is the optimal solution? The optimal solution focuses on two clubs with a men's and women's team. Each squad will consist of 50 senior players and operate with playing budgets of £7.8m, while there will only be room for two non-Welsh qualified players in each side. It favours a heavily centralised system in line with the New Zealand model. In terms of the ownership model the WRU wants control of all rugby operations with the current investors taking charge of the commercial element of the club. In its own words the WRU wants "unified management and contracting of all elite players (professional men's and women's teams, national team and national academy) to align decisions on selection and talent development with players and clubs". The union insists "that PRA-style arrangements are a particularly challenging choice due to an inherent mismanagement between stakeholder objectives". In other words there is a significant lack of trust between the WRU and the four professional clubs with both parties often pulling in different directions. The WRU sees this as an opportunity to "optimise collaboration" if it can seize control of all rugby operations. Controversially it wants to build a new national campus and base the two professional clubs there. In terms of players development the main point put forward is the return of a national academy-style system and significant investment being poured into Super Rygbi Cymru. The idea behind the two-club scenario is to concentrate talent which in turn creates more competition for contracts and starting places. It's a case of elitism on steroids, with the aim of driving up standards on and off the field. Is there likely to be pushback during the consultation and what might change? Having spoken to numerous high-ranking sources within the game there will be significant pushback. Clearly clubs are going to be fighting for their lives and the first priority will be survival. On that note we do not yet know whether the WRU will simply scrap two teams or create two new entities with new branding. Under the proposed optimal system private investors are still required to pour in £17m, which amounts to £1m a year. But why would any private investor want to pour money into a club if the WRU have complete control over player contracting and development? The original PRA25 involved circa £125m worth of WRU funding over five years, while their new 'optimal solution' of two teams results in £94 worth of WRU payments. But where is the remaining £26m? That has not been accounted for but may well be kept back to invest into a new national campus, the SRC and academy system. There will also be significant investment into improving the women's game, while competition income will likely decrease with a reduction of teams, as might broadcasting income. They have also spent £6m on a roof walk, while the cost of assuming ownership of Cardiff also has to be taken into consideration There is £121m worth of investment with the three equally-funded club solutions and £116m if they go to three teams under a tiered funding model. Private investors are required to put in £25m if it's four teams, £21m with three unequally funded teams, £21m with three in a tiered funding model and £17m if they reduce to two. The academy budget per club is £800k in every mode. Join WalesOnline Rugby's WhatsApp Channel here to get the breaking news sent straight to your phone for free They are now also proposing a salary cap of £7.8m-£8m in the optimal solution which is only marginally better than where they are now. This is close to the Gallagher PREM cap but short of some of their competitors in the United Rugby Championship. It seems they are hoping to drive a harder bargain with Welsh talent with limited number of overseas player spots at clubs in England and France. This is likely to be enough to be significantly more competitive if talent is concentrated into two teams, although to really compete in the latter stages of the Champions Cup it will need to be higher. Another area where there will certainly be a significant amount of pushback is with the idea of having two teams training at the same national campus. The WRU's director of rugby and elite performance Dave Reddin was quick to stress both teams would have separate team rooms at the facility and different identities. But there are many within the game who believe this is anti-competitive, with professional sport all about different styles and cultures. Union-owned sides allow for far greater control from the national coach and potentially greater cohesion in terms of on-field partnerships and playing styles, especially if the majority of the national squad are concentrated into two teams. But it is arguably not the job of the WRU to own and control its teams, but rather to facilitate the growth of the game in Wales. Union-owned teams are arguably anti-sport and is one of the reasons the URC is an inferior competition to the French Top 14 and the Gallagher PREM. Can the new 'optimal structure' win over supporters? This remains to be seen but the reaction has not been a positive one on social media. Wales has a club-based history and it is a very tribal nation so the very idea of creating two new teams is not going to go down well. There were hints during the media interviews this week the WRU saw the SRC as the "heritage league" where tribalism can thrive and old rivalries can continue. While this has not been confirmed they may prefer to have an East and West team playing in the professional game with the current four clubs downgraded to SRC level. Reading between the lines they may view a fan supporting east Wales the same as a Cardiff fan now supporting Wales. If they can be successful and challenge for silverware then they will attract supporters. But this is highly unlikely to get buy-in from current supporters of the four professional sides, with traditional club branding more likely to attract fans. Welsh rugby's tradition is rooted firmly in the club game. What competition will they play in? A reduction to two teams playing in the URC would be a complete and utter disaster because it is a competition which Welsh fans have never truly bought into. The vast majority of Welsh fans would much prefer to face the likes of Bristol, Bath, Gloucester, Northampton Saints, Exeter Chiefs and Leicester Tigers on a weekly basis. Get the latest breaking Welsh rugby news stories sent straight to your inbox with our FREE daily newsletter. Sign up here. It would be transformational for the Welsh game and a leading figure at a Welsh club told WalesOnline this week an Anglo-Welsh league would result in its commercial income rising by at least £3m. The WRU insist they are committed to the URC but if it really wants to deliver an 'optimal solution' it has to be in an Anglo-Welsh. Anything else is sub-optimal. According to numerous people within the upper echelons of the game PRL might expand to 12 or 14 teams but would only consider two Welsh teams. Article continues below It is worth noting teams who are owned by a governing body or has significant union control is unlikely to get accepted into an Anglo-Welsh league. Like it or not radical change is required to drag Welsh rugby out of the doldrums and unlike what some fans have been saying this is not a knee-jerk reaction. But it has to be the right change and the WRU's 'optimal solution' leaves a lot to be desired.


Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Cardiff Bus gives update on planned September strike
Cardiff Bus gives update on planned September strike The company warned customers of possible disruption next month There has been a long-term dispute over pay conditions at Cardiff Bus (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne) Cardiff Bus has warned customers of potential strike action next month as members of Unite the union continue to ballot for an improved pay offer. The Union said that the action would affect services for a period of three and a half weeks from Monday, September 1. Earlier this week, the company's management was informed of the action through a formal notification. The bus service is the primary bus provider for the Welsh capital and its surrounding areas like Barry and Penarth. The strike is however dependent on the result of an existing ballot which will be held by the union. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here The result of this will be announced on Friday, August 29 at the latest and if the revised pay offer is accepted a letter rescinding the strike action will be issued. Cardiff Bus said they were "preparing contingency plans" for if the strike was to go ahead with only a short window between the ballot result and start of the strike action. They reassured customers that as soon as a definite decision is made further details would be published on the company's website, app and social media channels. Content cannot be displayed without consent Craig Hampton-Stone, Managing Director, said: "We hope it does not come to this and that the ballot result is acceptance of the revised pay offer. "However, we have to act responsibly, both for our customers and our staff, by preparing for all scenarios. "We remain committed to resolving this dispute and have put forward a new pay deal which led to the postponement of the previous strike and commencement of the subsequent ballot. Our focus is on achieving a fair resolution that avoids unnecessary disruption. "Cardiff Bus will update customers on progress with pay talks and the outcome of the ballot as soon as further information is available. "Please check the company's website, app and social channels for the latest updates." Article continues below Strike action was previously called off earlier this month after a revised pay offer was put forward alongside proposed changes to working conditions which included longer breaks and improved sickness terms. This original industrial action was due to take place from August 17 and was due to run for three weeks, ending on Sunday, September 7.


Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
New £1 rail ticket will let you explore 95 destinations in this European country
Thanks to a bank holiday offer, you'll be able to explore Wales for less than the price of a cup of coffee. To promote it's Pay As You Go (PAYG) system, Transport for Wales (TfW) have slashed the price of train travel to just £1 one way. Given the announcement that rail fares are set to rise in England by 5.8% next year, it's welcome to those both living in, and visiting, Wales. From August 19 to August 28, the £1 tickets are available for travel at any station where passengers tap in and out. This means that 95 stations (all of which are in the southeast) across the TfW network are taking part, including all stops on the Valleys lines, as well as routes to Bridgend, Maesteg, the Vale of Glamorgan, Abergavenny, and Chepstow. This £1 per single journey promotion is exclusively available to passengers using PAYG, and excludes all other ticket types. Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here. While the savings aren't massive, they'll soon add up, especially if you're commuting around the southeast. For example, a single fare from Abergavenny to Cardiff Central usually costs £4.20, so you're saving £3.20 per day, one way. If you do that journey five days a week for a month, both ways, that's a saving of £128. Alexia Course, TfW chief commercial officer said: 'Our PAYG service offers our customers the fastest, easiest and cheapest way to travel on our network, with the added flexibility of being able to tap in and tap out. 'Since launching last year, PAYG has become our fastest selling ticketing product. Through this exclusive and time-limited summer campaign, we're offering customers the ability to travel between any of our PAYG-enabled stations for just £1 per single journey.' And, for those travellers in north Wales wondering where their cheap tickets are, cabinet secretary for transport and North Wales, Ken Skates, said: 'With the introduction of PAYG across North Wales coming soon, more and more people will get the opportunity to benefit from cheaper fares.' Alexia added: 'Whilst this ticketing method is currently exclusive to South Wales for the moment, we are excited to be exploring how we can roll it out across North Wales as a part of the Network North Wales project.' It's not the first big announcement from TfW this year. Back in April, it was revealed that a £1,000,000,000 'Welsh Tube' would be coming to the country, spanning a staggering 105 miles. More Trending The six core lines will connect the Welsh capital to the likes of Aberdare, Coryton, Merthyr, Tydfil, Rhymney and Treherbert. However, it's not without controversy. Metro readers shared their takes on the ambitious project, and opinion was split down the middle. While some thought it was a 'brilliant idea' others claimed that the 'rest of Wales [is] ignored yet again.' Helen Peely Jones Irving explained: 'Far more important is a train from Carmarthen to Aberystwyth so you do not have to travel to England to go from South Wales to North Wales, but as usual anywhere after Swansea does not count as Wales.' If you're a fan of rail journeys – but you like to luxe life – there are plenty of options out there for you. Metro recently boarded the luxury Pullman, for a trip back in time. While tickets for the famous train often come with a hefty price tag, this summer, you can take a ride and tuck into a three-course lunch — all for £10, as part of their Grape British Railway experience Want to romanticise your commute? One of the UK's busiest commuter trains is bringing back first class travel, with WiFi, faster internet and improved storage — but no free snacks. Okay, this train itself might not be boujee, but we reckon enjoying a mini safari from your seat is pretty A-list. If you hop on board a train at London's Liverpool St and go to Norwich, you'll be able to spot some polar bears along the way. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Red Arrows fly past: Where and when to see this bank holiday weekend's displays MORE: The cheapest Spanish holiday destinations revealed – from £13 flights to £31 hotels MORE: Vienna is one of Europe's most expensive cities, but I know how to do it on the cheap