Innovative company announces revolutionary product that could help protect food supply: 'A transformative development'
Rice is a staple crop for over half of the world's population and is grown in over 100 countries, but bacterial leaf blight (BLB) is causing crop losses and driving the use of potentially dangerous pesticides.
Ascribe Bioscience, a New York-based agricultural tech company, believes it can reduce the impacts of the disease with its new biopesticide: Phytalix.
Jay Farmer, the company's CEO and founder, told Forbes that he believes the product is "a transformative development for farmers big and small."
"Current chemical solutions used to manage these diseases are not meeting growers' needs," added Farmer. "They are harmful to the environment, expensive, and are losing their efficacy as pathogens develop resistance."
BLB primarily affects rice crops in both temperate and tropical zones, although it's been particularly devastating to crops in tropical regions of Asia, where losses of up to 74% have been piling up, as a study in the journal Heliyon, shared by Science Direct, observed.
India has been especially hard hit, with yield losses up to 80%, as the disease flourishes in its warm, humid climate. This threatens to disrupt the country's rice crop, which accounts for 27% of the world's supply, as Forbes explained.
Trials of Phytalix conducted in the country resulted in an 83% reduction in BLB severity while outperforming traditional treatments by 20%, according to the publication. Rice yields saw a 30% increase in tests where BLB was particularly heavy and an overall boost of 13% across all the areas it was applied.
The use of pesticides is estimated to have grown 20% over the last decade, according to the Institute for Functional Medicine, with some low-income countries seeing growth of up to 153%. Many of these are chemical pesticides that are associated with elevated cancer risks, among other dangers to human health.
This has led to substantial growth in the global market for natural, non-chemical pesticides, which was said to be worth $226.3 billion in 2021, according to Acumen research. Its projections say it could hit $631.4 billion by 2030.
Some farmers in parts of Asia have been using antibiotics on their crops in hopes of fighting the disease, but researchers are worried it may be fueling antibiotic resistance while using up the valuable medical resource.
What is the biggest reason you don't grow food at home?
Not enough time
Not enough space
It seems too hard
I have a garden already
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Phytalix, however, is "derived from natural molecules sourced from the soil microbiome" as Forbes explained, which makes it sustainable for rice farmers big and small.
Ascribe said that it actually helps to boost the plant's immune system and guards against major fungal pathogens, as well as bacterial and viral disease.
Natural methods of pest control such as this could provide a safer way to protect global rice production, which Forbes suggested is projected to increase by 11.12% by 2030.
Srinivas Veeranki, managing director of crop science service AgReveal, told the outlet that Phytalix could be "a major step forward for farmers and global food security, offering effective and long-lasting disease control while also making rice production more resilient to growing environmental and market challenges."
Ascribe's product is currently pending review in Brazil and the U.S., as Forbes explained, with future plans for approval in key rice-producing countries across Asia.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Cuomo Comes Under Fire at Debate Over Nursing Home Covid Deaths
Andrew Cuomo's actions during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic, and how they have may have led to a disproportionate number of deaths at nursing homes while he was governor, became a flashpoint in Wednesday night's debate. Mr. Cuomo defended the state's leadership during the crisis, suggesting that New York ranked 38th in nursing home deaths, and pushed back against accusations that his administration undercounted nursing home deaths. But New York's attorney general found that the Cuomo administration undercounted nursing home deaths by several thousand. Mr. Cuomo later acknowledged as much, attributing the lower figure to fears that the Trump administration would use the data as a political weapon. Mr. Cuomo has come under fire for guidance, issued by the New York State Health Department in March 2020, that directed nursing homes to readmit patients who had tested positive for the coronavirus. Opponents of Mr. Cuomo assert that this guidance led to the unnecessary deaths of thousands of older New Yorkers in nursing homes. Mr. Cuomo has maintained that his administration was following federal guidelines. The problems for Mr. Cuomo and his aides worsened after his administration published a report later in 2020 shifting blame for those deaths. Reporting by The New York Times revealed how Cuomo and his top aides had edited the report to conceal how many nursing home residents died in the pandemic, a finding that congressional investigators also reached. Several state and federal entities, including the Justice Department, looked into Mr. Cuomo's actions but did not pursue criminal charges. Mr. Cuomo would not answer when asked directly whether he had personally rewritten portions of the 2020 report. More recently, The Times reported that the Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation into Mr. Cuomo and whether he lied to Congress. It came about a month after a Republican House committee chairman reiterated his call for Mr. Cuomo to be prosecuted for decisions he made during the pandemic. The debate moderators pressed Mr. Cuomo on whether he had lied to Congress. He said he had not lied.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could AI cost me my job as a weather forecaster?
Weather forecasts play a huge role in our daily lives. They help us to decide how we get to work, if we need an umbrella and when to hang out the washing. For industries like farming, shipping, aviation and renewable energy, accurate forecasts are essential. I've been presenting the weather on the BBC for nearly 30 years. Over that time, I've witnessed how our changing climate is bringing more extreme and intense weather events. It is so important to keep improving the way we predict the weather, and scientists are exploring how AI could make forecasting more accurate, efficient, and faster than ever before. In some countries, broadcasters have even begun to experiment with AI-generated weather presenters. But does all this mean that forecasters like me could soon be out of a job? The people who think AI might become conscious UK weather forecast more accurate with Met Office supercomputer Traditionally, weather forecasting relies on complex numerical weather prediction models which require vast amounts of data and supercomputers - like the ones used by the Met Office. But the Met Office is now working with experts from the Alan Turing Institute, the UK's national centre for data science and AI, to build a new global forecasting system powered by AI. One of their models, called FastNet, uses machine learning to improve prediction capabilities. Prof Kirstine Dale, Chief AI Officer at the Met Office, said it had the potential to revolutionise forecasting. "AI is phenomenally fast - not just a bit faster, but tens of thousands of times faster," she told me. "That means it can produce up to date forecasts with a fraction of the computational cost and carbon dioxide." She said AI could also produce "hyper-localised" forecasts, "potentially offering more up to date forecasts tailored to your postcode". Forecasts driven by AI could also help to mitigate against the impacts of storms, floods and heatwaves by providing earlier and more accurate warnings of severe weather. But there are challenges - especially in predicting rare or extreme weather events. "The past is no longer a reliable indicator of the future," said Prof Dale. "So we need traditional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models to explore how the climate may change and generate recalibrated datasets. "These recalibrated datasets of future climates can be used to train AI-based models. "AI-based models simply aren't aware of the physics - and changing physics - of the atmosphere, so NWP will likely continue to play a vital role in forecasting extreme events, as well as adding a layer of validation to AI forecasting outputs." Dr Scott Hosking, Mission Director for Environmental Forecasting at the Turing Institute, said that once trained, AI models were cheaper and quicker to run than traditional forecasting systems. "AI has surprised us in a number of ways," said Dr Hosking. "One of them is how well it predicts the tracks of cyclones and hurricanes. AI is always learning what it has seen in the past." But he said AI still had some way to go in certain areas, including in its ability to forecast high-intensity rainfall - the kind that often leads to flash flooding. AI could also play a key role in space weather forecasting, helping to predict solar storms more accurately and efficiently. These storms, caused by solar activity, are best known for producing the aurora borealis - the Northern Lights - which have been seen in Wales several times recently. But space weather can be hazardous too, affecting Earth's magnetic field and potentially disrupting communication systems and infrastructure. Dr Huw Morgan, Head of Solar System Physics at Aberystwyth University, led a project to enhance the Met Office's space weather forecasting. Speaking from the university's AI Hub, he told me AI could offer a vital role. "It's a very complicated system to try to model. Forecasts exist but they have many weaknesses because space weather is so complex," Dr Morgan said. "And unlike on Earth, we can't put recording stations on the Sun or between the Sun and Earth. "We are really dependent on remote data from telescopes. "So AI offers a good solution, because we can't monitor the whole system constantly, and we cannot really build models that are appropriate for the system yet." However, Dr Morgan acknowledges AI has its challenges and scientists will continue to rely on traditional space weather forecasting techniques for now. So what about AI-generated weather presenters? Met Office meteorologist Aidan McGivern is not so sure. "It's important for people to have presenters they trust," he told me. "No one wants an AI version of Derek. "They want the real Derek - someone who can take all the data and explain it in a way that makes sense." Aidan is optimistic about what the future holds for forecasting. "When I started this job 18 years ago, we couldn't really predict beyond four or five days. "Now we're giving outlooks 10 or even 14 days ahead. "We may not be able to give specific details that far out but we can already offer a sense of whether it'll be warm or cold, wet or dry - and highlight big changes on the way. "And with AI, the potential only grows. "Just imagine - in the near future, we might be able to talk about a month's worth of weather at once, and visualise it in a way that really connects with the public. "That's hugely exciting." The potential for AI in weather prediction is immense, but AI won't replace traditional forecasting methods entirely. It's more likely to work alongside them and be another tool for meteorologists like me to use. For now, at least, I think my job is safe. Hopefully the real Derek will continue to say "hello, shwmae" for a long while yet. A day in the life of a weather forecaster Can AI therapists really be an alternative to human help? BBC presenter on why cold weather makes his body hurt
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Expert advises to 'keep pets inside' amid Canadian wildfire smoke warnings: How to keep your dog or cat safe
As parts of Canada — including Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan — continue to navigate the effects of raging wildfires, many Canadians and Americans are seeking ways to cope with compromised air quality. People in affected areas are advised to avoid spending time outdoors and people at-risk of respiratory conditions are encouraged to wear N95 masks. But what about our pets? As Canadian families cope with the impact of smoke, it's important to ensure the safety of all members — even the furry ones, like our dogs and cats. Read on for everything you need to know. Dr. Louis Kwantes, former president of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association, previously told Yahoo Canada that "the danger mirrors the danger to people" for pets exposed to wildfire smoke. That's especially true for pets who go outside. "Dogs love to go outside, but they can also be negatively affected by the smoke — they are," Kwantes said. "I'm thinking about cats with asthma, they can be significantly affected, even indoors too." The impact of smoke is very similar to that on humans. "If they're really close to the fire, there's things like toxic gases and so forth. But most of it, is particulate matter that will actually get down into the lungs," the Alberta-based vet explained. That particulate matter is known as PM 2.5 particles. "The function of a dog's lungs or cat's lungs is very, very similar to human lungs... Birds' lungs are different, but they also definitely can be affected... we recommend keep them inside if they can," he added. "So the damage that it can do to lung parenchyma, or lung tissue, is very similar between our pets and ourselves." Though N95 masks are advised for high-risk people, according to Kwantes, masks for dogs are not the most effective safety measure. "They don't fit properly, and so if you have leakages, whether it's a homemade masks or another one, that's a problem. And also, [dogs] usually don't tolerate them very much," he explained. "What we suggest is where the air quality is very poor, that we keep the pets inside." For those with active dogs involved in outdoor activities, Kwantes added, it's best to limit those activities. "The more they're heavy breathing, it's going to impact the lung function more seriously when the air quality is poor." For cats — which he recommends keeping indoors anyways — he suggests HEPA filters for some rooms. "If we're in an area of the country where the air quality is particularly poor outside, and we're able to go to set up a HEPA filter for even a small part of the house, then both for pets and for ourselves, that's a better place to be when necessary." Kwantes said owners shouldn't "push boundaries" with the dangers of wildfire smoke, and they should look out for symptoms. "If a person does take their dog out and be quite active... and they come back coughing or have significant problems, that's a real issue," the animal doctor said. "I would suggest that pet owners keep a close eye for the signs of problems with poor air quality." These are generally respiratory problems, he said, including: runny nose, coughing, sneezing, runny eyes. "If you see those type of things, then you know that you're already in the danger zone," Kwantes said. Mild signs, such as slight heavy breathing, should be a first warning sign to get your pets inside. But any escalation would be good enough of a reason for a visit to the vet. "Use your common sense," he advised. Keep your pet out from areas of danger — that means keep them inside. For animals with history of health problems, even mild symptoms could lead to serious consequences. "You don't want them to end up with chronic bronchitis or lung consolidation or other issues," he claimed. "I generally say, if you're concerned, that's enough of a concern to go to the veterinarian." Even if the pet isn't showing signs of irritation, use yourself as measure, Kwantes added. "If we're healthy, and we can sense that the smoke is kind of irritating, you can be sure that it will be irritating your pet."
