Quebec government will not appeal court ruling scrapping out-of-province tuition hike
MONTREAL — The Quebec government says it won't appeal a court decision overturning a university tuition hike for out-of-province students.
But the province is not backing down, with the office of the higher education minister saying the government isn't obliged to guarantee access to Quebec universities for non-Quebecers.
The statement by Pascale Déry's office did not give details on the government's next move.
Quebec decided in 2023 to hike out-of-province tuition by 33 per cent to reduce the number of English-speaking students in the province, but a Superior Court judge in April found the increase was unreasonable and not justified by data.
The ruling gave the government nine months to revise its tuition plan, and also overturned new French-language proficiency requirements for out-of-province students at English-language universities.
The government says it will hold discussions with the universities about those requirements in the coming weeks.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
13 minutes ago
- CBC
For now, Chatham-Kent's biggest homeless encampment is staying put
It remains unclear where people living in Chatham-Kent's largest homeless encampment, comprised of approximately 50 people, will end up. For the time being, they'll stay put on the grounds of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) on Grand Avenue East in Chatham. After meeting for several hours Monday night, the municipal council tweaked a series of encampment bylaw amendments for people living in tent communities on municipal property. This includes a setback of where tents can go from residential properties. The distance is being increased from 10 metres to 100 metres away. Any final vote on the bylaw — and where those living there will possibly be redirected to — was postponed until council's next session, planned for August 25. "By the time we got ready, we were trying to make a decision … it was nearly 11:00 p.m.," Chatham-Kent Mayor Darrin Canniff told CBC Radio's Windsor Morning host Amy Dodge on Tuesday. "I don't remember having a council meeting go that long. We had to stop it by law." WATCH | Chatham encampment near Thames River dismantled in July 2025: Chatham-Kent encampment dismantled as Monday deadline passes 28 days ago With the bylaw amendments, administration says there's one other location in the city that meets the majority of outlined criteria. Thames Grove Conservation Area is near the river, and not far south from the where the current encampment is. The encampment was moved from downtown Chatham earlier this summer because of construction along the river's embankment. Many homeowners near the PUC property say they were blindsided by the arrival of the campers. Canniff says it's one of the toughest decisions he's been involved in during his time as mayor. "Certainly in every neighbourhood [it] has been moved to, [it] creates problems and outcry from the people near it. It's kind of like we're flying around on an airplane, looking for an airport and there isn't one. There is no airport." There is some imminent housing support on the way in the municipality. Roughly 50 tiny transitional cabins are about to open in Chatham. They're 100 square feet and include a bed, small refrigerator, microwave and climate control. People living in them will share bathrooms, laundry and kitchen space in a central building. According to Canniff, the hope is that some of the people living in the encampment will be redirected there. However, not everyone will be able to make the transition.
CBC
44 minutes ago
- CBC
How a Musqueam court case in B.C. inspired a fight for fishing rights on the other side of Canada
Social Sharing Indigenous rights and title cases, including the renowned Sparrow and Marshall decisions of the 1990s, are top of mind for many Indigenous people as federal Bill C-5 — which took only a few weeks to pass through Parliament — aims to fast-track certain infrastructure and energy projects. The Building Canada Act grants the Carney government, and future governments, the ability to bypass certain laws and environmental regulations if a project is deemed in the national interest. Indigenous people across the country are warning that the bill's provisions could wind up violating their rights — rights that were affirmed after long battles in court. Under section 35 of the Canadian Constitution, Indigenous people have the right to be consulted and, where applicable, accommodated if government action is going to infringe on any "Aboriginal and treaty right," as stated in the document. But with Prime Minister Mark Carney using "shovels in the ground" language for the fast-tracking of Canadian build projects, many Indigenous people say they are worried about transparency and the potential erosion of consultation, in particular around mining projects and pipeline development. Coastal First Nation rights Hunting, gathering and fishing are integral parts of Indigenous cultures across Canada, with fishing especially important for those near a coastline. The Sparrow and Marshall cases were initiated in response to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) arrests of two Indigenous fishermen. The arrests were for different reasons, and while they both contributed to Indigenous rights in Canada, they led to different outcomes. The right to harvest seafood for consumption and as part of cultural traditions is what a Coast Salish First Nation in B.C. was trying to protect 35 years ago when Musqueam fisherman Ronald (Bud) Sparrow — who has since died — took the province to court. The Sparrow case went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. In 1990, Sparrow won, affirming for the first time that Indigenous people in B.C. who didn't sign a treaty have the legal right to hunt, gather, and fish in their traditional territories for food, social, and ceremonial purposes. Sparrow's victory inspired other Indigenous groups to pursue their own cases — including one on the other side of Canada, where Mi'kmaq fishermen in Nova Scotia launched their own court case and also won at the Supreme Court of Canada. The Marshall case took Indigenous fishing rights a step further, expanding them to allow for "moderate livelihood" fishing, allowing Indigenous people to sell their harvest to make a living. The Mi'kmaq, citing Sparrow, argued that their right to make a moderate livelihood from fishing and hunting was derived from the Peace and Friendship Treaties that they signed in the 1700s. Sparrow decision Sparrow was arrested by DFO for fishing using an illegal net. In his fight against the charges, Sparrow argued that under section 35, Musqueam members have the right to fish on their traditional territory and any infringements on that right are invalid unless intended to protect fish populations. "We had the whole country's attention, and there were a lot of people concerned that this was not the case to run, that we could set a bad precedent," Aaron Wilson, a Musqueam lawyer and a relative of Sparrow's, told CBC's The Early Edition. "This was the very first time that the Supreme Court of Canada was interpreting section 35, so it really was something people were watching," he said, adding that the case inspired him to study law. Despite the win in 1990, the struggle for fishing rights persists. Wilson, who says he does not speak on behalf of the Musqueam Nation, says that a core lingering problem following the Sparrow decision is that, due to declining fish populations and conservation measures, members of the nation rarely get to fish. Similar sentiments are shared on the East Coast, where some First Nations say that hydroelectric dams are infringing on their right to fish because the dams are harming a traditional food source — eels. Marshall case In Nova Scotia, Mi'kmaq fisherman Donald Marshall was arrested by DFO in 1993 for using an illegal net and for fishing and selling eel out of season. Marshall and his nation took Nova Scotia to court. The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada, where Marshall was successful in arguing that he had the right to fish and make a moderate living from his harvest due to the Sparrow decision, section 35 and the nation's rights and title derived from the Peace and Friendship Treaties. The Peace and Friendship Treaties were signed by the M'ikmaq, Wolastoqey and Passamaquoddy First Nations in Atlantic Canada between 1725 and 1779 with the British Crown, and state that signatories have the right to make a moderate livelihood from fishing and hunting. Kerry Prosper, who was chief of the Paqtnkek M'ikmaw First Nation at the time that Marshall was arrested, remembers pursuing the case. "DFO would be harassing us, we would see them coming and pack up our gear," Prosper told CBC News. He says that the Sparrow decision had created controversy in B.C. and that non-Indigenous B.C. fishermen had travelled to Nova Scotia to warn of possible impacts on commercial fisheries. "A wave of people came from B.C. to warn the non-native fishing groups that the M'ikmaw are going to be able to fish lobster and ruin their commercial fisheries," he said. During the Sparrow case, Musqueam proved their right to fish for social purposes, Prosper said. This sparked questions about what "social fishing" meant, and if it included economics or a moderate livelihood. "Years later, here you have one of the biggest rulings in Canada, the Marshall case, that we have a right to make a moderate livelihood." Struggle to exercise rights Both Wilson and Prosper say that even though the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Indigenous rights, Musqueam and M'ikmaq peoples still struggle to exercise those rights. In B.C., Wilson says Musqueam members aren't able to harvest fish as much as they want to due to declining fish populations and conservation regulations. "Sparrow isn't just about harvesting salmon; it's also about stewardship and responsibility, the responsibilities that come with the rights we continue to exercise," he said. "That is sometimes overlooked when it comes to what Sparrow is about, and that's the heart of what a lot of First Nations are thinking about when they move to advance and defend their Aboriginal and treaty rights, it's because there is a responsibility to be stewards over the territories and resources." Prosper says that in Nova Scotia, hydro-dams are placed in the migration path of eels both up and downstream, and eels are cut into pieces when trying to migrate into the Sargasso Sea in Atlantic Canada, where they spawn. "Eels are in trouble and there's no real talk about protecting what's left," he said. Eels are a traditional food source, and he wants designers and developers to change hydroelectric dam technology to better support eel migration. Doing so could mean that the M'ikmaq can continue to exercise their culture, traditions, and rights. Prosper is also urging better regulation of commercial fisheries to support fish populations. He says that under Sparrow, commercial fisheries are supposed to be regulated to maintain fish populations, but instead, Indigenous food and recreational fisheries are regulated — and that's an underlying issue in exercising rights. Prosper says that he grew up eating eel, but hardly sees anyone fishing for food anymore. "Nobody wants to listen to what Sparrow is about, protecting food for generations to come." Wilson says that it's time for Indigenous rights and title recognition to be put into action, highlighting the government's duty to consult with Indigenous people.
CBC
44 minutes ago
- CBC
Polls now open in 2 provincial byelections in Prince Edward Island
Polls have now opened in two Prince Edward Island districts as voters head to the polls for byelections to fill vacant seats in the provincial legislature. The byelections are happening in District 9, Charlottetown–Hillsborough Park, and District 15, Brackley–Hunter River. Polls are open from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., and voters can find their polling locations on the Elections P.E.I. website . Brackley–Hunter River was represented by former premier Dennis King until he resigned as Progressive Conservative in February. He'd served as the district's MLA since 2019. In alphabetical order, the District 15 candidates are: Kent Dollar for the Progressive Conservatives. Nicole Ford for the Liberals. Philip Hamming for the Green Party. Michelle Neill for the New Democratic Party. Charlottetown–Hillsborough Park was left vacant by the resignation of Natalie Jameson, the district's MLA since 2019, who later ran federally for the Conservatives. In alphabetical order, the District 9 candidates are: Dennis Jameson for the Progressive Conservatives. Dr. Janine Karpakis for the Green Party. Carolyn Simpson for the Liberals. Simone Webster for the New Democratic Party. Elections P.E.I. said more than 1,000 voters in each district cast ballots during advance polling, representing about a quarter of eligible electors.
