Pandemic treaty talks inch toward accord
Countries hope more than three years of negotiations on battling future pandemics will finally end Tuesday, after reaching a preliminary agreement last week.
It has been more than five years since the COVID-19 pandemic began, killing millions of people and devastating economies.
Experts say an accord has become even more crucial with new health threats, ranging from H5N1 bird flu to measles, mpox and Ebola.
The negotiations had been scheduled to conclude last June but were extended for a year in a bid to overcome disagreements.
The thirteenth round of talks started on April 7 as health agencies reeled from drastic foreign aid cuts by the United States — the world's donor superpower.
Washington has not taken part in the negotiations, since President Donald Trump decided on his first day in office in January to begin withdrawing from the World Health Organization.
Accord, 'in principle'
Early Saturday, after five days and a full night of talks, Anne-Claire Amprou, the talks' co-chair, announced that countries had reached "an accord, in principle," pending final approval from capitals.
Delegations are to meet Tuesday behind closed doors at the WHO headquarters to finalize the text.
"A pandemic agreement is within reach," Catharina Boehme, WHO's assistant director-general for external relations, said on LinkedIn.
"After a very intense week of negotiations, including an all-night sprint, WHO member states are closer than ever to getting it done," she said.
"A pandemic agreement will give the world better tools to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the next pandemics."
If agreement is sealed, the text will be ready for final approval at the WHO annual assembly next month.
French President Emmanuel Macron has welcomed the progress, saying a pandemic treaty "is creating a new system to better protect us," in a post on X on Saturday.
Tech, sanctions
One of the main remaining sticking points had been Article 11, which deals with technology transfer for the production of health products for pandemics — particularly to benefit developing countries, several sources said.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, poorer countries accused rich nations of hoarding vaccine doses and tests.
Several countries with large pharmaceutical industries have, meanwhile, opposed the idea of mandatory tech transfers and have insisted on it being voluntary.
Another "remaining issue is language related to sanctions" under Article 13, said Thiru Balasubramaniam at the NGO Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), who has been monitoring the talks.
The text provides for the establishment of a global supply chain and logistics network to expand access to vaccines, treatments and tests needed to fight pandemics, or in humanitarian crisis situations.
However, in discussions on Article 13, countries have yet to agree on granting unhindered access to health products outside of the pandemics or humanitarian contexts, which would allow countries under international sanctions to obtain things like vaccines, tests and treatments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kyodo News
3 hours ago
- Kyodo News
Over 70 nations to call for int'l plastic pollution reduction targets
KYODO NEWS - 1 minutes ago - 22:42 | All, World Over 70 countries are set to call for targets to reduce plastic production and consumption worldwide to combat marine pollution in a joint statement to be issued at the U.N. Ocean Conference this week, a source related to the matter said Monday. Japan is not expected to back the statement, which will be issued by various European and Pacific island nations at the conference running Monday through Friday in the southeastern French city of Nice. Middle Eastern countries and others that produce petroleum, a raw resource used to manufacture plastics, have also opposed manufacturing restrictions and are expected to forego backing the statement. An estimated over 8 million tons of plastic waste is washed into the world's oceans every year. Concerns have also grown over microplastics that end up in the ocean and enter the bodies of marine organisms, which in turn could impact human health if they are consumed. Negotiations on the creation of an international treaty will also resume in Switzerland in August, but the lack of countries onboard with the statement has highlighted the difficulty of reaching a consensus on manufacturing regulations, the biggest focus of the negotiations. At the previous round of talks held in South Korea from November to December, participating nations could not reach an agreement on manufacturing restrictions. The joint statement will additionally call for mandatory reporting of manufacturing, and import and export volumes in order to achieve the reduction targets. France, which leads support for the regulations, is touting the joint statement as a "historic opportunity." Japan has opted not to be named in the joint statement, stating that it wants an agreement that includes as many countries as possible and avoids fragmentation. But environmental groups have criticized Japan, saying that it should clarify its stance in order to make the treaty effective. Related coverage: Japan's last 2 captive sea otters symbolizing species' fragile future Starbucks Japan to switch to green plant-based straws in January
NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
Zelenskyy responds to Trump's comparison to kids' brawl
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said Russian President Vladimir Putin is a murderer and not a child in a park, as described by US President Donald Trump on Thursday. Zelenskyy made comment in an interview with American media outlet ABC News. He was referring to Trump's remarks, in which he compared the conflict between the two countries as two young children fighting in a park. The Ukraine president said, "We are not kids at the playground," adding that Putin is "a murderer who came to the park to kill kids." Zelenskyy was asked if his relationship with Trump, which apparently improved after their brief meeting at the Vatican in April, remains that way. He said he would like to believe that the relationship has changed for the better but cannot give a 100-percent guarantee. Zelenskyy also said there are people who communicate with Trump more than he does and that they convey different messages to him. He expressed his desire for more communication. Meanwhile, the countries continue to exchange fire. The Ukrainian Air Force has said Russian forces launched 479 drones and 20 missiles against Ukraine from Sunday night to Monday morning.
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
The MAGA odd couple turns combustible
Relationship status: It's complicated. The simmering feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk has gone public, sending Tesla's stock tumbling then rebounding, calling his government contracts into question and leaving Trump possibly in a more commanding position over the world's richest man. But really, who knows what to make of this always-odd pairing between two erratic men? Late Thursday, Musk signaled he was open to a detente. Reports of a Friday phone call surfaced and were then dismissed by Trump, and all against the backdrop of pleadings from a MAGA world riven by the prospect of their leaders turning on each other. Yet little is permanent in Trump world, except for chaos and disruption. Where this goes from here and how it ends is anyone's guess, but what's clear is that the political friendship that saw two of the world's most powerful men attached at the hip at the beginning of Trump's presidency has now become an unstable mess. This, of course, is no way to run a country. The daylong brawl starkly revealed what had always been plainly obvious: This relationship is transactional and has always smelled of corruption, with Musk's $270 million campaign contribution buying him a powerful foothold in the government, including billions in contracts and access to data and the inner workings of federal agencies. It was only last week that Trump gifted Musk with a golden key to the White House, saying his "service to America has been without comparison in modern history' and commemorating his final day as a special government employee. But that send-off couldn't paper over the increasing cracks in the friendship. Musk had become a political liability to Trump, even as the president became a business liability to the world's richest man. The union has cost Musk billions, damaging his brand and leading him to suggest he was done with politics. "I think I've done enough,' Musk said in a Bloomberg interview last month when asked about his political spending on Trump and the Republican cause. The billionaire, who operates the Building America's Future PAC, had vowed to spend $100 million on the midterms, though that's now in doubt. And in ceding such power to Musk, Trump marred the first 100 days of his presidency with erratic cuts, mistakes and walk-backs that led to infighting among staff and cabinet members who couldn't control Musk. His Department of Government Efficiency was largely a failure, with costs likely outweighing savings, federal spending continuing to rise and the Trump administration now undoing some of DOGE's firings. In the days after his official tenure wrapped up, Musk then proved just how uncontrollable he was, training his fire on Trump's massive reconciliation bill, calling it an "abomination.' "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk, the wannabe kingmaker, threatened on X on Tuesday. But the feud has the potential to be as damaging to both men as their unlikely friendship proved to be. At stake for Trump is the kind of muscle, megaphone and money that only Musk can bring, given his status among the powerful techno right bros who fueled Trump's campaign and the GOP more broadly. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude.' Most of Trump's political alliances have had a sell-by date, but his relationship with Musk has been like no other. For Trump, Musk was a force multiplier, magnifying his stature and bringing other billionaires, tech bros and regular bros along with him. But in challenging Trump, and particularly by bringing up his connection to Jeffrey Epstein, Musk tests his power over MAGA and puts himself — and his companies — at risk of canceled contracts and potentially even federal government investigations. Trump holds tremendous power over Musk's vast wealth. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' This was scorched earth, revealing Trump's strong hand and Musk's big weakness. Ultimately, MAGA belongs to Trump. As for the massive bill, it will still likely pass in some form, though Musk has now put a spotlight on the worst parts of it — it adds $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade and is hardly MAGA. Meanwhile, some Democrats have suggested that Musk is a potential free agent and should be courted and brought into the fold. But that would be a mistake. An alliance with Musk is akin to having a tiger by its tail in a very small and crowded tent. There are no good choices and the only certainty is chaos. Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
