&w=3840&q=100)
South Korea debates nuclear weapon option as Trump retreats from Ukraine
US allies were alarmed when Trump, following a heated argument with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House, withdrew military and intelligence support to Kyiv read more
Donald Trump's return to the power in the United States has left Washington's allies scratching their heads on the issue of security. US allies were alarmed when Trump, following a heated argument with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House, withdrew military and intelligence support to Kyiv. In South Korea, this made people realise the US security umbrella may no longer be reliable in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.
South Koreans were also left anxious when Trump, just hours after taking office in January, described Pyongyang as a 'nuclear power.' Some drew conclusions whether the US would treat North Korea as an establish nuclear state with no ambition of denuclearisation on the peninsula.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Debate over nuclear arms intensifies in South Korea
Amid all these developments, South Koreans are now increasingly calling for developing a nuclear arsenal of their own, which would not just help Seoul wean itself off overreliance on US but also ward off threats from the North.
'We can't always rely on the U.S. They're looking after themselves first now,' Kim Min-ho, a 29-year-old IT worker in Seoul, was quoted as saying by Nikkei Asia.
'If Trump is going to charge us for protection, maybe it's time we protect ourselves. Why should North Korea have nuclear weapons but not us?'
A Korea Institute for National Unification (KINU) survey last year revealed that 45 per cent of South Koreans now preferred having nukes of their own, against 40 per cent who still preferred reliance on US security umbrella. It was for the first time that more people favoured nuclear option against US reliance. Overall, some 60 to 70 per cent people in South Korea remain in favour of developing nuclear weapons but the support falls to just 30 to 40 per cent when they are informed about associated costs, including potential sanctions from the global community and collapse of alliances.
'What looks like overwhelming support becomes far more cautious when costs are factored in,' said Lee Sang-sin, a senior researcher at KINU, speaking at a policy forum in March.
The North Korea threat
South Korea's relationship with nuclear weapons dates back to the 1970s when Seoul briefly pursued a covert nuclear programme. However, in recent years, as North Korea's nuclear arsenal expands, the idea of South Korea acquiring nuclear weapons has gained more attention. North Korea is estimated to have at least 50 nuclear warheads, and this number could increase significantly in the coming years.
North Korea's growing ties with Russia have further complicated the security situation. Since late last year, North Korean troops have been confirmed to be on the ground in Ukraine, supporting Russia's invasion. Analysts say North Korea is using the war to gain battlefield experience and test weapons that could be used in future conflicts in Northeast Asia.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Will US allow South Korea's nuclearisation?
The Trump administration has not signalled any change in US policy but the Pentagon now includes officials who have supported Seoul's nuclear ambitions in the past.
Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, for instance, has supported the idea of Seoul having nuclear weapons. Before taking office, even Trump himself said he wanted both South Korea and Japan to pursue nuclear weapons.
Interestingly, even North Korea may also support the South's nuclear move as it could provide legitimacy to their own nuclear arsenal, forcing the world to completely abandon the denuclearisation of Korean Peninsula.
The regional implications of South Korea acquiring nuclear weapons would be significant, experts warn. Such a move could prompt Japan to pursue its own nuclear arsenal, which would likely trigger a regional arms race in East Asia. China, which reacted strongly by imposing sanctions on South Korea when it deployed US missile defence systems in 2017—costing South Korea's economy about $7.5 billion—would likely respond even more harshly to any nuclear weapons development in the region.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
US Court Rules Trump Can Exclude Journalists From Oval Office
A federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can exclude journalists from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other 'restricted' spaces based on their editorial decisions, handing the administration a win in its fight with the Associated Press over access. In a 2-1 order on Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit halted a lower-court judge's order that had restored the wire service's ability to participate in a rotating pool of reporters who cover the president's daily movements. The news agency sued the Trump administration in February when the White House press office started limiting the access of reporters and photographers after the wire service refused to update its style guide to rename the 'Gulf of Mexico' the 'Gulf of America' following a Trump executive order. A Washington federal judge's order forcing the White House to reinstate the 's access took effect April 14 after the appeals court didn't immediately intervene. The next could ask the full bench of active judges of the DC Circuit to reconsider the panel's order or ask the US Supreme Court to immediately intervene. A lawyer for the and a White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Judge Neomi Rao wrote in the majority opinion that the lower court's decision 'impinges on the president's independence and control over his private workspaces.' The panel did leave in place part of the original order that required the to still have access to the East Room in the White House, which was usually open to a broader group of reporters. 'Throughout our nation's history, presidents have held crucial meetings and made historic decisions in the Oval Office and on Air Force One,' wrote Rao, joined by Judge Greg Katsas. 'On occasion, they have welcomed the press to observe. But these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora, and the President retains discretion over who has access.' Rao and Katsas were nominated by Trump in his first term. Judge Nina Pillard, appointed under former president Barack Obama, dissented. Historically, the has been part of a small, rotating pool of media outlets that cover the president's day-to-day activities as well as events open to larger groups of credentialed media outlets. In an April 8 order, US District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that the was likely to succeed in arguing that the Trump administration violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution by singling out one media outlet based on its editorial choices. He said that officials remained free to exclude journalists from one-on-one access to Trump, but that they couldn't kick out the if it allowed in its peers. The case is Associated Press v. Budowich, 25-5109, DC Circuit Court of Appeals This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
22 minutes ago
- India.com
Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?
New Delhi: Just a day after X (formerly Twitter) lit up with signs of a possible ceasefire between the two alpha billionaires of American influence, US President Donald Trump has poured cold water over any reconciliation talk. Asked by ABC News if he would speak to Musk after their very public clash, he scoffed, 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? I am not particularly interested in talking to him.' Classic Trump, doubling down even when the temperature seems to be cooling. There is an odd symmetry here. Musk, who had just hinted at making peace – replying 'You are not wrong' to billionaire investor Bill Ackman's call for the two to settle their feud for the sake of the nation – now finds himself ghosted by the very man he might have tried to reach out to. 'I am not even thinking about Elon. He has got a problem, the poor guy has got a problem,' Trump told CNN with dismissive finality during a June 6 interview. And while the White House reportedly flirted with the idea of brokering a peace call, as per Politico, other sources quickly knocked that down – saying no such call had been scheduled. So now, America's two most powerful disruptors remain locked in a bizarre standoff that is half-reality TV and half-national policy debate. This feud is not only personal, it is political and economic. It started when Trump lashed out during a White House appearance, accusing Musk of betrayal over criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hit back hard. He accused Trump's trade policies of potentially triggering a recession and even dragged the former president's links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein into the public arena. Then came the bizarre twist – Trump, clearly furious, threatened to cancel U.S. government contracts with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies. In retaliation, Musk posted that he would 'retire' the Dragon spacecraft – a vehicle crucial to NASA. The internet melted down. But a few hours and likely a few backchannel calls later, Musk reversed course: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' In this verbal space race, it is hard to tell who is steering the ship and who is punching holes in the hull. Whether this ends in detente or total decoupling remains unclear, but what is certain is this – the Trump-Musk saga has become a defining narrative of America's political tech complex where egos, economics and electoral stakes collide like celestial bodies on a crash course.


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'
Errol Musk weighs in on Elon-Trump feud Elon Musk 's father, Errol Musk, weighed on his son's feud with Donald Trump which included reference to Jeffrey Epstein in an attack on US President, calling it 'just a silly mistake' and "not knowing what he (Elon) was thinking". He also urged his son to let the feud 'fizzle out.' In an interview with Al Arabiya English from a lounge in Delhi Airport, Errol Musk downplayed the widely publicised social media clash between the two high-profile figures, characterising it as a momentary flare-up between strong personalities under pressure. 'I have no idea what he was thinking… I can only imagine that's just a silly mistake,' Errol said of Elon's now-viral post alleging Trump's name was in the Epstein files. Musk had, in a post on X, said, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'. Errol, attributed his son's actions to stress rather than intent. Referencing scripture, he added, 'Let the innocent person cast the first stone,' suggesting no one is without fault. The elder Musk said he had personally messaged his son to help ease tensions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo 'I did send him a message… telling him, make sure this fizzles out,' he said, confidently predicting that the spat would be short-lived. 'Yes, of course,' he added when asked whether Trump and Elon would reconcile. 'When people have been through a great deal of stress… eventually people reach a point where they lash out,' Errol said. 'Even at the highest levels, people struggle to find common ground.' He suggested Elon's criticisms stemmed from concerns over Democrats' use of financial incentives to push legislation—a dispute that eventually escalated into a social media confrontation. Describing the online standoff as 'elephant bulls or alphas having a go at each other,' Errol Musk brushed off the seriousness of the episode. Reflecting on his recent visit to the US, Errol also claimed overwhelming public support for the former president. 'I would like to say 80 percent, but actually 100 percent [are] behind Trump,' he said. What is the Musk-Trump feud ? The public spat between US President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk has intensified, following Musk's opposition to a significant domestic policy initiative by Trump. Following his 129-day tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), Musk utilised his platform X to denounce the bill as a "disgusting abomination", adding: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." He expressed concerns about the legislation's impact on national debt levels and urged his followers to contact their representatives in opposition to the spending proposal. The conflict between the two wealthy individuals heightened on Thursday as they traded harsh words on their respective social media platforms, indicating the end of their previous collaboration. Trump initiated the exchange by expressing disappointment over Musk's criticism of his administration's primary tax and spending legislation, suggesting this could terminate their formerly positive association. In response, Musk claimed credit for Trump's electoral success, stating: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election". The deterioration in their relationship occurred after Musk's sustained opposition to Trump's spending legislation, which received approval from the US House and awaits Senate consideration.