Leaving Cert biology: Plenty of choice but challenging in places
Killian Keegan, a student at Athlone Community College and one of this year's Irish Times student diarists, said that it was the
most accessible paper in years
.
Liam Hennelly,
Studyclix.ie
subject expert and a biology teacher at Belvedere College in Dublin, said that it was well-laid out.
'It gave students plenty of choice across all three units of the course, and allowed them to show off what they know.
READ MORE
'Some of the questions were challenging in places and required an in-depth knowledge of subject material, as you would expect with any higher-level paper,' said Mr Hennelly.
Biology, higher level, sections A and B:
David O'Brien, ASTI subject representative and a teacher at Ballincollig Community School in Co Cork, said that it was a very fair paper.
'The students I spoke to were happy with the exam,' he said.
'They were well-prepared. They were delighted with the experiment question about habitat study in question eight.
'There was a question about vaccination and immunity in section C, which is very relevant,' he said.
'With so much choice on the marking paper, and a good balance between anatomy, plants, cells and genetics, the marking scheme will ultimately distinguish between the H1 and H2 candidates.'
Biology, higher level, section C:
Wesley Hammond, a biology teacher at the Institute of Education, said that students who were diligent in their past papers and didn't cut corners when revising chapters will be happy with this paper.
'Many of the areas that students consider as 'bankers' for their marks were nicely represented,' he said.
The questions in section A won't have thrown anyone, said Mr Hennelly.
'There were no surprises and if you had put in the time to work through past papers you will recognise much of it. While all questions might not suit everyone (Q2's longitudinal section of the root may challenge those less confident in plant biology), there were plenty of viable alternatives to let them demonstrate their efforts over the last two years,' he said.
Ordinary level
On the ordinary-level paper, Mr Hennelly said that it also had a wide selection of questions that ranged across a broad number of topics.
'Short questions included food, ecology, a true/false question, cell structure, tropisms, the nervous system and mitosis. Experiment questions included food tests, enzymes and factors that affect germination,' he said.
'The long questions gave students a lot of choice across ecology, genetics & protein synthesis, photosynthesis & respiration, plant structure, human reproduction and microbiology among other topics,' Mr Hennelly said.
From September 2025, senior cycle students will start a new curriculum for all science subjects, with an increased focus on experimentation, and 40 per cent of marks awarded for project work.
Biology, ordinary level, sections A and B:
Mr O'Brien, the ASTI subject representative, said that schools have yet to receive health and safety guidelines or risk assessments for practical investigation.
'Schools have not received sufficient funding for purchasing equipment and chemicals, which are expensive, and will need annual funding. We're also concerned about digital inequality in the system, as students or schools with more access to computers will be at a disadvantage,' Mr O'Brien said.
Biology, ordinary level, section C:
Try this one at home:
LEAVING CERT BIOLOGY, QUESTION 16 (D)
Lymphocytes mature in the lymphatic system, which is part of the human defence system.
(i) 1. Name two organs of the lymphatic system.
2. Other than maturation of lymphocytes, give two functions of the lymphatic system.
(ii) Lymphocytes play a role in the specific defence system. State the precise location in the body where lymphocytes are produced.
3. Name two types of lymphocyte and describe the role of each.
4. Explain the term 'vaccination'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Take some time to look up': Perseid meteor shower could be visible tonight
One of the most eagerly awaited astronomical events of the year – which promises one or two meteors or 'shooting stars' a minute – is set to dominate Irish skies on Tuesday night. Gazers of the Perseid meteor shower could see about 60 meteors an hour darting across Tuesday's night sky – weather and light pollution permitting. Met Éireann forecasts clear spells for most, though cloudier conditions are expected to build in the south. In urban areas, where light pollution can hinder sight of the night sky, those hoping to catch a glimpse can still expect a decent show, said astronomer Danielle Wilcox from Blackrock Castle Observatory, Cork. READ MORE 'It gives some of the brightest meteors, so you can be in the city and see some of those bright ones,' she said. The Perseid meteors are caused by dust particles shed by the comet, Swift-Tuttle. The comet, which takes 133 years to orbit the sun, was last seen in Irish skies in 1992. At this time of year, Earth moves through this debris cloud, making one of the most celebrated astronomical events and arguably the most predictable. Particles from the debris cloud subsequently burn up on entering Earth's atmosphere and create flashes of light. While the shower is active for several weeks, it peaks on the night of August 12th. 'It's such a special time of the year,' Ms Wilcox said. With a caveat to ease heightened expectations, she said the public would not see 'thousands of stars falling from the sky', but could see one or two meteors a minute. The Perseids take their name from the constellation of Perseus, from where they appear to spread in all directions, and towards which Ms Wilcox advised looking on Tuesday night. A meteor streaks across the sky over West Virginia during the annual Perseid meteor shower in 2021. Photograph: Bill Ingalls/Nasa There are about a dozen meteor showers each year, but 'tonight in particular is the night to go out'. 'It's a really good meteor shower in particular because it gives us a lot of meteors per hour compared to other meteor showers,' she said. With about 60 meteors an hour, 'you're almost guaranteed, if you sit out and look up for a few minutes, to see a meteor,' she said. 'That's what's so exciting about it, especially for people who have never seen 'shooting stars', this is your chance to get out there and see that,' she said. The number per hour can rise to 100 for those under 'really, really dark skies'. She said August's full moon, known as a Sturgeon Moon, might hinder sight of the less bright meteors, but it was 'luckily' becoming less bright and was rising later. This provided an optimal window, between sunset and moonrise, for stargazers to look north and catch a glimpse of the shower. 'Take some time to look up,' she said.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Move to ease climate targets criticised for allowing continued high methane emissions
Climate scientists have criticised Ireland over proposed measures that would weaken the country's commitments to reducing methane emissions. Countries that export livestock – including Ireland and New Zealand – have proposed a new approach to climate targets, known as 'temperature neutrality'. Scientists say this method would undermine efforts to create a sustainable global food system as it allows countries to maintain high agricultural methane emissions while claiming to meet climate targets. A study containing the warning, published in Environmental Research Letters today, was led by University of Galway researchers with input from scientists at University College Cork (UCC) , University of Melbourne, and Climate Resource, which models climate scenarios. READ MORE Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that traps significantly more heat than carbon dioxide over shorter periods, leading to accelerated warming. [ Scientists accuse Ireland of 'accounting trick' to justify livestock emissions Opens in new window ] 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees,' said lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy, a lecturer in agri-sustainability at University of Galway. 'Worse still, this approach doesn't just weaken climate ambition, it entrenches inequality,' he added. 'It protects the status quo for wealthy countries while placing an unfair burden on poorer, food-insecure countries, limiting their ability to grow their own food systems.' This approach, the research concludes, 'dramatically reduces the level of ambition needed for overall greenhouse-gas emission reduction'. Revised targets using the new method were proposed to the Government by the Climate Change Advisory Council , an independent body, in part to reduce potential disruption from Ireland's legal commitment to achieve national 'climate neutrality' by 2050. [ The difference between 'net zero' emissions and 'temperature neutrality' ] It is understood the concept is favoured by the Department of Agriculture , but the Government has yet to adopt it. Minister for Climate and Energy Darragh O'Brien has told the Oireachtas climate committee he has 'not formed a definitive view on that one way or the other'. All views from experts, 'who will have different views on this', will be assessed in determining carbon budgets later this year, he said. Temperature neutrality is based on stabilising a country's contribution to global warming rather than aiming for the more demanding existing target of net zero emissions. [ Ireland's emissions trend 'alarming and shocking, with actions reset required' Opens in new window ] In effect, the researchers say, it requires modest reductions in methane from high-emitting countries, and denying methane emission 'rights' to countries producing less of the gas. As methane emissions are strongly linked with agricultural production, they say widespread adoption of temperature neutrality would lock in current inequalities in the global food system by reducing the need to curtail or offset methane emissions by current major livestock exporters. The study shows 'temperature neutrality severely restricts development space for agriculture in low-income, food-insecure countries where livestock products are most needed to improve nutrition'. The researchers evaluated scenarios to assess impact from the policy – first proposed in New Zealand – on global mean temperatures. Apart from 'business as usual', the temperature neutrality approach performed the worst in terms of global warming emissions. By 2050, Ireland's per capita methane emissions would remain almost six times the global average, it finds. Dr Duffy added: 'The science shows the new policy essentially grandfathers methane emissions – meaning a country's future share of warming is based not on equity or ambition, but on historical share of emissions. In essence; 'I had more, so I get more'.' UCC sustainable energy specialist Prof Hannah Daly said: 'Methane emissions are responsible for around 40 per cent of global warming ... [its] short lifetime in the atmosphere means that cutting its emissions is an essential lever to limit global warming to safe levels. 'For a country like Ireland, with outsized methane emissions, to base our long-term climate target on simply stabilising warming is inadequate to meet our global obligations and sets a dangerous precedent.' Dr Róisín Moriarty of UCC Sustainability Institute said: 'A 'no additional warming' approach to target-setting amounts to backsliding on a country's commitment to the Paris Agreement and is not a reflection of 'highest possible ambition'.'
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
The difference between ‘net zero' emissions and ‘temperature neutrality'
Climate scientists have challenged the view that prioritising 'temperature neutrality' as a revised approach to meeting climate targets is merited. This is because insufficient reductions of greenhouse gases would be achieved. It is considered a get-out-of-jail card for big livestock-producing countries with high methane emissions such as Ireland, they say, because it endorses an approach that shifts policy to containing 'additional global warming'. Getting to net zero emissions is much more demanding than keeping temperatures where they are right now. 'Temperature neutrality is essentially a political choice to take current levels of warming as 'acceptable' while committing not to increase them,' said University of Galway researcher Dr Colm Duffy. READ MORE 'For methane, this is particularly problematic. Because of its short atmospheric lifespan, future warming is determined by future emissions, meaning the temperature framing effectively carves out a long-term methane emissions space for the country adopting it.' Methane is a potent short-lived climate pollutant with a much higher warming impact than CO² over 20 years, but it only lasts about a decade in the atmosphere. 'It is simultaneously a huge threat, but also our greatest lever for actually lowering temperatures. CO² is essentially up there forever,' he adds. [ Ireland can reduce impact of extreme climate events by transforming economy, experts suggest Opens in new window ] In short, stabilisation is temporary due to shifting global methane background levels. 'This means the temperature neutrality [scenario] is essentially a moving target, which is not something you want to pin climate policy on.' As Dr Róisín Moriarty of University College Cork 's Sustainability Institute says, with less than three years of 'global carbon budget' remaining to limit warming to 1.5 degrees, and a 50 per cent chance of achieving it, countries need to do as much as they possibly can on the issue. A carbon budget is the total amount of emissions that may be released in an effort to contain global warming. In Ireland, five-year legally binding carbon budgets are in place, applying to all sectors including agriculture. The Climate Change Advisory Council put forward this new concept. The independent body, which advises the Government, claims it is in line with the Paris Agreement. Moreover, it based carbon budget modelling and subsequent advice around future carbon budgets on it. While the council has indicated there is nothing stopping the Government from being more ambitious, it will not advise on a higher level of ambition. In June, the council told the Oireachtas climate committee it 'considers climate neutrality to mean that Ireland is no longer contributing to the increase in global temperatures by 2050'. [ Move to ease climate targets criticised for allowing continued high methane emissions ] This aligns with the national climate objective of transitioning to a climate-resilient, biodiversity-rich, and environmentally sustainable economy, it said. 'Achieving this involves balancing greenhouse gas emissions with their removal from the atmosphere, effectively stopping Ireland's contribution to rising global temperatures.' It said improved analysis of mitigation options were used for the new proposal, targeting temperature neutrality pathways rather than an overreliance on as-yet unproven technologies such as carbon capture and storage. The approach has not been adopted by Government, though the Department of Agriculture favours including temperature models in scenario planning. The council said its Carbon Budgets Working Group assessed 1,196 scientifically based emissions scenarios that were developed for consistency with Ireland's national climate objective. In Dr Duffy's opinion, however, temperature neutrality 'shifts the goalposts on ambition and passes the buck on climate mitigation, while essentially claiming the opposite. 'From an EU perspective, such a [scenario] could be seen as a backslide on commitments, with potential political and reputational implications,' Dr Duffy adds.
