
How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow
PILOTS manually cutting the engines were to blame for the two most deadly air crashes of this decade, investigations suggest.
With a total of 420 lives lost in the flick of three buttons, urgent questions are swirling about what can be done to reduce the risk of pilot error or sabotage.
Advertisement
8
The wreckage of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 which crashed and burned at Muan International Airport in South Korea in December
Credit: AFP
8
Some 179 people were killed in the disaster
Credit: AFP
8
An Air India plane smashed down into a built-up are in June, and killed all but one of the 242 people on board
Credit: Alamy
8
Former airline pilot Terry Tozer explained what could have contributed to the pilots' actions
Credit: Channel 5 News
The Jeju Air emergency-landing crash killed 179 people in December, and 241 people died when the Air India plane came down shortly after takeoff in June.
Investigators have sensationally revealed there is "clear evidence" that the Jeju Air pilots mistakenly shut down the wrong engine after a bird strike.
The plane was then forced to make an emergency landing at Muan International Airport on December 29, where it slammed into a concrete wall and burst into a fireball.
Meanwhile, the leading theory in the Air India crash is that the pilot manually flipped both guarded fuel switches to the 'cut-off' position — a move aviation experts say could only have been deliberate.
Advertisement
read more on the air disasters
CRASH DISASTER Pilots of doomed South Korean plane 'switched off wrong engine', killing 179
A report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India (AAIB) revealed a recording of the panicked co-pilot asking which the main pilot shut off the engines.
Terry Tozer, former airline pilot and author of "Confessions of an Airline Pilot – Why Planes Crash", told The Sun that it would have been be possible for the Air India pilot to shut off the engines without the other noticing.
In the cockpit were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder.
Terry said: "The handling pilot, which we know was the First Officer, would have had his hands full.
Advertisement
"He would have had his hands on the controls, but the monitoring pilot [Sumeet] would have his hands free."
What caused fireball South Korea plane crash as 179 confirmed dead in horror explosion
"There is absolutely no procedure or logical reason why you would shut the engines off just after takeoff. That's so blindingly obvious that it doesn't need to be stated.
"So either it happened by accident, which I think a lot of people find extremely hard to believe or it was done deliberately."
Terry said that the switches are "latched", meaning you have to lift them up before you can move them.
Advertisement
Despite the safety mechanism, Terry said it would 'probably' have been possible for one pilot to shut down the engines without the monitoring pilot noticing, because the switches "would be kind of behind his natural line of sight".
The experience pilot also called on investigators to release a key piece of evidence that could clear up what happened in India.
8
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal is thought to have switched both the engines off shortly after take off
A cockpit view of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft shows the fuel switch;
Advertisement
8
Brit Vishwas Ramesh was the only survivor of the Air India disaster
Credit: Dan Charity
He explained the area microphone on the cockpit voice recorder would have picked up the sound of the switches being flicked.
Terry said: 'So it would have been helpful if the investigators had said whether or not they were able to tell whether a switch type sound was detectable around about the time that they think the switches might have been switched off.'
Speaking about the Jeju crash, Terry said the pilots "obviously" shut down the wrong engine by "mistake" - but revealed they would have been contending with a chaos in the cockpit.
Advertisement
He said: 'They probably would have had all kinds of bells and whistles going off and lots of indications that both engines were in trouble.'
The former pilot said "takes time to analyze whether or not you should shut down one or neither or both" - but this was time the Jeju pilots did not have.
He also said the new revelations about those crucial moments had been revealed in a "very odd manner".
Terry said: "I understand that it was released to the relatives of the victims and in private, prior to release to the general public.
Advertisement
"And then that causes riots and chaos."
8
A family member of a victim of the Jeju air crash mourns at the site
Credit: EPA
8
An engine of the Jeju Air passenger plane wreckage is salvaged days after the crash
Credit: EPA
Advertisement
However, Terry said that whatever happened in the two cockpits, there is one factor that determines passengers' fate above all else.
He said the 'single most important thing' in passenger safety is the "airline culture".
Terry explained: 'If it is a disciplined professional safety culture with a good training regime, then that makes a huge difference.'
Terry recalled a similar occasion when the wrong engine was shut down - the Kegworth air disaster of 1989 - and said that was "definitely a cultural problem in the training department'.
Advertisement
'That may have been a factor with Jeju Air,' he said.
In the wake of the two tragedies, many aviation figures have called for he introduction of cockpit CCTV.
That would clear up immediately how the two engines came to be shut off on the Air India flight - but Terry said pilots would push back.
He said: 'I can see why the investigators might welcome cockpit CCTV.
Advertisement
"We should be doing everything we can to minimize crashes.
'And in any responsible environment, with a good airline and a regulatory environment that is already happening.
"And obviously, if there was a video evidence of what went on on the cockpit. They would know the answers pretty clearly by now.
"But it's something that I think pilots would resist, for the simple reason that they're already scrutinized, trained, checked, examined, monitored, regulated so much."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Why Air India flight to London was forced to abort take-off
An Air India flight from Delhi to London was forced to abort its take-off due to a suspected technical issue. Flight AI2017, scheduled to depart on Thursday, 31 July, returned to the bay after the cockpit crew discontinued the take-off run as a precaution. Passengers were asked to disembark, and an alternative aircraft was subsequently deployed to complete the journey to London. This incident follows a separate Air India flight crash on 12 June, which was bound for London Gatwick. That crash in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, resulted in the deaths of 241 people on board and at least 29 on the ground, with an investigation into its causes ongoing.


The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Air India flight to London aborts take-off due to technical issue weeks after fatal crash
An Air India flight bound for London was forced to abort take-off due to a suspected technical issue. Flight AI2017, which was scheduled to depart Delhi for London on Thursday (31 July) was brought to a halt after the cockpit crew decided to 'discontinue the take-off run'. Passengers on board the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner were asked to disembark as precautionary checks were carried out. Air India later deployed an alternative aircraft to complete the journey to London. An Air India spokesperson said: 'Flight AI2017, operating from Delhi to London on 31 July, returned to the bay due to a suspected technical issue. 'The cockpit crew decided to discontinue the takeoff run following standard operating procedures and brought the aircraft back for precautionary checks. 'An alternative aircraft was deployed to fly the passengers to London.' The incident comes just weeks after an Air India flight bound for London Gatwick struck a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad minutes after take-off, killing 241 people. Indian aviation officials confirmed the pilot issued multiple distress calls before the Gatwick -bound flight crashed in Gujarat state on 12 June, killing 241 people on board and at least 29 more on the ground. 'Thrust not achieved... falling... Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!' the pilot is reported to have said moments before the aircraft lost height and erupted in flames. There were 230 passengers and 12 crew members on board, including 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese citizens and one Canadian, according to Air India. Alongside the formal investigation, the Indian government has set up a high-level committee to examine the causes leading to the crash. The committee will focus on formulating procedures to prevent and handle aircraft emergencies in the future, the Ministry of Civil Aviation said. Air India and the government are looking at several aspects of the crash, including issues linked to its engine thrust, flaps, and why the landing gear remained open as the plane took off and then came down.


Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Air India flight to London aborts take-off in Delhi after 'technical' scare
The Air India flight from Delhi to London returned back to the airport and all passengers had to disembark as the pilot was not prepared to go ahead with the long-haul flight An Air India plane aborted take off after a technical scare, just weeks after another of the airline 's planes crashed. The flight from Delhi to London returned back to the airport and all passengers had to disembark after the pilot was unhappy to go ahead with the long-haul flight. In a statement following the incident on Thursday, the airline said the cockpit crew of the Boeing 787-9 decided to "discontinue the takeoff" so checks could be carried out. The Air India spokesman said: "Flight AI2017, operating from Delhi to London on July 31, returned to the bay due to a suspected technical issue. The cockpit crew decided to discontinue the takeoff run following standard operating procedures and brought the aircraft back for precautionary checks." It comes after horror moment a Japan tsunami sends gigantic wall of water smashing into coast. The Air India statement added: "An alternative aircraft is being deployed to fly the passengers to London at the earliest. Our ground staff is extending all support and care to the guests to minimise inconvenience caused due to this unexpected delay." The aborted flight comes after doomed Air India flight 171 crashed in June killing all but one of the people onboard. The Boeing 787 jetliner - bound for Gatwick Airport - careered into a medical college in Ahmedabad, India, moments after take-off. Footage of the UK-bound plane showed it plummeting towards the ground before erupting into a huge fireball. The clip appeared to have been taken from a nearby building and shows the aircraft swiftly losing height. As it sinks lower to the ground, an explosion suddenly erupts from the plane. A giant fireball as thick, black smoke billowed out of the crash site. Other images and videos of the crash show a blanket of smoke covering the area of Ahmedabad as emergency services rushed to the scene. The flight departed from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad but crashed just moments after taking off. Authorities have since launched a probe into what caused the crash. Early indications found evidence that an emergency generator may have been the aircraft's primary power source at the time it went down. One leading theory is that the plane suffered a dual engine failure, though what triggered this is yet to be determined.