&w=3840&q=100)
US visa crackdown: International students rethink summer travel plans
A PhD student at the University of California, San Diego, had planned a trip with friends to Hawaii. But after reports of students across the country losing their legal status, the trip was called off.
'I probably am going to skip that to ... have as few interactions with governments as possible,' the student told Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity out of fear of being targeted.
Travel plans under scrutiny
The Trump administration's crackdown on student visas has caused widespread anxiety among international students hoping to travel for holidays, to visit family, or to conduct research.
Some universities had already advised students and staff to delay travel, even before large-scale terminations were reported. Early warnings were linked to government efforts to deport students involved in pro-Palestinian activism. As the number of status terminations has grown, more institutions have urged caution.
University of California, Berkeley, issued an advisory last week warning that international travel could be risky due to 'strict vetting and enforcement.'
An Associated Press review of university statements, official correspondence and court documents found that at least 1,220 students at 187 colleges, universities and university systems had either lost their visas or had their legal status terminated since late March. Some students left the country, others stopped attending classes, and a few went into hiding.
Many international students whose status was revoked said they did not fit into either category, or had only minor incidents on record.
Sheela Murthy, president and CEO of US-based Murthy Law Firm, told Business Standard there was little individual review behind the mass cancellations.
'Based on our understanding, the Department of Homeland Security took a shortcut of targeting anyone who had any type of incident or had their fingerprints taken or attended a court hearing,' said Murthy. 'They may have used AI to send out blanket visa revocations and SEVIS terminations without confirming if they were throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
She added that most affected students either had no criminal record or had seen their cases dismissed. 'The revocations and terminations in those cases would be clearly incorrect and violate due process under US law,' she said.
Warnings mirror early Trump era concerns
The last time universities issued similar travel warnings was before Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025.
Universities including the University of Massachusetts, Wesleyan University and Yale University urged their international communities to return early from travel plans.
'Based on previous experience with travel bans enacted in the first Trump administration, the Office of Global Affairs has made this advisory out of an abundance of caution,' the schools said in a joint advisory.
Speaking to Business Standard at the time, Russell A Stamets, Partner at Circle of Counsels, a Delhi-based law firm, said universities were recommending that foreign students return to campus for their own protection.
'Trump has made it clear he intends to prioritise protecting American jobs, which has caused anxiety among international students,' he said.
Thousands more affected
The real number of affected students appears to be far higher. According to an April 10 response from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to congressional inquiries, at least 4,736 international students' visa records were terminated in the federal database that tracks their legal status.
< Some students went into hiding or left the United States voluntarily.
< Many said they had only minor infractions or were unaware why their visa records were deleted.
< Federal judges raised due process concerns in some cases, leading the government to reverse several terminations.
However, new guidance has since expanded the reasons students can lose their legal status. Under the revised policy, a student's visa being revoked could now be grounds for immediate termination of their legal stay, even if they remain enrolled. In the past, students whose visas were revoked could typically remain until completing their course but could not leave and reenter.
Students feel trapped
The uncertainty has created deep distress among international students. A student at the University of Illinois, who spoke to AP on condition of anonymity, said he has kept a low profile since one of his classmates was forced to leave the country after their status was terminated.
He had already booked a trip to visit his family in Asia this summer, but now fears he may not be allowed back into the United States.
'Right now," he said, "I'm afraid I might not be able to come back." With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US SC clears way for deportation of several immigrants to South Sudan
The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger AP Washington The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the deportation of several immigrants who were put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan, a war-ravaged country where they have no ties. The decision comes after the justices found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. The court's latest order makes clear that the South Sudan flight detoured weeks ago can now complete the trip. It reverses findings from federal Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts, who said his order on those migrants still stands even after the court lifted his broader decision. The Trump administration has called the judge's finding a lawless act of defiance. Attorneys for the eight migrants have said they could face imprisonment, torture and even death if sent to South Sudan, where escalating political tensions have threatened to devolve into another civil war. The push comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Trump's Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities can't quickly send them back to their homelands. The eight men sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of serious crimes in the US. Murphy, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, didn't prohibit deportations to third countries. But he found migrants must have a real chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent to another country. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Trumponomics 2.0 will erode the foundations of America's prosperity
Was it JUST a false alarm? The panic about the world economy that followed President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day" tariffs in April has given way to growing optimism. Tariffs' inflationary effect has so far been muted. In private, bosses say they now expect trade fights to produce trade deals, not to be an end in themselves. Surveys show that business and consumer confidence, though low, is improving. The S&P 500 index of stocks has hit a record high. And as we report, the One Big Beautiful Bill act (BBB) that passed the Senate on July 1st and the House on July 3rd looks more like traditional tax-cutting, spending-slashing Republicanism worthy of Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney than it does a MAGA fantasy. Suddenly, business leaders are again willing to see Mr Trump as the populist from his first term: a man to be taken seriously but not literally. Unfortunately, the BBB, which Mr Trump plans to sign into law on July 4th, is likely to cast a shadow over this sunny picture. It illustrates the long-term damage Mr Trump is doing to the foundations of America's economy. The bill's main effect is to extend the tax cuts from Mr Trump's first term which were due to expire. Republicans paint this as an extension of the status quo. Yet they, like the Democrats before them, ignore the fact that the status quo is unsustainable. Over the past 12 months America's budget deficit has been an astonishing 6.7% of GDP. If the bill passes, the deficit will remain around that level and the country's debt-to-gdp ratio will in about two years exceed the 106% reached after the second world war. Revenue from tariffs will help, but not enough to stop the ratio rising—meaning that the drift towards crisis will continue. To the extent the bill tightens the belt, it does so in the wrong places. As life expectancies rise and the population ages, America should trim handouts to the old, for example by raising the retirement age. Instead, pensioners are getting a tax break and Republicans are cutting Medicaid, health insurance for the hard-up. Some sensible measures include reducing the ability of states to game the system for more federal cash. Yet according to official projections, the overall effect will be to add nearly 12m to the number of Americans without health insurance. That is a scandalous number for the world's richest big country. Many of those who lose coverage will fall foul of new requirements that recipients must work. Such rules have in the past created an obstacle course of paperwork for claimants while failing to boost employment. More savings come from repealing tax credits for clean energy passed under President Joe Biden. The credits were littered with protectionist 'buy American" requirements that this newspaper opposed. But because Congress abhors carbon pricing, nothing will replace them. The country will once again lack a federal policy for decarbonisation, and its greenhouse-gas emissions will be greater than they would have been. Mr Trump's nostalgia for fossil fuels ignores the potential of renewables to make energy much more abundant. That is foolish when the race for artificial general intelligence is in part a race for the electricity necessary to train massive models. Even the way the bill was passed reveals America's creeping dysfunction. The BBB is gargantuan because governing parties very rarely get more than one chance a year to pass a tax and spending bill with just 51 votes in the Senate, rather than the 60 needed to circumvent the filibuster. In such a big bill, important reforms are poorly scrutinised, and a lot of pork can be used to buy the support of congressmen. Optimists acknowledge some or all of this, but argue that economic growth will wipe out all these worries. Faster growth would ease the burden of debt, benefit the poor through more jobs and higher wages and make political dysfunction seem economically irrelevant. Sure enough, the administration projects nearly 5% more output over the next four years. Yet it is wrong to expect this bill to create a growth boom. The tax cuts in the BBB that are already in effect offer little fresh stimulus, and tariffs are an offsetting force. In any case, interest rates are three times their level when Mr Trump last cut taxes and the Federal Reserve is more likely to balance looser fiscal policy with tweaks to its monetary stance. Supply-side tax cuts will help boost investment, but account for just 8% of the total, by cost. Many new tax cuts, including exemptions for tips and overtime, are gimmicks. The administration's deregulation agenda could help, but only on the margins. In fact, America's geyser of debt issuance will increasingly harm growth. In normal times public debt crowds out private investment, raising the cost of capital for new projects like data centres. And the costs of a sudden fiscal adjustment, forced on America by bond markets, would be vast. Goldman Sachs, a bank, reckons that if Congress postpones fiscal tightening for another decade, it may then need to cut spending or raise taxes by an annual 5.5% of GDP to stabilise debt-to-GDP. That is more than the austerity endured by the euro zone after its sovereign-debt crisis in the 2010s. If that proved too hard for legislators, America might resort to tactics used after the second world war: inflation and financial repression. Vote-a-rama leads to borrower-drama The BBB's neglect of the long term is part of a wider malaise. Riding high on America's economic might and undoubted negotiating leverage, Mr Trump ignores the foundations of America's success. He has renewed his attacks on the Fed, adding another threat to economic stability. His defunding of scientific research will harm American innovation. His cavalier approach to the rule of law makes America a riskier place to invest. And despite the moderation of his trade war, the average tariff rate is still its highest in a century and trade-policy uncertainty is a burden. Even as American assets boom in dollar terms, they have fallen behind when priced in foreign currencies. An 11% fall in the dollar this year reflects long-term risks to the American economy that are real, and growing.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Sees No ‘Progress' in Putin Call on Ending Ukraine War
US President Donald Trump said he did not make any headway toward ending Russia's war in Ukraine during a call with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, and expressed frustration at the ongoing conflict. 'We had a call, it was a pretty long call. We talked about a lot of things including Iran. We also talked about, as you know, the war with Ukraine, and I'm not happy about that,' Trump told reporters Thursday evening. 'No, I didn't make any progress,' he said when asked about their talks. This was the sixth publicly acknowledged call between the two leaders since Trump returned to the White House in January. The Kremlin earlier Thursday also indicated there had been little progress on ending the war — a key foreign policy aim of the US president — during the discussions. 'Donald Trump once again raised the question of an early cessation of hostilities,' Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters after the call, which lasted almost one hour. Putin said Russia 'will not back down' from its war aims, Ushakov added. He described the conversation as 'frank, businesslike and concrete,' adding that the leaders agreed to continue their discussions soon. Putin and Trump talked about Iran and the situation in the Middle East 'in considerable detail,' Ushakov added. There was no discussion of a meeting between the two leaders, and they didn't touch on the US decision to halt weapons supplies to Ukraine, he said. Trump and Putin spoke after the Pentagon announced this week it was pausing the transfer of artillery rounds and air defenses to Ukraine, citing a review of US stockpiles as it weighs the need to save weapons for other threats. That's as Russia has intensified its missile and drone attacks on Ukraine in recent weeks. Trump is likely to hold a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday, according to a person familiar with the matter. The US president campaigned on ending the war in Ukraine quickly, citing his relationship with Putin, but has also threatened to walk away if the two sides can't agree to terms. Trump voiced his frustration at the pace of progress last month, saying it might be necessary to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a little while' before trying to broker a peace deal. While Trump has squeezed weapons supplies to Ukraine, he hasn't imposed any more sanctions on Russia. That's despite appeals from Zelenskiy and European leaders to ramp up pressure on Putin. Putin agreed in talks this week with French President Emmanuel Macron to coordinate their approach on Iran, the first phone call between the two leaders since 2022. Iran is said to be cutting off communication with key United Nations atomic watchdog officials, deepening uncertainty over the status of its nuclear program. Macron wants to coordinate with permanent members of the UN Security Council on pressing Iran to accept the return of International Atomic Energy Agency inspections, Bloomberg reported this week. The US, Russia, China, France and the UK are permanent members of the Security Council. With assistance from Stephanie Lai and Ben Holland.
