U.S.-Canadian political tensions play out at UFC's Malott-Radtke fight in Montreal
This wasn't the first time U.S.-Canadian politics played out in the sports world since President Donald Trump's talks of a 51st state. In February, the 4 Nations Face-Off hockey championship game between Canada and the U.S. saw three fist fights within the first nine seconds – and the U.S. national anthem was booed.
So the stakes were high for the first UFC event in Canada since Mr. Trump's re-election. And the Quebec setting felt even more significant: The province voted largely Liberal in the federal election, a sign that voters may be more concerned about facing down Mr. Trump than about independence interests.
At the prefight news conference, Mr. Radtke made it known he would make Canada 'pay' for booing The Star-Spangled Banner. But by the second round, the American was grounded and being pummelled by Mr. Malott to the riotous approval of the crowd. Minutes after his win, with a Canadian flag wrapped around him, Mr. Malott addressed the arena, 'When it comes to defending this country, know one thing Canada: I stand on guard for thee.'
Just outside the caged Octagon, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre – joined by his wife and a host of security guards – was waiting to congratulate the fighter. In his postfight news conference, Mr. Malott told reporters he 'didn't mean to take a firm political stand' by greeting Mr. Poilievre, but 'I appreciate people who are trying to make our country a better place.'
Political undertones aren't a new thing in the UFC, one of the biggest mixed martial arts organizations in the world, worth about US$11-billion. In the 2000s, Mr. Trump gave the UFC an early push by allowing fights at the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City when other venues shut out the sport, which at the time was called 'human cockfighting' by Senator John McCain. These days, the President is regularly seen cageside, often next to UFC CEO Dana White, and treated as a prized fighter by the crowd.
Mr. White, in turn, has publicly endorsed Mr. Trump, and spoken at the 2016, 2020 and 2024 National Republican Conventions. Similarly, podcaster Joe Rogan, a regular UFC Fight Night broadcaster, endorsed Mr. Trump just one day before the 2024 U.S. election.
While Mr. Rogan didn't turn up in Montreal Saturday night – saying on his podcast that he'd 'rather go to Russia' than come to Canada – thousands of Canadian fans were there to celebrate the UFC's first return to the city in a decade. And with six Canadian fighters on a 12-fight card, there was an abundance of patriotic energy to go around.
Not all attendees are bothered by Mr. Trump's close ties with the UFC, even if they were here to see the Canadian fighters dominate the night. For these die-hard MMA fans, the love of the fight transcends politics.
'It sucks that it's getting more political,' said Emille Cooren, who wore a Canadian flag as a cape as he headed towards the arena. But for him and friends Felix Burt and Henry Large, the fighting is just too good to let politics get in the way.
'Look at the NHL, they have Trump supporters there too,' said Mr. Burt, adding that the UFC gets disproportionate scrutiny.
Do he and his friends take the idea of the 51st state seriously? Not at all. To them, it's no different than the trash talk between fighters. 'It's just characters,' said Mr. Burt, comparing politicians and UFC fighters.
Trash talk is a tenet of fighting sports in general, and the UFC is home to some huge characters. Irish fighter turned political candidate Conor McGregor – who in 2024 was found liable for sexual assault and this year was accused of sexual battery – catapulted the organization into the mainstream with his brazen aggression.
Other fighters have found cheekier ways to make a name for themselves. In March, Brazilian fighter Jean Silva brought out a globe at a news conference ahead of his fight against American opponent Bryce Mitchell, a known flat-earther.
In the stands at Bell Centre, loud, bold personalities loomed large: Guttural screams, men flexing their biceps for selfies, and both men and women wolf-whistling the Octagon Girls who signalled the start of each round. When a fight lulled, calls for more brutality echoed across the arena. UFC pay-per-view events, which typically occur monthly with a championship belt on the line, can last eight hours as the Octagon canvas get bloodier with each round.
The main fight of the night saw Palestinian Belal Muhammad lose his welterweight belt to Australian Jack Della Maddalena, but it was arguably the Canadian fighters who stole the show.
Quebec's Georges St-Pierre, considered one of the best UFC fighters in history and now retired, helped coach Montreal's Aiemann Zahabi to victory. Flyweight Jasmine Jasudavicius won by submitting Brazilian fighter Jéssica Andrade in the first round. And Mr. Malott's win sent the crowd into a frenzy that spilled out onto the streets after the fight.
Elsewhere in the arena, Gail Bouchard drew stares wherever he walked: His entire upper body was chalked in the Quebec Fleurdelisé flag. To him, the night was a historic moment for Quebec – a chance for the province to show its fighting potential. Still, the political leanings of the UFC bothered Mr. Bouchard a bit, particularly since it took away from the beauty of the sport.
'I'm a simple guy,' he said. 'I love MMA, I love my country.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
Town of Essex invites residents to help shape 2026 budget at fall engagement sessions
Essex town hall can be seen in this undated photo. (Town of Essex) The Town of Essex is gearing up to host two budget engagement events this fall to gather feedback on the upcoming 2026 budget. The first session will be held Tuesday Sept. 23, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the Essex Arena in the Shaheen Room. ADVERTISEMENT The second session will be held Thursday Oct. 2, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the community room at the Harrow Arena. 'We want residents to come out in person and really see how the municipal budget works, and to take time providing their feedback,' Bondy said. 'There are so many competing priorities in the municipality, so having public engagement is key to getting residents to supporting the budget process.' According to Bondy, the municipality has a lot of challenges because of how big and spread out it is. 'We have the four wards that all have competing priorities, so do residents want to see more roads done? We've done a great job at doing roads. Maybe now they want to see more development in our parks and recreation,' she said. Bondy added, it's important that the municipality listens to residents and that they get what they want out of their tax dollars. 'Tax dollars can only go so far, and it's really good to have residents understand the process, see what we're dealing with. Many residents think municipalities have a lot of money. We don't have a lot of money, so we really need to use it wisely.' The online interactive budget tool allows residents and business owners to create their own draft budget by allocating funds to capital initiatives they believe are important to the community's growth and prosperity. Participants can prioritize key spending areas and submit feedback that will help guide council and administration in making informed decisions for the upcoming budget. Bondy said the 2026 draft budget was expected to tabled late fall. The upcoming meetings are being held in addition to gathering feedback online through Friday Oct. 10. — Dustin Coffman/AM800 News
CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
Federal government taps Cohere to work on use of AI in public service
The federal government has signed an agreement with a Canadian artificial intelligence company to identify areas where AI can enhance public service operations. Cohere will look at how its products can improve federal public services, said Sofia Ouslis, a spokesperson for Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon. The agreement sets up "early-stage collaboration" between the federal government and the Toronto-based tech company, she said. Cohere develops large language models, a type of generative AI focused on language, and the company specializes in AI services for businesses. "The focus is on identifying where Cohere's Canadian-built AI tools can improve public services, making them faster, smarter and more secure. While there are no formal deadlines attached, the government sees this as a priority and is moving quickly to explore real-world applications," Ouslis said. Ouslis said the agreement does not include a "financial component." Cohere said in a blog post Tuesday it signed the agreement "to transform the public sector with our secure, sovereign AI technology." "Accelerating AI adoption will deliver massive productivity and efficiency gains to enhance public services and modernize operations," it said. A government news release also said the agreement with Cohere involves looking at building Canada's commercial capabilities to use and export AI, but did not provide details about what that effort will involve. Using artificial intelligence to increase efficiency in the public service was one of Prime Minister Mark Carney's election promises. Carney also promised to cap the size of the public service, and most departments and agencies have since been asked to find program spending cuts of up to 15 per cent. The government news release said AI "has the potential to significantly improve government operations and services for Canadians," and that Ottawa is "seeking to harness the power of this transformative technology while building a vibrant made-in-Canada technology sector."
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. What's happening? The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. Why would Trump do this? In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit? That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' Why would Intel do a deal? The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Would this deal be unusual? Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. Would the government run Intel? U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. What government grants does Intel receive? Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
