logo
Trump administration violated ‘impoundment' law by freezing electric vehicle funding, GAO finds

Trump administration violated ‘impoundment' law by freezing electric vehicle funding, GAO finds

Politico22-05-2025

The Government Accountability Office ruled Thursday that the Department of Transportation violated the 51-year-old law blocking presidents from withholding funding Congress has approved.
The congressional watchdog ruled the Trump administration illegally withheld funds by suspending new obligations under the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program, the $5 billion initiative from the bipartisan infrastructure law to build charging stations across the country.
The GAO could issue similar rulings in the coming months, as the independent, nonpartisan watchdog agency works through at least 39 investigations into whether the Trump administration violated the Impoundment Control Act. GAO rulings are nonbinding but could influence Congress' response to President Donald Trump's freezing of billions of dollars lawmakers intended to flow to specific programs and projects, as well as the many ongoing lawsuits challenging the president's tactics.
As Trump and his top advisers argue that the decades-old law is unconstitutional, GAO notes the Constitution 'specifically vests Congress with the power of the purse.'
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said in a statement the GAO decision 'affirms what we've long known: the President is breaking the law to block funding Congress passed on a bipartisan basis and that is owed to the American people — simply because he disagrees with it.'
The department has said that pausing the charger program was necessary as it rewrites rules for using the grant money, but the federal watchdog dismissed that argument.
If the Trump administration 'wishes to make changes' to funding under the program, GAO wrote, the president needs to send Congress a so-called rescissions request or propose new legislation to make changes to funding mandates already signed into law.
GAO also ruled the Transportation Department erred in its interpretation of when funds were 'obligated' under the program — a key factor because DOT allowed states to keep spending money that was already obligated when it ordered the pause in February.
Under the Trump administration's interpretation — which it said matched the way it operated other highway aid programs — the funding for electric vehicle infrastructure was considered obligated when states signed project agreements with the Federal Highway Administration to build a charging station. That meant $526 million was obligated when it suspended the program, according to DOT.
But GAO said that under its interpretation of the infrastructure law, NEVI funds are considered obligated when they become available to states under the statute each fiscal year — meaning more than $3.2 billion should be considered obligated.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget called GAO's opinion 'wrong' and said the Transportation Department is 'appropriately using the authority granted to it by statute to review state plans.'
A DOT spokesperson could not be immediately reached for comment.
The Trump administration is also facing a lawsuit from 17 states over the frozen EV charger funding.
The GAO ruling came the same morning Senate Republicans voted to overturn a California emission standards waiver issued by the Biden administration, despite the GAO and Senate parliamentarian ruling the waiver did not qualify for reversal using the Congressional Review Act process.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was…
Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was…

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was…

The UK and US stock markets are once again approaching all-time highs. Markets have truly rebounded since Trump shocked the world with his trade policy. However, this rebound concerns me. These stock markets are trading near all-time highs despite a huge increase in the average effective US tariff, despite worsening geopolitical tensions, and despite sovereign debt concerns. Personally, I'm not sure investors have truly factored in the full impact of recent tariff increases on corporate earnings. Over the past year, average effective tariff rates have risen significantly, reaching levels not seen since the late 1930s. Under the Biden Administration, the average effective tariff rate was around 2.5%-2.7%. In May, that figure had risen to almost 20%. These tariffs have introduced new costs for businesses that rely on international supply chains. However, I just don't believe we've really seen the impact of them yet. After all, 'Liberation Day' took place at the beginning of Q2, and we're still in Q2. The full earnings impact of these tariffs is expected to become more visible in the second half of 2025, as companies report on their financial results and adjust to the new cost structures. Michael Burry, best known for predicting and profiting from the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis — a story retold in The Big Short — sold nearly all positions at Scion Asset Management in the quarter ending 31 March 2025. This move, alongside concentrated bearish bets through put options — bets that a stock will go down — on major tech and Chinese stocks, seemingly reflected his conviction that the market was sinking. Burry's only notable long was Estée Lauder, suggesting a defensive stance. However, 13F filings only show holdings as of 31 March, so his actions after that date remain unknown. As we know, the market slumped in early April but has since recovered. Within this context, I'm increasing looking at defensive options. I could look at farming stocks like Pilgrim's Pride, for example, which could outperform in a downturn. However, one option closer to home is the National Grid (LSE:NG.). The company recently reported strong financial results for the fiscal year 2025, with statutory and underlying pre-tax profit up 20%. The company is also investing heavily in its infrastructure, with a capital expenditure plan of £10bn aimed at modernising the energy grid and supporting the transition to renewable energy sources. This investment is part of a broader strategy to expand its regulated asset base, which is expected to grow by around 10% annually over the next few years. It does, however, introduce additional execution risk. Net debt is already £47.5bn — very sizeable. It's also not particularly cheap on face value. The stock trades at 14 times forward earnings, which may be a little demanding when we consider debt is on par with market capitalisation. Nonetheless, the forward dividend looks strong at 4.6%. The National Grid is not a stock I'd normally watch, but given my concerns about the potential overheating of the market, it's something I'm adding to my watchlist. It may be worth considering. The post Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended National Grid Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Stay strong, Harvard
Stay strong, Harvard

Boston Globe

time28 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Stay strong, Harvard

Peabody Sadly, it is not surprising that the Trump White House is crying antisemitism at Harvard while simultaneously trying to oust Harvard's two most prominent (and Jewish) leaders. I fervently hope that Harvard, Garber, and Pritzker continue to stand strong. Dana Holmberg Middleborough The Trump administration has anonymously stated that 'no deal' can be made with Harvard as long as Alan Garber and Penny Pritzker remain in their positions. Both Garber and Pritzker are Jewish. To the best of my knowledge, no other university in the country is facing the same levels of harassment from the federal government as Harvard. It is time stop hiding behind the masquerade the government is using: claiming it is protecting Jewish students. This has been a lie from the first day the government took aim at Harvard. Advertisement Ed Mann Framingham

Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud
Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud

Ben Crump's picked his side in the Elon Musk and Donald Trump beef ... but, he's not backing a personality, he says he's backing the better idea -- and, he doesn't want the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to pass through the Senate. We caught up with the civil rights activist and attorney and asked him about the fight between POTUS and his former advisor ... and, he doesn't directly say he's on Elon's side -- but, he does think this spending bill is terrible. Crump rips the bill for making cuts to Medicaid -- the medical assistance program for people with lower incomes. BC says the world needs more humanity for all people ... instead of making the life of individuals struggling financially more difficult. As you know ... Elon lost his cool about this spending bill earlier this week -- firing off shots at the president and claiming Trump only won reelection because of his efforts. President Trump called BS on that idea ... but, Elon pushed on and claimed the real reason the administration hasn't released the so-called Epstein files is because the president's name is all over them. He's since deleted the post where he wrote that ... but, today Trump warned of serious consequences if Elon decides to support Dems who are running against Republicans who vote for the bill. BTW ... we also asked Crump about Trump potentially pardoning Diddy -- and, it sounds like Crump's staying out of that one, too. Bottom line ... back the idea, not the man -- that's the Ben Crump way!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store