Can't give nod ‘every now and then': Court rejects Navlakha's plea to travel to Delhi
In his plea, Navlakha sought permission to stay in Delhi from July 15 to August 30, citing that he had been similarly permitted in November 2024 and had abided with all conditions.
Rejecting the plea, the court stated that being allowed to travel and stay once in Delhi, does not mean that 'every now and then', he will be granted permission.
Navlakha, a Delhi resident, was granted bail by the Bombay High Court in December 2023, with one of the conditions being that he cannot leave the jurisdiction of the trial court in Mumbai without its permission.
In April this year, the 72-year-old Navlakha cited living expenses and increasing finances in Mumbai to seek permission to shift to Delhi, pending trial, which the special court had rejected, stating that the high court set conditions did not permit it.
The trial in the case is yet to begin, seven years after the first arrests in 2018.
In the latest plea, he submitted that he wants to travel as his sister cannot come to Mumbai due to her health condition.
He also submitted that he wants to meet his partner's children and grandchildren who are visiting in August, whom he has not met since his arrest in 2020. He also submitted that he wants to visit his doctor and take care of domestic affairs.
Special judge C S Baviskar said that the High Court had in its 'magnanimous humanity', granted permission to Navlakha to travel but with the permission of the trial court.
'While imposing such conditions, the Hon'ble High Court axiomatically expected the accused not to go beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, save for exceptional and extraordinary circumstance and that too, only after prior permission of the trial court ie. this court,' the court said, in its order on July 30, made available this week.
The special court said that Navlakha in moving a plea previously rejected, to shift to Delhi had shown 'utter disregard towards intention and objective of the Hon'ble High Court' and called his plea to seek permission now to stay in Delhi for 45 days, a 'trick'.
'Now, perhaps to give go by to the intention and directions of the Hon'ble High Court as above, the applicant/accused ingeniously has found out the trick of moving such application after application with the same prayer on the same grounds to facilitate him to reside at Delhi. It is not at all expected,' the court said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Why BJP is scrambling to contain fallout as Mumbai's Jains take to streets, 2nd time this yr
On Wednesday, Jains turned up in large numbers outside the Dadar 'kabutarkhana', which stands alongside a Jain temple, and attempted to dismantle the tarpaulin cover put up by the BMC over the 'kabutarkhana'. The protest caused massive chaos and traffic disruption in the already congested site. This time, the protests are against a decision of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to shut down all 'kabutarkhanas' (pigeon-feeding spots) in the city and penalise those feeding pigeons, owing to concerns over health and hygiene. The BMC decision followed a Bombay High Court directive, arising out of health concerns over the uncontrolled feeding of pigeons across the city. Mumbai: For the second time this year, there has been a wave of protests by members of the Jain community on the streets of Mumbai against the city's civic body, which is now under the control of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Mahayuti government in Maharashtra. On Tuesday, following sporadic protests by the Jain community in various parts of Mumbai, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis intervened in the matter, emphasising respect for public sentiments. He proposed regulated feeding and mechanised cleaning of the pigeon droppings and directed the BMC to ensure the same, as well as inform the Bombay High Court of the state government's stance Thursday. 'Whatever happened (Wednesday) was wrong. CM Fadnavis ji had heard everyone and given appropriate directions … I would like to request everyone to maintain peace and not take law into their hands,' BJP leader Mangal Prabhat Lodha, a minister in the Maharashtra government and guardian minister of the Mumbai suburbs, told reporters at the Dadar 'kabutarkhana'. The Jain community has also been participating in protests against the relocation of a 36-year-old elephant, Mahadevi, earlier housed at the Jain Math in Nandini village, Kolhapur, to the Vantara elephant sanctuary in Gujarat, as directed by the court. On Wednesday, CM Fadnavis held talks with Vantara officials, who offered to build a dedicated elephant rehabilitation facility in Kolhapur. The protests have had the BJP scrambling to placate the community, considering it has been a loyal vote bank of the BJP and is a prosperous, dominant business community in Mumbai. Local polls, including the BMC elections, are scheduled to be held over the next few months, and no doubt that the BJP would like to keep its support base happy. However, party leaders say, the protests will not impact the support for the party within the Jain community. A senior BJP leader who did not wish to be named told ThePrint, 'The Jain community is aware of its influence and monetary power. They know that the BJP needs the community to be on its side. Incidents like these—where they have to come out to protests—will not make the community anti-BJP. The community is just trying to assert its position.' She added that politically, the BJP now also has an opportunity to reiterate its commitment to the Jain community by finding a solution to a problem caused by a court-mandated decision. In April this year, the Jain community similarly took to the streets to protest against the BMC for demolishing a Jain temple in Vile Parle, Mumbai. The temple was allegedly built illegally inside a housing society. However, back then too, following the backlash, the Devendra Fadnavis-led government scrambled to take charge of the narrative and shunted out the civic officer in charge of the demolition exercise. BJP leaders, such as Lodha, MLA Parag Alavani, and former corporator Moorji Patel, even attended the protests at the time. Jayant Jobalia of the Borivali-based Shree Vardhaman Sthanakvasi Jain Sangh told ThePrint that the current protests are being given a political colour but have nothing to do with politics. 'We are all non-violent people. We follow the tenet of 'live and let live'. These protests are in the pursuit of the same tenet. It is not political,' Jobalia said. 'We have good relations with political leaders from the ruling party.' The 'influential' Jain community of Mumbai The Jain community, awarded minority status in the country in January 2014, is not numerically strong in the state. At 1.24%, the Jain population in Maharashtra is only 14 lakh. Maharashtra Jains, however, account for nearly a third of the total population of Indian Jains. BJP leaders say Jains account for 30-40 percent of the Mumbai-based Gujarati voters, known for championing their party. No official statistics exist, but the Gujarati voter base is estimated at 28-30 percent—close to the Marathi population. A Mumbai-based BJP leader often cites an example that shows the strength and purchasing power of the Jain community in the city. At least three popular restaurants—Status, Cream Centre and Swati Snacks—run empty during the Jain 'Paryushan', a nine-day fast observed within the community. Another example of their influence is how several major developers across the city plan residential projects prominently advertising a Jain temple on the premises. The strength and influence of Jains in Mumbai have also prompted the Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray-led Shiv Sena to build bridges with the community by meeting Jain monks over the years. The undivided Shiv Sena built its politics on the agenda of the Marathi population in Mumbai. The protests against the 'kabutarkhana' closures stem from the Jain principle of 'Jeev Daya'—showing compassion and kindness towards all living beings—with pigeon-feeding spots often located close to Jain temples. 'There have been issues where the Jain community has come and asserted their stand, but that does not mean they will not remain with the BJP. Jains are prosperous, knowledgeable and understand what is happening around them. The party has also always made efforts to maintain its relations with the Jain community,' the Mumbai-based BJP leader quoted before in this section said. It is also a primary reason for the growth of Lodha's political career. 'He is an influential, prosperous Jain with deep networks within the community,' he added. Lodha, one of the wealthiest politicians in the BJP, owns assets worth Rs 141 crore. From just an MLA, he became a former Mumbai BJP president, then a state cabinet minister, and now a guardian minister for Mumbai's suburbs. Political commentator Abhay Deshpande said, 'The entire community is united in its support of the BJP. They will not distance themselves from the party just over one or two issues. But this kind of aggression of the community on the streets of Mumbai might be an opportunity for Opposition parties to consolidate the Marathi voter base.' 'BJP playing with emotions of Jains' During this episode of the BMC's attempts to close 'kabutarkhanas' and Jains hitting the streets to protest the action, the Opposition has been pointing to how the action, though court-mandated, was mainly at the behest of the leaders of the ruling parties. It was MLC Manisha Kayande from the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena who raised the issue of health hazards associated with 'kabutarkhanas' in the state legislative council during the monsoon session last month. BJP MLC Chitra Wagh backed her demand. In response, Uday Samant, state industries minister and a senior leader from the Shinde-led Shiv Sena, informed the public that Mumbai has 51 'kabutarkhanas' and that the state government will direct the BMC to shut them down. Animal rights activists Pallavi Patil and Sneha Visaria filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against the government directives last month. The court, however, refused to grant interim relief. The court, however, directed that no heritage 'kabutarkhanas' should be demolished until further orders. On Wednesday, after the ruckus at the Dadar 'kabutarkhana', MLA Rohit Pawar from the Sharad Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party visited the spot. The state government decided what to do in haste, he said. 'Uday Samant should have thought a little about it, saying we will close 'kabutarkhanas', but any sudden action will harm the birds. The state government should have looked at closing 'kabutarkhanas' phase-wise and rehabilitating the affected birds,' Pawar said. 'If any decision of the BJP backfires, they resort to double standards,' he added. Similarly, MLA Aaditya Thackeray from the Shiv Sena (UBT) Tuesday questioned if the BJP was 'playing around with the emotions of the Jains only for their political benefit'. 'The truth is the Jain community is seen as a guaranteed vote bank by the BJP—that can be swayed during elections, despite such games by the BJP,' he said. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also read: On mission to shut Mumbai's iconic kabutarkhanas, BMC faces the quiet defiance of city's bird lovers
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Man arrested for alleged attempt to extort and defame actor-director Balachandra Menon
The Kochi City Cyber Crime police have arrested a man accused in the case registered in connection with an alleged attempt to extort actor-director Balachandra Menon and tarnish him over social media. The arrested was identified as Sangeeth Luis, 46, a native of Kundara in Kollam and now residing at Ayyanthole in Thrissur. The police said he was an accused in several cases. He was under the surveillance of the police for a while and was arrested in the early-morning hours of Thursday (August 7, 2025). The incident pertaining to the case took place last September. He was declared an offender under the Kerala Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act and arrested on preventive grounds by the Kundara police in 2023, the police said. The police had arrested the other accused in the case, actor Minnu Muneer, 45, after she surrendered at the station on June 30, 2025. She surrendered at the Cyber Crime police station after the Kerala High Court dismissed her anticipatory bail plea and directed her to appear before the police. Later, she was released on bail as per the direction of the High Court. The case was registered on October 2, 2024. The accused were booked under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 351(2) (criminal intimidation), the IT Act Sections 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form), and the Kerala Police Act 120 (o) (causing, through any means of communication, a nuisance of himself to any person by repeated or undesirable or anonymous call, letter, writing, message, e-mail or through a messenger). According to the FIR, Ms. Muneer consistently made derogatory posts against the petitioner, posted the photo of the petitioner and instigated vulgar comments. The second accused allegedly made threatening calls to the petitioner on September 13 and 14, 2024. The alleged posts came shortly after the release of the Hema Committee report on the alleged atrocities against woman in the film industry.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Mumbai court denies Elgar Parishad case accused's plea to visit Delhi
A Special NIA Court in Mumbai has dismissed activist Gautam Navlakha's application seeking permission to travel to Delhi for 45 days, sharply criticising the repeated nature of such requests and calling it a "deliberate attempt to circumvent judicial restrictions".Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad case, had sought leave to visit Delhi between July 15 and August 30, citing multiple personal grounds. These included the deteriorating health of his 86-year-old sister, a reunion with his partner's family after five years, personal domestic matters, and medical for Navlakha, Advocate Wahab Khan argued that his client had previously complied with all conditions imposed by the court when allowed to travel and that the present request was genuine and limited in duration. However, the plea was opposed by Special Public Prosecutor Prakash Shetty, who contended that the gravity of the charges against Navlakha warranted a stricter Judge Chakor S Baviskar, while rejecting the application, noted that a similar request had been granted in November 2024 due to serious grounds. However, Navlakha's subsequent plea to permanently relocate to Delhi had already been denied by the court on June 19 this year."Only because that application [in 2024] was allowed, it does not automatically give license to Navlakha to claim the same liberty each and every time. It does not mean that, every now and then, Navlakha on the same grounds, for the same reason, should be granted permission," Justice Baviskar the court held that Navlakha's repeated applications on the same grounds appeared to be a calculated effort to achieve indirectly what had been denied directly. "Now, perhaps to give go-by to the intention and directions of the High Court... Navlakha ingeniously has found out the trick of moving such application after application with the same prayer on the same grounds to facilitate him to reside at Delhi. It is not at all expected," the order the court refrained from imposing costs on Navlakha, the judge made it clear that such tactics were unacceptable. "There is legal trite that, the thing which you cannot do directly, cannot do indirectly as well," he Elgar Parishad case, in which Navlakha is a key accused, pertains to alleged inflammatory speeches at a conclave held in Pune in 2017, which authorities claim triggered violence at the Bhima Koregaon war memorial the next day.- Ends
