What happens when Joburg Water cuts your fibre connection in half?
A recent Johannesburg High Court ruling clarifies the legal responsibilities of telecoms companies when their fibre connections are damaged by municipal actions, highlighting crucial steps for affected parties
Image: Ron/Ai
A recent court case in the Johannesburg High Court has shed light on what happens when a fibre connection is destroyed through Johannesburg Water's actions, or that of one of its contractors.
Burst water pipes that then require streets digging up to repair them are a known occurrence in the area, with the City conceding in the 2018/19 financial year that 42 977 pipe bursts occurred. These are the latest figures IOL could locate.
A decision, handed down on Wednesday, explained that telecoms companies need to sue under one law, the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, and not any other.
Dark Fibre Africa (DFA), which owns and controls a network of underground fibreoptic cables that it rents to other companies, alleges that Johannesburg Water, or its contractors, negligently damaged one of Dark Fibre's cables while performing work on an underground water pipe in Greenside, Johannesburg.
The fibre company, which is owned by Maziv, instituted proceedings in the Johannesburg Regional Court claiming just over R320 000 for what it said was the reasonable cost of repairing the damage caused.
Where DFA went wrong, the judgement said, is that it didn't, within six months of the debt occurring, deliver a 'notice setting out the facts giving rise to the debt and the particulars of the debt insofar as these are known to the claimant' to Johannesburg Water under the Legal Proceedings Act.
DFA had initially argued that, because Johannesburg Water was not an organ of state, it didn't need to provide the utility with the specific notice in terms of the Legal Proceedings Act.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The Johannesburg High Court disagreed, stating that Johannesburg Water falls within the definition of 'organ of state' because it carries out its duties on behalf of the municipality. In addition, because its assets and liabilities are the City's assets and liabilities.
'For that reason, Johannesburg Water's liabilities are ultimately underwritten by the state itself,' said the judge. As a result, the state would need to sort out the claimed debt and, because of this, requires the notice of debt be filed within six months, the judgement noted.
However, DFA was not completely sent packing.
DFA did have to pay Johannesburg Water's costs because the utility had appealed a magistrate's decision that it was not an 'organ of state'. However, it can now return to the lower court and start proceedings over after first asking that court to condone the fact that it did not first provide the required notice.
'Dark Fibre must now ask the court below to condone its failure to give the notice section 3 of the Legal Proceedings Act requires. The court below will grant that application if good cause has been shown, if Dark Fibre's claim has not prescribed, and if Johannesburg Water was not prejudiced by the failure to give notice. On the facts of this case, these seem to me to be slight hurdles indeed,' the judgement read.
Yet: 'Dark Fibre's action should be stayed until the court has had an opportunity to answer it,' said the judge.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
05-06-2025
- IOL News
Zandile Gumede trial: Former eThekwini officials unaware of tender protocol violations
Former mayor of eThekwini, Zandile Gumede. Image: Nomonde Zondi The Durban High Court, hearing the R320 million Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender corruption trial this week learned that the former City manager of eThekwini Sipho Nzuza and the ex-deputy head of Supply Chain Management (SCM) Sandile Ngcobo were not aware that certain protocols were not undertaken before the awarding of the tender in 2018. The former eThekwini bosses are accused, along with the former mayor of the city, Zandile Gumede, and 19 others, of numerous charges, including money laundering, racketeering, fraud, corruption, and contravention of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act, relating to the tender. The court has learned that since the contracts were set to expire on December 31, 2017, the Solid Waste Unit stated that it was imperative to hire experienced service providers to collect waste in 2018. During cross-examination by defence counsel Advocate Jimmy Howse SC, he questioned a State witness who was part of the Executive Acquisitions Committee (EAC), established by Nzuza to advise him on recommendations made by the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC). Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Former eThekwini city manager Sipho Nzuza. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers Howse asked the witness why, in her capacity as an EAC member, she did not alert Nzuza that compliance checks had not been completed. He also asked her why she did not tell Nzuza that the BAC had approved the quotations of contractors to collect waste and that this had to be reviewed by the EAC. The witness, who cannot be named, said Ngcobo had told her that EAC was not a statutory committee. She said when Ngcobo came to her office on December 28, 2017, to request her to prepare letters of award as per Nzuza's instruction, she raised this with Ngcobo, who told her that Nzuza had the final say. 'How could I have advised him(Nzuza) when I was told that EAC is not a statutory committee. I was not sitting on EAC at that time because I was on tenders and contracts,' the witness said. She also said that she told Ngcobo that compliance checks were not done. Howse asked her why she did not mention this when she was writing her affidavit. He said she did write that compliance checks were not completed but she did not state that she alerted Ngcobo about this on December 28. 'Because what Ngcobo and I mostly disagreed on was that the report (the BAC decision) had to go to the EAC,' she replied. The witness added that one of her concerns was that she did not have staff to draft the letters of award. When it was put to the witness that she was duty bound to tell Nzuzo about any concerns she tresponded that she had raised her concerns with Ngcobo and it was his responsibility to inform Nzuza. When Howse put it to the witness that she failed to do her job, the witness disagreed with him and said she did her job to the best of her abilities. A new witness is expected to start her testimony on Friday.
IOL News
03-06-2025
- IOL News
Witness in Zandile Gumede trial prefers waste pile over irregular expenditure
Former mayor of eThekwini, Zandile Gumede, with her supporters outside the Durban High Court. Image: Nomonde Zondi In the R320 million Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender fraud case involving former eThekwini municipality mayor Zandile Gumede, a State witness has told the Durban High Court that she would prefer not to have a pile of rubbish picked up than to deal with irregular expenses for not following due process. The witness, who cannot be named as per court order, is currently being cross-examined by advocate Jimmy Howse SC, who is counsel for Sandile Ngcobo, a fifth accused who was a deputy head of supply chain management (SCM) in eThekwini. Gumede, Ngcobo, and 20 others are facing numerous charges, including money laundering, racketeering, fraud, corruption, and contravention of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act relating to the tender. The witness told the court that waste collection is not an emergency, but a critical service. The court has heard that the Durban Solid Waste Unit had sought authority in December 2017 to get experienced service providers to collect waste from January 2018. This is because the contract of service providers was going to expire on December 31, 2017. In November 2017, the unit advertised a tender for waste collection, but they claimed that they received a lot of submissions and needed extra time to go through all of the proposals.. The witness during this time worked at the tenders and contracts unit. Part of her job included issuing letters of award to those who had won tenders. She said that after the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC) gave the DSW the go-ahead to get service providers and approved the quotations, that decision needed to be reviewed by the Executive Acquisitions Committee (EAC), which was established by former city manager Sipho Nzuza to advice him. The BAC-approved quotations are subject to compliance checks, and then letters of appointment will be issued to the service providers. Howse asked her if it made sense that the EAC had to consider this on January 29, 2018, when the service providers should start collecting waste on January 1, 2018. The witness said that had she been instructed to do otherwise, she would have. "I was following due processes," she said. Howse asked her if she had approached any of her supervisors to tell them that there were not going to be waste management services in January, considering the email that was sent by a DSW contract administrator stating that this was an emergency. She said no and added that this was not the only contract she was dealing with. Additionally, Howse asked her if the SCM policy had any distinction between critical and emergency. She said it was her view that this was not an emergency and she continued to refer to SCM policies. She said the DSW Unit had a sole mandate to ensure contracts for waste management and illegal dumping. 'Failure to have those contracts does not result in an emergency. That is a failure to properly plan. In my view, Mr Howse, this was not an emergency,' she said. On December 28, 2018, the witness said Ngcobo had asked her to prepare the letters of award for the contractors, who were going to collect waste in January 2018. Howse said this was after his client received a call from the city manager enquiring about the letters of award.
The Citizen
02-06-2025
- The Citizen
Big update on Rand water maintenance outages
Demand management will play a crucial role in the recovery process, according to Rand Water officials. Rand Water has successfully completed its critical B16 maintenance project and resumed pumping operations at Mapleton, marking a milestone in the utility's major infrastructure programme that has affected water supply across Gauteng since late May. The water utility announced the completion of the B16 project on Monday morning, bringing relief to thousands of residents who have endured water shortages for several days. 'We're pleased to share that all work on the B16 project is complete, and pumping at Mapleton has officially started!' Rand Water stated on its social media platforms. Rand water maintenance gradual recovery process expected Despite the completion of maintenance work, the restoration of the water supply will not be immediate across all affected areas. Rand Water emphasised that the distribution system requires time to rebuild pressure and capacity before normal supply can resume. The utility explained that recovery patterns will vary significantly based on geographical elevation. It stated that low-lying areas are expected to see water supply return first, while residents in high-lying areas will likely experience longer wait times before their taps flow normally again. Demand management will play a crucial role in the recovery process, according to Rand Water officials. 'Recovery depends on overall demand, so if your supply is back, please use water sparingly to help the system stabilise,' the utility advised residents. ALSO READ: Water outages continue in Gauteng due to maintenance Extended recovery timeline Both Rand Water and Johannesburg Water have prepared residents for a potentially lengthy restoration period. Johannesburg Water previously cautioned that the recovery process would extend well beyond the completion of maintenance activities. 'After each maintenance has been completed, it will take a maximum of 14 days for the system to fully recover, and for normal water supply to return,' Johannesburg Water stated in earlier communications with residents. ALSO READ: Gauteng water outage: Here's how long it could take water to be restored after maintenance Ongoing maintenance programme The B16 project forms part of Rand Water's broader maintenance programme that commenced on Thursday, 29 May. The utility has been running multiple maintenance operations concurrently to address critical infrastructure needs across the water supply network. Rand Water has not yet provided specific timelines for when different areas can expect full water supply restoration following the completion of the B16 project. The utility continues to monitor system performance as pressure builds throughout the distribution network. The water supplier concluded its latest update with appreciation for public cooperation during the challenging period. NOW READ: Tshwane's water warning to residents
