
‘Without your mum, something is missing': The children left behind by migrant parents
In the village of Salchia, in southern Moldova, 14-year-old Mihail misses his mother. At lunchtime and in the evenings, he calls her on Viber or WhatsApp. But it's not the same as having her at home.
'Without your mum, something is missing, right?' he says.
When Mihail was just a baby, both of his parents left the country to find work – a necessity in a poor rural region where opportunities are scarce. He was raised by his grandparents and aunts. Now that he's older, his parents take turns staying with him while the other works abroad. At present, his mother is employed on a farm in Italy.
'He's at a sensitive age now, so one of us is always at home with him. But if neither of us went abroad, it would be hard for us to make ends meet,' says Mihail's father, Leonid.
There are millions of children like Mihail around the world, kids whose parents leave their impoverished home regions in Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, China or South America in search of work, higher wages and better prospects. Academics refer to them as 'children left behind'.
In Moldova, more than 20 per cent of all children are estimated to have at least one parent working abroad. In China, tens of millions of children are believed to have been left in the care of relatives in rural areas while their parents migrate to cities in search of jobs.
In the Philippines, one of the world's leading labour-exporting countries, nearly a quarter of children are growing up without one or both parents at home. In Indonesia, over 11 million of the country's 84 million children are thought to live in similar circumstances, while in Venezuela the figure stands at 800,000 out of a total child population of nine million.
It's a situation that was once common in Western Europe, particularly during the industrial revolution, when the migration of adults from rural areas to towns and cities – a pattern of development – took off.
Weighing up the pros and cons of parental labour migration for the children left behind is no simple task. In many cases, children in these families enjoy better material conditions than their peers. But a large body of research – much of it conducted in China – shows that they also seem to face significantly higher risks of anxiety, depression, and antisocial behaviour.
When 29-year-old Moldovan Ecaterina Grati was a child, her father left their home country to work abroad. By the time she was eight and her brother three, their mother had also gone, to Russia. The two siblings were left in the care of their grandmother.
'It was scary, being without both mum and dad,' she recalls. 'I felt very sorry for my little brother. He cried a lot when mum left. We tried to distract him, saying she'd be back soon, and so on. But overall, we both probably felt fear.'
Her childhood was tough. At the time, she couldn't understand why her parents had gone, but she now recognises they had no real choice. There were simply no other means of making a living and giving their children a decent life. 'For my parents, it's still a painful subject,' she says. 'Mum always cries when we talk about that time.'
Growing up, she more or less raised herself and took on a big share of responsibility for her little brother. But the hardship also brought strength. She developed a strong sense of initiative and independence, traits that have served her well in adult life. Today, at 29, she runs her own cleaning business. 'My childhood taught me that you have to rely on yourself,' she says.
The ability to take responsibility and act independently is a trait that sociologist Viorela Ducu Telegdi-Csetri and her husband and colleague, social scientist Áron Telegdi-Csetri, have also observed in children left behind by migrating parents. The couple, based at the CASTLE Centre for the Study of Transnational Families at Romania's Babeș-Bolyai University, have studied children in Romania, Ukraine and Moldova.
'Many of them even tend to view children whose parents stay with them as spoiled,' says Viorela Ducu Telegdi-Csetri. The children were often also understanding of why their parents had left. Áron Telegdi-Csetri recalls interviewing a Ukrainian teenager who was asked whether his parents had involved him in the decision to work abroad. 'There was nothing to discuss, not even for our parents. They had no choice,' he replied.
Because the phenomenon still carries a degree of structural stigma in parts of Eastern Europe, the researchers sometimes encountered what Áron describes as 'a peculiar reflex' among the children. 'I've noticed that they'll say other parents might have abandoned their children – but 'my parents didn't abandon me.' There's a strong impulse to defend them,' he says.
In the early years after her parents left, Ecaterina Grati could barely speak to them at all, a silence that only deepened her sense of abandonment. 'Phone calls to Russia were expensive, and this was before video calls became common,' she says.
Later, as communication technology improved, keeping in touch became easier. But even today, many parents can't afford mobile data for video calls in the first months after migrating, says Viorela Ducu Telegdi-Csetri. Until they've earned their first pay cheques, contact with children back home can be sporadic at best. That's why the CASTLE project has proposed that local authorities provide emergency communication kits to transnational families. 'Because the first months of migration are the hardest,' says Viorela Ducu Telegdi-Csetri.
China is believed to have the world's largest population of left-behind children – a result, in large part, of the hukou system, a household registration policy that restricts access to public services for rural migrants working in cities. As a consequence, many parents are forced to leave their children behind in home villages while they seek employment in urban areas.
Xiaojin Chen, a sociologist at Tulane University in the United States, has spent several years studying China's left-behind children. Unlike the Romanian researchers, he hasn't observed a trend toward greater independence and sense of responsibility among these children. Rather the opposite.
'A lot of times, the grandparents become very protective. They know that they have the responsibility to make sure the children are safe,' he says.
Many studies have highlighted negative psychological effects experienced by China's left-behind children, such as depression. But results vary and Xiaojin Chen argues that psychological well-being is difficult to measure. 'On average, compared with children who live with both parents, these children may be a little more isolated, and they're probably not as active as other kids,' he says.
Yet, he often observes that the social bonds with grandparents can, in many cases, almost entirely replace those with the parents, who may only see their children once or twice a year.
'In Western culture, we tend to assume that the emotional bond must come from the nuclear family. But in more traditional rural China, a strong emotional connection with grandparents can be enough. If that bond exists, the child should be fine,' says Xiaojin Chen.
From time to time, moral debates flare up in China, where migrant families are stereotyped as dysfunctional. Parents are cast as neglectful, their left-behind children traumatised and with grandparents ill-equipped to care for them. It became especially clear last spring, after three 13-year-olds in the Hebei Province murdered another 13-year-old whom they had bullied for a long time.
Both the victim and the perpetrators were children of migrant workers and had been left in the care of relatives.
Xiaojin Chen has not found any strong evidence that left-behind children are significantly more prone to criminal behaviour, although some studies suggest otherwise. What he has observed, however, is an increased risk for some of these children to become victims of bullying or sexual abuse, particularly when no strong guardian is present.
Overall, it is children who grow up with both parents absent and only a single grandparent – often elderly and frail – who are most at risk, Chen argues. 'That is a huge risk factor,' he says.
When Xiaojin Chen reflects on the long-term social consequences of millions of Chinese children growing up without their parents, he sees one threat in particular. What will happen to the intergenerational informal contract – the long-standing expectation in rural China that children will care for their parents in old age?
'The emotional connection between parents and the children left behind is very weak. Will they really take care of their migrant parents when they become older? We don't know that yet.'
In Moldova, Ecaterina Grati sees how children who, like her, grew up without their parents often end up following the same path. 'Most children in such families grow up believing that the only way to earn a decent living is by going abroad. They have no role models who've succeeded at home,' she says.
Even though she now understands why her parents made that choice, she could never bring herself to leave her six-year-old daughter behind to work in another country. 'I don't want my child to go through the same thing.'
But 14-year-old Mihail has already made up his mind. He plans to do exactly what his parents did when he's older. 'I will leave,' he says. 'There's nothing here. No jobs, no people. Everybody already left.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE America's favorite snack could put you at risk of colon cancer, terrifying new study reveals
You might want to consider holding the parmesan next time you order pasta. Researchers have found that eating too much cheese can cause changes in the gut linked to colon cancer. Your browser does not support iframes.


The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Can Pope Leo XIV solve the Vatican funding crisis? Here's how the Holy See manages money
Vatican City, the world's smallest country, is facing a significant budget deficit. The city-state primarily relies on donations, ticket sales from the Vatican Museums, investment income, and its real estate holdings to finance the Catholic Church's central government. And unlike other nations, the Vatican does not tax its residents or issue bonds. In 2022, the Holy See published a consolidated budget projecting 770 million euros, with the majority allocated to embassies worldwide and Vatican media operations. However, in recent years, revenue has fallen short of covering expenses. Pope Leo XIV now faces the challenge of securing the necessary funds to steer the Vatican out of its financial difficulties. Withering donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion 'according to the resources of their dioceses.' U.S. bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections. New donors The Vatican bank and the city state's governorate, which controls the museums, also make annual contributions to the pope. As recently as a decade ago, the bank gave the pope around 55 million euros ($62.7 million) a year to help with the budget. But the amounts have dwindled; the bank gave nothing specifically to the pope in 2023, despite registering a net profit of 30 million euros ($34.2 million), according to its financial statements. The governorate's giving has likewise dropped off. Some Vatican officials ask how the Holy See can credibly ask donors to be more generous when its own institutions are holding back. Leo will need to attract donations from outside the U.S., no small task given the different culture of philanthropy, said the Rev. Robert Gahl, director of the Church Management Program at Catholic University of America's business school. He noted that in Europe there is much less of a tradition (and tax advantage) of individual philanthropy, with corporations and government entities doing most of the donating or allocating designated tax dollars. Even more important is leaving behind the 'mendicant mentality' of fundraising to address a particular problem, and instead encouraging Catholics to invest in the church as a project, he said. Speaking right after Leo's installation ceremony in St. Peter's Square, which drew around 200,000 people, Gahl asked: 'Don't you think there were a lot of people there that would have loved to contribute to that and to the pontificate?' In the U.S., donation baskets are passed around at every Sunday Mass. Not so at the Vatican. Untapped real estate The Vatican has 4,249 properties in Italy and 1,200 more in London, Paris, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. Only about one-fifth are rented at fair market value, according to the annual report from the APSA patrimony office, which manages them. Some 70% generate no income because they house Vatican or other church offices; the remaining 10% are rented at reduced rents to Vatican employees. In 2023, these properties only generated 35 million euros ($39.9 million) in profit. Financial analysts have long identified such undervalued real estate as a source of potential revenue. But Ward Fitzgerald, the president of the U.S.-based Papal Foundation, which finances papal charities, said the Vatican should also be willing to sell properties, especially those too expensive to maintain. Many bishops are wrestling with similar downsizing questions as the number of church-going Catholics in parts of the U.S. and Europe shrinks and once-full churches stand empty. Toward that end, the Vatican recently sold the property housing its embassy in Tokyo's high-end Sanbancho neighborhood, near the Imperial Palace, to a developer building a 13-story apartment complex, according to the Kensetsu News trade journal. Yet there has long been institutional reluctance to part with even money-losing properties. Witness the Vatican announcement in 2021 that the cash-strapped Fatebenefratelli Catholic hospital in Rome, run by a religious order, would not be sold. Pope Francis simultaneously created a Vatican fundraising foundation to keep it and other Catholic hospitals afloat. 'They have to come to grips with the fact that they own so much real estate that is not serving the mission of the church,' said Fitzgerald, who built a career in real estate private equity.


Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Telegraph
Bulgaria could break the euro. The EU would only have itself to blame
Its inflation was in double digits only a couple of years ago. It has had seven elections over the last two years. Corruption is endemic and it has few major industries. Bulgaria is hardly anyone's idea of a stable economy. But, hey, never mind any of that. The European Central Bank (ECB) has had a great idea. Let's merge its currency with that of Germany, Belgium and France. What could possibly go wrong? Well, quite a lot, as it happens. As Greece showed 15 years ago, hustling a country into the eurozone before it is ready can bring the entire currency crashing down. The euro survived the Greek crisis, just about – but that doesn't mean it will necessarily survive Bulgaria. It certainly marks another major step forward for the euro. On Wednesday, both Brussels and the ECB confirmed that Bulgaria had finally met all the criteria for joining the euro. The formal decision is expected in July and the replacement of the lev will take place on Jan 1 next year. We can expect a ponderous speech from Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, about how the European family is expanding. There'll be some grand claims from Christine Lagarde,the ECB president (assuming she hasn't quit to run Davos instead by then) about how the euro is finally taking its place on the world stage. And there'll be some fireworks as well, as the old currency is quietly buried and the new notes and coins are introduced. Of course, on one level that will be a victory for the single currency. Bulgaria will be the 21st nation to adopt the euro, and the fact that new countries keep joining is certainly a sign of its strength, even if the really successful economies in central Europe, such as the rapidly growing Poland, show absolutely no interest in having anything to do with it. And initially it won't actually make a huge difference to the economy. The lev is already tied to the euro by a currency board, meaning it can neither appreciate or devalue. The trouble is, it is very hard to see how Bulgaria can be seen as part of a natural currency zone with Germany and France. One problem is that many of the electorate don't seem to want the euro very much. There was a rally in Sofia last weekend protesting against the decision, and the country's independent president Rumen Radev has already proposed a referendum on the issue, a demand criticised by the government as 'sabotage'. You might hope for a bit more of a settled consensus on an issue as important as adopting a new currency. Still, leaving aside that point, it is the fundamental economics that are more worrying. To start with, Bulgaria is one of the poorest countries in the EU, with a GDP per capita of $15,800 (£11,700) according to World Bank data, compared with $54,000 in Germany and $44,000 in France. It is not exactly a minor gap to put it mildly. It has continually missed its inflation targets, with the rate hitting 16pc as recently as 2022. And it has bitterly divided politics, with a bewildering succession of elections, having had eight prime ministers since 2020, if we include caretaker administrations. Even worse, it is not as if Bulgaria even has a great record of paying back its creditors. For much of the post-war period it was of course part of the Soviet bloc, but before that, it defaulted on its debts in 1915 and 1932. Admittedly, that is a better record than Greece, which has defaulted on its debts six times over the last couple of hundred years, but for much of the 19th century Bulgaria was part of the Ottoman Empire which was hardly known for its financial stability either. Over any reasonable time frame, it does not look like a very good bet for bond investors. Likewise, the lev has been through four incarnations since Bulgaria became an independent country, with the latest re-denomination in 1999, when one new lev replaced 1,000 of the old ones. Again, it is not a currency that has been a great place to store your life savings. Fifteen years have now passed since the Greek financial crisis erupted, rocking the eurozone, which is probably long enough for most of its main lessons to have been forgotten. It had multiple causes, but the nub of it was this. Greece was hustled into the zone before it was ready and before its economy had merged with its more developed neighbours, encouraging its politicians to borrow recklessly in a currency that was as good as Germany's and running up debts that turned out not to be sustainable. Eventually, the whole house of cards came crashing down, threatening the stability of the banking system right across the continent. It triggered a cascading series of crises that caught up Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland from which it took years to recover and forced the ECB to launch a bailout that everyone had assumed was ruled out by the treaties. In reality, Bulgaria is Greece on roller skates. Sure, the zone managed to recover from the Greek crisis, and has put itself back on a firmer financial footing. But it was a long hard slog, a decade was lost, and Greece suffered the worst collapse in output of any developed nation since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The zone may get lucky and Bulgaria may integrate seamlessly into the wider European financial system. And yet the blunt truth is this. Admitting Bulgaria into the zone is a very big risk, and a decision that has been made on purely political grounds. It may well end up crashing the system all over again – and the leaders of the zone will only have themselves to blame.