Ector County ISD leaders advocate for public education at Texas Capitol
AUSTIN, Texas (KMID/KPEJ)- Two leaders from Ector County Independent School District (ECISD) traveled to the Texas Capitol just before Spring Break, advocating for policies that support public education.
Bowie Middle School Principal Amy Russell and Lauren Tavarez, ECISD's Director of Digital Learning, met with state legislators to share firsthand experiences about the challenges and successes within their district, emphasizing the need for stronger educational policies and funding.
Russell and Tavarez, both alumni of Raise Your Hand Texas initiatives, were selected from a pool of applicants statewide for this advocacy event. The initiative provided two options: delivering public testimony or meeting directly with legislators.
Russell opted to visit legislative offices, where she and her group engaged in discussions with lawmakers about the importance of supporting House Bill 2 (HB 2) and House Bill 26 (HB 26)—key pieces of legislation impacting public school funding and operations.
She met with Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows, Representative Gina Hinojosa, Ector County's Representative Brooks Landgraf, and Senators Royce West and Kevin Sparks.
'It was impressive to see what goes into changing funding, and also rewarding to see non-educators stand up, speak up, and work to make change happen for Texas schools,' Russell said. 'We really enjoyed being a voice for ECISD students, staff, and families and value the impact we felt we made on such an important topic affecting so many of us.'
Tavarez took a different approach, opting to provide testimony before the House Committee on Public Education regarding HB 2, a bill focused on public school finance and funding. She delivered a three-minute testimony before answering questions from committee members. Her testimony can be viewed at this link, beginning at the 17:00 mark.
'It was a great day, we learned a lot and were so proud to have the opportunity for our voices to be heard,' Tavarez said. 'This was a unique platform to gain valuable insight, forge important connections, and contribute meaningfully to the dialogue about public education.'
Their advocacy efforts highlight ECISD's commitment to improving education policy and funding, ensuring that Texas students and educators receive the support they need. By stepping into the legislative arena, Russell and Tavarez demonstrated the power of firsthand experience in shaping policies that impact schools statewide.
'We are proud of their leadership and commitment to the betterment of our educational system,' ECISD Chief Communications, Mike Adkins wrote.
Their participation in this event serves as a reminder of the importance of advocacy in education, reinforcing the need for ongoing engagement with policymakers to address the challenges facing Texas schools.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘A colossal mistake': Abilene ISD superintendent criticizes Texas' new education voucher law
ABILENE, Texas () – Four days after Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 2 into law, allocating billions in public education funding and creating a new voucher-style program, Abilene ISD Superintendent Dr. John Kuhn is voicing serious concerns. Calling the move a 'colossal mistake,' Kuhn claims the new education savings account program threatens to weaken the state's public school system by diverting funds to private institutions and undermining decades of public education policy. 'I think it's really, really unfair to fund kids who go to private schools at $10,000 each out of the state treasury, while you're funding kids in public schools in Texas, $6,000 out of the state treasury. I think it doesn't pass the smell test,' Kuhn shared. 'The public school system was established to ensure that every kid in the state of Texas, no matter where they live, has access to free, appropriate public education, and that is the system that has traditionally educated 90 plus percent of the kids in Texas. It feels to me like the state is taking its eye off the ball, and rather than serving the majority of kids now, they've decided to spend a billion dollars covering the tuition costs that traditionally parents have covered when they chose private schools.' Lambert backs $7.7B school bill, explains why he voted for vouchers Kuhn pointed to other states that have adopted similar voucher programs, explaining that most recipients were already attending private schools prior to receiving state assistance. 'So the notion that these vouchers are going to be used to help public school kids escape failing schools, that's really not what pans out. I think it's Iowa, where only 13% of the voucher recipients ever attended a private school. So what it ends up being is a new entitlement. It's like reverse Robin Hood, where you're taking money away from the middle class to help offset expenses that traditionally, wealthy parents have covered for themselves,' Kuhn explained. As this legislation rolls out, alongside efforts to eliminate the STAAR test, Kuhn believes public schools must begin to rethink how they present themselves to their communities. 'I think for a lot of us in schools, we had the mentality that we have to make sure that our students are being successful, so that when they take the STAAR test, we're getting a good accountability rating. I think a lot of us traditionally have thought that's really our marker of success, that we can show parents, hey, we're a high-quality school,' Kuhn said. 'What I've seen, especially with large charter school chains, is that they have huge marketing budgets that public schools have traditionally not had. With this new bill coming, I think it's really going to be important that public schools start to really more aggressively market themselves and really kind of aggressively compete for public eyeballs and for positive public perception.' Kuhn noted that while public schools receive around $6,000 per student from the state, the $10,000 earmarked for voucher students is comprised of state funds, and there could potentially be more in federal funds soon. Programs like free and reduced lunch and Title I help bridge the gap in public school funding. 'The state is basically fronting these private schools' money that we get from the federal government, not from the state, right? ' Kuhn shared. 'There's a bill coming through the federal government right now that would add even more voucher dollars to students in the states that are in voucher programs. So ultimately, if and when that passes, which is pretty likely to pass at the federal level, voucher students will be getting more in state and federal voucher money than public schools get in state and federal money.' Abilene & Wylie ISD superintendents discuss potential negative impact of vouchers on Texas education As for how the new voucher program will impact enrollment in Abilene ISD, Kuhn anticipates only modest effects. 'I think this is just another choice in an already choice-rich environment. I don't expect a devastating impact on enrollment, but I'm also not going to say we won't have any students who opt for a voucher,' Kuhn explained. Still, he remains wary of how voucher programs will evolve in the future, especially as more private institutions become eligible to participate. 'To participate in the voucher system, a private school has to have been in existence for at least two years. The purpose of that part of the bill was to prevent, like fly-by-night operators, from just popping up a private school because they see an opportunity to make money,' Kuhn added. 'I don't disagree with the notion of parents having choices. I do completely disagree with the rhetoric that they didn't already have a lot of choices; they have had them, but I think for us in Abilene, we definitely have looked at our own system and kind of broken through some of those really old barriers of how things have always been done in public schools. And that's a good thing.' Kuhn also kept a close eye on another major education proposal this session: the potential elimination of the STAAR test. Though the Texas House voted to replace STAAR with a national norm-referenced alternative, the bill ultimately died due to disagreements between House and Senate leadership. 'Some of those national norm-referenced tests we already use in public schools as a kind of diagnostic tool to see how our students are progressing through the year, so that we know they're going to be ready when it's time to take the STAAR…The other good thing about using a national norm reference test is that the Texas Education Agency can't get its fingers in it and adjust the scoring metrics, and so it's like it's an objective measure. There's no subjectivity to it. Thirdly, you can compare how Texas students are doing versus students in several other states. With the STAAR test, you can't do that,' Kuhn said. FORUM: Exploring school choice in Texas with Big Country leaders He added that over time, STAAR has lost its credibility due to politically motivated adjustments and unclear metrics. 'They constantly tweak all of these metrics, and it has resulted in a system that really nobody has very much confidence in. In fact, there were representatives who said nobody trusts the STAAR test. Well, the reason nobody trusts the STAAR test is that it pretends to be a school accountability system, but it's really a political narrative machine. When we need schools to look good because somebody's running for office and wants to say we had a Texas miracle, then they make schools look good, and when they need them to look bad so they can get vouchers passed, then schools look bad, and that has happened over and over and over again. It's not a trustworthy system, because these aren't trustworthy people,' Kuhn expressed. 'When you let the politicians control the school accountability system, it has all the validity of the Soviet crop reports. You know what you hear about from the old days, right? It's a completely moral and ethically compromised system that misinforms Texans rather than informs them.' Even so, Kuhn sees value in using standardized testing as a tool when done properly. 'As soon as you take student test results and weaponize them, turning them into a battering ram to beat up teachers and beat up schools. Now there's a motivation to have those tests not be great… The first thing I would do is make it diagnostic,' Kuhn said. 'When we get our STAAR results back, I dig into them. I've maintained a spreadsheet going back to 2012, which is the first year STAAR was given. I did it for my last school district. I'm doing it for Abilene ISD, where I track trends, and have we improved year upon year? And then, how did we do in comparison to the state? Are we lagging behind the state? Are we doing better than the state? Are we catching up to the state? All of that is very useful information to me.' Kuhn said that the challenges he faced during his time at Mineral Wells ISD mirror many of those in Abilene. His solution: advocate loudly and consistently for his district and the people within it. 'I'm going to fight for the reputation of my district. I'm going to fight for the reputation of my teachers, my kids,' Kuhn expressed. 'We aren't just building up kids. We're building up a city, we're building up society, we're building up the state and the world by giving these kids a fighting chance. The accountability system is just one quality marker that matters. That's why I talked earlier about marketing, right, like I think public schools have put all of our eggs in the accountability system basket as the way we prove that we're good. But if you look at universities, look at ACU, they market themselves with logos everywhere. You look around, there's purple all over the place… I think we've been a little too passive in really being forward with the fact that we are a great school, and here are all the reasons why. I think part of the reason for that is we're very busy just trying to teach kids and trying to feed kids and trying to transport kids and trying to make sure that the hallways are safe. I mean, there's so much to be done just to have a school, that we've taken our eye off the ball when it comes to marketing ourselves as public schools. The big charter school chains haven't made that mistake. There are charter school chains that have worse academic scores than the public schools around them, but they still draw quite a few kids from the public schools because they market themselves extremely well.' What is school choice? Big Country officials explain the 'voucher' dilemma Still, Kuhn's primary concern remains the long-term fiscal impact of vouchers. 'The costs have exploded in the other states that have done universal vouchers. Currently, the bill they just passed is a billion cap over the next two years. The question is, are they going to remove that cap? When they do, there are states where it's now 10 times what they initially budgeted for it,' Kuhn explained. 'There's one state governor, Arizona, I think, who said, we're going to have to stop certain programs in our state just to pay for the voucher system. So I think that's what I would I would challenge people to watch over the next 5 to 10 years, what does this do to the state budget? Because I think they made a colossal mistake.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Austin LGBTQ+ advocates oppose gender-defining bill awaiting Gov. Abbott's approval
The Brief A bill defining a person's sex based on biological sex at birth is headed to Governor Abbott's desk. Proponents call it the "Women's Bill of Rights," aiming to protect women's rights and spaces, while LGBTQ+ advocates fear it will lead to discrimination against trans individuals. If signed, Texas would join over a dozen other states with similar laws, and the bill would go into effect on September 1st of this year. AUSTIN - Soon to head to Governor Abbott's desk is a bill that would define a person's sex in Texas. If Abbott passes it, Texas would be joining more than a dozen other states with similar laws. Proponents call House Bill 229 the "Women's Bill of Rights," but LGBTQ+ advocates worry this bill could be used to discriminate, specifically, against those who identify as trans. The bill defines a female or woman as someone whose reproductive system is developed to produce ova. The bill would require that strict definition to be used on documents and other data collected by the government. It would require transgender and intersex people to use the sex they were assigned at birth in state records. Supporters of the bill say it protects single-sex spaces like locker rooms, bathrooms and prisons. What they're saying Sherri Brodell is among the people concerned. She's also a proud mom of four. "My dream, our dream as a family, is to have a home where our kids can come back, and our grandkids can come back, and we have big family reunions and big holidays, and just like every other family," said Brodell. But unlike most families, she's helping one of her kids create an exit plan out of the state when they turn 18. That child is trans, and she's asked FOX 7 not to identify them out of safety concerns. "The laws in our home state are making it so that we're not welcome here," said Brodell. "Every time someone has to present that paperwork, and it doesn't match what they appear to be, then you are increasing the risk of violence, discrimination, and just emotional trauma," said Brodell. "This is not a singular story," said Kitty Ferguson-Mappus, who owns Unbroken Abundance Therapy in Georgetown. "We are the only openly publicly affirming practice in Williamson County." This legislative session, she said she's seeing more LGBTQ+ patients seeking help. "There's a level of cultural trauma that's happening where you're put in the community, and just these microaggressions and trauma is happening minute by minute sometimes," said Ferguson-Mappus. "They need to know that they are creating an environment where people don't want to live," said Brodell. "They would rather die than exist here and so, as a parent as a trans kid, that's what I'm fighting to prevent. I'm fighting to prevent my child from feeling like exiting this world is the only solution." The other side Bill advocates, like Austin State Rep. Ellen Troxclair, argue it will protect women. "We're going to pass the women's bill of rights, a bill that we shouldn't have to pass, in 2025," said Troxclair. "By defining what a woman is today, we are protecting their basic rights to privacy, safety, and fairness." What's next Governor Greg Abbott said on X he plans to sign the bill. It would go into effect on September first of this year. The Source Information in this article came from FOX 7 interviews and previous coverage.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting protests at public universities awaits Gov. Abbott's approval
The Brief A new bill, SB 2972, limiting protests on Texas public university campuses has passed both the Senate and House. The bill prohibits activities like using amplified sound during class, protesting in the last two weeks of the semester, and wearing masks to conceal identity. Critics, including the ACLU of Texas, argue the bill violates First Amendment rights. AUSTIN - A bill that passed through the Texas legislature last weekend would prohibit certain times and locations of protests on public university campuses. Critics worry the bill is in direct violation of the First Amendment, as well as the Texas Constitution. Senate Bill 2972 defines "expressive activities" in the same manner as the First Amendment and the Texas Constitution, directly citing those documents to include assemblies, protests, speeches, the distribution of written materials, the carrying of signs, and the circulation of petitions. Under the new bill, the following would be prohibited at Texas universities: Using devices to amplify sound during class hours while engaging in expressive activities. Engaging in expressive activities during the last two weeks of the semester. Camping or setting up tents on campus. Wearing a mask or other disguise while engaging in expressive activities. Lowering the U.S. flag with the intent to raise another flag. Engaging in expressive activities between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. Note that these are limited and expanded upon individually within the bill's text. The Senate passed the bill 21-10 on May 14. The House passed it 97-39 on May 28. What they're saying The bill's text says it may not be construed to limit freedom of speech or expression as protected by the First Amendment or Texas Constitution. Critics wonder how this is possible, saying the bill in its entirety is an imposition of prohibitions on rights defined in those texts. Caro Achar, the engagement coordinator for free speech at the ACLU of Texas, released the following statement to that point. "S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs. This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public." Dig deeper The new bill comes on the heels of recent major protests on Texas university campuses, largely related to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, as well as developments with mass deportations. At one UT Austin protest in April 2024, 79 pro-Palestine protesters were taken into custody. The university was later found to have violated several institutional rules when handling the incident. Feds to screen social media of migrants, foreign students for antisemitic activity Columbia must notify students before handing records to Congress amid antisemitism probe ICE detains U of M student at Twin Cities campus, officials say What's next SB 2972 now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature. According to the ACLU, he is expected to sign it into law. If he neither signs nor vetoes the bill, it will become law without his action. The Source Information in this article comes from Texas Legislature Online, the ACLU of Texas and previous coverage by FOX 7.
