Penny Mordaunt joins British American Tobacco
Former Conservative cabinet minister Penny Mordaunt is taking up a part-time paid role with British American Tobacco as a member of its "transformation advisory board".
Details of the appointment were published on the website of Acoba, the watchdog that provides advice on jobs politicians accept after they leave government.
In a letter to Acoba, British American Tobacco said Mordaunt would be "asked to contribute her insights on the topics of tobacco harm reduction".
Mordaunt told the watchdog the role would also involve testing the company's strategy "to reduce its combustible products i.e. cigarettes".
British American Tobacco has produced some of the world's most famous cigarette brands including Lucky Strike and Rothmans, but in recent years has begun selling vapes.
The company says it wants to build "a smokeless world" by moving smokers to smokeless alternatives. It aims to become a "predominantly" smokeless business by 2035.
A very quick guide to Penny Mordaunt
Tobacco giant sees sunset for US cigarette business
How many people still smoke in the UK?
All former ministers are expected to seek advice from Acoba (the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments) on any job they want to take up two years after leaving government.
The committee considers whether the job could be seen as a reward from a prospective employer for favourable decisions made by the politician when they were in power.
It also looks at whether the former minister could have access to insider information.
If the committee has concerns, it can advise the politician to delay taking up the job or avoid particular activities while in the role.
In its advice letter to Mordaunt, Acoba said the risk that her role with British American Tobacco could be seen as "a reward for your decisions in office" was "limited".
It added that Mordaunt had not had access to specific information that would "offer an unfair advantage to British American Tobacco".
"It is also relevant that you have been out of office for five months, creating a gap between your access to information in government and your role with British American Tobacco," it added.
Acoba noted that Mordaunt had said she would not lobby for the firm, but it advised her to have "no direct engagement with government on behalf of the company as to do so would raise significant risks under the government's rules".
During his last months as prime minister, former Tory PM Rishi Sunak introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which would have made it illegal to sell tobacco to anyone born after 1 January 2009.
Although Sunak was keen to push the legislation through, many of his Conservative MPs had doubts. Mordaunt herself did not vote on the bill when it came to Parliament.
Labour backed the proposals, and since coming into government has reintroduced a similar bill to Parliament.
Mordaunt is not the first politician to work for British American Tobacco. After losing the 1997 Tory leadership election, former chancellor Ken Clarke took up a deputy chairmanship with the company.
During her time in government, Mordaunt served as a minister in several departments, including the Treasury and the Ministry of Defence.
She stood in the 2022 Conservative Party leadership race, but was eliminated in the penultimate round of the contest that was ultimately won by Liz Truss.
Had she not lost her seat in Portsmouth North in 2024, she would have been a potential contender to lead her party in opposition.
In addition to taking a role with British American Tobacco, Mordaunt is planning to produce and appear in a series of short films about Ukraine, entitled "Do Not Look Away".
She is also taking a paid role with Sub Sea Craft Limited, a Portsmouth-based engineering company that produces maritime technology.
Mordaunt was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
Thousands of people have gathered to 'send a message' to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday. MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
These 5 shares could generate a £1,584 annual passive income from a £20k lump sum
Putting some spare money to work in the stock market can be a simple way to set up passive income streams. That can be quite lucrative. As an example, if an investor had a spare £20,000 to invest (whether or not through a Stocks and Shares ISA) they could spread it evenly across the five shares below that currently yield an average 7.9%. That ought to earn around £1,584 in passive income each year, if the dividends are maintained at their current level. That is never guaranteed: dividends can fall, but can also grow. To start with are a couple of FTSE 100 shares in the financial services business, both offering a high yield. Asset manager M&G yields 8.2% at the moment. It has a large base of both retail and institutional clients, a strong brand, and a proven business model. A recently announced tie-up with a large Japanese firm could help boost revenues. One risk I see is a turbulent stock market leading policyholders to withdraw funds, hurting profits. Whereas M&G is a well-known name for many British people, the same may not be true of Phoenix Group (LSE: PHNX). But the company is a discreet giant, with around 12m customers and a variety of well-known brands. It aims to grow its dividend per share annually and currently yields 8.3%. I like its proven cash generation potential and critical mass, though if the housing market falls badly I see a risk that its mortgage book value could fall sharply. Another share to consider is 6.8%-yielding cigarette maker British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS). The owner of premium brands including Lucky Strike has a highly profitable business that has helped it raise its dividend per share annually for decades. Whether that can continue depends in part on whether declining cigarette sales lead to lower earnings for British American. I own shares in polymer manufacturer VIctrex (LSE: VCT), which currently offers investors a 7.6% yield. I see it as a share passive income hunters ought to consider. That yield partly reflects a weaker share price than before, as Victrex has fallen 62% in five years. Profitability has been inconsistent and I see a risk that weaker demand in key markets could keep eating into earnings. Clearly, the City has its doubts about Victrex compared to a few years back. But first-half sales volumes grew 16% year on year, pre-tax profit soared to £17m and the company maintained its interim dividend. Its focus on high-performance applications like automotive and aerospace components gives Victrex pricing power and I see its proprietary polymer technology as a powerful competitive advantage. The fifth share to consider is also one I own: Income and Growth Venture Capital Trust. The investment trust has an 8.7% yield. It has typically aimed to pay at least a 6p per share annual dividend, which would mean an 8.7% yield in future too at the current share price. It funds that by investing in small or medium companies it hopes can grow. Weak consumer demand has hurt the valuation of some of its investments. I see a risk that will continue. However, I think owning a stake in Income & Growth could hopefully still generate a long-term passive income stream for me. The post These 5 shares could generate a £1,584 annual passive income from a £20k lump sum appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has positions in Income & Growth Vct Plc and Victrex Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended British American Tobacco P.l.c., M&g Plc, and Victrex Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government struggles to cut foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the amount of foreign aid it spends on hotel bills for asylum seekers in the UK, the BBC has learnt. New figures released quietly by ministers in recent days show the Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year - that is only marginally less than the £2.3bn it spent in 2024/25. The money is largely used to cover the accommodation costs of thousands of asylum seekers who have recently arrived in the UK. The Home Office said it was committed to ending asylum hotels and was speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The figures were published on the Home Office website with no accompanying notification to media. Foreign aid is supposed to be spent alleviating poverty by providing humanitarian and development assistance overseas. But under international rules, governments can spend some of their foreign aid budgets at home to support asylum seekers during the first year after their arrival. According to the most recent Home Office figures, there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the UK. Labour promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds". Contracts signed by the Conservative government in 2019 were expected to see £4.5bn of public cash paid to three companies to accommodate asylum seekers over a 10-year period. But a report by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) in May said that number was expected to be £15.3bn. Asylum accommodation costs set to triple, says watchdog Asylum hotel companies vow to hand back some profits On June 3, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Home Affairs Committee she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation and added: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether." The Home Office said it was trying to bear down on the numbers by reducing the time asylum seekers can appeal against decisions. It is also planning to introduce tighter financial eligibility checks to ensure only those without means are housed. But Whitehall officials and international charities have said the Home Office has no incentive to reduce ODA spending because the money does not come out of its budgets. The scale of government aid spending on asylum hotels has meant huge cuts in UK support for humanitarian and development priorities across the world. Those cuts have been exacerbated by the government's reductions to the overall ODA budget. In February, Sir Keir Starmer said he would cut aid spending from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% by 2027 - a fall in absolute terms of about £14bn to some £9bn. Such was the scale of aid spending on asylum hotels in recent years that the previous Conservative government gave the Foreign Office an extra £2bn to shore up its humanitarian commitments overseas. But Labour has refused to match that commitment. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, said: "Cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government. "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul." Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said the government was introducing "savage cuts" to its ODA spending, risking the UK's development priorities and international reputation, while "Home Office raids on the aid budget" had barely reduced. "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict," she said. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK," she said. "The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour promised in their manifesto to end the use of asylum hotels for illegal immigrants. But the truth is there are now thousands more illegal migrants being housed in hotels under Labour. "Now these documents reveal that Labour are using foreign aid to pay for asylum hotel accommodation – yet another promise broken." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and continue to take action, restoring order, and reduce costs. This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. "We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026." Is the government meeting its pledges on illegal immigration and asylum?
