
Letters to the editor: Danger that Iran conflict is distracting us from the horrors of war in Gaza
In fact, it is possible this was part of Benjamin Netanyahu's calculations, though a war with Iran, in which he could embroil the US, is certainly something he long desired.
The daily rocket, drone and air strikes dominate the news cycle, pushing the horror in Gaza into the background on many media outlets.
The death toll in Gaza continues to rise, with nearly 60,000 people now killed, and it is clear no one is safe. Children account for about one-third of the dead.
Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza will be looked back on by future generations with astonishment and shame.
Fintan Lane, Lucan, Dublin
US and Israel are not the law-abiding states they always claim to have been
In 2009, Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize just a few months after he was elected US president.
Under his command, his administration and the US military probably caused more deaths than any of his predecessors since the Vietnam War, when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Prize for allegedly ending that war.
Since the end of the Cold War, successive US governments have acted in contravention of multiple international laws, including by waging wars of aggression, acting in breach of the UN Charter, UN Convention Against Torture and the Geneva Conventions.
Israel has gone even further by committing genocide against the Palestinian people and illegally occupying and seeking to annex territories in Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.
The US and Israel have been behaving as rogue states, not the law-abiding democratic states they have always claimed to be.
ADVERTISEMENT
Taoiseach Micheál Martin, speaking on RTÉ Radio 1 news on June 23, expressed concern about the developing situation in Iran following US overnight bombing attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities.
He referred to the chaos that resulted from the US-led wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria.
Successive Irish governments have been and are still complicit in these serious breaches of international laws by allowing the US military to transit through Shannon Airport and Irish airspace.
US president Donald Trump is believed to be hoping for a Nobel Peace Prize. War criminals should be imprisoned for their crimes rather than awarded peace prizes.
Edward Horgan, Castletroy, Limerick
Bully and warmonger is not a worthy nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize
Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace prize by Pakistan, citing his statesmanship in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan is cynical and laughable.
Trump has knocked the final nail into the coffin of the two-state solution by recognising Jerusalem as the eternal and indivisible capital of Israel, by recognising the Golan heights under the sovereignty of Israel and by sending armaments to Israel while refusing to condemn its ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity towards Palestinians.
In Ukraine, Trump sided with the aggressor Putin in his war to annex the Crimea and eastern Ukraine and demanded the exploitation of Ukraine's rare mineral resources.
He also withdrew the US from the World Health Organisation, jeopardising efforts to achieve health equity and social justice. Far from being a genuine peacemaker, Trump is a bully and warmonger.
Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London
When it comes to worries about who's saying the mass, mum's the word
Reading Tom Gilsenan's letter about the T-shirt with the slogan 'What time is mass?' (June 24) reminded me of the Blessing of the Graves in Tullysaran last Sunday.
I arrived late, so stood outside at my parents' grave, with the overflow congregation, listening to the mass relayed from inside the chapel.
At one point I asked my sister: 'Who's saying the mass?' She looked at me and said: 'You don't need to know that any more. Your mother's not here to ask you.'
Which, when you think about it, is a fairly definitive liturgical update.
Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh
Have we considered the consequences of finding life on other planets?
If we discover extraterrestrial life, what happens next?
The search for extraterrestrial life is seen as one of pure curiosity, but as in other areas of science, we should worry about the consequences of success.
I have to ask why we spend so much time looking for intelligent life on other planets. I would be happy to find intelligent life on Earth.
John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary
World's poor shouldn't have to foot the bill as we phase out fossil fuels
We're going to be hearing a lot about Just Transition in the coming months.
At the UN Bonn climate talks, which will shape the road to the Cop30 climate summit in Brazil, governments are starting to engage with the idea of a Just Transition.
This is to be welcomed. The climate crisis is no longer a distant threat, but a burning reality for millions. Yet the burden continues to fall unfairly on the world's poorest and those who have contributed least to global emissions and climate change.
While the level of fossil fuel finance had been declining since 2021, last year saw two-thirds of banks increasing their financing by a combined $162bn (€139bn) in a period when the world experienced its hottest year since records began.
Ireland is shamefully playing its part in fossil fuel financing. A recent report by ActionAid Ireland and Trócaire revealed that as of June last year, €31bn in fossil fuel investments was held by Irish-based financial institutions.
Even more disturbing, 91pc of that investment is tied to companies actively expanding fossil fuel operations in direct defiance of international scientific consensus on the need to limit global warming to 1.5C.
Without a clear agreement on Just Transition at Cop30, the energy transition risks deepening inequality and further destabilising fragile economies. The world must move beyond rhetoric to action.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Secret Iranian fortress Trump's bombs CAN'T reach: Fears ultra-secure ‘Pickaxe' mountain is perfect nuclear hiding place
TRUMP may have "obliterated" Iran's notorious Fordow facility, but there are fears the nuke programme lives on in another top-secret mountain fortress. Iranian officials have claimed the key enriched uranium was carted out of Fordow before Advertisement 8 8 Satellite pics show lorries lining up outside Fordow in the days before the US strikes Credit: Reuters 8 One of the last missiles fired by Iran into Israel lodged in the ground Credit: Twitter 8 A B-2 Spirit bomber escorted by two F 15E Strike Eagles Credit: Alamy Pickaxe is a peak in the mountains surrounding Natanz, another of Iran's nuclear plants hammered by the US and Israel, and around 90 miles south of The site is still under construction, but has been secretly expanded and reinforced over the past four years. The peak is over 5,000ft high - taller than any mountain in the UK - and the site is thought to be buried 328ft down. The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said last year: "It is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the programme are taking place." Advertisement read more on iran's nukes When asked what was going on beneath Pickaxe, Iran responded: "It's none of your business ." Satellite images show tunnels feeding into the mountain and leading to a deep-buried operation. Experts say it could be more secure than any of the facilities struck by the US and Israel . America's bunker-buster bombs were the only weapons capable of reaching Fordow - but even those might prove ineffective against Pickaxe. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun Exclusive In the days before Trump's stealth bombing raid over the weekend, a train of lorries was pictured lining up outside Fordow. And in the aftermath, Iran has claimed that it moved the key nuclear material. White House fuming over top secret leak on Iran nuke site bombing as Don attends key summit It's believed there was 400kg of uranium enriched to 60 percent at the plant which, if still intact, could sustain Iran's ambitions to build nuclear weapons. Sima Shine, with decades of experience in the military establishment, said Tehran had "hundreds if not thousands" of advanced centrifuges capable of producing weapons-grade uranium. Advertisement And Pickaxe could be the perfect new hiding spot. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said it cannot be ruled out that there is further, undeclared material hidden beneath the towers of rock. 8 Trump claimed Iran's nuclear programme had been 'obliterated' Credit: EPA 8 A B-2 bomber refuelling mid-air Credit: AFP Advertisement 8 Craters on a ridge at the Fordow plant after US strikes Credit: EPA Grossi renewed his demands that Iran let inspectors in to "account for" the stockpiles of uranium. Trump claimed that other Iranian sites had been "obliterated" by the An Iranian official insisted that 'contrary to the claims of the lying US president, the Fordow nuclear facility has not been seriously damaged, and most of what was damaged was only on the ground, which can be restored". Advertisement And the extent of the damage is debated after an intelligence report was leaked on Tuesday night. 8 The assessment claims that Iran's nuclear programme was set back by just a few months by the US bombs. Sources told CBS that the stash of uranium had not been eliminated. Advertisement The White House was furious and slammed the "flat-out wrong" assessment leaked by "a low-level loser in the intelligence community". America deployed its heaviest weapons against Fordow - 14-ton GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators. The monster explosives burrow 60 metres into the ground before detonating. Inside covert US raid on Iran's nuclear sites By Patrick Harrington DECOY and deception were at the heart of Donald Trump's tactical Operation Midnight Hammer strikes against Iran's nuclear sites. Through meticulous planning and artful bluff, the B-2 stealth bomber squadron The US began spinning a web of deception at the start of The President maintained the smoke-and-mirrors act, telling reporters at a flagpole opening ceremony: "I may do it, I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm gonna do." Then a day later, Trump played a masterstroke which saw the White House put out a "two-week" deadline for A decoy fleet of B-2s flew west over over the Pacific and towards Guam to throw Iranian intelligence off the scent. Read more about the operation


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Nato leaders to back Trump defence spending goal at Hague summit
Nato leaders gathered in The Hague on Wednesday for a summit tailor-made for US president Donald Trump , with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance. The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of 5 per cent of GDP – a response to a demand by Mr Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine . Nato secretary General Mark Rutte acknowledged that it was not easy for countries to find the extra money but said it was vital to do so. 'There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative,' he told reporters. READ MORE Nato officials are hoping the conflict between Israel and Iran and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Mr Rutte in his home city. Finnish President Alexander Stubb, whose country borders Russia and joined Nato two years ago, said the alliance was evolving. 'I think we're witnessing the birth of a new Nato, which means a more balanced Nato and a Nato which has more European responsibility,' he told reporters. Mr Trump has threatened not to protect Nato members if they fail to meet spending targets and again raised doubts about his commitment on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause. 'I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there,' he said. The new spending target – to be achieved over the next 10 years – is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2 per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently. Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence – such as troops and weapons – and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle heavy military vehicles. All Nato members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal and can meet its commitments by spending much less. Mr Rutte disputes that but accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez as part of his efforts to give Mr Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Mr Trump displayed the extent of those efforts on Tuesday by publishing a private message in which Mr Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on 'decisive action in Iran'. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,' Rutte told Trump. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win.' Mr Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge to try to avert any friction with Trump. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for attending the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than a the main meeting on Wednesday, although Mr Trump said they would probably meet separately. Mr Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Mr Trump about buying US weapons including Patriot missile defence systems and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions. The Kremlin accused Nato of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a 'fiend of hell' to justify its big increase in defence spending. – Reuters

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump rejects leaked intel that says US strikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear programme
AN EARLY INTELLIGENCE assessment found that the US military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of Tehran's nuclear programme, and likely only set it back by months. While over a dozen bombs were dropped on two of the nuclear facilities, the Fordo Fuel Enrichment plant and the Natanz Enrichment Complex, they did not fully eliminate the sites' centrifuges and highly enriched uranium, CNN reported. The strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. The assessment was produced by the Defence Intelligence Agency – the Pentagon's intelligence arm – and is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by the US Central Command after the US strikes. The report by the Defence Intelligence Agency estimated that the programme was delayed less than six months, the New York Times said in another report. Trump has rejected this. In a post on Truth Social the US president said 'THE NUCLEAR SITES IN IRAN ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED!'. Iran's underground nuclear enrichment site at Fordo. PA PA White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had previously confirmed the authenticity of the assessment but said it was 'flat-out wrong'. Advertisement Leavitt responded to the reports on social media: 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program.' Earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared a 'historic victory' against Iran, despite the leaked US intelligence report. Netanyahu, in an address to the nation after the ceasefire, announced that 'we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project'. 'And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt,' he said. Israel had said its bombing campaign, which began on 13 June, was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. Israel's military said that its strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme 'by years'. After Trump angrily berated both sides for early violations of the truce yesterday, Iran announced it would respect the terms of the deal if Israel did the same, while Israel said it had refrained from further strikes. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, but that his country would continue to 'assert its legitimate rights' to the peaceful use of atomic energy. 'Everyone is tired' Some Israelis welcomed the prospect of a truce. 'Everyone is tired. We just want to have some peace of mind,' said Tel Aviv resident Tammy Shel. 'For us, for the Iranian people, for the Palestinians, for everyone in the region.' In Iran, people remained uncertain whether the peace would hold. Related Reads Israel says 'campaign against Iran not over' after Iranian president announces 'end of 12-day war' Watch: Trump says Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f**k they're doing' Amir, 28, fled from Tehran to the Caspian Sea coast and told AFP by phone, 'I really don't know… about the ceasefire but honestly, I don't think things will return to normal.' Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry. A damaged apartment in Tehran, Iran. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 28 people, according to official figures and rescuers. The international community reacted with cautious optimism to the truce. Saudi Arabia and the European Union welcomed Trump's announcement, while Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia hoped 'that this will be a sustainable ceasefire'. But French President Emmanuel Macron warned there was an 'increased' risk that Iran would attempt to enrich uranium secretly following the strikes on its nuclear sites. After the truce was announced, Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir said Israel's focus would now shift back to Gaza. The Israeli opposition, the Palestinian Authority and the main group representing the families of Israeli hostages all called for a Gaza truce to complement the Iran ceasefire. With reporting from Andrew Walsh Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal