Secret Iranian fortress Trump's bombs CAN'T reach: Fears ultra-secure ‘Pickaxe' mountain is perfect nuclear hiding place
TRUMP may have "obliterated" Iran's notorious Fordow facility, but there are fears the nuke programme lives on in another top-secret mountain fortress.
Iranian officials have claimed the key enriched uranium was carted out of Fordow before
Advertisement
8
8
Satellite pics show lorries lining up outside Fordow in the days before the US strikes
Credit: Reuters
8
One of the last missiles fired by Iran into Israel lodged in the ground
Credit: Twitter
8
A B-2 Spirit bomber escorted by two F 15E Strike Eagles
Credit: Alamy
Pickaxe is a peak in the mountains surrounding Natanz, another of Iran's nuclear plants hammered by the US and Israel, and around 90 miles south of
The site is still under construction, but has been secretly expanded and reinforced over the past four years.
The peak is over 5,000ft high - taller than any mountain in the UK - and the site is thought to be buried 328ft down.
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said last year: "It is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the programme are taking place."
Advertisement
read more on iran's nukes
When asked what was going on beneath Pickaxe,
Iran
responded: "It's none of your
business
."
Satellite images show tunnels feeding into the mountain and leading to a deep-buried operation.
Experts say it could be more secure than any of the facilities struck by the US and
Israel
.
America's bunker-buster bombs were the only weapons capable of reaching Fordow - but even those might prove ineffective against Pickaxe.
Advertisement
Most read in The US Sun
Exclusive
In the days before Trump's stealth bombing raid over the weekend, a train of lorries was pictured lining up outside Fordow.
And in the aftermath, Iran has claimed that it moved the key nuclear material.
White House fuming over top secret leak on Iran nuke site bombing as Don attends key summit
It's believed there was 400kg of uranium enriched to 60 percent at the plant which, if still intact, could sustain Iran's ambitions to build nuclear weapons.
Sima Shine, with decades of experience in the military establishment, said Tehran had "hundreds if not thousands" of advanced centrifuges capable of producing weapons-grade uranium.
Advertisement
And Pickaxe could be the perfect new hiding spot.
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic
Energy
Agency (IAEA), said it cannot be ruled out that there is further, undeclared material hidden beneath the towers of rock.
8
Trump claimed Iran's nuclear programme had been 'obliterated'
Credit: EPA
8
A B-2 bomber refuelling mid-air
Credit: AFP
Advertisement
8
Craters on a ridge at the Fordow plant after US strikes
Credit: EPA
Grossi renewed his demands that Iran let inspectors in to "account for" the stockpiles of uranium.
Trump claimed that other Iranian sites had been "obliterated" by the
An Iranian official insisted that 'contrary to the claims of the lying US president, the Fordow nuclear facility has not been seriously damaged, and most of what was damaged was only on the ground, which can be restored".
Advertisement
And the extent of the damage is debated after an intelligence report was leaked on Tuesday night.
8
The assessment claims that Iran's nuclear programme was set back by just a few months by the US bombs.
Sources told CBS that the stash of uranium had not been eliminated.
Advertisement
The
White House
was furious and slammed the "flat-out wrong" assessment leaked by "a low-level loser in the intelligence community".
America deployed its heaviest weapons against Fordow - 14-ton GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators.
The monster explosives burrow 60 metres into the ground before detonating.
Inside covert US raid on Iran's nuclear sites
By Patrick Harrington
DECOY and deception were at the heart of Donald Trump's tactical Operation Midnight Hammer strikes against Iran's nuclear sites.
Through meticulous planning and artful bluff, the B-2 stealth bomber squadron
The US began spinning a web of deception at the start of
The President maintained the smoke-and-mirrors act, telling reporters at a flagpole opening ceremony: "I may do it, I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm gonna do."
Then a day later, Trump played a masterstroke which saw the White House put out a "two-week" deadline for
A decoy fleet of B-2s flew west over over the Pacific and towards Guam to throw Iranian intelligence off the scent.
Read more about the operation
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate
President Donald Trump has insisted that US strikes delivered a crushing blow to Iran's nuclear programme despite a preliminary American intelligence assessment suggesting that the assault inflicted only a marginal setback. 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Mr Trump said as his administration deployed a phalanx of top officials to defend his claims that Iran's nuclear programme was 'completely and fully obliterated'. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the leaked intelligence assessment, which said Iran suffered a delay of only a few months, was 'preliminary' and 'low confidence'. President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit as secretary of state Marco Rubio, right, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth listen, in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP) US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the officials who disclosed the findings are 'professional stabbers'. The White House pointed to a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission that said Iran faced a setback of 'many years'. Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult, making the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Mr Trump's risky decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran. Also at stake are Mr Trump's next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program. Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while US and Israeli leaders have described the country's nuclear programme as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon. One of the targets of the US attack was Fordo, where nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground. Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP) The Israeli commission said in a statement that the bombing 'rendered the enrichment facility inoperable'. The statement was distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other parts of Iran's military nuclear programme, have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years', the statement said. In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from US bombers. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he said. The episode has triggered some of Mr Trump's longstanding vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, who he has often viewed as a part of a 'deep state' dedicated to undermining his agenda. He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as 'scum' and 'disgusting'. President Donald Trump dismissed media reports (Piroschka Van De Wouw, Pool Photo via AP) Mr Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack the nuclear facilities with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground. The reports, he said, were 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country'. One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the US strikes. 'I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,' Mr Trump said. He added that 'it's very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous'. Classified briefings for legislators, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place on Thursday and Friday.
Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Watch: NATO chief calls Donald Trump 'daddy' in bizarre exchange
The Secretary General of NATO has raised eyebrows after he called US President Donald Trump 'daddy' in a meeting about the Israel-Iran conflict. Mr Trump declared a ceasefire between Israel and Iran following 12 days of exchanges over Iran's reported nuclear progress, which was broken just over an hour later when the two countries began firing missiles at each other again. After Mr Trump said that both countries 'don't know what the f**k they're doing,' the fragile ceasefire has held for now; with him speaking on the conflict at a NATO summit with Secretary General Mark Rutte. 'Sometimes daddy has to use strong language.' Nato's secretary general Mark Rutte referred to US President Donald Trump as 'daddy' when discussing the Israel-Iran conflict at the summit in The Hague. — Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) June 25, 2025 After comparing Israel and Iran to 'two kids in a schoolyard,' Mr Trump said 'they fight like hell, you can't stop em. Let em fight for about two to three minutes, then it's easy to stop them.' However, the exchange took a weird turn when Mr Rutte said 'and then daddy [Mr Trump] has to sometimes use strong language,' referring to Mr Trump swearing on live television. The 'daddy' comment raised eyebrows on Twitter (X), with one person commenting 'Is cringe a new component of NATO offensive capabilities?' The Secretary General of NATO has raised eyebrows after he called US President Donald Trump 'daddy' in a meeting about the Israel-Iran conflict. Pic:'This is genuinely nauseating,' another wrote, while another tweeted ''daddy'?? What the actual HELL is going on!? NATO Chief just called Trump 'daddy' on camera and people are losing it!' Israel began launching fresh missiles at Iran, claiming that the country violated the ceasefire that US President Trump announced on Truth Social in the early hours of Tuesday morning. The ceasefire lasted only a few hours, before the exchanges began again. After telling Israel 'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS [sic],' on Truth Social, Mr Trump addressed the media, where he said both countries were violating the ceasefire, and telling Israel to 'calm down' — before saying that both countries don't know 'what the f**k they're doing.' US president Donald Trump said that Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f**k they're doing' after an hours old ceasefire was broken. Pic: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images 'There was one rocket that I guess was fired overboard after the time limit and now Israel is going out. These guys [have] got to calm down,' Mr Trump said. 'I didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after we made the deal. They didn't have to unload. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing.'
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump affirms his commitment to Nato's Article 5 pledge for mutual defence
US President Donald Trump has affirmed his commitment to the Nato alliance's mutual defence guarantee as he attended its summit in the Netherlands. Before landing in the Netherlands on Tuesday, Mr Trump cast doubt on whether the US would abide by Article 5 of the Nato treaty, which calls on all members to defend one another in case of an attack. But on Wednesday, the US president said he stood with that promise. Front row left to right, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, President Donald Trump and Britain's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a group photo of Nato heads of state and government at the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands (Geert Vanden Wi 'That's why I'm here,' Mr Trump said as he met with Dick Schoof, the prime minister of the Netherlands. 'Why would I be here?' Meanwhile, the alliance on Wednesday enacted one of the Republican president's chief priorities: a pledge by Nato member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defence. 'I've been asking them to go up to 5% for a number of years,' Mr Trump said earlier on Wednesday as he met with Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary general. 'I think that's going to be very big news.' The 32 leaders endorsed a final summit statement saying: 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.' Spain had already officially announced that it cannot meet the target, and others have voiced reservations, but the investment pledge includes a review of spending in 2029 to monitor progress and reassess the security threat posed by Russia. The boost in spending follows years of Mr Trump's complaints that other countries were not paying their fair share as part of an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most Nato countries, with the key exception of Spain, appeared motivated to bolster their own defences not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Mr Trump. 🆕 NATO Allies have agreed to invest 5% of their GDP annually in defence. A substantial commitment in response to significant threats to our security#NATOsummit — NATO (@NATO) June 25, 2025 As a candidate in 2016, Mr Trump suggested that as president he would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defence guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the Nato treaty. In March this year, he expressed uncertainty that Nato would come to the United States' defence if needed, though the alliance did just that after the September 11 2001 attacks. On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition'. 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Mr Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signalled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he was at the summit. New Hampshire senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, who travelled to The Hague and met with several foreign leaders at the summit, said other countries raised 'understandable questions' about the US commitment to the alliance, 'certainly given President Trump's past statements'. 'We were very strong and reassuring everyone that we are committed to Nato, we are committed to Article 5, we are committed to maintaining troops on the Eastern flank,' said Ms Shaheen, who represented the US Senate with Democratic senator Chris Coons of Delaware. From right, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth, secretary of state Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump during a meeting with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte at the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands (Piroschka Van De Wouw, Pool Photo via AP) Mr Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire – although on Monday, he said the ceasefire was 'very good'. After Mr Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, reported that a US intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated', as Mr Trump had said. But on Wednesday morning, Mr Trump and other senior cabinet officials vigorously pushed back on the assessment, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the administration was launching an investigation into who disclosed those findings to reporters. 'That hit ended the war,' Mr Trump said. Drawing comparisons to the atomic bombings from the US during the Second World War, he added: 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war.' The White House has not said which other world leaders Mr Trump would meet with one on one while in The Hague, but the US president said during his meeting with Mr Rutte that he will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky later on Wednesday.
