
Japan to start discussions on reviewing retrial system Monday
A government advisory panel will start discussions Monday to review the country's retrial system for criminal cases in which guilty verdicts have become final, Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki said Friday.
The Legislative Council, which advises the justice minister, will hold the first subcommittee meeting on the matter Monday.
The minister also announced the 14 members of the subcommittee, including former judge Hiroaki Murayama, who decided to start the retrial of Iwao Hakamata that led to his acquittal for the 1966 murder of a family in Shizuoka Prefecture, central Japan.
Murayama is currently a lawyer. In 2014, as presiding judge at the Shizuoka District Court, he gave the go-ahead to the retrial of Hakamata, whose death sentence had been finalized in 1980, and decided to suspend his sentence and detention. Lawyer Yumi Kamoshida, who has been advocating for a revision to retrial-related legislation, was also appointed.
Toshihiro Kawaide, professor at the University of Tokyo's Graduate Schools for Law and Politics who specializes in criminal law, and Hiroshi Morimoto, director-general of the Justice Ministry's Criminal Affairs Bureau, will join the subcommittee as well.
"They are suitable for considering the retrial system from a broad perspective," the justice minister said of the subcommittee members.
A suprapartisan group of lawmakers that seeks a review of the retrial system had asked the justice minister to include as subcommittee members victims of false charges and former judges who were involved in retrial cases, saying the composition of the panel would have a major impact on the content of its discussions. This time, victims of false accusations and their families were not included.
Japan's Code of Criminal Procedure does not clearly define how retrials should be handled or set guidelines for evidence disclosure by investigative authorities. This has led to drawn-out proceedings and inconsistent decisions on whether to grant retrials, depending heavily on individual judges' discretion.
Against this backdrop, the subcommittee is expected to focus on how evidence should be disclosed during the process of seeking a retrial and limitations on prosecutors' ability to appeal decisions to grant one.
The retrial-related legislation has never been revised since 1948, when the current Code of Criminal Procedure was enacted. If the review is realized, it will be a major turning point in the country's criminal justice history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nikkei Asia
2 days ago
- Nikkei Asia
China is 'different kettle of fish' from 'rash' Russia: Finland president
TOKYO -- The biggest national security threat facing Finnish President Alexander Stubb is indisputably Russia, which shares a 1,340-kilometer land border with his country. Many Asian governments would point to China as their top challenge. But the Nordic leader this week warned against drawing easy parallels between the two Eurasian powers, stressing each is a "different kettle of fish." Stubb, who is on a five-day visit to Japan until Thursday, spoke at the University of Tokyo on Tuesday, laying out his perspective on geopolitics and a shifting global order. He described Russia -- whose 2022 invasion of Ukraine spurred Finland's move to join NATO in 2023 -- as "imperialist" and "rash."


Nikkei Asia
5 days ago
- Nikkei Asia
Latest on Chinese in Japan
TOKYO -- More Chinese are migrating to Japan than ever before, with many driven by a "search for freedom." The easing of requirements for obtaining visas has made it possible for wealthy and middle-income Chinese to more easily move to Japan, and the number of Chinese residents in the country is expected to exceed 1 million in 2026. But what does "search for freedom" mean, exactly? For many, it's better educational opportunities. In interviews by Nikkei, Chinese people said they were unhappy with the stifling atmosphere and anxiety they found in China, noting how fierce the competition is for entering universities there. "We want to bring up our children in a better educational environment," one person said. "In China, graduating from a university does not lead to finding employment," noted another. Takadanobaba, a neighborhood in Tokyo, has become a hub for preparatory schools specializing in university entrance exams for Chinese people who dream of finding employment and living in Japan after graduation. Song Jiaying, 19, is one of them. This spring, she gained admission to the prestigious Hitotsubashi University. "I like Japan's atmosphere of freedom," she said. "I'm no longer thinking of returning to China." Song is no exception. Chinese students already make up large percentages of foreign students at leading universities in Japan, representing as much as 70% at the University of Tokyo. Liu Yanming, 50, migrated to Japan two years ago for his son, an elementary school student who likes soccer. He was attracted by Japan's educational environment and did not hesitate about moving. "In China, studying is really hard," he said. "But in Japan, both study and soccer can be done with pleasure and in a balanced way." Jin Xin, 46, who runs a restaurant in China's Liaoning province, looks forward to emigrating to Japan. His wife is already in Japan and has been making efforts over the past year to prepare for the family's migration.


Japan Times
05-06-2025
- Japan Times
Japan's prison reform focuses on rehabilitation
For the first time in more than a century, Japan has overhauled its prison system with new rules placing greater emphasis on rehabilitation over punishment to combat the country's high recidivism rates. The new system, which took effect last Sunday, marks the first time that correctional facilities undergo a reform in 118 years. Individuals subject to the new rules are those who commit crimes after the law's implementation. A Penal Code amendment passed in 2022 removed the distinction between imprisonment with labor and that without. This means prison labor is no longer mandatory, which allows more time for educational and rehabilitative programs aimed at reducing recidivism. Previously, inmates were treated largely based on their risk of reoffending — a system that opened up the possibility of elderly repeat shoplifters being treated similarly to organized crime figures. In a news conference last Friday, Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki said that the new policy is designed to reduce recidivism and that preparations for the changes are being actively made at each correctional facility. 'It is expected that the introduction of (the Penal Code revision) will further advance crime prevention in Japan, and it will be important to implement initiatives that reflect this intent moving forward,' Suzuki said. 'We will continue to advance efforts to achieve more effective treatment for the rehabilitation and reintegration of inmates into society, with the aim of realizing a society in which every citizen can live safely and securely.' The current law now defines imprisonment simply as 'confinement in a penal institution,' with inmates to be assigned either 'necessary work' or 'necessary guidance' for their rehabilitation and improvement. The change was prompted by the country's persistently high recidivism rates. According to an Ministry of Justice report in 2023, the rate stood at 47%, with repeat offenders accounting for about half of all arrests in recent years. Under the previous system of imprisonment with labor, inmates were often burdened with mandatory work, leaving insufficient time for guidance aimed at reformation. Yuko Shiota, an official at the Center for Prisoners' Rights who is in contact with current and former inmates, said the organization welcomes the changes and commends the ministry for recognizing the need for change. The new framework will also implement treatment that combines work and guidance tailored to the characteristics of inmates by categorizing them into 24 groups according to age, background and individual needs. These include a 'Daily Care – Senior' program for inmates 70 and older with dementia and 'Addiction Recovery' for those with drug dependencies. Other programs are designed for adults age 20 to 26, and those serving sentences of 10 years or more. Older inmates will focus on maintaining physical and cognitive function, while younger prisoners may take part in education programs to support reintegration into schools after release. According to Shiota, some groups — such as those involved in the disability rights movement or advocates — argue that such categorization is discriminatory. Some point out 'that since people with disabilities must live in a diverse society, it's important for society to see and interact with them, or else discrimination will inevitably emerge,' she said, adding that she thinks it's a valid point. However, Shiota also acknowledged that in the specific context of prisons, things are different. 'When you have a mix of people, those with disabilities often move more slowly and struggle to complete various tasks. Because of that, they've often been subjected to bullying or punishment,' she said. As such, she thinks it is a good idea to separate them from everyone else in prison to keep them from continuing to be discriminated against because of their disabilities. Shiota also expressed concerns about the significant pressure that correctional officers might come under due to their new roles. 'If you look at the official materials, it always says things like 'understanding the inmate's mental state' or 'responding according to each inmate's individual characteristics,' but even professional psychologists find that kind of work challenging,' she said. 'Expecting correctional officers to do it is really a heavy burden.' That said, Shiota acknowledged it is still too early to judge how the changes will go, and that as a whole, it is a positive development that is welcomed by many who advocate for prisoners' rights. 'I'm thinking of making recommendations once I've gathered enough information,' she said. 'I already receive many letters from people in prison asking for advice. I think I'll receive letters from everyone later on saying things like, 'Things have changed like this,' or 'This has started,' so I'm thinking of (making recommendations) after reading those letters.'