Some Silicon Valley AI startups are asking employees to adopt China's outlawed ‘996' work model
Silicon Valley's startup hustle culture is starting to look more and more like an outlawed Chinese working schedule.
According to a new report from Wired, Bay Area startups are increasingly leaning into models resembling China's 996 working culture, where employees are expected to work from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., six days a week, totaling 72 hours per week.
Startups, especially in the AI space, are openly asking new starts to accept the longer working hours. For example, AI start-up Rilla tells prospective employees in current job listings not to even bother applying unless they are excited about 'working ~70 hrs/week in person with some of the most ambitious people in NYC.'
The company's head of growth, Will Gao, told Wired there was a growing Gen-Z subculture 'who grew up listening to stories of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, entrepreneurs who dedicated their lives to building life-changing companies.' He said nearly all of Rilla's 80-person workforce works on a 996 schedule.
The rise of the controversial work culture appears to have been born out of the current efficiency squeeze in Silicon Valley. Rounds of mass layoffs and the rise of AI have put pressure and turned up the heat on tech employees who managed to keep their jobs.
For example, in February, Google co-founder Sergey Brin told employees who work on Gemini that he recommended being in the office at least every weekday and said 60 hours is the 'sweet spot' for productivity.
Other tech CEOs, including Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, have stressed that productivity among workers is king, even if that means working hours or days of overtime. In November 2022, Musk infamously told remaining X, then Twitter, employees to commit to a new and 'extremely hardcore' culture or leave the company with severance pay.
Part of the reasoning for the intense work schedules is a desire to compete with China amid a global AI race. Especially after Chinese startup DeepSeek released an AI model on par with some of the top U.S. offerings, rocking leading AI labs.
China has actually been trying to clamp down on the 996 culture at home. In 2021, China's top court, the Supreme People's Court, and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security jointly declared China's '996' working culture was illegal. At the time, the move was part of the Chinese Communist Party's broader campaign to reduce inequality in Chinese society and limit the power of the nation's largest tech companies.
But the practice has already spilled over to other countries. Earlier this summer, the European tech sector also found itself in a heated debate over the working culture.
Partly exacerbated by an ongoing debate about Europe's competitiveness in the technology and AI space, some European VCs warned that more work and longer hours may be needed to effectively compete.
Harry Stebbings, founder of the 20VC fund, said on LinkedIn in June that Silicon Valley had 'turned up the intensity,' and European founders needed to take notice.
'[Seven] days a week is the required velocity to win right now. There is no room for slip up,' Stebbings said in the post. 'You aren't competing against random company in Germany etc but the best in the world.'
Some other founders weighed in, criticizing the rise of the 996 working culture and warning that it could quickly lead to burnout culture. Among them was Ivee Miller, a general partner at Balderton Capital.
'Burnout [is] one of the top 3 reasons early-stage ventures fail. It is literally a bad reason to invest,' Miller said on LinkedIn.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military
A top Republican senator demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan reveal if he has any ties to China's Communist Party and military – citing national security concerns. In a letter sent Wednesday to Intel Chairman Frank Leary, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote that he is concerned 'about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security,' according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Post. Tan replaced ousted Intel chief Pat Gelsinger in March — a year after the struggling company was awarded a whopping $8 billion in Biden-era CHIPs Act funding. Advertisement 3 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan speaking on stage in Taiwan in May. REUTERS Cotton's missive came after a report earlier this year claimed Tan invested at least $200 million across hundreds of Chinese firms between March 2012 and December 2024. Some of these advanced manufacturing and semiconductor firms have been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and military, Reuters reported in April. Advertisement In his letter, Cotton questioned whether the board had required Tan to divest from these stakes before assuming the CEO role. The senator asked whether Tan had disclosed his remaining investments to the US government, since Intel has a responsibility as a major recipient of federal funding. He also demanded to know whether the board was aware of subpoenas targeting Cadence Design – which Tan ran from 2008 to 2021 – before it hired him. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson told The Post. Advertisement Intel added that it will address the matter with Cotton, who asked for responses by Aug. 15. 3 Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's chairman with concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's reported ties to China. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Cotton wrote in the letter. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations.' Advertisement In 2024, Intel was awarded $8.5 billion in CHIPs funding under the Secure Enclave program, a national security initiative to make secure microchips for defense and intelligence applications. Later that year, the government slashed that figure by more than $600 million to about $7.85 billion. Intel still ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. 3 Intel ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. Getty Images A source familiar with the matter told Reuters in April that Tan had divested from his positions in Chinese firms. The outlet reported at the time that Chinese databases still listed many of his investments as current. While it is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, there is a US Treasury list of banned Chinese firms. Reuters reported earlier this year that Tan was not invested directly in any company on that list. Meanwhile, Cadence Design last week agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to settle charges that it sold its chips to a Chinese military university, according to a Reuters report. Advertisement The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, according to the report. Those sales took place under Tan's leadership at Cadence. After stepping down as CEO in 2021, Tan stayed on at Cadence as executive chairman through May 2023.
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Truth Social's Perplexity search comes with Trump-friendly media sources
President Trump's social media company Truth Social unveiled a new search tool powered by AI answer engine Perplexity on Wednesday — but Truth Social users who run Perplexity searches may find their results limited to a narrow set of typically Trump-supporting media outlets. Why it matters: Increasingly, where you ask online matters as much as what you ask. Catch up quick: Trump Media & Technology Group on Wednesday said it was launching a public beta test of a search engine, Truth Search AI, powered by Perplexity. Perplexity has been seen as a nascent Google-killer and is often touted by investors as a possible acquisition target for the likes of Apple. How it works: Axios asked seven questions on both a logged-in Truth Social account and the free, logged-out Perplexity website … What happened on January 6, 2021? Why was Donald Trump impeached? What crimes was President Trump convicted of? Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election? What is Hunter Biden's laptop a reference to? Was Hillary Clinton ever charged with a crime? Is the new "Naked Gun" movie good? Between the lines: In most cases, the responses were generally similar — but the sources linked to the answers were not. In all seven responses on Truth Social, either was the most common, or the only, listed source of information. Other sources were Washington Times or Epoch Times. In contrast, answers via the public version of Perplexity returned a wider variety of sources, including Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, NPR, Esquire and Politico. Although the questions were matched and asked at roughly the same time, there was no source overlap. What they're saying: A Perplexity spokesperson tells Axios that Truth Social is a customer of Perplexity's API, which means it — like tens of thousands of other developers — is building tools to its own specifications, and with its own restrictions. Any customization, like limiting the sources for its answers, would happen entirely on the Truth Social side. While it's standard practice for platforms to put their own layers of rules and information on top of tools, search tools usually cast a broader net. Truth Social did not mention any restrictions in its announcement, although it did say it plans to "refine and expand our search function based on user feedback." Perplexity's Sonar API specifically includes the ability for users to customize sources, which the company noted in January was a top user request. The bottom line: When you ask a search tool a question, particularly in the age of AI, it's best to know exactly where your information is coming from, and whether there are any limits on what the tool will tell you. Expect more of this as governments and businesses increasingly put their thumbs on the AI scale to serve their interests.
NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Wall Street gains, as oil ends lower in volatile trade
Wall Street indexes gained on Wednesday on largely upbeat corporate earnings, and U.S. yields also rose, while European shares closed flat and broke a two-day winning streak. U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, saying the country has imported Russian oil. Oil prices seesawed and finished down, as Trump's remarks about progress in talks with Moscow created uncertainty on whether the U.S. would impose new sanctions on Russia. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe rose 0.65% to 933.23. On Wall Street, the Nasdaq Composite led gains, rising 1.21% to 21,169.42 as Apple shares climbed after news of its plans to announce a domestic manufacturing pledge. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.18% to 44,193.12 and the S&P 500 rose 0.73% to 6,345.06. 'Earnings are seeing a mixed reaction. Particularly for a few of the AI names, expectations were just extremely high, but by and large, the earnings in aggregate have been good enough to keep a floor under the market,' said Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird. Europe's broad STOXX 600 index closed 0.06% lower, dragged down by healthcare stocks after Trump announced a tariff plan for the pharmaceutical sector. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan closed lower by 0.08% to 654.33, while Japan's Nikkei rose 0.60% to 40,794.86. The health of the U.S. economy is a major focus for markets, and Wall Street closed lower on Tuesday after data showed services sector activity unexpectedly flatlined in July. That reinforced the message from Friday's soft jobs data, which caused markets to significantly increase bets on the Federal Reserve cutting rates in September. 'There's this tug-of-war going on between the more concrete signs that we have seen that the U.S. economy is slowing and the fact that rate cuts are coming, which removes some of the pressure on valuations,' said Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier. Traders have been focused on tariff impacts. 'The market is more focused on the fact that we're not getting maximalist tariffs, but I wonder if it isn't focusing enough on the fact that we are still getting something moderate, and more could be coming, pharmaceuticals for example,' Chaar said. Trump on Tuesday said he would announce tariffs on semiconductors and chips in the next week or so, while the U.S. would initially impose a 'small tariff' on pharmaceutical imports before increasing it substantially in a year or two. He said the U.S. was close to a trade deal with China, and he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement was struck. Brazil's government has filed a consultation request at the World Trade Organization over U.S. tariffs. In the government bond market, Treasury yields gained ground. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 3.4 basis points to 4.23%, from 4.196% late on Tuesday. The yield on the benchmark German 10-year Bunds DE10YT=RR rose 0.2 basis points to 2.644%, from 2.642% late on Wednesday. Fed funds futures imply a 94% chance of a rate cut next month, with at least two cuts priced in for this year, according to the CME's FedWatch. Investors are waiting for Trump's pick to fill a coming vacancy on the Fed board of governors. Trump said the decision will be made soon, while ruling out Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as a contender to replace current chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. The euro was up 0.68% at $1.1653. The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies, fell 0.5% to 98.24. Brent crude futures fell 75 cents, or 1.1%, to settle at $66.89 a barrel, while U.S. crude dropped 81 cents, or 1.2%, to settle at $64.35.
