logo
Labour will lose the North without rail links, Andy Burnham warns Starmer

Labour will lose the North without rail links, Andy Burnham warns Starmer

Telegraph18-05-2025

Sir Keir Starmer must approve big-ticket rail projects in the North if he is to avoid an exodus of voters, Andy Burnham has warned.
Appearing at a high-profile rally at Westminster, the former Cabinet minister turned Mayor of Greater Manchester said the Labour Government risks alienating its core support if it continues to overlook transport upgrades outside London.
Mr Burnham said Northern voters were rightly angry after watching multibillion-pound projects such as the Elizabeth Line come to fruition in London while schemes promised to them a decade ago remain in limbo.
He told The Telegraph: 'They look around the country and they see different standards here in terms of transport. And they see what they have to put up with every day.
'That feeds an alienation that some people feel. My argument starts to deal directly with some of the root causes of the frustration that people feel when they see a country that they don't sense is working properly at the moment and doesn't feel fair to them.'
'Unifying story'
Mr Burnham, viewed as one of the few figures within Labour able to garner support from the Left and Right of the party, issued the warning after claiming that excessive spending in the South East was partly to blame for Reform UK's recent success in the local elections.
The event, staged just yards from the House of Commons, marked a high-profile return to Westminster for Mr Burnham, who spent 15 years as an MP and held three ministerial roles under Gordon Brown.
He quit the Commons for Manchester after coming second to Jeremy Corbyn in the 2015 Labour leadership vote, and he has since sought to reinvent himself as a champion of the North.
This persona was on full display last week, as he was in London to launch plans for a new Liverpool-to-Manchester railway that he claimed would contribute £90bn to the economy.
In a joint presentation with Steve Rotheram, Mayor of the Liverpool City region, and Huw Merriman, a former Tory rail minister, he called on Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to commit to funding preparatory work that would allow construction to begin early next decade.
Mr Burnham said that would provide the certainty needed to attract investment along the route, while also providing a pipeline of work for the rail industry once the High Speed 2 (HS2) project begins to wind down.
The Manchester and Liverpool mayoral authorities, together with one to be formed in Cheshire next year, would help manage the scheme and ensure that it had cross-party support, he said, avoiding much of the controversy that dogged HS2.
He said: 'Where we can come in is to provide a kind of unifying story around where we are going from here.
'This is about giving equivalent infrastructure across the country, to start to rebalance it in a fair way. And I think that is an answer to some of the feelings that people have at this time.'
The railway would be far shorter than the new Oxford-to-Cambridge line already approved by the Government, but offer twice the economic return, according to its backers.
The scheme is central to the recently unveiled Northern Arc project, which aims to revitalise plans for a rail-led development zone stretching from Liverpool to Leeds.
Dating back to the launch of George Osborne's Northern Powerhouse blueprint in 2014 and once ambitiously dubbed High Speed 3, those plans have yet to advance beyond an upgrade of the route between Manchester and Leeds.
The Liverpool-Manchester line would slash journey times on the world's first intercity route, which opened in 1830, a decade after the world's first passenger trains began running on the Stockton & Darlington Railway.
The new line would connect the two city centres via Liverpool and Manchester airports and a new super-station at the junction with the West Coast Main Line in Warrington.
It would also include options for a connection to HS2 should the route be extended north beyond the Midlands.
Challenge to Starmer
Mr Burnham, a Cambridge graduate born in Liverpool but who grew up in Newton-le-Willows on the borders of Merseyside and Greater Manchester, met with the Chancellor during his visit to Westminster and said the response was encouraging.
However, he said 'a tangible and concrete commitment' to the line was still required.
Mr Burnham, a former health secretary and chief secretary to the Treasury, added that he was hopeful that Ms Reeves's spending review – expected in June – would confirm changes to the Treasury's Green Book investment rules 'to allow a more long-term approach'.
That should address concerns that the current requirements favour projects in the South East, he said.
However, Mr Burnham, 55, also used the project launch to issue a wide-ranging critique of the Government.
Asked about Sir Keir's strategy for cutting benefits to force more people into work, he said he sympathised with Labour MPs threatening to rebel against the proposals.
'When it comes to disability benefits and their impact on people who perhaps have no other means of making up the loss in their income, I do think it's an issue a Labour government should look at,' he said.
The remark drew cheers from onlookers on College Green, the small area of public parkland opposite the Palace of Westminster chosen for the launch.
Mr Burnham also revealed that he had pitched an initiative to ministers aimed at making benefits reform fairer by having local agencies work with claimants to help them get back into the jobs market.
He is understood to be seeking tens of millions of pounds in the spending review to roll out the plan, on which he has consulted with Alan Milburn, a Labour moderniser under Tony Blair who last year was appointed to a key advisory role at the Department of Health.
Mr Burnham stopped short of criticising the Prime Minister directly and diplomatically dodged questions about Sir Keir's 'island of strangers' immigration speech, which has drawn parallels with Enoch Powell.
The appearance of a Labour 'big beast' holding court outside Westminster, meeting with ministers and proposing a slew of proposals aimed at addressing Labour's shortfalls may nevertheless have sounded the alarm for Sir Keir.
On the one hand, giving in to Mr Burnham's demands for increased regional investment would keep him within Labour's leadership tent. On the other, it would hand further prominence to a potential rival.
While Mr Burnham won a third term as Mayor of Greater Manchester a year ago, he has said repeatedly over the years that he would not rule out a further tilt at the Labour leadership.
While Sir Keir's leadership ratings have plummeted, in a Survation survey of Labour members published in March 57pc of respondents who did not back the Prime Minister named Mr Burnham as their favoured successor, despite him not being an MP.
Overall, Sir Keir was preferred by 43pc of respondents and Mr Burnham by 21pc.
As Mr Burnham left College Green on Wednesday for discussions with Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, one man shouted that he was 'the best prime minister we never had'.
Mr Burnham smiled and said that he was 'too kind', signalling that perhaps his long-term ambitions lie in Westminster and not just the North.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision'
Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision'

Wales Online

time39 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision'

Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision' The Reform UK leader was in Port Talbot on Wednesday where he vowed to reopen the town's steelworks and bring coal mining back to the Welsh Valleys Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) Reform UK chief Nigel Farage has outlined a series of proposals including the abolition of the default 20mph speed limit, prioritising "Welsh people" for housing queues and reinstating coal mining in Wales. Wales Online readers are, on the whole, not convinced. Moreover, he has declared his party's aim to "reopen Port Talbot's steelworks". Despite Tata Steel currently owning the operational steelworks, the remaining blast furnaces were shuttered in 2024 with plans to construct an electric arc furnace for steel recycling. This transition is resulting in the loss of thousands of jobs. ‌ At a press conference in Port Talbot, when pressed about the funding for reigniting the blast furnaces - an idea deemed unfeasible by industry specialists - he acknowledged that the total cost would be "in the low billions", meaning it would need substantial investment from the UK Government. ‌ Farage, in a WalesOnline article, mentioned that Reform UK's would "allow coal, if suitable, to be mined in Wales". When asked if people would actually want to work down mines, he responded that they would if they were paid enough. The latest opinion poll in Wales indicates that his party is on track to secure its first seats at the Senedd in the forthcoming May 2026 election. Currently, the party's presence in Wales is limited to councillors, yet a recent YouGov/Barn Cymru survey for the election for the Welsh Parliament next May places Reform UK as runner-up with 25% of the vote. They are trailing narrowly behind Plaid Cymru, who are forecasted to receive 30%, and passing Labour which stands at 18%. Moreover, Reform said they would stop any properties from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers, will end funding for the Welsh Refugee Council, and will abolish the Welsh Government's "Nation of Sanctuary" policy. Article continues below He further pledged to establish an Elon Musk-inspired department aimed at reducing costs. He said: "A Reform UK Senedd will also save hundreds of millions each year by cutting bureaucracy, waste and bad management. The establishment of Welsh DOGE will help us uncover where there is woke and wasteful spending and we will make sure those funds are redirected to frontline services." Commenter Shane1976 says: 'I cannot believe how gullible people are. Where is the money coming from to [reopen] the steel works and the mines? Where are the miners coming from? This man promised the world with Brexit and Welsh voters believed him and Wales is worse off for it.' Ironside agrees: 'It was Mr Farage's idea to leave the EU in the first place when he was with UKIP and the Brexit Party. He fooled the British people, including myself, that leaving the EU would make things better instead Brexit has been a total disaster for the UK and Wales." ‌ Thebear2025 adds: 'I honestly do not believe him. He is just saying what he thinks the people of Wales want. While I think Labour definitely have to go, I don't think Reform is the answer to our prayers and will backtrack once in power the same as the other parties do.' Tigerbay replies: 'Reform will do well in Wales, but only because of the mess the other parties are making!' Exess60 wonders: 'As far as the steel works goes, do the good long suffering people of Port Talbot really want to revert to the filthy fog that blemished their environment and caused so much ill health for over a century? Surely that was yesterday, not the future!' ‌ DaisyDD writes: 'We want mining again in the Valleys. Our lads need work and it kept our communities together. Face it we are getting ready for war and need to be more self-sufficient for our steel. Opening Port Talbot's blast furnaces with coal again is a great idea. It should never have been allowed to close.' Numbersontheleft replies: 'I am not a Reform supporter but there are a lot of really good points in Farage's speech. It's simply wrong that steel will no longer be made in Wales. "Getting rid of the nation of sanctuary, blanket 20mph and the extra 36 MSs are policies any sane party should be supporting. And who wouldn't support improved efficiency and reduced waste in our public sector. The other parties are trying their best to rubbish Reform, but they are clearly worried that Farage is saying the things their voters want them to be saying.' ‌ Robo78 believes: 'It sounds like Nigel Farage wants to give us the jobs that no one else wants to do; this will enlarge our brain drain, not tackle it. What we need in Wales is a coherent, long-term strategy that links skills training to meaningful local employment. "Proposals like Farage's often present a narrow, backward-looking vision: one focused on recreating large-scale, traditional industrial jobs that are no longer economically viable, rather than planning for how these vital skills can be integrated into a modern, diverse Welsh economy.' Numbersontheleft retorts: 'So you think steel making, welding, plumbing, robotics, electrical trades, and industrial automation are jobs nobody else wants to do? Whilst in the real world, Wales and Britain desperately need construction trades to build homes and infrastructure. Also manufacturing the things we use, instead of importing goods manufactured in other countries.' Article continues below Would you like to see heavy industry back in the South Wales Valleys? Is Reform the answer to Wales' woes? Have your say in our comments section.

Newscast  Grooming Gangs National Inquiry Announced
Newscast  Grooming Gangs National Inquiry Announced

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Newscast Grooming Gangs National Inquiry Announced

Today, we look at the announcement that there will be full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs. Sir Keir Starmer said he had accepted the recommendations of an audit by Baroness Louise Casey into the data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse. And as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues, Laura, Paddy and Henry Zeffman, look at what the UK is doing in response. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Paddy O'Connell and Laura Kuenssberg. It was made by Chris Flynn and Josh Jenkins. The technical producer was James Piper. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.

Grooming gang victims' concerns weren't dismissed, Reeves says
Grooming gang victims' concerns weren't dismissed, Reeves says

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Grooming gang victims' concerns weren't dismissed, Reeves says

Rachel Reeves has insisted ministers "never dismissed the concerns of victims" of grooming gangs, as she defended the decision to launch a national inquiry after months of chancellor said Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was focused on victims "and not grandstanding".Sir Keir has faced criticism for resisting calls for such an inquiry, with the Conservatives claiming they forced him into a detective Maggie Oliver, who resigned from Greater Manchester Police over the way grooming cases were handled in Rochdale, said the Conservatives and Labour had both been "dragged kicking and screaming to this point". The prime minister said on Saturday he had read an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for an inquiry, covering England and report is expected to be published on Monday and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is set to address the findings of the review in the start of the year, the government dismissed calls for a national Keir and other ministers argued the issue had already been examined in a seven-year inquiry led by Professor Alexis on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Reeves was asked whether the prime minister had been wrong to initially resist the replied: "We've never dismissed the concerns of victims. These are the most important people in those discussions."Reeves said the government had been focused on implementing the recommendations of Professor Jay's review."But the prime minister wanted to assure himself he was doing everything that was necessary, which is why he asked Baroness Casey to do this rapid review," she asked if Sir Keir had changed his mind on the need for a national inquiry, Reeves replied: "Our prime minister has always been really focused on the victims, and not grandstanding but actually doing the practical things to ensure something like this never happens again." Ms Oliver said the inquiry was "an important step on the journey to change" and that Baroness Casey's report would "lift the lid on what has been going on".But she said Labour and the Conservatives had "equally failed" to confront the issue of grooming gangs, so "won't get a single bit of thanks" from her. "For me, I can only look at them with contempt, because I see on the ground the suffering that their neglect has caused," she added. Appearing on the same programme, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the decision to launch the inquiry should have happened "far, far earlier".He said the Conservatives had been "calling for this for many, many months" and accused Sir Keir of dismissing their concerns as "some kind of far-right bandwagon"."That was the wrong response," Stride said. "This is just another example of the prime minister being pressurised by us into U-turning."The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) said it was pleased the prime minister accepted the recommendations of Baroness Casey's the charity's chief executive Chris Sherwood said "a national inquiry into abuse by organised networks must not delay urgent action on child sexual abuse that is long overdue".He said survivors had already waited more than two years for the recommendations from Professor Jay's report to be Jay's inquiry found institutional failings, with tens of thousands of victims across England and seven-year investigation concluded child sexual abuse was "epidemic" across the two nations and made 20 recommendations in the final report published in grooming gangs issue was thrust into the spotlight at the start of this year, fuelled partly by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who criticised Sir Keir for not calling a national inquiry.A row between the two centred on high-profile cases where groups of men, mainly of Pakistani descent, were convicted of sexually abusing and raping predominantly young white girls in towns such as Rotherham and January, the government stopped short of launching a statutory national inquiry into grooming gangs, despite the idea receiving support from some Labour statutory inquiry now backed by the prime minister will be able to compel witnesses to provide government has already announced plans for five local inquiries, to be held in Oldham and four other areas yet to be named.A senior government source said the national inquiry would "co-ordinate a series of targeted local investigations".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store