Tourism tax could help fund ‘significant' revitalisation of Dublin
A tourism tax could help bring in 'significant' funding for a plan to 'revitalise' Dublin city, the Taoiseach said.
The Dublin City Taskforce report, published in October 2024, said Dublin has become 'less welcoming' since the financial crash and pandemic and makes recommendations on how to revive it.
Advertisement
At a press conference on Tuesday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris and Minister of State Sean Canney confirmed the Government's backing for the Capital City Report of the Dublin City Taskforce.
A roadmap for delivery of the Dublin City Taskforce Report was also published on Tuesday.
'Our capital city does undoubtedly have a lot to offer,' Micheal Martin said.
While the city is viewed positively by some, Mr Martin acknowledged there have been 'increased concerns about safety, cleanliness, reduced footfall and changing attitudes to shopping and socialising'.
Advertisement
He said the redevelopment of the GPO as 'a world-class and historic flagship project', with a 'significant' cultural element, supported by retail and office parts, was among the recommendations to revitalise Dublin.
Mr Martin said that a tourism tax will be examined to help fund the 'significant' expenditure needed to make the city more enticing.
'It could provide additional revenue raising powers, so that will be examined. Because, let's be honest, there's going to be significant investment here.
'There's going to be significant additional expenditure to make the city more attractive.
Advertisement
'It will be examined in more detail. Estimates varies between depending on rate of fee applied, it would range from four million to 41 million.'
The Tanaiste added: 'There can be significant benefit in a tourist tax if done in the correct way.
'Many, many European capital cities have it, but of course, you want to get the timing right, you want to, obviously consult.
'You want to do the work the Taoiseach has outlined.'
Advertisement
He said it would also be about 'empowering' Dublin City Council to decide whether it needed an additional revenue stream.
'The idea that people who visit our city would make a small contribution, they would go back into the city council coffers to help them deliver some of the projects.
'So fundamentally, I believe, massively in local government, empowering councillors and providing revenue streams, there needs to be a sensitivity around the timing.'
Business
Majority of tourism businesses 'seriously concerne...
Read More
The report of the Dublin City Taskforce said there are a number of funding mechanisms that could be leveraged to support implementation of its revitalisation plan.
Advertisement
'These include state level supports through funds like the Urban Regeneration and Development Fund (URDF), European level supports through the European Investment Bank (EIB), public/private partnerships and the introduction or enforcement of levies such as a tourist tax, congestion charges, increased vacant property levies or a lifting of the derogation for rates on State buildings.
'Any decision on fundraising is a matter for government and is outside the remit of the taskforce.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government could have an unlikely ally in welfare cuts vote
The Prime Minister 's proposed welfare reforms, which aim to save £5bn annually by reducing personal independence payments, are facing a significant rebellion from more than 100 Labour MPs. The Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, has offered her party's support to pass the reforms, meaning the Prime Minister would rely on opposition votes against his own party's rebellion. Critics within Labour and trade unions have warned that it would be shameful for the Prime Minister to rely on Tory votes to pass the benefit cuts. Despite the widespread dissent, including potential rebellion from 12 ministers, the Prime Minister has vowed to press ahead with the reforms, arguing the current welfare system is broken and unsustainable. Labour MPs rebelling against the bill are reportedly undeterred by threats of losing the whip or deselection, fearing deselection by their constituents more if they support the cuts.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer says government will stand firm on disability welfare overhaul
Keir Starmer has said the government will stand firm on its welfare plans as ministers and party whips struggled to contain a growing Labour rebellion before next week's crunch vote. The tally of rebels already stood at 108 by Tuesday morning and, as Labour heavy-hitters waded into the row, there were fears inside government that the number would rise and scupper Starmer's changes to benefits. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, was among those urging the prime minister to drop his plans, warning they would 'destroy the financial safety net' for millions of people. Some Labour frontbenchers could quit to vote against the plans. While cabinet ministers were deployed to win over Labour rebels, some whips and government aides were accused by MPs of threatening deselection and suggesting a defeat could blow up the government. No 10 denied the claims. The Labour rebels, including senior committee chairs, have tabled an amendment that calls for the government to pause the legislation and bring forward the promised £1bn to get more people into work first. If ministers do not agree, they will try to vote the bill down. The scale of the rebellion appeared to take Downing Street, and even some of the Labour backbenchers themselves, by surprise, amid concerns that thousands of vulnerable people could be plunged into poverty as a result of losing their disability benefits. Starmer, however, said on Tuesday that he would press ahead with the overhaul, insisting there was a 'clear moral case' for change. Speaking on his way to the Nato summit in The Hague, the prime minister defended the plans to tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), arguing the current system was unsustainable. 'There is a clear moral case, which is: the current system doesn't help those who want to get into work,' he said. 'It traps people. I think it's 1,000 people a day going on to Pip. The additions to Pip each year are the equivalent of a city the size of Leicester. That is not a system that can be left unreformed.' When asked if he would consider delaying the vote due to the scale of opposition, Starmer replied: 'We were elected to change what is broken in our country. The welfare system is broken, and that's why we will press ahead with our reforms. It's very important that we do so, because the current system is not working for anybody.' Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, spent much of Tuesday locked in talks with MPs as she sought to win over opponents. Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, Jonathan Reynolds and Wes Streeting were also understood to have been deployed to try to convince anxious backbenchers. The size of the rebellion – which one rebel source suggested on Tuesday night had risen to 127 – is enough to threaten Starmer's working majority of 165 and defeat the government's plans if opposition MPs side with the rebels. No 10 could opt to pull the bill rather than face defeat. Vicky Foxcroft, a former government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has signed the amendment, along with the former cabinet minister Louise Haigh. More frontbenchers, who would then have to stand down, are expected to join the rebellion. On Tuesday evening Kemi Badenoch offered Conservative support to help the government pass its welfare bill in exchange for three commitments from Starmer. Badenoch told Sky News: 'I'm just making it very clear to Keir Starmer that if he will make commitments at the dispatch box to meet our conditions which are to reduce the welfare budget, to get people into work and not to have tax rises, then we can support his bill. 'The bill is a bit of a mess. It needs some work. It looks like it's been rushed for Rachel [Reeves] to fix other problems that they've got. But our welfare budget is far too high, and we really need to bring it down.' The rebel amendment, led by the Treasury select committee chair, Meg Hillier, raises concerns the proposals could push up to 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. It also criticises the government for failing to publish the Office for Budget Responsibility's impact assessment before the vote, and for pursuing changes without adequate consultation with disabled people. The proposed legislation would make it harder to qualify for Pip by requiring claimants to meet a higher threshold in their assessments. It also includes plans to halve the health top-up in universal credit for new claimants from 2026 and phase out the work capability assessment. Khan urged ministers to 'look again' at the hardship the changes would force on vulnerable and disabled people. He said the additional employment and training support should be brought in as soon as possible, and proper transitional protections put in place before cuts. 'I have always said that more must be done to support people to go from relying on benefits to getting back into work. It's vital for a healthy and prosperous London. What we can't do is take away the vital safety net that so many vulnerable and disabled Londoners rely upon,' he added. Asked whether concessions would be offered to rebels, a No 10 spokesperson said: 'We'll talk to them over the next week but the government believes this is a good package of reforms. We hope that colleagues will engage positively over the next few days.' The Cabinet Office minister, Pat McFadden, said on Tuesday morning it would be a 'very serious thing' for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the legislation at its first major outing in the Commons. But he added that ministers would continue talking to MPs. Disability charities have criticised the changes, warning they will disproportionately impact people with mental health conditions, women with fluctuating illnesses and unpaid carers. Experts warned that up to 1.2 million people with disabilities are expected to lose thousands of pounds a year under Kendall's plans to save £5bn a year by overhauling the welfare system, including by cutting Pip. An extra 250,000 people will fall into relative poverty by 2029-30, according to the government's own impact assessment.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Another big success': Nato leader flatters Trump before The Hague summit
In The Hague, the Nato summit waits for Donald Trump – and no one more so than the alliance's secretary general, Mark Rutte. 'You are flying into another big success,' Rutte wrote in a text on Tuesday, one of several released shortly afterwards by a hyperactive Trump as he travelled across the Atlantic in Air Force One. The sycophantic messages from the Dutchman had compared Nato's plan to dramatically increase defence spending to the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend: 'Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do.' That tone underlined how keen the head of the alliance and most other western allies are to ensure the summit passes off well, knowing full well that Trump's commitment to Nato has been unpredictable in the past – and that every step has to be taken to keep the freewheeling US president on message. Meanwhile, as Air Force One headed over the Atlantic to the Dutch capital, it did not take Trump long to drift off message. Would, the president was asked, the US abide by Nato's article 5 guarantee that says that if one member of the alliance is attacked, it is considered as an attack on all, and other allies should take the actions deemed necessary to assist the country attacked? 'Depends on your definition,' Trump said. 'There's numerous definitions of article 5, you know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends.' The president was asked to explain this watery response, prompting him to say he was 'committed to saving lives' and 'committed to life and safety', before adding that he did not want to elaborate while flying. At the 2018 summit during his first term, Trump hinted that the US might be leaving Nato, but at this year's specially shortened get-together, every step has been taken to ensure that he is in an upbeat mood and supportive of the military alliance that the US contributes so much to and Europe has benefited so much from. The US president flew in the early evening, for a leaders' dinner held at Paleis Huis ten Bosch, the royal palace and a home of King Willem-Alexander. But in a change announced at the last minute, it emerged that Trump would be staying there overnight, not at the Grand Hotel Huis ter Duin in Noordwijk as planned, and would be breakfasting with the Dutch monarch. Over the past few months, Rutte has been negotiating directly with Trump and other Nato leaders to persuade the alliance's 32 members to agree what amounts in most cases to a substantial hike in defence spending, lifting core military budgets to 3.5% of GDP by 2035, and wards when an extra 1.5% of related spending on cyber, intelligence and infrastructure is factored in. One Nato military leader praised Rutte's diplomatic skills. 'The way he has handled Trump has been brilliant, from the moment he went to visit him in Mar-a-Lago,' he said, referring to a trip made in November last year, when Trump was still president-elect. It was a deal, he said, that had been hammered out between the two, before country by country, almost every Nato member was brought around. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion On Monday, Rutte was circumspect when asked about how he managed to work with Trump and bring him on board with the plan, or his role in trying to make the summit a success. 'I'm holding the gavel. I opened the meeting, I closed the meeting, and in the meantime, I travel a lot between allies and talk and discuss,' he told the Guardian. The tone of the texts, however, reveal the reality of the Rutte approach – perhaps the only one calculated to bring success. 'It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5%!' he wrote to Trump. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win. Safe travels and see you at His Majesty's dinner.' After Tuesday's dinner, Wednesday will see a cut-down summit, with a single two-and-a-half-hour meeting where Trump and other leaders will sign off a short communique of a handful of paragraphs that will confirm the 5% deal. The hope is that Trump – flushed also with a feeling of success after the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites – will be pro-Nato in private and again at the mid-afternoon press conference. But some unhappy diplomats in The Hague worried that there could yet be a row with Spain. Though its prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, has said he would not block the 5% commitment, he has insisted that Spain can meet its Nato responsibilities by spending less: 2.1% of GDP. Of the dozen or so social media postings Trump made from the flight was a media graphic headlined: 'Spain threatens to derail summit.'
