Three ‘random old coins' you could have buried at the bottom of a jar worth £100,000 – exact details to look for
Plus, the most rare and valuable coins of all time
CASH IN Three 'random old coins' you could have buried at the bottom of a jar worth £100,000 – exact details to look for
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A COIN-collecting expert has said Brits could be sitting a goldmine of old currency.
TikToker CoinCollectingWizard highlighted three coins - one of which is still in active circulation - which could collectively be worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Among your loose change could be coins worth a fortune to collectors
Credit: Getty
1933 penny
The first, the 1933 penny, is one of the UK's rarest coins and is worth well over £100,000.
The exact number minted is unknown, but it is believed only six or seven 1933 pennies were ever made, as that year the Royal Mint decided there were enough pennies in circulation.
However, it was tradition for the monarch to put a set of new coins underneath the foundations of any important new buildings.
That meant a handful were struck for ceremonial purposes.
The coin's rarity attracted the attention of criminals and in August 1970 thieves raided the coins buried beneath the foundation stone of the Church of St Cross, Middleton, near Leeds.
That prompted the bishop of nearby St Mary's Church in Kirkstall to have the coins under his church dug up to be sold.
The third and final penny is buried somewhere under Senate House at the University of London in Bloomsbury.
At auction the 1933 pennies have sold for over £100,000.
Neil Paisley, managing director of AH Baldwin & Sons, told the YouTuber Tom Scott that one sold in 2016 for a hammer price of approximately £140,000.
The penny's value has also frequently led to counterfeit attempts, with people attempting to change the 5s to 3s on the more common 1935 penny.
Minor detail to spot on ultra-rare 1p coin worth £130,000 at auction
The Coin Collecting Wizard said: "Be careful, many fakes are out there. If you think you've got one, get it authenticated."
1905 half crown
The second coin mentioned by the TikTok coin enthusiast is the 1905 half crown.
Only 166,008 were minted, which puts their value between £450 and £10,000 depending on condition
The coin is made of silver and features a portrait view of King Edward VII on one side and a shield on the other.
While few members of the public are likely to have a 1905 half crown buried in the bottom of the wallet or down the back of the sofa, the third coin is one the average person is much more likely to run into.
What are the most rare and valuable coins?
The most valuable coin of all-time
The 1933 Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle - $18.9 million. The current record for the world's most expensive coin. It is illegal to own. The only publicly traded example sold for $18.9 million in 2021.
The rarest coin of all-time
The 1343 Edward III Florin - also known as the "Double Leopard", it was minted during King Edward III's reign in medieval England and only three examples are known to exist today.
2p - 'NEW PENCE'
The two pence coin was introduced in the UK in 1971. It was printed with the words 'NEW PENCE' on it until 1982, when it was changed to 'TWO PENCE'.
However in 1983 a number of coins were accidentally issued with the previous 'NEW PENCE' wording.
Those 1983 two pences pieces with the 'new' markings are now worth upwards of £1,000.
It comes after a rare 50p coin with iconic childhood character was sold on eBay for 14 times its face value.
A Peter Rabbit coin fetched nearly £2,500 recently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Rachel Reeves pumps cash into NHS with 4m more tests and procedures to cut waits
The NHS and defence were big winners from the Chancellor's Spending Review as Rachel Reeves set out the Government's spending plans for the rest of the decade Rachel Reeves turned on the spending taps today with a £300billion package to renew Britain. The Chancellor said "destructive" Tory austerity had inflicted misery on ordinary Brits and damaged the economy, and vowed: "My choices are different". The NHS and defence were big winners from the Spending Review as Ms Reeves set out the Government's spending plans for the rest of the decade. The NHS was handed an extra £29billion-a-year, a 3% increase for day-to-day running costs over the next three years. Tonight, the Chancellor promised up to 4 million additional NHS tests and procedures would be delivered over the next five years to help slash waiting lists. New scanners, more community diagnostic centres, ambulances and Urgent Treatment Centres will be put in place, with increased capacity in community care to reduce pressure on hospitals. The Chancellor pumped an additional £190billion into day-to-day spending, with Government budgets set to grow by 2.3% per year across the period 2023/24 to 2028/29. And she announced £113billion for infrastructure projects, including £39billion for affordable homes over the next decade, £15.6billion for transport networks outside of London and £16.7billion for nuclear power. Some £30 billion will also be invested over the next five years in maintenance and repair of the crumbling NHS estate, with more than £5 billion dedicated to the most critical repairs. Keir Starmer told the Cabinet that it marked "the end of the first phase of this government, as we move to a new phase that delivers on the promise of change for working people". In a statement to MPs, Ms Reeves said her plans were a far cry from Tory austerity, where public spending was cut by 2.9% per year in 2010. She said: "Let's be clear, austerity was a destructive choice for the fabric of our society. And it was a destructive choice for our economy too, choking off investment and demand, creating a lost decade for growth, wages and living standards." She added: "My choices are different. My choices are Labour choices. The choices in this spending review are possible only because of my commitment to economic stability and the decisions that this Government has made." Ms Reeves said Labour was "renewing Britain", adding: 'I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it. This Government's task, my task as chancellor, and the purpose of this spending review is to change that, to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs and on their high streets." Defence spending will hit 2.6% of GDP by 2027 - including cash for intelligence - made up by a raid on the foreign aid budget. But no details were given on when the Prime Minister will meet his ambition of hiking it to 3%. A massive £86billion will be spent on the science and technology sector by the end of this Parliament, including funding research into drug treatments. The Chancellor also promised to set out plans for Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), a scheme to improve rail services between Liverpool and Leeds. There was also £3.5 billion more funding for the TransPennine Route Upgrade between York and Manchester, as well as £445million for rail in Wales over the next 10 years, and funding for a new line between Oxford and Cambridge. Schools will see their budgets swell by £2 billion, with per pupil funding to grow by 1.1% a year. Some £2.3 billion per year will go to fixing "crumbling classrooms" and £2.4 billion per year to rebuild 500 schools. But the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that paying for an expansion of free school meals to another 500,000 children whose families claim Universal Credit next year means a real terms freeze to school funding. Labour will stop housing asylum seekers in hotels by the end of this Parliament, saving the taxpayer £1billion a year. But policing is expected to feel the squeeze as the Home Office grapples with cuts exceeding the asylum savings. The National Police Chiefs' Council warned a projected £1.2 billion shortfall in funding is expected to grow, leaving forces facing further cuts. There will also be £7 billion to fund 14,000 new prison places and up to £700 million per year for probation reforms. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Department for Transport and Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs are all in line for real-terms cuts. Much of the funding has been front-loaded to the start of this Parliament, which means the average increase falls to around 1.5% from 2025-26. Stephen Millard, interim director of the NIESR economic research institute, said: "The Chancellor has yet again said that her fiscal rules are 'non-negotiable'. But, given the small amount of headroom at the time of the spring statement and the increases in spending announced since then, it is now almost inevitable that if she is to keep to her fiscal rules, she will have to raise taxes in the autumn budget." Health leaders said the cash boost for the NHS would not guarantee waiting time targets can be met. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, warned that "difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it".
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Major shake-up of how people pay BBC licence fee proposed
Major shake-up of how people pay BBC licence fee proposed BBC chairman Samir Shah suggested the current flat fee could be replaced in future The BBC licence fee would be means tested if the proposals were introduced (Image: Getty ) A BBC boss has proposed TV licence fees could be based on the value of one's home in future. Chairman Samir Shah suggested that the current £174.50 fee could be replaced with a progressive payment structure tied to property values. In an interview earlier this year, he proposed that the fee could be linked to council tax bands and collected concurrently, marking his first significant change since succeeding Richard Sharp. He also dismissed the notion of replacing the TV licence with a Netflix-style subscription service, arguing it wouldn't fulfil the BBC's mission to provide something for everyone in the country. Under this proposal, households in higher council tax bands would pay more for BBC services, while those in lower bands might pay less than the current rate. The option to opt out of paying a TV licence would be removed. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Shah believes this approach would lessen the need to prosecute non-payers, telling The Sunday Times: "It gets rid of the enforcement issue, which is a problem. The idea that not paying the licence fee is a criminal offence seems too harsh." For regions like Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands, where Council Tax doesn't apply, an alternative method would need to be established, reports the Express. Article continues below Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy may be receptive to the idea, having previously described the current model as "harder for poorer households to pay". During the interview, he tackled queries about altering the BBC's funding model and dismissed the idea of a hybrid structure that would offer basic services like news for free while charging for drama or comedy content. He also mentioned that introducing advertising to the BBC would "kill off ITV" and rejected the notion that the BBC should be funded entirely through general taxation, arguing it would "leave the BBC open to influence from the government of the day". Article continues below At the moment, although there are concessions or free licences for certain groups, such as those over 75 who receive Pension Credit, the licence fee does not take personal assets into account. The standard licence fee is set at £174.50 per annum, with a reduced rate of £58.50 for black and white TV subscriptions. For individuals who are blind or severely sight-impaired, there is a 50% concession, bringing the cost down to £87.25.
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Popular Scots baby store announces shock closure leaving expectant parents out of pocket
Some families have accused the firm of "taking money from people, knowing they were going under" Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) EXPECTANT parents claim to have been left out of pocket after a popular Scots baby store shut its doors without warning. Stirling Pram pulled the shutters down last week after announcing on social media that "despite our best efforts" it had gone bust. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Stirling Pram announced the shock closure on social media last week Credit: Stirling Pram 2 It was an official stockist of renowned brands like Mamas and Papas Credit: Stirling Pram The baby shop, an official stockist of renowned brands such as Mamas and Papas, was a go-to for newborn essentials, including prams, car seats and nursery furniture. Just days before the closure, Stirling Pram launched a half-price "furniture clearance sale" - claiming it was to make space for new stock. But shortly afterwards, the store revealed on Facebook that it would be ceasing trading. In a post on Stirling Pram's now-deleted Facebook account, staff wrote: 'To all our amazing customers, after pouring our hearts into this business it's incredibly difficult to now share that we are closed and going into liquidation. 'Running a physical store in recent years has been more challenging than ever – from the rapid growth of online shopping and price cutting, people increasingly using us just as a showroom for buying online, to the rising costs of rent, utilities, supplies and operations. 'Despite our best efforts, these pressures became too much to bear.' It added: 'This decision hasn't come easily, and we want to say a heartfelt thank you to every one of you who walked through our doors, supported us, and believed in what we were doing.' According to The Courier, employees at the Stirling Enterprise Park store learned they were losing their jobs on the same day the closure was announced. Parents-to-be, who claim to have spent hundreds of pounds on prams and other items, say the company has ignored their attempts to contact them following the announcement. Several have taken to social media, accusing the firm of "taking money from people, knowing they were going under". End of an Era: Beloved Scottish Discount Chain Closes Its Edinburgh Branch One wrote: 'Absolutely fuming, ordered pram, changing unit and other stuff from Stirling Pram in Stirling. 'Paid quite a bit in deposits, only to find out when I tried to contact them they'd gone into administration. 'We're lucky, if we can't get a refund from bank… but for some, they've given their money thinking they're giving their unborn child the best and are left with nothing.' Another added: 'I am very sorry to hear about your shop closing. 'But I'm also very angry as I've have bought and fully paid for my daughter's pram for her first baby, which is currently being held in your store for us until nearer baby's due date. 'I am absolutely disgusted and my daughter at 10 weeks to go certainly does not need this stress of now knowing we have no pram or money to buy another one.' Stirling Pram claimed it had appointed "insolvency practitioners" who would contact existing customers with "more details on next steps". The business was put up for sale ten months ago, described as a "well-established business" with an annual turnover of £650,000. Stirling Pram's website and social media channels have all been deleted.
