Judge rules Alabama can't prosecute people who help women travel for abortions
A federal judge ruled that Alabama cannot prosecute people or groups who help women travel out of state to get abortions.
'It is one thing for Alabama to outlaw by statute what happens in its own backyard,' U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote in a Monday ruling.
'It is another thing for the State to enforce its values and laws, as chosen by the Attorney General, outside its boundaries by punishing its citizens and others who help individuals travel to another State to engage in conduct that is lawful there but the Attorney General finds to be contrary to Alabama's values and laws.'
In his 131-page opinion, Thompson handed a win to abortion advocacy groups who sued Alabama's Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) after he previously said he would consider prosecuting any person or organization that 'aids and abets' in an abortion, utilizing the state's criminal conspiracy law.
Marshall, who was appointed in 2017, has not, so far, carried out such prosecutions.
Thompson offered other scenarios of state overreach in his ruling.
'For example, the Alabama Attorney General would have within his reach the authority to prosecute Alabamians planning a Las Vegas bachelor party, complete with casinos and gambling, since casino-style gambling is outlawed in Alabama,' Thompson wrote. 'As the adage goes, be careful what you pray for.'
After the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022, Alabama's trigger law soon went into effect, making abortion almost entirely illegal in the state. The reliably red state has one of the strictest abortion bans in the U.S., with no exceptions for incest or rape.
'Today is a good day for pregnant Alabamians who need lawful out-of-state abortion care,' said Jenice Fountain, executive director of Yellowhammer Fund, one of the groups that sued the state, in a statement following the ruling.
'The efforts of Alabama's attorney general to isolate pregnant people from their communities and support systems has failed.'
A spokesperson for Marshall told news outlets
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
State, federal cannabis changes threaten Ohio festival's future
WAVERLY, Ohio (WCMH) — Several thousand marijuana enthusiasts will descend upon Waverly next month for the second annual Stargazer Cannabis Festival. It may also be the last. 'We're very sad about that fact, and it would be very ironic that this festival was conceived out of a celebration for legalization, and then ironically, the law will make it illegal,' festival organizer Chad Thompson said. Dispensary reacts to Ohio marijuana limit changes Thompson is concerned about changes to cannabis laws in consideration at the state and federal level that would minimize or eliminate the three-day cannabis festival. Ohio lawmakers have weighed multiple changes to Ohio's recreational marijuana laws, which passed in 2023 with 57% of the vote. Federally, a provision currently included in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would prohibit most products that use hemp-derived THC. Under the new federal proposal, the U.S. would redefine which hemp products are legal. Hemp was redefined in President Donald Trump's first term to mean cannabis that has minimal THC levels, 0.3% or lower. People have used this definition to synthetically manufacture cannabis products that are both legal and intoxicating. The budget draft would ban those hemp products, making ingestible hemp federally illegal again. 'There is an effort to eliminate that segment of the hemp market, which would really give a big hit to hemp businesses and us, as a cannabis festival, also would be greatly impacted by that,' Thompson said. 'It would take a big portion of our vendors and make them illegal.' Black bear spotted in Licking County for the first time in over two decades Thompson said changes to cannabis law would significantly harm Ohio's emerging marijuana industry, which is on track to be a $2 billion market. Among higher taxes and a decreased legal maximum THC level, legislators have also considered a ban on ingesting cannabis in public spaces, which would largely prevent the festival from taking place. Thompson said if the state changes cannabis laws, Stargazer Festival will have to consider relocating to a 'friendlier state,' taking its business with it. The festival will nearly double the population of Waverly for the weekend, and Thompson said visitors are coming from 35 states. 'This festival this year will cost us close to $200,000 to organize and put on, and that's all revenue that is being filtered in the state down through porta potties, tent rentals, local performers,' Thompson said. More than 400,000 Ohioans see driver's license suspensions lifted Thompson said he does not want to move the festival, saying it would be a 'sad day' if they had to leave their home state. Stargazer began as a celebration for Ohio activists after voters successfully legalized recreational marijuana. As part of the celebratory mission, many festival events involve giveaways for festival attendees, including a $1,000 bonus for five randomly selected cannabis judges and a giveaway dream cannabis wedding officiated by Afroman. Thompson said as this July 25-27 may be the last festival, people should get their tickets ahead of time, as they will likely be sold out at the door. He said he and other advocates are prepared to rally and adjust, but hope the laws will stay favorable. 'Even after legalization, the fight is not done to ensure the best possible cannabis laws on the books for the greater good of the people currently and into the future,' Thompson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge dismisses lawsuit challenging minority representation on Alabama board
The Alabama State Capitol in Montgomery, Alabama as seen on Feb. 4, 2025. A law that maintains diversity on the Alabama Real Estate Appraisers Board remains after case challenging it is dismissed. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector) A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit last week that challenged a state law and administrative regulation requiring the Alabama Real Estate Appraisers Board to have at least two minority members. U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. dismissed the case on Friday after both parties agreed to end the proceedings after the plaintiff in the case, American Alliance for Equal Rights (AAER), objected to being subjected to discovery. With both parties agreeing to end the litigation, Huffaker then agreed to the stipulations from both parties and ended the case with prejudice. The American Alliance for Equal Rights (AAER), a group founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, argued that a 1989 law requiring that 'no less than two of the nine board members shall be of a minority race' on the board violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Huffaker, appointed to the bench by President Donald Trump, dismissed the case without weighing in on the merits of the case after the litigants agreed to end it. Pamela Wyatt, president of the Alabama Association of Real Estate Brokers (AAREB), a mostly-Black organization that intervened to preserve the law, said in a statement that the case 'allowed us to demonstrate how important state laws ensuring diversity on state boards are to people in Alabama.' 'State boards make decisions that affect all Alabamians and should be reflective of the communities they serve,' the statement said. 'For the past three decades, this Alabama law has aimed to ensure that state boards reflect the state's rich diversity, and we are thrilled that this case has been dismissed with prejudice.' The association intervened in the case after Gov. Kay Ivey's office said in court filings that the regulations were an 'unconstitutional requirement that 'she does not—and will not—enforce,'' according to court documents. The governor's office did object to AAER's challenge to inclusivity language in the statute. Blum, the founder of the AAER, brought a lawsuit that led to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023 to strike down race-conscious college admissions. The AAER sued the state after the appraisers board rejected an application filed by Laura Clark, a member of AAER, because her appointment would have violated state statute that at least two of the board members be nonwhite. Clark, who is white, also serves as the interim president of the Alabama Center for Law and Liberty, a conservative nonprofit law firm that says it advocates for 'limited government, free markets, and strong families.' The AAREB said Alabama's long history of racial discrimination in housing made minority representation on the state appraisal board critical to fairness. 'This particular law is critically important for that organization and many, many, other real estate professionals of color, and people of color in the state, who will suffer immensely if the law is struck down,' said Brooke Menschel, an attorney with Democracy Forward, representing the AAREB, last year. The parties proceeded to discovery last July after Huffaker rejected a request for summary judgment filed by AAER for the court to rule in its favor. AAER was listed as a plaintiff in the case, which subjected it to discovery. That meant opposing counsel could depose the members and staff of the organization and request documents to be used as evidence during litigation. 'Rather than continue to litigate an issue that both plaintiff and defendant agree is unconstitutional, we went ahead and agreed to have the case be dismissed,' said Haley Dutch, an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation. In the spring, AAER requested to be removed as a party to the case and have Clark added instead, which would have subjected her to discovery. 'AAER brought this case on Ms. Clark's behalf, relying on the doctrine of associational standing to assert her interests, not its own,' AAER said in a request filed with the court in March to substitute Clark for AAER as the plaintiff. 'AAER is thus not a necessary or indispensable party to the litigation.' Democracy Forward opposed the request. 'It is a fundamental rule of litigation that when you choose to sue you have to expose yourself to discovery,' Democracy Forward said in a filing in April opposing the substitution. 'AAER has a clear choice. If AAER does not want to litigate this case, it may voluntarily dismiss this litigation and Ms. Clark can file a new case if and when she has standing with regard to a live controversy. But if AAER wants to maintain this action, it must sit for a deposition, like all other litigants. It cannot shirk its discovery obligations.' Huffaker rejected the request for substitution. 'What does appear clear is that AAER declared itself the jockey in a race that it started and has ridden this horse in this manner since February 2024,' Huffaker said. 'Clark could have been the jockey from the outset, but AAER chose not to proceed in that manner. Similarly, AAER could have switched riders (i.e., Clark for AAER) well before the amended pleadings deadline.' 'The Court will not tolerate such tactics,' Huffaker added.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Juneteenth festival organizer accuses city of slow walking permit application
After three court hearings and two deadlines set by a judge, the City of Pittsburgh still has not issued the final permit to the long-time organizer of one of the largest Juneteenth celebrations in the country. At a status conference before the judge today, Organizer B. Marshall learned that the city had approved phase two of his application. They approved phase one on Tuesday morning, just hours before another status conference. After telling the judge Wednesday afternoon that phase two had finally been approved, the city attorney said that the application was now under review by the special events committee, which includes representatives from Police, Fire, Emergency Management, Public Works, and Permits, Licenses and Inspections. When asked by the judge how long that process would take, the city attorney said it may go until next Wednesday, the day before the Juneteenth celebration is scheduled to open at Mellon Park in East Liberty. The judge scoffed at that and ordered the city to provide an email update on the process by 4 p.m. Wednesday. Marshall praised the judge for appearing to expedite the process. 'We're appreciative of the judge today because he's seen today, apparently they want to continue to slow walk this process,' Marshall said. Marshall was calm after the hearing but expressed frustration with the process, which the city said now includes a review of the permit by police, fire and other city departments. The city attorney said that was standard procedure, but Marshall, who is organizing his 12th annual Juneteenth celebration, said he was unaware of this additional step in the review process. The city attorney also said in court that there are some outstanding questions about fire safety concerning some vendors and public works needs more information about the size of the stage. 'I can tell you this, B has done everything in his power to respond immediately,' said Marshall's attorney, Phil DiLucente, who filed a petition in court last month to force the city to act on the permit. Marshall had submitted his initial permit application in February. In court earlier this week, the city said they couldn't approve the application because Marshall had requested the closing of Penn Ave, which is a state-run road. Marshall said he withdrew that request in April. Last weekend, Marshall filed an updated permit application to reflect the change. The city received the updated application and approved phase one of his application just hours before the hearing on Monday. Marshall believes the city is intentionally delaying the permit process because of his ongoing feud with Mayor Ed Gainey over funding. Gainey pulled Marshall's funding last year and the city awarded the contract to a friend of the Mayor's wife. After public outcry, city council reinstated Marshall's $125,000 funding. Marshall did not receive any city funding this year. In court Wednesday afternoon, the judge acknowledged that progress had been made, but he was clearly troubled that the festival is scheduled to start next Thursday and the permit is still in limbo. 'He wants an update, a status report. We commend the judge and we believe now Juneteenth will now without question kick off on time,' DiLucente said. 11 Investigates is still waiting to find out what transpired between today's noon hearing and the 4 p.m. deadline imposed by the judge. Marshall said he's confident the four-day festival, which he expects will bring 65,000 people to the city, will go on as planned. The celebration was held at Point State Park and Market Square last year but those venues are both undergoing renovations. Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
