State, federal cannabis changes threaten Ohio festival's future
WAVERLY, Ohio (WCMH) — Several thousand marijuana enthusiasts will descend upon Waverly next month for the second annual Stargazer Cannabis Festival. It may also be the last.
'We're very sad about that fact, and it would be very ironic that this festival was conceived out of a celebration for legalization, and then ironically, the law will make it illegal,' festival organizer Chad Thompson said.
Dispensary reacts to Ohio marijuana limit changes
Thompson is concerned about changes to cannabis laws in consideration at the state and federal level that would minimize or eliminate the three-day cannabis festival. Ohio lawmakers have weighed multiple changes to Ohio's recreational marijuana laws, which passed in 2023 with 57% of the vote. Federally, a provision currently included in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would prohibit most products that use hemp-derived THC.
Under the new federal proposal, the U.S. would redefine which hemp products are legal. Hemp was redefined in President Donald Trump's first term to mean cannabis that has minimal THC levels, 0.3% or lower. People have used this definition to synthetically manufacture cannabis products that are both legal and intoxicating. The budget draft would ban those hemp products, making ingestible hemp federally illegal again.
'There is an effort to eliminate that segment of the hemp market, which would really give a big hit to hemp businesses and us, as a cannabis festival, also would be greatly impacted by that,' Thompson said. 'It would take a big portion of our vendors and make them illegal.'
Black bear spotted in Licking County for the first time in over two decades
Thompson said changes to cannabis law would significantly harm Ohio's emerging marijuana industry, which is on track to be a $2 billion market. Among higher taxes and a decreased legal maximum THC level, legislators have also considered a ban on ingesting cannabis in public spaces, which would largely prevent the festival from taking place.
Thompson said if the state changes cannabis laws, Stargazer Festival will have to consider relocating to a 'friendlier state,' taking its business with it. The festival will nearly double the population of Waverly for the weekend, and Thompson said visitors are coming from 35 states.
'This festival this year will cost us close to $200,000 to organize and put on, and that's all revenue that is being filtered in the state down through porta potties, tent rentals, local performers,' Thompson said.
More than 400,000 Ohioans see driver's license suspensions lifted
Thompson said he does not want to move the festival, saying it would be a 'sad day' if they had to leave their home state. Stargazer began as a celebration for Ohio activists after voters successfully legalized recreational marijuana. As part of the celebratory mission, many festival events involve giveaways for festival attendees, including a $1,000 bonus for five randomly selected cannabis judges and a giveaway dream cannabis wedding officiated by Afroman.
Thompson said as this July 25-27 may be the last festival, people should get their tickets ahead of time, as they will likely be sold out at the door. He said he and other advocates are prepared to rally and adjust, but hope the laws will stay favorable.
'Even after legalization, the fight is not done to ensure the best possible cannabis laws on the books for the greater good of the people currently and into the future,' Thompson said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Gerth: It took White House picnic snub for Rand Paul to lose respect for Trump?
Gerth: It took White House picnic snub for Rand Paul to lose respect for Trump? | Opinion Rand Paul put up with Trump being impeached twice and using corporate money to pay off a porn star, but he had to draw the line when he was uninvited to the White House Congressional Picnic. Show Caption Hide Caption Sen. Rand Paul talks tariffs after meeting with GLI Sen. Rand Paul met with Louisville business leaders to talk about the potential impact of tariffs on the Kentucky economy. Sen. Rand Paul was reportedly uninvited to the annual White House Congressional picnic, later being re-invited. Paul stated the reason for the rescinded invitation was likely his opposition to Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Rep. Thomas Massie was also reportedly uninvited to the picnic, then later given tickets. I swear, I didn't know Sen. Rand Paul was such a cornhole fan. I mean he put up with Donald Trump being impeached twice, wasn't worried at all about his felony convictions for using corporate money to pay off a porn star to help his presidential campaign, couldn't care less when he drove wedges between us and our closest allies and made goo goo eyes at Vladimir Putin. But the thing that finally got him to lose respect for Trump is that he thought Donny wasn't going to let him play cornhole at the annual Congressional picnic on the White House lawn. Paul said on Wednesday that when he went to pick up his tickets to the picnic, he was told that Trump has rescinded his invitation. If Paul wanted barbecue ribs, he'd have to buy himself a smoker. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' he said during an impromptu interview making its rounds online. Was Rand Paul uninvited to Congressional picnic? Trump has since said on Truth Social that Paul would be allowed to attend. You wonder if it was Trump or someone like deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller who made the decision to uninvite Paul. I assume Paul attended the event Thursday. Paul said he wasn't told why the White House had put the kibosh on his attending the picnic, but he assumes it's because he opposes Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which would explode the national debt, cut services to the poor and give billionaires a big wet kiss by extending the tax break he gave them in his first term. Gerth: $70 million for a police headquarters? Are they building the Taj Ma-Law? | Opinion 'I just find this incredibly petty,' he said. 'The level of immaturity is beyond words. … It really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Surely Thomas Massie and Rand Paul know of Trump's pettiness U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie said Thursday Trump had disinvited him as well. (Massie later got an invitation and tickets.) But how in the world could either of them have not seen this sort of pettiness coming from Trump. Here are just a few of the things he has done: He calls his political opponents names including 'Fat Alvin' Bragg, the New York District Attorney; 'Little Marco' Rubio, a former foe and now Trump's secretary of state; Elaine 'Coco' Chao, his former Transportation secretary and Mitch McConnell's wife; 'Birdbrain' Nikki Haley, the former governor of South Carolina; and Gavin 'Newscum' Newsome, the governor of California. He questioned whether the late Sen. John McCain was truly a war hero — he was — and he recently said of former President Joe Biden, following news he has an aggressive form of prostate cancer, 'If you feel sorry for him, don't feel so sorry, because he's vicious.' Trump held up shipments of arms to Ukraine after officials there refused to make up a lie and say Joe Biden's son, Hunter, was under investigation there — and since he's returned to office has worked to help Russia win the war. Again, he is willing to see a country lose a war and face untold casualties because the country's president refused to lie about the son of a Trump political opponent. What caused Rand Paul to lose respect for Trump? But none of this was enough to make Paul lose respect for Trump. More Gerth: Former political powerbroker now spending millions on a religious shrine | Opinion His respect for the most unrespectable president ever was fully intact until he faced the prospect of sitting in his apartment watching reruns of Gunsmoke and eating a frozen dinner while everyone else was playing cornhole or badminton or bocci on the White House Lawn — or whatever they do at a White House picnic. It's good to know where Paul's priorities are, though. Cornhole. Or whatever it is they do at White House Picnic. Joseph Gerth can be reached at 502-582-4702 or by email at jgerth@ You can also follow him at @
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Columbus social media influencer pleads guilty to $20 million Ponzi scheme
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — A Columbus social media finance influencer pleaded guilty Friday to orchestrating a $20 million Ponzi scheme, according to federal prosecutors. Prosecutors said Tyler Bossetti, 31, of Columbus, took more than $23 million in investments from the victims, dozens of which lost more than $11 million. Watch previous coverage in the player above. Bossetti pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aiding in false tax filing. He faces up to 23 years in prison. His sentencing will be set at a later date. 1970s fish and chips chain Arthur Treacher's to make central Ohio return Between 2019 and 2023, Bossetti solicited short-term real estate investments while promising returns of 30% or more from purchasing, rehabbing, refinancing, and renting or selling residential properties, according to prosecutors. Bossetti used social media and third-party companies to solicit the investments, prosecutors said. He gave promissory notes that 'falsely claimed investments were risk-free and secured by real estate' that he owned. Fourteen false and fraudulent 1099-INT tax forms were also filed due to Bossetti, according to prosecutors. He admitted to 'misappropriating investor funds to further his lifestyle,' prosecutors said, including payments for a downtown Columbus condo, frequent travel, a $150,000 Mercedes and cryptocurrency investments. Bossetti hosts a podcast and runs Boss Lifestyle LLC, and Bossetti Enterprises, LLC. His Instagram account, which had 1 million followers, appears to have been deleted. Nearly 100 homes in Franklin County have sold for $1 million in 2025 He bills himself as an entrepreneur and investor on his LinkedIn profile. He also runs a Substack, in which he posts about financial topics to more than 87,000 subscribers. A post was made as recently as June 8. An attorney listed for Bossetti in court records previously told NBC4 that they would have no comment on the case. Bossetti has at least a dozen civil cases against him and his businesses in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, online records show. Many of the cases — dealing with alleged mishandling of money and investments — have been closed, but several remained active. In one case, he was sued for owing more than $30,000 in credit card debt on his American Express Business Gold card. The judge ordered Bossetti to pay $31,834.19 to the bank after he 'failed to properly answer or otherwise defend although duly served with process according to law by Certified Mail on 11/24/23.' Bossetti is also named as a defendant in another federal lawsuit, which was closed in August, where he was accused of failing to pay back $1.125 million by Nov. 30, 2022, for a $900,000 loan he received from Oak River Equity Ventures, LLC. He asked for an extension of the payment deadline after stating that he wouldn't have the money on time. The two parties agreed to an extension, with Bossetti owing a new amount of $1.162 million, according to the complaint. Bossetti failed to pay by the new deadline, but told Oak River that the payment was sent on Jan. 13, 2023, which the company said was false. A judge found that Bossetti was liable to pay a total of $2.26 million plus post-judgment interest due to a 50% interest rate plus a 5% supplemental default interest, according to court documents. In a second federal lawsuit, Bossetti was accused of failing to pay back another $550,000 loan. A judge ordered him to pay back the loan plus the 20% interest and 5% added on any delinquent principal, according to court records. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Where the Money Goes: Map, Charts Show Migrant Remittance Payments
A provision in President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" making its way through the United States Congress would place additional taxes on money immigrants want to send back to their home countries. In 2023, the last full year of data available, over $650 billion was received in remittances by countries worldwide. Roughly a third of that comes from the U.S., with countries with high levels of immigration to American benefitting most from the payments. Republicans in Congress want to recoup some of the money migrant workers in America are sending home, arguing the money should remain circulating within the U.S. economy. Those opposing the move, and some who have studied remittances for years, argue that a remittance tax could drive up immigration to the U.S. rather than hinder it. "Undocumented migrants play a huge role in the U.S. economy, not only as they participate in the labor force, and part of this is that they do send money back home, but a large number of them actually do pay taxes," Rubi Bledsoe, a research associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) told Newsweek. "They also participate in supporting social programs that Americans get access to, without necessarily being able to access them themselves." Bledsoe argued that if remittances aren't being sent back to family and friends, or if the funds are reduced, then those who depend on them may look to come to the U.S. for work as well. Remittances from the U.S. to Mexico in 2023 were around $63.3 billion, or about 3.5 percent of Mexico's total GDP. Most of that money makes it way to some of the poorest regions of Mexico, Bledsoe said, which research from the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute (MPI) think tank supports. "For families in low- to middle-income countries who receive remittances from the United States, for instance, remittances are a lifeline that allows people to pay for utilities, services, and everyday expenses that they would otherwise not be able to afford," Ariel G Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at MPI, told Newsweek. "Remittances can also be turned into investments that benefit not just individual families but also communities through shared projects, like building hospitals, schools, or buying necessary supplies to improve infrastructure." Among the biggest recipients of all global remittances in 2023 were India ($120 billion), Mexico ($66.2 billion), the Philippines ($39 billion), France ($36.9 billion), China ($29.1 billion), and Pakistan ($26.5 billion), according to the World Bank. The data from the World Bank covers worldwide payments, meaning not all that money came from the U.S. — though in cases like Mexico, remittances from the U.S. make up the vast bulk of the total. Americans living overseas who send back money home also count in the data. The U.S. received around $7.7 billion in remittances in 2023. CSIS estimates Mexican workers are sending $300 a month back home in remittances, on average, meaning most of their paycheck is still being spent within the U.S. That means their money is going towards housing, goods and services in their communities, and often state and federal taxes. There has been a steady rise in the amount of money heading to certain countries in recent years, as migration levels and access to jobs in the U.S. have increased. This has caused concern among some on the right who want to see stricter regulations on remittances. "It is kind of a double-edged sword," Ira Mehlman, media director at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) told Newsweek. FAIR advocates for a more restrictionist immigration policy. "Yes, it does send money back to people in the home countries, but it also becomes a dependency. If you're going to be sending your best workers out of the country to work in another country and then wait for the money to come back, it impedes the development that needs to happen in those countries." Mehlman said FAIR also has concerns that payments are making their way back to cartels and other organized crime groups, while American companies are getting away with employing those without legal status, enabling a cheaper workforce that is detrimental to U.S. citizens as well as immigrants with work authorization. While there is widespread agreement that stopping payments to criminal organizations is necessary, both Bledsoe and Ruiz Soto cautioned against introducing tougher rules on remittance payments. They say this could have an adverse effect on illegal immigration, predicting that, should remittances be cut off from low- and medium-income countries, then more people may look to make the journey to the U.S. "Because the migrant is already here, sending money back, it means that the family of that migrant isn't in the United States," Bledose said. "So it is preventing migration on some level." Ruiz Soto added that "by filling the void of government investment and development, remittances reduce the economic pressures for many people to emigrate irregularly over the long term." Mehlman said Congress could act to introduce stricter measures, as it is looking to do with the tax on remittances, while Ruiz Soto said more security measures to track the funds being sent abroad could be introduced in an attempt to root out abuse. Related Articles Migrants From Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela Told To Self-DeportLA Taco Chain Closes 15 Locations Amid ICE CrackdownWorld Cup Boat Party Canceled After DHS, Coast Guard OperationNew Jersey ICE Escapees: What We Know 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
