Hidden Detail in Crotch Solves 500-Year-Old Leonardo Da Vinci Mystery
To draw the Vitruvian Man in 1490 – an illustration of the 'ideal' human body – the Renaissance man may have relied on a mathematical ratio not formally established until the 19th century.
It's one of the most iconic images of all time, and yet for more than 500 years, no one could figure out why da Vinci chose such specific proportions for the arms and legs.
A London dentist thinks he's solved the mystery at last.
Related:
Rory Mac Sweeney has found a crucial hidden detail, tucked in the Vitruvian Man's crotch: an equilateral triangle that he thinks may explain "one of the most analyzed yet cryptic works in art history."
The Vitruvian Man is partly inspired by the writings of Roman architect Vitruvius, who argued that the perfect human body should fit inside a circle and square.
Da Vinci's drawing uses a square to precisely contain a 'cruciform pose', with arms outstretched and legs in. The circle, meanwhile, encompasses a posture where the arms are raised and the legs are spread.
A popular explanation is that da Vinci chose the Vitruvian Man's proportions based on the Golden Ratio Theory, but the measurements don't quite match up.
According to Mac Sweeney, "the solution to this geometric mystery has been hiding in plain sight".
"If you open your legs… and raise your hands enough that your extended fingers touch the line of the top of your head… the space between the legs will be an equilateral triangle," da Vinci wrote in his notes for the Vitruvian Man.
When Mac Sweeney did the math on this triangle, he found that the spread of the man's feet and the height of his navel created a ratio of around 1.64 to 1.65.
That's very close to the tetrahedral ratio of 1.633 – a uniquely balanced geometric form, officially established in 1917.
The ratio is used to establish the optimum way to pack spheres. If four spheres are connected as closely as possible into a pyramid shape, for instance, then the height to base ratio from their centers will be 1.633.
Perhaps Mac Sweeney recognized the significance of that number because of a similar triangular principle used in dentistry.
Imagined on the human jaw, Bonwill's triangle dictates the optimal positioning for jaw function, used since 1864. Its ratio is also 1.633.
Mac Sweeney doesn't think that's a coincidence.
Similar to minerals, crystals, and other biological packing systems found in nature, Mac Sweeney thinks the human jaw naturally organizes around tetrahedral geometries, which maximize mechanical efficiency.
If the tetrahedral ratio is repeated around our bodies, Mac Sweeney thinks that is because "human anatomy has evolved according to geometric principles that govern optimal spatial organization throughout the universe."
If Mac Sweeney is right, Da Vinci may have stumbled across a universal principle while drawing the Vitruvian Man.
"The same geometric relationships that appear in optimal crystal structures, biological architectures, and Fuller's coordinate systems seem to be encoded in human proportions," writes Mac Sweeney, "suggesting that Leonardo intuited fundamental truths about the mathematical nature of reality itself."
Whether other scientists agree with Mac Sweeney remains to be seen, but the fact that da Vinci mentioned the equilateral triangle in his notes suggests that what lies between the Vitruvian man's legs is important.
The study was published in the Journal of Mathematics and the Arts.
Related News
Neanderthal 'Swiss Army Knife' Discovered in Belgian Cave
'Classic' Hymn Deciphered From Ancient Babylonian Library
Ancient Neanderthal 'Fat Factory' Reveals How Advanced They Really Were
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New study says self-test could prevent up to 1,000 cervical cancer cases a year
About a third of women are overdue for their appointment for life-saving cervical cancer screening – due to embarrassment, discomfort or simply not having enough time to attend. But offering women an at-home self-test could prevent as many as 1,000 cases of cervical cancer every year, a study led by Queen Mary University of London with King's College London found. More than 3,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year in the UK. It has been estimated that the number would be 5,000 higher if it weren't for cervical screening. The number of women participating in cervical screening has been falling, and in 2024, only 66 per cent of those eligible for screening were up to date. It tests for a virus called human papillomavirus (HPV), which can cause changes in the cervix and in some cases, can lead to cervical cancer. 'Cervical cancer is the most preventable of cancers. Women born before 1990 will not benefit from the HPV vaccination. But they can reduce their risk by 80 to 90 per cent if they get screened regularly,' Professor Peter Sasieni from Queen Mary University of London explained. In the study, published in the journal EClinicalMedicine, researchers recruited 13 GP practices in West London to find out the benefits of offering women a take-home test. These practices were divided into two groups, with about 6,000 women who were overdue for their screening in each group. One group of GP practices made in-person kit offers to women who were at least six months overdue for their cervical screening, the other group did not. For the first group, when women attended their GP practice for any reason, their doctor or nurse was encouraged to offer them a self-sampling kit. In the study, people who were 15 months overdue for cervical screening were randomised each month. Half received no special communication, a quarter were mailed a self-sampling kit, and a quarter were sent a letter offering a kit. Of the 449 women opportunistically offered a kit in a GP appointment, 234 (52 per cent) accepted and returned a sample. However, the uptake of self-sampling after a postal offer was lower: 12 per cent among those sent a kit, and just 5 per cent for women sent a letter offering a kit. Researchers estimate that if this approach were adopted across the NHS, 1,000 cases of cervical cancer could be prevented. Home-testing kits for HPV will soon be offered to people in England who are overdue for cervical cancer screening, giving women and people with a cervix the option to stay up to date with cervical screening without needing an internal examination. Dr Anita Lim, lead epidemiologist on the study from King's College London, said: 'These findings are directly relevant to current efforts to modernise cervical screening in England. Self-sampling gives women greater control over how and when they get screened. 'This study reinforces that many women welcome the option - particularly when it's offered in person by a trusted healthcare professional. A simple change like this could have a major impact on preventing cervical cancer.' There are about 100 types of HPV, and only 30 can affect the genital area. Many people never show symptoms as they can arise years after an infection, and the majority of cases go away without treatment. Vaccinating against HPV is almost 90 per cent effective at preventing cervical cancer in women in their twenties who were offered it at age 12 to 13, according to Cancer Research UK. But the best way to prevent cervical cancer in those not vaccinated when they were young is through screening, reducing the risk by 80 per cent. Fiona Osgun, head of health information at Cancer Research UK, said: "We know that almost a third of people in the UK tell us they are overdue their appointment - whether that's due to discomfort, embarrassment, or simply struggling for time. "That's why we welcomed the government's decision last month to roll out cervical home screening kits in England for people who don't take up their invite. This study shows that offering these kits during GP appointments could be part of an effective approach to making screening more accessible and remove barriers. "It's important to remember that cervical screening is for people without symptoms so, if you notice any unusual changes for you, don't wait for a screening invitation - speak to your doctor."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Concerned About Aluminum in Vaccines? Here's What the Research Shows
Real-world data from 1.2 million children offers strong reassurance. If you've ever paused at a vaccine ingredient list or felt confused while reading a vaccine insert, you're not alone. One ingredient that often sparks questions is aluminum, specifically aluminum salts used in some vaccines to help the immune system respond more effectively. But does the aluminum in vaccines pose a real risk to children's health? A new study out of Denmark, which tracked more than 1.2 million children over 24 years, offers strong reassurance: aluminum exposure from routine childhood vaccines was not linked to higher rates of autism, ADHD, asthma, or autoimmune disease. What is aluminum doing in vaccines? Aluminum salts aren't preservatives. They're adjuvants, something that helps certain vaccines work better by boosting the immune response. They've been used safely in childhood vaccines for decades. A real-world study with real-world relevance The concern about aluminum in vaccines isn't new. It's been used safely for decades in many non-live vaccines, like DTaP and Hib, to help the immune system respond better. The amount a child gets can vary a bit depending on which brand and version of a vaccine is used. That natural variation is actually what made this study possible. Researchers followed over 1.2 million children, tracking how much aluminum each child received from vaccines by age 2 (ranging from 0 to 4.5 mg total). Then, they followed up through age 5, and for some age 8, to see whether aluminum exposure was linked to (50 different conditions): Autoimmune disorders like type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease Allergic conditions like asthma and eczema Neurodevelopmental diagnoses like autism and ADHD So, what did they find? Even when kids received more aluminum, their rates of these conditions didn't go up. In fact, kids who received more aluminum had slightly lower rates of some diagnoses, like autism and ADHD. That doesn't mean aluminum protects against anything. It just that it's not harmful at the levels used in childhood vaccines. And here's a key point: for many of the outcomes studied, the data was strong enough to rule out even small or moderate increases in risk. What about concerns or limitations? Some people will likely still have concerns about the study, and it's worth being transparent about the questions that come up, even when the data is strong. No study is perfect or 100% generalizable. Here's what critics might argue, and some thoughts on rationale. It's not a randomized controlled trial (RCT). True, it's an observational study, not the 'gold standard' for proving causality. But an RCT would mean intentionally withholding vaccines from children, which would be unethical. This study used naturally occurring differences in vaccine aluminum exposure, which is the next best, and most ethical, option. Some confounders might have been missed. Always a possibility. But, the study controlled for a lot: income, preterm birth, birthweight, maternal conditions, and more. But no study can control for everything. Still, the patterns were consistent across subgroups and time periods, which helps strengthen confidence in the results. Diagnoses came from health registries, not medical record review. That's true, but Denmark's health registries are considered high quality, and any misdiagnoses or under-reporting would likely be spread evenly across all groups, meaning it wouldn't skew the results. Denmark isn't the U.S. That's fair. But both countries vaccinate against the same diseases, using many of the same vaccine components, just with slightly different schedules and formulations. The underlying science and biologic principles are the same. What this study actually adds This study doesn't tell us that aluminum is good. It doesn't claim to end the conversation forever. But here's what it does offer: Reassurance grounded in data, not dismissal. Parents have asked smart questions for years. This isn't about 'just trust us,' it's about finally having large-scale, high-quality data to help answer those questions with clarity and care. Real-world relevance. This isn't a theoretical model or a lab experiment. It's 1.2 million real children, followed over 24 years, across a variety of vaccine exposures, and the results were consistent. Stronger evidence than ever before. While past studies raised concerns based on small samples or extreme exposures, this one helps fill a major gap: what happens when kids get routine aluminum-containing vaccines, as recommended, in actual pediatric care settings? The answer: no increased risk for autism, ADHD, allergies, or autoimmune conditions. Here's what's key to understand: This is exactly why large, real-world cohort studies, like the new Danish one, matter so much. They track actual vaccine use, actual outcomes, and actual kids. Bottom line And maybe most importantly? This keeps the focus where it belongs: informed, compassionate decision-making. Not panic. Not pressure. Not shame. If you've ever paused at a vaccine ingredient list, wondered about aluminum, or felt caught between headlines and your instincts, this study is for you. It doesn't shut the door on questions. But it opens the door wider for answers that are actually backed by evidence. Looking for more details on the study, concerns about past research, and how aluminum in vaccines differs from other exposures? You'll find it all in this PedsDocTalk Newsletter.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Low Danube waters bring huge mayfly swarms in Budapest
STORY: :: Mayflies swarm the river Danube earlier than usual and in greater numbers :: Budapest, Hungary :: July 23, 2025 :: Gyorgy Kriska, Associate Professor, Eotvos Lorand University 'Since 2012 we have seen huge swarming in those years when the water levels are quite low. We think it is because the sun lights the riverbed more and the algae can breed more and that way the larvae find more food.' :: Researchers put up special blue lights to guide the mayflies, which get confused by city lights :: July 26, 2025 'What our lights are doing is that they keep them here, they don't let them fly above so they keep swarming around the lights, and often a swirl of insects form around the lights, which reaches the surface of the water and they splash into the water. Where the mayflies reach the water they place their eggs there. What we can achieve is that they stay in place over the water and the next generation is saved. They cannot go further up but at least their offspring survive.' :: Mayflies, a protected species in Hungary, live for less than a day after they hatch Hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, of mayflies engage in a frantic rush to mate and reproduce before they perish within just a few hours. Mayflies live for less than a day after they hatch, and their abundance is closely connected to the health of the Danube. Danube mayflies usually start swarming in August, but this year it began in mid-July, and is expected to last for weeks. Danube mayflies, a protected species, did not swarm for about four decades as the river was too polluted. They returned in 2012 when the Danube became cleaner due to the construction of wastewater treating plants, he added. As mayflies swarm upriver after mating, they can be confused by city lights or the shadows of bridges, causing them to crash on the riverbank instead of laying their eggs in the water. To help them as much as possible, Hungarian researchers installed special blue lights on two bridges. Solve the daily Crossword
