What do Americans name their cars?
A new survey of 2,000 Americans found one in three has a nickname for their car, with Buttercup's Folly, The Slug and Old Flame some of the monikers dished out to vehicles.
Gen X and millennials are the generations most likely to name their cars, with more than 40 percent of each doing so.
Boomers are the least likely to throw out a moniker to their vehicle, with less than a third (31%) saying they've done this.
The survey, conducted by Talker Research on behalf of GuessingHeadlights.com found clear themes in the names Americans are lovingly bestowing on their motors– many embraced pop culture classics like Batmobile, The Millennium Falcon, or, more recently, Toothless from How to Train Your Dragon.
Others opted for names of strength, embracing power monikers like Beast, the slightly enhanced Nasty Beast or Road Warrior.
While animal names also stood out, Party Chicken, Blue Goose, Turtle and The Slug were just some of the creature-themed cars hitting America's streets.
One practically-minded driver appropriately calls their car The Grocery Getter.
And, could the love we have for our cars be a two-way thing? One in eight Americans (12%) say they think that cars have feelings, a further 10% were unsure.The younger a person is, the more likely they are to think cars have feelings - 26% of Gen Z'ers think their auto is more than just the sum of its parts, versus just seven percent of boomers.
Licensed Psychologist Vincent Miles of Miles Psychological Services LLC gives context as to why our bonds with our cars form and why we might feel the need to name them: "We form interesting relationships with our cars, often because these vehicles serve as unique transitional elements in our lives. We gain some of our first independence by obtaining our license as teenagers, often marking our first foray into adulthood."
"Additionally, our car is often our very first financial investment. This creates a unique bridge between childhood and adulthood, carrying forward some of our childlike creativity and beliefs at a time when we are fighting hard to create our identity. Anthropomorphizing our car in our own imaginations allows us that playful connection with something that we inevitably spend hundreds of hours alone with (and thousands of dollars maintaining)."
WHAT ARE AMERICANS NAMING THEIR CARS?
Love BugPuddle JumperOld FlameButtercups FollyRoad WarriorBatmobileNasty beastThe Rolling TurdThe SlugToothlessSilver BulletThe BeastThe Millennium FalconGreen MachineBeach WhistleTurtleThe Grocery GetterParty ChickenBlue Goose
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Americans; the survey was administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 9 and May 15, 2025.
We are sourcing from a non-probability frame and the two main sources we use are:
Traditional online access panels - where respondents opt-in to take part in online market research for an incentiveProgrammatic - where respondents are online and are given the option to take part in a survey to receive a virtual incentive usually related to the online activity they are engaging in
Those who did not fit the specified sample were terminated from the survey. As the survey is fielded, dynamic online sampling is used, adjusting targeting to achieve the quotas specified as part of the sampling plan.
Regardless of which sources a respondent came from, they were directed to an Online Survey, where the survey was conducted in English; a link to the questionnaire can be shared upon request. Respondents were awarded points for completing the survey. These points have a small cash-equivalent monetary value.
Cells are only reported on for analysis if they have a minimum of 80 respondents, and statistical significance is calculated at the 95% level. Data is not weighted, but quotas and other parameters are put in place to reach the desired sample.
Interviews are excluded from the final analysis if they failed quality-checking measures. This includes:
Speeders: Respondents who complete the survey in a time that is quicker than one-third of the median length of interview are disqualified as speedersOpen ends: All verbatim responses (full open-ended questions as well as other please specify options) are checked for inappropriate or irrelevant textBots: Captcha is enabled on surveys, which allows the research team to identify and disqualify botsDuplicates: Survey software has "deduping" based on digital fingerprinting, which ensures nobody is allowed to take the survey more than once
It is worth noting that this survey was only available to individuals with internet access, and the results may not be generalizable to those without internet access.
The post What do Americans name their cars? appeared first on Talker.
Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
Should I refinance my auto loan?
With increased sticker prices and inflated interest rates, Americans are struggling to keep up with their auto loans. The average monthly car payment has shot up nearly 30% since 2020, according to online auto resource Edmunds. According to a recent TransUnion survey, nearly two-thirds (63%) of respondents said they're considering within the next 12 months. With the Fed weighing an interest rate cut in September, refinancing your auto loan could be a tempting option. But is it the right move for you? Ask yourself these four questions before you decide. Your original lender considered your credit history when setting your rate. If your score has gone up since then, you're more likely to qualify for a better rate now. Having excellent credit (a 750 FICO Score or higher) will help get you the best terms, but a substantial increase of any kind can be enough to get you approved for a lower rate. "I'd say an improvement of at least 50 points would make it worth looking into refinancing," said Brian Moody, an editor at Cox Automotive, which owns Kelley Blue Book. Because interest rates on car loans have been at record highs for the past two years, people with older loans are facing a different reality, according to Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds. "If you have a loan from 2019, your interest rate on a new car was probably a lot lower, maybe 4% or 5%," Drury said. "Today, you're looking at something closer to 7%." Keep an eye on upcoming Fed meetings to see how they impact auto loan interest rates and plan accordingly. Offers in this section are from affiliate partners and selected based on a combination of engagement, product relevance, compensation, and consistent auto coverage is available in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., with 16 discounts and add-ons like roadside assistance, rental car reimbursement and mechanical breakdown offers an array of riders, including rideshare insurance and a Deductible Savings Bank that deducts $50 each policy period you go without a claim. It also offers mechanical breakdown insurance, which covers unexpected major system failures. To secure their investment, lenders frontload interest at the beginning of your car loan. If you're in the final years of financing, interest is probably only a small portion of your bill. You're mostly paying down the principal. Refinancing in that situation might not make sense, since you'd restart the interest payment process all over. "Break out the calculator," Drury said. "It's not fun math, but thankfully, there are calculators. You can see on your loan statements how much of your payment has been going toward interest now versus how much is toward the principal." If you're worried about falling behind on payments or even your car being repossessed, refinancing could get you a longer term with smaller, more manageable monthly payments. Keep in mind, though, that while your monthly payments will be smaller, you'll have a longer term and could easily wind up paying a lot more in the long run. Be sure to factor in any loan acquisition fee or prepayment penalty, as well. Auto loan refinancing allows you to substitute your existing financing with a new loan, ideally at a lower rate and/or a different term length. There's no set waiting period for refinancing, but you can't get a new loan until your original lender receives the car's title from the manufacturer or previous owner, which can take up to two or three months. If you're concerned about your credit, you should wait at least six months. That's long enough for your credit score to recover from any drop caused by the initial lender's hard inquiry. Waiting a year after the original loan could improve your score even more if you're able to make on-time payments in full during that time. You must meet certain requirements to refinance, like being up to date on your loan payments and meeting the lender's credit score and income requirements. There may also be limits on the car's age and mileage and the loan balance. Your car is collateral for the loan, so some lenders won't lend more than 100% of the value of the vehicle. The ones that will usually require good credit and have limits on how much negative equity they'll finance. Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox. Sign up here. At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every auto loan article is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors. While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties, and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jury orders Elon Musk's Tesla to pay massive sum for fatal crash allegedly caused by Autopilot: 'Will send shock waves to others in the industry'
A federal jury has determined that Tesla "bore significant responsibility" for a deadly crash in Florida involving Autopilot, an advanced driver assist system intended to reduce driver workload and traffic collisions, as reported by the Associated Press. The ruling comes as Tesla grapples with lagging sales, declining revenue, volatile stocks, damaged brand trust, and eroding consumer loyalty, with CEO Elon Musk's polarizing politics and public disputes playing a role in these struggles. What's happening? A Miami jury ordered Tesla to pay more than $240 million to the victims of a 2019 crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. According to the AP, the jury ruled that because its Autopilot failed, Tesla was partially responsible for the crash even though driver George McGee was distracted by his cellphone. Brett Schreiber, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, argued that Tesla misleads drivers to believe its Autopilot is more capable of handling road situations than it is because other automakers use terms like "driver assist" and "copilot" to prevent overreliance on similar technologies. "Words matter," Schreiber said. "And if someone is playing fast and loose with words, they're playing fast and loose with information and facts." Why is this news worrying for Tesla? Teslas are generally among the safest cars around and offer long-term environmental perks and cost savings on energy and maintenance, like other electric vehicles. However, like any vehicle, they aren't perfect. The jury's verdict could further erode consumer trust in the brand at a time when Tesla is pivoting to AI and robotics to boost profitability. Already, Tesla's fight to keep crash data involving its Autopilot and Full-Self Driving systems private has raised eyebrows. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also opened multiple investigations into the automaker after crashes involving several of its autonomous features. Do you think a majority of Americans will have EVs in 20 years? Absolutely Only in some states No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. In the latest case, the families of Leon and Angulo alleged Tesla lost or hid crucial evidence — a claim Tesla disputed as an honest mistake after evidence came to light, according to the AP. While similar cases against Tesla have previously been dismissed or settled out of court, the jury's $240 million verdict could set a precedent. "It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry," Wedbush Securities financial analyst Dan Ives said. "This will open the floodgates," added car crash attorney Miguel Custodio, who wasn't involved with the federal case. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." What are Tesla's next steps? Lead defense attorney Joel Smith said Tesla warns drivers that it is their responsibility to stay alert and be ready to take over when using its Autopilot and FSD features, putting the blame on McGee for being distracted after dropping his cellphone, per the AP. For its part, Tesla said in a statement to the AP that it will appeal the jury's decision. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology," Tesla said. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump is undermining California's EV goals. The state has a new plan to fight back
From Donald Trump's first day back in office, he vowed to unravel California's sway over the nation's auto-emission standards by eliminating the state's progressive zero-emission mandates. He made good on that promise within the first several months of his second term. After a series of controversial congressional votes in May, Trump signed legislation that effectively nullified several of California's auto-emission standards, including the state's landmark regulation to ban selling new, gas-only cars statewide by 2035. Several weeks later, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order reaffirming California's commitment to its emissions goals, and effectively sending state agencies back to the drawing board in light of a newly antagonistic federal government. Their task: to reassert California's climate leadership and identify policies to boost zero-emission vehicle sales. At stake isn't just sales numbers for car and truck manufacturers, but California's ambitious climate agenda and the health of millions of its residents. Without the federal rebates and subsidies to support widespread adoption electric vehicles, the state will almost surely fall short of its greenhouse gas reduction targets and remain in violation of federal air quality standards. Unless, that is, Sacramento steps in, in a big way. On Tuesday, state officials delivered an eight-page report to the governor's office detailing several strategies to do just that. It focuses on boosting zero-emission vehicle adoption and reducing tailpipe emissions in communities dealing with some of the nation's worst air quality and most rapidly intensifying effects from global warming. In Southern California, alone, about 1,500 residents die annually due to exposure to unhealthy levels of air pollution, according to Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board, one of the agencies that authored the report. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' Randolph said. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health. We have a legal and moral obligation.' The report comes amid a statewide slump in electric vehicle sales, expiring federal clean-vehicle subsidies and widespread economic uncertainty from Trump-imposed tariffs. In the document, California officials argued that one of the most important ways to counteract federal actions is to find state funding to restore subsidies for zero-emission vehicles. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will end federal tax credits for zero-emission vehicles — up to $7,500 for car buyers — on Sept. 30. Because electric vehicles generally cost more than their gas-powered counterparts, government incentives were critical in encouraging Americans to buy cleaner cars. Not long after Trump's election, Newsom committed to restore funding for a state rebate program if Trump eliminated the federal tax credit. The previous state program, which ended in 2023, provided $1.49 billion in funding for more than 594,000 electric, hydrogen or plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the state Air Resources Board. That offered thousands of consumers up to a $7,500 rebate for purchasing or leasing a new zero-emission vehicle or plug-in hybrid, and the initiative prevented drivers from burning more than 456 million gallons of fuel, according to estimates. A new round of state subsidies for zero-emission vehicles would likely require state lawmakers to introduce new legislation or to create a specific allocation for that purpose in California's budget bill next year. Daniel Villasenor, a spokesperson for Newsom's office, said the state's cap-and-trade program — the state's leading climate program that generates $4 billion annually — could be the source of new zero-emission vehicle incentives. 'The Governor and his team are reviewing the recommendations set forth in the report,' Villasenor said. 'As the Governor said when he signed the executive order, California will continue our world-leading transition to cleaner cars.' Last year, more than 1.75 million new cars were sold in California; over 25% of those were zero-emission or plug-in hybrids, according to state data. As of June 30, about 900,000 cars have been sold in 2025, and 22.3% are zero-emission or plug-in hybrids. Tesla registered only 76,000 new cars statewide, well off its pace last year, when it sold around 200,000. Adrian Martinez, director of the nonprofit Earthjustice's 'Right To Zero' campaign, said government subsidies are critical for California to not only meet its clean air and climate goals, but to also stay economically competitive. 'It's smart for California to think about how they can [counteract] some of the reckless behavior of the federal government,' Martinez said. 'It's incredibly important right now, because there's huge environmental need for these zero emission vehicles. But there's also huge economic benefits from facilitating and advancing electric vehicles, including a lot of jobs in California.' State officials have advised the governor's office to consider other financial inducements to zero-emission drivers, such as free or reduced costs to drive in lesser-congested toll lanes on California highways. Electric car owners, who are permitted to drive alone in carpool lanes with a state-issued decal, are poised to lose privileges on Sept. 30 without federal authorization. The report calls on the California Public Utilities Commission to explore financial incentives to make electric-vehicle charging less expensive as electricity prices have risen substantially. It also broadly proposes expanding and maintaining the state's electric-vehicle charging networking, which has been plagued by broken charge ports, long wait times and too few stations. In addition, state officials stressed the need to lead by example. The state operates a fleet of more than 35,000 vehicles, and it is essential, the report says, that new vehicles purchased be zero-emissions. 'One of the opportunities is whether or not the state fleet might be able to move even faster [than our requirements],' Randolph said. 'I think it's a wonderful opportunity for sate fleets to show how zero-emission vehicles can be deployed.' Beyond incentives and demonstrating its own purchasing power, environmental advocates say California and local regulators must continue to adopt innovative regulations within their own authority. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta sued the federal government moments after Trumped signed legislation that overturned California's auto emissions standards, including the Advanced Clean Cars II — the regulation that which would have banned the sale of new gas-only cars by 2035. As Bonta continues to fight for the landmark rule, Newsom's executive order in June instructed the California Air Resources Board to begin drafting the state's next major regulation in the coming months: Advanced Clean Cars III. There aren't specifics, at this point, so it's unclear if it is intended to build on existing regulation or act as an alternative measure if Trump succeeds in defeating Advanced Clean Cars II. In either case, state officials are signaling that California does not intend to shelve its environmental agenda. 'The world is accelerating forward toward cleaner vehicle technologies, and is going to watch the U.S. fade into the rearview mirror because this administration is choosing to quit the race,' Randolph said. 'This report shows California is still going to keep up the momentum.'
