Driver bailed for second time after two schoolgirls killed in Wimbledon school crash
The driver of the four-by-four which smashed into a primary school killing two schoolgirls has been bailed for the second time after the Met Police rearrested her.
Claire Freemantle, 48, is now due to report to a police station in late April.
Her Land Rover Defender smashed through a fence of the Study Prep school in Wimbledon and killed N uria Sajjad and Selena Lau, both 8, as they celebrated the last day of the summer term with their classmates and parents at a picnic.
Scotland Yard said the driver had been arrested for a second time on Tuesday, having first been arrested at the time of the crash and later told she would face no further action.
An internal review was launched last year after 'concerns' were raised by the families of the two girls, who said they remained 'unconvinced' that the investigation was conducted thoroughly.
It had previously been announced in June that the driver had suffered an epileptic seizure behind the wheel and would not face criminal charges.
Last summer, prosecutors found that Freemantle had never had an epileptic seizure before and was in good health before the crash.
In a statement, she expressed her 'deepest sorrow' and said she had 'no recollection of what took place' after losing consciousness.
The Met said the review identified lines of enquiry which required further examination and, in October, the investigation was moved to the specialist crime command.
Following the arrest, Det Supt Lewis Basford said: 'I would like to take this opportunity to appeal to any witnesses or individuals with information who are yet to speak to police to please come forward.
'Were you attending the local golf course or driving in or around the area of the Study Prep school in Wimbledon at the time of the collision? Did you see the vehicle – a distinctive gold Land Rover Defender – in the lead-up to the collision?
'We believe there were people in the local area who have not been spoken to by police and remain unidentified. I would ask those individuals to please contact us.
'Our main priority is to ensure the lines of inquiry identified by the review are progressed.
'This is a live investigation and in order to maintain its integrity I can't go into further detail at this stage. I would urge people to avoid speculation.'
After the initial decision that no further action would be taken was announced, the parents of Selena and Nuria released a joint statement.
They said: 'All the victims of the events of July 6 2023 did nothing wrong.
'We were all in the safest place we could have been outside our own homes. We were celebrating a day filled with joy.
'Nuria and Selena's lives were taken in a moment. So many lives were also irreparably shattered in that moment.
'Hundreds of people – parents, teachers, children, neighbours, friends and family members – will never lead 'normal' lives again. Some of us will never experience joy again.
'We have tried to keep faith in the systems and institutions that are supposed to protect victims and deliver justice to those affected. We have been disappointed by this system. We have already expressed, publicly, our dissatisfaction with the pace of the investigative process.
'It is now clear to us that the depth of the process is questionable too. In the absence of any concrete evidence to the contrary, we can only surmise that the investigation has been equally poor.'
Anyone with information can contact police on 0207 175 0793 or 101 quoting CAD 6528/27Jan, or message the Met on X (Twitter) quoting the same reference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Second new Love Island hunk questioned by cops after being accused of stealing woman's phone during night out
LOVE Island hunk Dejon Noel-Williams was questioned by police after he was accused of stealing a phone on a night out. The semi-pro footballer, 26, who is set to star in the new series, was interviewed after a woman's mobile was taken in London. 2 It makes Dejon the second Islander this series to have been quizzed by cops, after The Sun yesterday revealed Kyle Ashman was held over a machete attack. Both were released with no further action. ITV was aware of the incident with Dejon when he secured his place on the dating show, a spokesman confirmed. He spoke to cops alongside Kettering FC footballer Harlain Mbayo, who was ordered to carry out a community resolution, which can involve an apology or compensation. The dispute was sparked over payment for food and an Uber taxi ride. Personal trainer Dejon last night told The Sun: 'I was never arrested. 'I voluntarily spoke to the police to clarify the truth about what happened in this incident, with no further action taken. "To stress, my intentions here were entirely honourable and it is very upsetting to read claims that suggest otherwise.' The Met Police said: 'On March 16 at 04:05hrs officers responded to a report of a robbery in which a phone was taken. 'An investigation was launched and two men voluntarily took part in interviews. The victim's phone was recovered and has been returned. 'No further action was taken against the 26-year-old man.'
Metro
12 hours ago
- Metro
Bollywood film worker and his partner found dead after 'taking mystery green pil
Neighbours have paid tribute to a Bollywood film worker and his 'beautiful' partner who died at their west London home after allegedly taking a mystery green pill. The couple, who have not been named by police, were found unresponsive in their bedroom by their flatmates at their flat in Havelock Road, Southall, on bank holiday Monday. Ambulances and police were called to the scene but they were unable to save them. The pills were obtained while the couple were out clubbing in south London the day before, police believe. Metro can reveal that the 28-year-old man was a driver for celebrities in the Bollywood film industry in London and is originally from India. He and his partner, 20, were described as a 'beautiful hard working couple' by locals. A father of three, who is a neighbour at the Southall flats where the couple rented, told Metro: 'To me they were a clean-cut, hardworking couple who left early in the morning and were ambitious. They were a pleasure to be around. 'He worked in the Indian film industry as part of the crew and was working his way up. He was from a good family and they couple had their whole lives ahead of them. 'It's a total shock – if something like this can happen to them it can happen to anyone. They were the perfect couple just enjoying life.' He added: 'It was horrific on the day they were found. I think they had been out with the flatmates the night before. They wondered why the couple had it got up the next day originally thinking they were just having a lay in. Then one went in their bedroom and found them. 'The flatmates were in total shock. Loads of police ambulances came. One of the flatmates was vomiting, it was just terrible. Blue or pale lips or fingertips Very light, shallow breathing or no breathing Loud raspy 'snoring' or gurgling 'People need to be aware of what they are taking. I can say honestly this was not a hard-drinking, drug-taking couple. They were just enjoying London life and trying to get ahead.' Another neighbour told Metro the cricket-loving couple were 'just the nicest people you could meet'. He said: 'The guy drove Bollywood celebrities around and was on the crew, he had a bright future ahead of him. His partner was a beautiful, hard-working person. 'We used to meet up with them in the garden. We watched some of the cricket World Cup together. They were great company and lived with three good friends. They were just great people. His parents came to stay at one point. Very nice people – they will be devastated.' A Met Police statement said: 'Police continue to make enquiries following the sudden deaths of a 28-year-old man and a 20-year-old woman in Ealing on Monday. 'This is following reports that the individuals allegedly passed away after taking an illicit substance in the form of a green pill. 'No arrests have been made at this time and we're working closely with our partners, including the health service and councils, to issue advice to people in the area.' Ealing Council have also raised the alarm over the mystery pills circulating. More Trending It said : 'Over the Bank Holiday weekend, two people were found dead in Southall, following attendance at a nightclub in South London on Saturday 24 May. They are thought to have consumed green pills with an '80' on one face and possibly an 'OP' on the other. 'Please remember, there is no way of knowing what is in any pill or drug that is bought illegally, or how your body will react. 'If you, or anyone you are with, starts to feel unwell after taking any pill or drug, go to your nearest Accident and Emergency department or call 999. Authorities urge anyone in possession of unknown pills or powders to avoid taking them and to seek advice from harm reduction services. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Two men charged with murder after boy, four, killed in pick-up truck crash in Dartford MORE: Boy, three, starved to death by parents 'became invisible to child services' MORE: Two people seriously hurt after crash near London's Blackwall Tunnel
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Prince Harry's latest doomed court battle over security - which he 'wished someone had told me beforehand' there was 'no way to win' - costs British taxpayers £100,000, new figures reveal
Prince Harry's latest doomed battle with the Home Office over police bodyguards cost British taxpayers £100,000, new figures revealed today. The Duke of Sussex lost his case at the Court of Appeal last month, saying in a BBC interview straight afterwards that 'I wish someone had told me beforehand' there was 'no way to win'. Today the Mail can reveal the Home Office has put its legal costs in the case at £656,324, which includes £554,000 for the original case a year ago which the High Court ruled Harry had 'comprehensively lost'. Since then, during which time Harry appealed the decision, an additional £102,000 has been incurred by government lawyers. It is likely that, as the losing party, Harry will be ordered to reimburse taxpayers all or most of the costs, putting him on the hook for as much as £1.5million, when his own legal costs are added. Last year, after he lost the original case, a judge said Harry should repay 90 per cent of the public's costs. Last month's damning appeal ruling was a bitter blow to the duke who said that, of all his various court battles, this one 'mattered the most'. He had flown in from California to attend a two-day hearing in April and sat in court as his barrister argued that removing his automatic right to Met Police armed bodyguards when he was in the UK had put his life 'at stake'. His KC said the threats against him had not diminished just because he had stopped being a frontline royal, and his military service had placed him at particular risk. The Duke of Sussex at the Royal Courts of Justice on April 8 during his appeal against a High Court ruling preventing him getting automatic taxpayer-funded police protection in the UK, which was taken away following Megxit On May 2, England's second most senior judge, Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos, sitting with two other judges, ruled that while 'these were powerful and moving arguments, and it was plain the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated by the system…I could not say that the duke's sense of grievance translated into a legal argument'. Sir Geoffrey ruled the original security decision had been a 'predictable' and even 'sensible' reaction to Megxit - when Harry stepped back from being a senior royal and quit Britain. Hours after the Appeal Court's ruling, Harry went nuclear in a BBC interview filmed in California, launching a blistering attack on the King who 'won't speak to me' and claiming there had been 'an Establishment stitch-up'. He accused the royal household of 'interfering' in his long-running battle in His Majesty's courts to reinstate his police bodyguards. He said of his children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet: 'I think it's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland', adding he does not even know 'how much longer my father has' to live. Bitter Harry, 40, raged that 'the other side' in the court case had 'won in keeping me unsafe'. He declared himself 'obviously pretty gutted about the decision', but he added: 'It's certainly proven that there is no way to win this through the courts – wish someone had told me that beforehand. But yeah, the decision has been a surprise as well as not a surprise.' Figures released today via a Freedom of Information request show that the Home Office has spent £656,324 of public money successfully fighting the case - so far. The Home Office said this figure could yet rise, because 'further costs may be included at a later date, for example costs relating to the period prior to 2 May that have not yet been captured'. The legal fees included more than £241,000 on barristers, £394,000 on solicitors at the Government Legal Department, and £3,800 in court fees. Harry's own legal costs have not been revealed, but could be similar. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, pictured as he rejected Harry's appeal saying the original security decision had been a 'predictable' and even 'sensible' reaction to Megxit Within hours of the Appeal Court judgment, Harry declared in his bombshell interview: 'This is a good old-fashioned Establishment stitch-up - and that is what it feels like'. He claimed there was a big injustice, and compared himself – born with security risks – to politicians such as prime ministers who seek public office and are then guaranteed Scotland Yard protection for life. He said: 'Other people have been protected, people who have made a choice for public office – why wouldn't you be comfortable with someone in my position, who has given 35 years' service to his country, including two tours of Afghanistan…I was born into this position. I was born into those risks, and they have only increased over time.' 'I love my country and always have done. I think it's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland.' At the time, Buckingham Palace said: 'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion', with a source adding: 'It would have been constitutionally improper for His Majesty to intervene while this matter was being considered by the Government and reviewed by the Courts.'
