logo
Middle East conflict highlights how vastly the global energy supply has changed in recent years

Middle East conflict highlights how vastly the global energy supply has changed in recent years

The Hill6 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Iran launched missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday, threatening to stoke a wider conflict in the Middle East, a region that supplies the world with about a third of the oil used globally every year. That same day, benchmark U.S. crude tumbled more than 7%, one of the biggest single day sell-offs this year. The following day, the same thing happened, driving crude prices down by double digits this week.
The seemingly illogical tumble in energy prices highlighted a new global reality: the world is awash in oil.
Gasoline prices barely moved this week, but experts say motorists will likely see prices at the pump begin to fall, perhaps as early as this weekend.
With the situation in the Middle East still volatile, Iran could try to block the Strait of Hormuz off its coast, through which 20% of the world's oil passes daily. While few expect Iran to do that because it would cripple the ability to move its own oil, the fact remains that there have been drastic changes in the 50 years since an Arab oil embargo hobbled the U.S. economy and sent energy prices skyrocketing.
Following is a quick rundown of the new forces on supply and demand that have reshaped the global energy landscape, and what you can expect to see as far as prices at the pump this weekend.
Technical innovation in the last two decades has upended global energy markets and made the U.S. the world's top oil producer, surpassing even Saudi Arabia in 2018. It's contributed to an extended surplus of oil, and that has consistenly driven prices lower.
Gas prices have been in broad decline for roughly three years. That has remained true even during traditional periods of high demand, like the summer travel season just now kicking into high gear.
Part of the reason, according to Patrick De Haan, the head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy, is that the U.S. announced aggressive tariffs against its trading partners at around the time of year that U.S. gas prices usually begin to rise. That suppressed demand, for both households and businesses, due to anticipation of economic fallout from a broader trade war.
And prices are likely to begin falling again, and fast. Gas stations bought their fuel supplies before crude prices slumped this week, so motorists have not seen gas prices decline due to a typical lag between oil and gasoline prices.
'I think that the national average will probably cease to increase in the next 24 to 48 hours,' Patrick De Haan, the head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy said Tuesday. 'Then it should stabilize for maybe a day or two and then we should start to see prices — at least the national average — to start falling this weekend.'
On Wednesday, the average retail price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. was $3.23, down from $3.47 a year ago. In June of 2022, the average U.S. price for a gallon of gas eclipsed $5, an all-time high, according to the auto club AAA.
The U.S. is producing record volumes of natural gas and crude. Production has reached such high levels that energy companies are shutting down drilling operations because pulling crude from the ground with prices so low doesn't make financial sense.
The odds of a U.S. oil company taking action after President Donald Trump's this week implored them in a social media post to 'drill, baby, drill,' is slim to none.
U.S. drilling activity began to slow last year and the number of active oil and gas rigs in the U.S. fell last week to 554, the lowest level since November of 2021. That's a decline of about 19% from a year ago at this time.
That might lead to short supply and higher prices if it weren't for producers outside of the U.S. that are currently boosting production. The type of drilling operations run outside of the U.S. can be less nimble and harder to shut off, and revenue demands much greater.
The OPEC+ alliance of oil producing nations this month announced that it was increasing production. This week, S&P Global Commodity Insights raised its 10-year production forecast for the Canadian oil sands, expecting production to reach record levels this year.
Yet these supply forces are colliding with the reality of weakening global demand for oil.
According to the International Energy Agency, oil's share of global energy demand in 2024 fell below 30% for the first time ever. Overall energy demand has increased, but more so for natural gas and other energy sources, the IEA said in its most recent annual report published in March.
Oil demand grew a meager 0.8% last year, according to the IEA.
Part of the reason is new technology in transportation.
Global sales of electric cars climbed 25% last year, according to the IEA, just the most recent example of the mainstreaming of EVs. One of every five vehicles sold last year was electric. That's one of the reasons demand for crude is falling, while demand for alternative forms of energy continues to rise. Additionally, fossil fuel powered engines are becoming increasingly efficient, whether they are traveling through the air, by sea, or on the road.
And right now, the same anxiety that has led households to cut down on trips in the car is also impacting airlines, which have reduced their projections for air travel this year due to potential trade wars and the economic unease that comes with them. That has added further downward pressure on oil prices.
New energy technology of course reaches beyond transportation.
According to the IEA, 80% of the increase in global electricity generation last year was provided by renewable sources such as wind and solar.
As more alternative energy sources are established, including natural gas, the demand for crude falls. Demand for natural gas grew 2.7% in 2024, while oil demand rose just 0.8%, down from a 1.9% increase in 2023.
Major U.S. technology companies have begun investing heavily in nuclear power to meet their energy needs for artificial intelligence and data centers.
Facebook parent company Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Google have all announced investments in and partnerships with nuclear power companies in the past year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal
NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal

The Big Story NATO leaders on Wednesday agreed to a major defense spending increase while leaving room for some alliance countries to not hit the new spending goals thanks to very particular wording. © AP 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations,' the 32 leaders of the alliance said in a statement that pointedly did not specify 'all allies' had committed to doing so. President Trump since his first term has pressured NATO countries to commit more of their annual GDP to military spending as the United States looks to shift its attention from security priorities in Europe to the Indo-Pacific and Middle East. NATO's biggest-spending member, Washington, since early this year has insisted alliance countries must up their defense dollars from the 2 percent goal set in 2014 to the ambitious 5 percent. But the goal seemed to be a stretch given that nine of the 32 NATO member countries have yet to reach the earlier 2 percent goal. With vague diplomatic language, however, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has claimed he delivered on Trump's spending demands. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden of that commitment. And that changes today,' Rutte said at the end of a meeting of NATO leaders Wednesday. To hit the 5 percent goal — which countries have until 2035 to reach — allies agreed to split the spending among different buckets to easier reach targets: A review of spending is set for 2029 to monitor progress and reassess Russia's security threat, given its ongoing war in Ukraine and overt threats to alliance members should they interfere in the conflict. But several countries have made clear they will not be meeting the new targets as they are pressed by economic challenges — issues that could be made worse by Trump's global tariffs. Among the most vocal of those countries is Spain, which before the NATO summit officially announced that it cannot meet the 'unreasonable' goal by 2035. 'Not all allies are bound to the 5 percent target,' according to a statement from the Spanish government ahead of the summit. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Unpacking the conflicting assessments on Iran strikes As the dust settles on Iranian sites hit by U.S. bombs and missiles over the weekend, there's growing tension over how much the military operation set back Tehran's nuclear program. The Trump administration is blasting assessments from U.S. intelligence agencies about the damage inflicted by strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, while apparently endorsing an Israeli assessment. And Director of … Questions around success of Iran strikes spark fears on Capitol Hill Questions swirling around the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are raising fears on Capitol Hill that more could be coming. President Trump is insisting Saturday's strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities were an unqualified success, 'obliterating' Tehran's nuclear capabilities and setting back the program for years. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, amplified that assertion Wednesday, … 50 percent say US strikes on Iran make Americans less safe: Survey Half of registered voters say they think U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear program would make Americans less safe, according to a new Quinnipiac University survey conducted in the days after President Trump bombed the Middle Eastern country. The poll, released Wednesday, phrases the question as a hypothetical, asking respondents whether 'U.S. military strikes targeting Iran's nuclear program would make Americans … Mother of Naval Station Norfolk sailor killed seeks Navy accountability WASHINGTON, D.C. (WAVY) — The mother of a sailor who disappeared from Naval Station Norfolk and was found dead in a Norfolk neighborhood is in Washington D.C. Wednesday demanding transparency and accountability from the U.S. Navy. Angelina Resendiz was initially reported missing May 29 and was last seen in her barracks at Naval Station Norfolk around 10 a.m., according to the Navy. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service confirmed … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Trump knocks down barriers around personal data, raising alarm The Trump administration is shattering norms around the handling of Americans' personal — and sometimes private — information, dismantling barriers around data in the name of government efficiency and rooting out fraud. Privacy experts say the moves bring the country closer to a surveillance … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Trump calls for firing of CNN reporter over Iran nuclear damage report President Trump on Wednesday called for the firing of CNN correspondent Natasha Bertrand, who reported on air an internal U.S. intelligence assessment … Read more Winners and losers from the New York City mayoral primary New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani stunned the country on Tuesday with his victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who conceded overnight … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-ed related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit
Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO's summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday has been described as 'transformational' and 'historic.' 'We're witnessing the birth of a new NATO,' Finland's President Alexander Stubb said. The 32 members of the world's biggest security organization endorsed a plan to massively ramp up defense spending, 'back to the defense expenditure levels of the Cold War,' as Stubb put it, driven by U.S. President Donald Trump and fears of the security threat posed by Russia. Here are some of the takeaways from the two-day meeting in The Hague. The nonbinding spending agreement means a steep budget hike for NATO's European members and Canada that will cost them tens of billions of dollars. It's a major revamp of the way NATO calculates defense spending. Until now, the allies had set a target of 2% of gross domestic product for their defense budgets. Now they'll be aiming for 3.5% by 2035. They'll now be able to include weapons and ammunition they supply to Ukraine in the equation, making the new target slightly easier to reach, but still difficult for Canada and a number of European countries with economic troubles. On top of that, the allies will dedicate 1.5% of their GDP to upgrading infrastructure — roads, bridges, ports and airfields — needed to deploy armies to the front. Money spent on protecting networks or preparing societies for future conflict can be included. Progress will be reviewed in 2029, after the next U.S. presidential election. Not everyone is on board. Spain officially refused the agreement. Slovakia had reservations. Belgium, France and Italy will struggle to meet the new target. The leaders reaffirmed their 'ironclad commitment' to NATO's collective defense clause, Article 5. In recent years, Trump had sowed seeds of doubt about whether the U.S. — NATO's most powerful member — would come to the aid of any ally under attack. Trump had appeared to condition that support on higher defense spending. With NATO's new spending pledge in the bag, he told reporters that 'I left there saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a ripoff. And we're here to help them protect their country.' He added that 'they want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States, it's not going to be the same.' After Russia invaded Ukraine by launching the biggest land conflict since World War II in 2022, NATO summits have largely focused on providing support to Kyiv. This summit was different. Previously, the emphasis was on Ukraine's membership prospects and on bringing it closer to NATO without actually joining. But the final summit statement this time made no such mention. Instead, the leaders underlined 'their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was at the venue. He dined with other leaders at the Dutch king's residence, held talks with several leaders and spent half an hour or so with Trump. NATO's plan was to focus the meeting only on Trump's pet cause, defense spending. Foreign ministers did meet on the sidelines with their Ukrainian counterpart in an official NATO-Ukraine Council. In a minor win for Ukraine, and for allies needing to persuade citizens that their governments must spend more on defense, Russia was identified as the standout of the 'profound security threats and challenges' facing NATO. If there were doubts that the United States runs NATO, the summit removed them. A very shortened summit and one-page statement were prepared to keep the U.S. president happy and focused. As Trump flew to the Netherlands, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte sent a text message gushing about him being on the verge of a great achievement and saying, 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' Trump posted the message on social media. Rutte said he wasn't embarrassed and that it was all true. After the meeting, Trump said he came to the summit seeing it as a political chore, but he was leaving convinced that the assembled leaders love the alliance, their own countries and, mostly importantly, the United States. He called NATO leaders a 'nice group of people' and said that 'almost every one of them said 'Thank God for the United States.''

Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit
Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Takeaways from the Trump-dominated NATO summit

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO's summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday has been described as 'transformational' and 'historic.' 'We're witnessing the birth of a new NATO,' Finland's President Alexander Stubb said. The 32 members of the world's biggest security organization endorsed a plan to massively ramp up defense spending, 'back to the defense expenditure levels of the Cold War,' as Stubb put it, driven by U.S. President Donald Trump and fears of the security threat posed by Russia. Here are some of the takeaways from the two-day meeting in The Hague. Tens of billions of dollars in new military spending The nonbinding spending agreement means a steep budget hike for NATO's European members and Canada that will cost them tens of billions of dollars. It's a major revamp of the way NATO calculates defense spending. Until now, the allies had set a target of 2% of gross domestic product for their defense budgets. Now they'll be aiming for 3.5% by 2035. They'll now be able to include weapons and ammunition they supply to Ukraine in the equation, making the new target slightly easier to reach, but still difficult for Canada and a number of European countries with economic troubles. On top of that, the allies will dedicate 1.5% of their GDP to upgrading infrastructure — roads, bridges, ports and airfields — needed to deploy armies to the front. Money spent on protecting networks or preparing societies for future conflict can be included. Progress will be reviewed in 2029, after the next U.S. presidential election. Not everyone is on board. Spain officially refused the agreement. Slovakia had reservations. Belgium, France and Italy will struggle to meet the new target. A Trump commitment to collective defense The leaders reaffirmed their 'ironclad commitment' to NATO's collective defense clause, Article 5 . In recent years, Trump had sowed seeds of doubt about whether the U.S. — NATO's most powerful member — would come to the aid of any ally under attack. Trump had appeared to condition that support on higher defense spending. With NATO's new spending pledge in the bag, he told reporters that 'I left there saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a ripoff. And we're here to help them protect their country.' He added that 'they want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States, it's not going to be the same.' A sidelined Ukraine After Russia invaded Ukraine by launching the biggest land conflict since World War II in 2022, NATO summits have largely focused on providing support to Kyiv. This summit was different. Previously, the emphasis was on Ukraine's membership prospects and on bringing it closer to NATO without actually joining. But the final summit statement this time made no such mention. Instead, the leaders underlined 'their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was at the venue. He dined with other leaders at the Dutch king's residence, held talks with several leaders and spent half an hour or so with Trump. NATO's plan was to focus the meeting only on Trump's pet cause, defense spending. Foreign ministers did meet on the sidelines with their Ukrainian counterpart in an official NATO-Ukraine Council. In a minor win for Ukraine, and for allies needing to persuade citizens that their governments must spend more on defense, Russia was identified as the standout of the 'profound security threats and challenges' facing NATO. A 'nice group of people' If there were doubts that the United States runs NATO, the summit removed them. A very shortened summit and one-page statement were prepared to keep the U.S. president happy and focused. As Trump flew to the Netherlands, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte sent a text message gushing about him being on the verge of a great achievement and saying, 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' Trump posted the message on social media. Rutte said he wasn't embarrassed and that it was all true. After the meeting, Trump said he came to the summit seeing it as a political chore, but he was leaving convinced that the assembled leaders love the alliance, their own countries and, mostly importantly, the United States. He called NATO leaders a 'nice group of people' and said that 'almost every one of them said 'Thank God for the United States.'' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store