20 months after residents forced to evacuate, troubled Edmonton condo sells for $5.1M
A north Edmonton condo evacuated nearly two years ago over fears the building could collapse has been sold.
The long-awaited sale will offer some financial reprieve to previous residents of Castledowns Pointe, which has sat vacant since September 2023.
Harmani, an Alberta-based developer and rental company, purchased the property for $5.1 million with plans to repair the existing structure and rent its 83 units once reconstruction is complete.
When it was first put on the market in mid-2024, it had been listed for just under $17 million.
The deal, approved in Edmonton's Court of King's Bench, closed on April 21.
Condo board president Susan Strebchuk said the sale is a welcome sign of closure for its former residents but added there's still a long road ahead.
"There is relief that it's going to be done, but it's not," Strebchuk said.
The sale proceeds will take months to be distributed, with owners not likely to see anything until October or November, Strebchuk said.
And their share will be a "drop in the bucket" against the mounting costs they've paid for repairs, condo fees and mortgage payments on homes that were no longer habitable, Strebchuk said.
"The damage that's been done to either your financial standing — or even your ability to move on from this — is not going to be recovered through whatever funds you will get," Strebchuk said.
Debts to the condo board will be settled before any proceeds from the sale are distributed to owners, she said.
"There is still lots of work to do," Strebchuk said. "We will all be very relieved when we're done."
The problems with Castledowns Pointe, constructed in 1999 at 12618 152nd Ave., first surfaced in March 2023 after a fire ripped through the fourth floor.
Investigators assessing the damage discovered dangerous structural flaws unrelated to the fire damage. The building does not match the architectural designs on record and does not comply with the building code.
In September 2023, when the extent of the structural issues was made clear in an engineering report, evacuation orders were issued.
Residents were given hours to leave their homes over concerns that the building might collapse.
In January 2024, owners opted to sell and cut their losses rather than attempt to repair the building. The building and land went on the market early last summer with an asking price of $16,950,000.
Seeking a buyer
The court-sanctioned sale has been a long, complicated process.
An unconditional offer of $6.25 million from Cormode and Dickson Construction Ltd. was accepted but faced delays as the Edmonton construction company sought repeated extensions.
Then, a flood in January 2025 caused more than $500,000 in damages, and the deal collapsed altogether.
A clause in the offer contract allowed the company to walk away. With their offer rescinded, the building was placed back on the market.
An offer from Harmani Sale Inc. was accepted by the condo board and approved by the court last month. As part of the deal, some proceeds from the sale will be held back to cover the cost of flood repairs.
'Safety and structure'
Harpreet Singh, co-founder of Harmani Rentals, said the company is eager to start work as soon as city permits are approved. The company will work closely with engineers and city officials to assess how the building's flaws can be fixed.
He expects reconstruction will take at least 18 months before the building will be added to Harmani's portfolio of rental buildings. That timeline could change once crews start ripping out walls and investigating hidden parts of the structure.
"There are certain areas of the building that we want investigated to make sure the structural solution that we're planning with our engineers, and with the City of Edmonton, works," Singh said.
"The key is safety and structure first and then we will go from there."
A previous assessment estimated it would cost more than $7 million to shore up the existing structure.
The Harmani group of companies has previously taken on other problematic properties, including foreclosed buildings and sites shuttered due to health violations, he said.
Even with the added cost and complication, they're eager to "revive the property," Singh said, adding there will be "no shortcuts" on safety and the company will be transparent with the public and future tenants.
If the structural issues are deemed too severe to repair, they will demolish and rebuild, Singh said.
"This is a high-profile situation. There are structural issues and there's safety concerns. Those need to be addressed," he said.
"As a developer, we need to make sure that everybody is safe in the building, that the building is safe. And if it isn't, we're going to knock it down."
Once sale proceeds are distributed, the condo board will dissolve. Strebchuk said there are no plans to pursue a lawsuit for the financial losses suffered by owners.
As Strebchuk reflects on the loss of her home, there is a pang of anger and disbelief.
Strebchuk said Alberta needs to better protect condo owners, ensure inspectors are more tightly regulated, and that builders responsible for structural flaws can be held liable.
She said the case should have brought about change but, instead, she feels owners have been forgotten.
"We all wish that this never happens to anybody else," she said. "But, through all of this, we haven't seen anything that has changed that would protect owners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
27 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Air Canada customers stuck in limbo highlights competition, air passenger protection issues, experts say
Travellers are looking to get back on track with their itineraries after Air Canada reached an agreement with the union representing its flight attendants on Tuesday. But the fallout from the labour dispute, which scuttled summer travel for thousands of Canadians, highlights a glaring gap in Canada's air passenger protection system that is exacerbated by scarce competition. Nearly a week since Air Canada began cancelling flights ahead of the strike deadline, many are still struggling to get what they're owed in this labour disruption, including refunds and rebookings. 'Air Canada and its flight attendants have totally left us high and dry,' said Adam Rabiner of North Vancouver. Air Canada resumes flying after flight attendants' strike ends Air Canada's flight attendant strike disrupts travel for thousands of people, at home and abroad Mr. Rabiner said he was set to fly to Paraguay on an Air Canada flight on Thursday to chaperone his daughter while she played at the Junior Pan American Karate Championships. Instead, he spent $1,300 on non-refundable tickets with another airline after he wasn't able to reach Air Canada to find out whether his flight was still leaving as scheduled or get a refund or rebooking. 'Unless they do something to compensate us and communicate with us properly, I will refuse to book with them again,' he said. While Mr. Rabiner has a few other options – WestJet, Porter and Flair for domestic flights, for example – the selection is slim. And that's part of the reason why passengers are in this mess to begin with, consumer advocates say. Airlines work to add flights, make schedule adjustments in face of Air Canada labour dispute 'If we had more competition in Canada, the airlines would be inclined to treat their passengers better and their workers better,' said Tahira Dawood, staff lawyer at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre. 'A lot of these problems would have not arose in the first place.' The rules meant to protect passengers' rights and their enforcement have also come under criticism. Canada's Air Passenger Protection Regulations require airlines to financially compensate passengers beyond rebookings or refunds when the disruption is within the airline's control and not related to safety. However, labour disruptions in Canada are considered outside the airline's control, which means passengers are owed little beyond the choice of a refund or rebooking. And even then, holding airlines to account has been difficult, Ms. Dawood said. When an airline fails to meet its obligations under Canada's Air Passenger Protection Rules, passengers have few avenues to turn to beyond an overburdened transportation regulator. (The Canadian Transportation Agency saw its backlog reach 87,000 complaints earlier this year.) Air Canada, the airline oligopoly and the abused consumer When it comes to flying with other carriers, alternatives in Canada are scarce. A June report from the Competition Bureau highlighted the issue and recommended opening up the domestic industry to foreign ownership, limiting mergers of carriers and removing operational barriers for smaller airports. Elsewhere, there are far stronger protections available to passengers in the event of labour disruptions. Strikes by an airline in both the European Union and Britain are considered within the airline's control, triggering compensation and duty of care obligations. 'In Europe and the U.K., the rule is simple,' said John Marzo, co-founder and chief executive officer of Airfairness, a travel tech and consumer protection company. 'If it's the airline's own employees on strike, you can claim compensation under EC261 or UK261.' Under EU Regulation 261, courts have consistently held that strikes by airline staff are not 'extraordinary circumstances,' said Baqa Rashdi, the managing director and senior lawyer at Law Booth in Mississauga, whose practice deals with criminal, family and civil litigation. His research into aviation law has been personal. Under the EU model, Air France paid him compensation quickly for a delay on a trip to Spain and openly acknowledged its mistake, he said. With Air Canada, 'I was essentially compensated with a credit toward a future flight.' Since labour relations by an airline in Europe are considered part of the carrier's ordinary business risks under its regulations, passengers are typically entitled to compensation when a flight is cancelled or delayed. In defying the back-to-work order, CUPE took a calculated risk that paid off The amount depends on flight distance and length of delay. But in general, the EU has put a clear price tag on passenger inconvenience: €250 (about $400) for short-haul, €400 for medium and €600 for long-haul flights, Mr. Rashidi said. The EU's framework has been effective in expanding consumer rights and creating predictable outcomes, reinforced by strong case law, he said. 'Canada's system has been criticized for carving out too many exceptions, strikes being one of the clearest examples.' While airlines often argue that giving out compensation at a high rate could drive up fares, Ms. Dawood referred to the Competition Bureau's July report that found higher Canadian fares are more closely tied to limited competition and concentrated ownership. The Competition Bureau's report also recommended removing exclusivity clauses on international flights that restrict competition and expanding Canadian Air Transport Security Authority services, which oversee specific elements of air safety, to smaller secondary airports. For example, the exclusivity clauses in ground leases at Montréal-Trudeau International Airport prohibit international flights at nearby secondary airports to limit competition. Removing these restrictions, among other barriers, would give passengers and workers more options, the report found. For now, passengers in Canada are left to suffer the effects of poor enforcement of air protection rights and an uncompetitive industry said Geoff White, executive director and general counsel at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre. 'This will take a legislative fix – this is fundamentally a failure of competition,' Mr. White said. 'When it comes to Canada's addiction to monopolies, it's a matter of political will.'
CTV News
27 minutes ago
- CTV News
Government moves to reverse new expense disclosure policy following backlash
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government may backtrack on a new expense policy that ends the public disclosure of receipts for government officials. Alberta's government is backtracking on a new expense policy that ended the public disclosure of receipts for government officials, following widespread criticism that the move erodes transparency. The policy, quietly published on Aug. 1 before the long weekend, removed a long-standing requirement that ministers, senior staff and deputy ministers publicly disclose receipts for expenses over $100. It also erased eight years of previously available online records. Premier Danielle Smith said the intent was to protect cabinet members, who often stay at the same hotels while travelling around the province. 'The issue that cabinet discussed was that there are a number of my ministers who go to the same hotels when they're frequenting different municipalities, and they just wanted the name of the hotel redacted, just in case people were tracking them down,' Smith said. 'It turned out to be something quite different.' Finance Minister Nate Horner's press secretary, Marisa Breeze, said the directive was meant 'to improve government operations and reduce red tape, and to bring Alberta's policies into alignment with other provinces.' She said the purpose was to 'ensure the privacy and safety of elected officials and staff specifically as it relates to the physical location of their accommodations while travelling.' She said receipts were still required for reimbursement and can be accessed through Alberta's Freedom of Information process. Later on Tuesday, Breeze provided CTV News with an additional statement: 'Earlier today, cabinet discussed recent amendments to the expense policy. Cabinet recognized the importance of an expense posting policy that achieves both security and transparency. 'Cabinet has therefore directed the president of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance to request Treasury Board immediately revert to the previous expense posting policy expecting that address information for accommodations will be redacted on receipts posted online to ensure security of elected members and staff.' The Opposition NDP called the policy a deliberate attempt to conceal government spending. 'Albertans foot the bill for government expenses. They expect receipts, not excuses,' said NDP house leader Christina Gray. 'Smith's government changed their policy on a Friday before a long weekend and scrubbed eight years of receipts from the internet. This was wrong, and all of these changes should be reversed.' NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi accused Smith of leading 'the most opaque government I've ever seen.' He said the premier 'claims she knew nothing about it. So she knows nothing about what's going on in her government. In reality, of course, she knew what was going on; she just wasn't expecting the backlash.' Independent MLA Peter Guthrie, a former cabinet minister, said the premier was also trying to shift blame. 'The premier is quick to take credit when things go right but just as quick to pass blame when they don't,' Guthrie said. 'Albertans deserve a government that leads with integrity, not one that hides expenses, blames others and dodges accountability.' The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said the rollback is essential. 'For the longest time, Alberta has had really strong transparency laws where politicians, their bureaucrats and staff have to show their receipts for their expenses,' said Alberta director Kris Sims. 'It isn't through FOI. You don't need to pay a fee. They have to post their receipts online—until now.' She added that taxpayers 'want to know if your tax dollars are paying to rent a Corolla or a Corvette, a Subway sandwich supper or lobster and steak on your dime. This is why detailed receipts matter.' Sims also dismissed the government's explanation that system capacity issues required the removal of older records. ' 'We hereby permit the government to go spend some money on external hard drives if it means they're going to be transparent with taxpayers,' she said. Lori Williams, a political scientist at Mount Royal University, said the explanation did little to ease concerns. 'They just removed eight years' worth of public records from the website,' she said. 'If it is a concern, you can simply redact the name of the hotel.' James Turk, executive director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, called the expense changes 'the tip of a far more serious iceberg.' He said the policy fits into 'a much larger blocking of access to information on the part of Albertans' under new legislation brought in by Smith's government earlier this year. 'In June, they brought in a new Access to Information Act, replacing the former FOIP Act as well as the Protection of Privacy Act,' Turk said. 'The access to information decreases the transparency of government and decreases the public and journalists' right to information from the government.' He added that by limiting the time receipts remain public and removing older records, the government is 'making it harder for the public and for journalists to keep track of what politicians and senior government officials are doing.' Turk said Alberta should be leading on transparency, not retreating. 'We don't want provinces going to the lowest common denominator,' he said. Diane McLeod, Alberta's information and privacy commissioner, provided a statement on the matter to media earlier this month. 'These changes diminish transparency and our office has no knowledge of the rationale for them,' her statement said, in part. 'The OIPC takes the view that transparency is critically important. Citizens are rightfully concerned about government stewardship of public resources and there is high, ongoing demand for records of government travel and other expenses, as well as other types of government spending. 'When expense concerns or scandals arise, they can lead to a crisis of public confidence in government. Proactively disclosing the expense data of senior government officials can enhance government transparency and accountability, build public trust and reduce formal access requests. 'This is why, in general, I regard government transparency as so important.'
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Air Canada, Union reach tentative deal. Here's what we know
A tentative agreement has been reached to end the contact dispute between Air Canada and its flight attendants, both parties announced Tuesday. The deal comes after nine hours of discussions with a mediator appointed by the federal government.
