Moonstone Beach was known for sun and buns. A look back at the end of RI's last nude beach
It's unclear when exactly Moonstone Beach became a haven for nude sunbathers.
According to various reports, the stretch of sandy beach located between the beaches in the South Kingstown villages of Matunuck and Green Hill gained popularity in the 1970s and remained so into the late 1980s. Then, by the end of the century, the sun and buns would start coming to a halt.
It was no joke when on April 1, 1988, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began erecting a mile-long, 4-foot-high fence along Moonstone Beach to enclose nesting piping plovers and least terns until Aug. 31.
According to Providence Journal archives, the fence closed off New England's only nude beach and South Kingstown's Town Beach during the nesting season. All that remained was a 50-foot right-of-way controlled by South Kingstown, and under the terms of the closing, which was announced earlier in 1988, the public still would be allowed on Moonstone Beach below the mean high water line – the average height of high tide – which is well below the sections of the beach where people sit.
The fence left bathers with a narrow strip between the fence and the water.
The decision to close most of the beach was made in the hopes of increasing the population of piping plovers by allowing them more room to nest and feed. Plovers, a shore bird that nests in the same soft sand that attracts sunbathers, became protected under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1986.
Only two pairs of plovers had migrated from the south in 1985 to nest at Moonstone, and eight of their eggs were destroyed by predators drawn by refuse left by beach-goers, a representative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said.
With the fence plan in place, the town also banned nudity within 200 feet of the town beach at Moonstone Beach in 1988.
The efforts proved semi-successful, with seven baby plovers surviving at Moonstone during the summer of 1989.
As the plan to protect the plovers was being hatched, nudists protested the decision, claiming at times that the Fish and Wildlife Service was overstepping its authority because it opposed nude sunbathing – a charge that was denied by service officials.
A letter-writing effort in June 1988 appealed to reopen the beach. An attempt to challenge the fence through a court injunction that summer also failed.
In fall 1989, members of the New England Naturist Association announced plans for sit-ins and other protest actions the following summer. In December 1989, fully clothed members of the New England Naturist Association picketed the local headquarters of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the hope that public pressure would force the agency to reopen the beach the following summer.
While those efforts proved unsuccessful, the association was able to find some relief when, in 1990, they leased a 350-foot beach adjacent to Moonstone. Association President Joseph R. DiPippo said that since the beach opened that July, they had averaged 150 people a day during the week and 250 to 300 people a day on the weekend. That beach would remain in use until 1992.
In 1993, the association purchased property in South Kingstown near the Charlestown border. That move came after another effort in 1993 by the association to lease a 32-acre peninsula on the Ninigret Pond side of the Ninigret State Conservation Area for nude sunbathing, but it was unable to get a local zoning permit.
That would remain in use for two summers until the Rhode Island Supreme Court dealt a blow to the New England Naturist Association when it ruled that the clothing-optional beach violated the town's zoning regulations. The court's ruling had nothing to do with issues of nudity, but rather with a local law requiring that the beach, as a recreational facility, receive a special exception from the town's Zoning Board to operate.
This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Moonstone Beach in South Kingstown was New England's last nude beach
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Moonstone Beach was known for sun and buns. A look back at the end of RI's last nude beach
It's unclear when exactly Moonstone Beach became a haven for nude sunbathers. According to various reports, the stretch of sandy beach located between the beaches in the South Kingstown villages of Matunuck and Green Hill gained popularity in the 1970s and remained so into the late 1980s. Then, by the end of the century, the sun and buns would start coming to a halt. It was no joke when on April 1, 1988, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began erecting a mile-long, 4-foot-high fence along Moonstone Beach to enclose nesting piping plovers and least terns until Aug. 31. According to Providence Journal archives, the fence closed off New England's only nude beach and South Kingstown's Town Beach during the nesting season. All that remained was a 50-foot right-of-way controlled by South Kingstown, and under the terms of the closing, which was announced earlier in 1988, the public still would be allowed on Moonstone Beach below the mean high water line – the average height of high tide – which is well below the sections of the beach where people sit. The fence left bathers with a narrow strip between the fence and the water. The decision to close most of the beach was made in the hopes of increasing the population of piping plovers by allowing them more room to nest and feed. Plovers, a shore bird that nests in the same soft sand that attracts sunbathers, became protected under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1986. Only two pairs of plovers had migrated from the south in 1985 to nest at Moonstone, and eight of their eggs were destroyed by predators drawn by refuse left by beach-goers, a representative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said. With the fence plan in place, the town also banned nudity within 200 feet of the town beach at Moonstone Beach in 1988. The efforts proved semi-successful, with seven baby plovers surviving at Moonstone during the summer of 1989. As the plan to protect the plovers was being hatched, nudists protested the decision, claiming at times that the Fish and Wildlife Service was overstepping its authority because it opposed nude sunbathing – a charge that was denied by service officials. A letter-writing effort in June 1988 appealed to reopen the beach. An attempt to challenge the fence through a court injunction that summer also failed. In fall 1989, members of the New England Naturist Association announced plans for sit-ins and other protest actions the following summer. In December 1989, fully clothed members of the New England Naturist Association picketed the local headquarters of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the hope that public pressure would force the agency to reopen the beach the following summer. While those efforts proved unsuccessful, the association was able to find some relief when, in 1990, they leased a 350-foot beach adjacent to Moonstone. Association President Joseph R. DiPippo said that since the beach opened that July, they had averaged 150 people a day during the week and 250 to 300 people a day on the weekend. That beach would remain in use until 1992. In 1993, the association purchased property in South Kingstown near the Charlestown border. That move came after another effort in 1993 by the association to lease a 32-acre peninsula on the Ninigret Pond side of the Ninigret State Conservation Area for nude sunbathing, but it was unable to get a local zoning permit. That would remain in use for two summers until the Rhode Island Supreme Court dealt a blow to the New England Naturist Association when it ruled that the clothing-optional beach violated the town's zoning regulations. The court's ruling had nothing to do with issues of nudity, but rather with a local law requiring that the beach, as a recreational facility, receive a special exception from the town's Zoning Board to operate. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Moonstone Beach in South Kingstown was New England's last nude beach
E&E News
3 days ago
- E&E News
Feds schedule open-mic month on ESA habitat conservation plans
The Fish and Wildlife Service is inviting fresh ideas for administering habitat conservation plans and other agreements intended to resolve Endangered Species Act issues. The agency is billing the move as a big opportunity for developers, loggers, the energy industry and environmental advocates to help update how the ESA works. A 30-day public comment period starting Monday will open up for consideration Section 10(a) of the landmark environmental law. The section authorizes the issuance of permits that allow for the unintentional killing or harming — called incidental take — of species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA. Advertisement 'The Service is dedicated to strengthening the section 10(a) program to more effectively support conservation efforts while addressing the needs of landowners, industry and local communities — ultimately improving the program's overall efficiency and impact,' the agency stated Friday.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Facing extinction, rare Florida swamp flower could get more protections
One of Florida's rarest and most beloved swamp dwellers, the ghost orchid, could soon see increased protections under the federal Endangered Species Act. Citing the flower's growing risk of extinction, officials with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service this week announced a proposal to list the ghost orchid as an endangered species. The decision is being hailed by experts as a lifeline for the phantom flower after decades of poaching, dwindling wetlands and habitat loss have cut its Florida population in half and plummeted its chances of survival. Federal wildlife experts say there are fewer than 1,000 ghost orchids remaining in the United States, and less than half of those are old enough to reproduce. Globally, the ghost orchid's population has dropped by an estimated 90% in recent decades. 'The ghost orchid is Florida's most famous flower, and it deserves a chance to live,' said Melissa Abdo, the Sun Coast regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association. A true child of the swamp, the ghost orchid clings high up on ancient cypress trees and pond apples, blooming in the hushed humidity of midsummer. Its white, dangling petals, seemingly aloft in midair, are the reason for its ghoulish name. A proposed increase in ghost orchid protections comes more than three years after a coalition of environmental advocacy groups, including the parks association, the Center for Biological Diversity and The Institute for Regional Conservation, petitioned the feds to add the ghost orchid to the list of endangered species. Jaclyn Lopez, director of the St. Petersburg-based Jacobs Public Interest Law Clinic for Democracy and the Environment at Stetson University's College of Law, helped file the petition in 2022. An endangered species listing imposes civil and criminal penalties under federal law for anyone who removes the flower from federal or state public lands, according to Lopez. The decision also requires federal wildlife officials to chart a course for its recovery. 'Once finalized, (the Endangered Species Act) listing will ensure a future where wild Florida is enriched and adorned by this beauty,' Lopez told the Tampa Bay Times in a statement. The ghost orchid is found in a small sliver of Florida swamplands, including in the Big Cypress National Preserve, the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park. Other conservation and tribal lands in Collier, Hendry and possibly Lee counties are also home to the orchid, according to the nonprofit environmental groups. Western Cuba also has a population of ghost orchids, where they're also considered critically threatened, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Wildlife officials aren't listing a specific critical habitat boundary for the flower, because they said it could increase the risk of poaching. In 2023, state wildlife officials said they caught people attempting to steal a ghost orchid from public swamplands. The flower's lore, and the thievery it draws, also inspired journalist Susan Orlean's 1998 nonfiction bestseller, "The Orchid Thief." The listing proposal was formally published in the federal register Thursday, beginning a 60-day public comment period ending in early August. The coalition of nonprofits that filed the initial petition underscored the importance of federal wildlife staff as the Trump administration has deteriorated habitat protections and laid off employees with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, including in Florida. 'This is welcome news for Florida's famously cryptic ghost orchids,' Elise Bennett, the Florida and Caribbean director and attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, wrote in a statement to the Times. But 'with incessant attacks on landmark environmental laws meant to stop species from going extinct, we know our job here isn't done.' The Tampa Bay Times launched the Environment Hub in 2025 to focus on some of Florida's most urgent and enduring challenges. You can contribute through our journalism fund by clicking here.
