Not going back to the city: what treechangers love about regional living
But the common story? A more permanent transition.
Nerida Lindsay and her family made the move from buzzing Bondi to the majestic mid-north coast NSW in 2020.
Like many Australians at the time, they were seeking space, simplicity and a break from the pressure cooker of city living.
Five years later, they're not looking back.
"We live a relaxed lifestyle in an amazing community, and in paradise," says Mrs Lindsay.
The current regional market outlook
Cotality data reveals that since March 2020 to 2025, regional values have risen more than 56 per cent.
Post pandemic boom, the regions have continued to show overall resilience. In the recent two quarters, for example, they're outperforming capital cities (1.6 per cent compared to 1.4 per cent).
Many metro and regional areas are also currently experiencing record highs, according to Cotality's July Housing Chart Pack.
Regional areas in Queensland (77.7 per cent), Brisbane (78.8 per cent), Perth (74.8 per cent), South Australia (61.4 per cent), and regional WA (53.6 per cent) are leading the pack.
Other areas, like Victoria, still offer opportunities.
Ray White Mildura Managing Director and Chairman's Elite Sales Agent Damian Portaro says regional markets went through a "consolidation phase" after the COVID surge where prices flattened out, but that activity is ramping up again - particularly among investors.
"Today, the exciting news is that regionally we are experiencing an investor boom, and that would be putting it lightly, to be frank."
Despite market fluctuations, interest in regional relocation continues to be driven by lifestyle migration, relative affordability and a lack of supply in metro areas.
Let's look at what makes regional living so good.
More house for your money
Affordability is the obvious drawcard for those who've chosen a treechange.
But it's about more than property prices - it's about what your money actually buys you.
Moving regionally gave Mrs Lindsay, her husband and three kids access to the kind of home and lifestyle that would have been financially out of reach in Sydney.
"In the area we're in, the general rule is for half the price of a place in Sydney, you get two to three times the amount of space," she says.
"It's kind of crazy. Around here, for under a million you can have a four-bedroom house with a backyard, garage - even a separate studio."
A similar sentiment is shared by Mr Portaro in regional Victoria.
"Property prices and value for money are definitely huge considerations [for relocation]. Double the land size and 50 per cent more house is attractive and regularly commented upon by 'tree changers,'" he says.
Rental prices tell a similar story
When the family were living in Bondi in 2019, their rent was $800 per week for an older-style apartment.
Their first rental on the NSW coast was just $425 a week for a large four-bedroom home that backed onto rainforest.
Mrs Lindsay says that even when prices climbed after COVID, rent remained under $700 per week in the area - significantly less than what you'd pay for a comparable property in any Australian capital, as rent prices skyrocketed in metro areas during the same period.
Cost of living: 'We cut our expenses in half'
It's not just the housing market that feels more accessible. Depending on the region, overall cost of living can also drop dramatically.
"I'm quite sure we cut our expenses in half," Mrs Lindsay says.
"We don't do takeaway at all anymore, we cook every meal. We still need daycare, but it's much cheaper, and we don't really have to pay for activities."
"It's other little things, too: you don't have to pay for parking here or worry about how long you've left the car somewhere," she says.
Speaking of cars, they turned out to be an unexpected hit to the hip pocket.
"The only thing that brings up costs is the cars, because living regionally, a family has to have two cars," says Mrs Lindsay.
"Petrol and car maintenance is very expensive, plus we have to pay double loan insurance and green slip and all of that, so that's a big hit that you wouldn't have in Sydney."
A stronger sense of community
For Mrs Lindsay and her family, regional life offers the kind of community connection that's harder to come by in the city.
"You truly feel that you're living in a community," she says.
"When we go to the markets, we don't have to stress or worry about where our kids are. Everyone knows your kids; everybody knows everyone.
"And while everyone isn't necessarily friends, if you need something, someone will always put their hand up to help. It's an amazing way to live and a great way for kids to grow up."
As if on cue, one of the couple's children interrupts the interview to ask when they are heading down to the beach for a sunset bonfire with friends.
Mrs Peters says this is a perfect example of a regular, relaxed way the family connects with their community.
Time over hustle
While the city might offer more choice when it comes to schools, specialists and extracurricular activities, regional life offers something many parents value more: time.
"The kids might not have as much access to certain facilities and things that you would have in the city, but we are able to spend more time with them - to help do their homework, attend every assembly, help them with things that they need, or spend lots of time out in nature with them," says Mrs Peters.
"If we lived in the city, I would have to work full-time and we'd both be working really long hours. The kids would be in before-school care, after-school care, and while that's fine, it's not what I personally wanted."
Regional living has allowed them to build a lifestyle that aligns with their values, albeit with some compromises.
Compromises and hurdles
What do you lose when you leave the city? For this family, it's mostly about food.
"Food, restaurants - we 100 per cent miss. Our area is not the best for restaurants, which is very sad," says Mrs Peters.
They've also had to be intentional about staying connected with friends. But the payoff is deeper quality time with the people who matter.
"When people visit, they stay with us and we really hang out," says Mrs Peters.
"Last weekend I had two old friends come up with their kids - three mums and seven kids - and we had three days together. It was awesome."
Another major hurdle can be work.
Mrs Peters says that it can be tricky finding suitable jobs or fully remote work, so moving regionally may only be viable for some.
In their case, Mr Peters runs a business that allows them to work remotely, circumstances they're aware aren't possible for everyone.
Keen for a change? Consider this first
"We do often find people need more than one reason to move, like family, work, sport. We are not just one suburb away," says Mr Portaro.
"But once here, they stay. Our weather, community at large and lifestyle are appealing to those that have been caught up in the metro pace (and traffic!)".
He advocates for renting as a way to get to know a location before making your final decision. "Often renting first to understand the geographic is ideal," Mr Portaro says.
"Where you want to live in metro areas might be determined by suburb, but regionally, it can be by small pockets or even streets. Move two streets over and it can feel completely different."
Mrs Peters recommends clarifying your values and priorities.
"What are the things that are most important to you at this point in life? Then you can set your life up a certain way to support those values. For us, choosing to leave the city was the path to realising that vision," she says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
How we can stop people getting ripped off from employers
When Coco* asked her former boss why she hadn't been paid her super, she was told "not to worry, it's paid quarterly". But as time went by, and with red flags flying ominously, she felt helpless. Despite months of enquiries and reassurances that payment would come, her worst fears were realised when her employer went into liquidation. This left her and colleagues without thousands of dollars in super payments they had earned and were legally owed. Almost every week we hear similar stories to Coco's. Many follow a similar pattern, where a lack of awareness and assumed trust, combined with an out-of-date obligation on employers to only pay super every three months, allows unpaid super to flourish. Analysis by the Super Members Council of unpaid super in Australia shows around 3.3 million people miss out on $5.7 billion a year in retirement savings. That's $110 million a week going unpaid. Over nine years, that has, cost Australians a shocking $47 billion. The average affected worker misses out on $1730 in super in a year. Women, people in insecure jobs, and young workers are most at risk. This adds up - making workers up to $30,000 worse off at retirement. While these numbers are bleak, there is a solution. One that will create a more simplified system for workers and employers than the current legal requirement for super to be paid only once a quarter, while protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Many businesses already do this. Payday super laws - which will see super paid at the same time as wages, making it easier for workers to monitor payments and levelling the playing field for employers, are due to come into effect on July 1, 2026. But legislation to make this happen still needs to be passed by Parliament. While there have been recent calls by one or two voices to delay the reforms, each week they are delayed, one quarter of Australia's workforce is a combined $110 million poorer. And that means less money to pay the bills in retirement after a lifetime of hard work. Australians cannot afford to wait a day longer. To smooth the transition for employers, we've proposed a couple of practical ideas to help. These include having super land in workers accounts within seven business days of paydays. We've also proposed a phased approach to ATO enforcement in the early stages to give comfort to employers genuinely trying to do the right thing. Finally, we've called for employers to be able to validate a worker's correct super account details in real time to help eliminate processing errors when super is paid. Each of these will help to secure this crucial reform. Implementing the laws as planned next year has strong community support. A new survey for the Super Members Council finds more than 70 per cent of Australians want these laws to start on July 1, 2026. Fewer than one in 10 people think the reforms should be delayed. We have a sensible timeline and public goodwill to implement these historic laws. And what a powerful legacy they will be for the government and the Parliament. All that's missing now is a sense of urgency to pass the legislation, so millions of Australians don't live a story like Coco's. So, let's get on with it - and get them paid. When Coco* asked her former boss why she hadn't been paid her super, she was told "not to worry, it's paid quarterly". But as time went by, and with red flags flying ominously, she felt helpless. Despite months of enquiries and reassurances that payment would come, her worst fears were realised when her employer went into liquidation. This left her and colleagues without thousands of dollars in super payments they had earned and were legally owed. Almost every week we hear similar stories to Coco's. Many follow a similar pattern, where a lack of awareness and assumed trust, combined with an out-of-date obligation on employers to only pay super every three months, allows unpaid super to flourish. Analysis by the Super Members Council of unpaid super in Australia shows around 3.3 million people miss out on $5.7 billion a year in retirement savings. That's $110 million a week going unpaid. Over nine years, that has, cost Australians a shocking $47 billion. The average affected worker misses out on $1730 in super in a year. Women, people in insecure jobs, and young workers are most at risk. This adds up - making workers up to $30,000 worse off at retirement. While these numbers are bleak, there is a solution. One that will create a more simplified system for workers and employers than the current legal requirement for super to be paid only once a quarter, while protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Many businesses already do this. Payday super laws - which will see super paid at the same time as wages, making it easier for workers to monitor payments and levelling the playing field for employers, are due to come into effect on July 1, 2026. But legislation to make this happen still needs to be passed by Parliament. While there have been recent calls by one or two voices to delay the reforms, each week they are delayed, one quarter of Australia's workforce is a combined $110 million poorer. And that means less money to pay the bills in retirement after a lifetime of hard work. Australians cannot afford to wait a day longer. To smooth the transition for employers, we've proposed a couple of practical ideas to help. These include having super land in workers accounts within seven business days of paydays. We've also proposed a phased approach to ATO enforcement in the early stages to give comfort to employers genuinely trying to do the right thing. Finally, we've called for employers to be able to validate a worker's correct super account details in real time to help eliminate processing errors when super is paid. Each of these will help to secure this crucial reform. Implementing the laws as planned next year has strong community support. A new survey for the Super Members Council finds more than 70 per cent of Australians want these laws to start on July 1, 2026. Fewer than one in 10 people think the reforms should be delayed. We have a sensible timeline and public goodwill to implement these historic laws. And what a powerful legacy they will be for the government and the Parliament. All that's missing now is a sense of urgency to pass the legislation, so millions of Australians don't live a story like Coco's. So, let's get on with it - and get them paid. When Coco* asked her former boss why she hadn't been paid her super, she was told "not to worry, it's paid quarterly". But as time went by, and with red flags flying ominously, she felt helpless. Despite months of enquiries and reassurances that payment would come, her worst fears were realised when her employer went into liquidation. This left her and colleagues without thousands of dollars in super payments they had earned and were legally owed. Almost every week we hear similar stories to Coco's. Many follow a similar pattern, where a lack of awareness and assumed trust, combined with an out-of-date obligation on employers to only pay super every three months, allows unpaid super to flourish. Analysis by the Super Members Council of unpaid super in Australia shows around 3.3 million people miss out on $5.7 billion a year in retirement savings. That's $110 million a week going unpaid. Over nine years, that has, cost Australians a shocking $47 billion. The average affected worker misses out on $1730 in super in a year. Women, people in insecure jobs, and young workers are most at risk. This adds up - making workers up to $30,000 worse off at retirement. While these numbers are bleak, there is a solution. One that will create a more simplified system for workers and employers than the current legal requirement for super to be paid only once a quarter, while protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Many businesses already do this. Payday super laws - which will see super paid at the same time as wages, making it easier for workers to monitor payments and levelling the playing field for employers, are due to come into effect on July 1, 2026. But legislation to make this happen still needs to be passed by Parliament. While there have been recent calls by one or two voices to delay the reforms, each week they are delayed, one quarter of Australia's workforce is a combined $110 million poorer. And that means less money to pay the bills in retirement after a lifetime of hard work. Australians cannot afford to wait a day longer. To smooth the transition for employers, we've proposed a couple of practical ideas to help. These include having super land in workers accounts within seven business days of paydays. We've also proposed a phased approach to ATO enforcement in the early stages to give comfort to employers genuinely trying to do the right thing. Finally, we've called for employers to be able to validate a worker's correct super account details in real time to help eliminate processing errors when super is paid. Each of these will help to secure this crucial reform. Implementing the laws as planned next year has strong community support. A new survey for the Super Members Council finds more than 70 per cent of Australians want these laws to start on July 1, 2026. Fewer than one in 10 people think the reforms should be delayed. We have a sensible timeline and public goodwill to implement these historic laws. And what a powerful legacy they will be for the government and the Parliament. All that's missing now is a sense of urgency to pass the legislation, so millions of Australians don't live a story like Coco's. So, let's get on with it - and get them paid. When Coco* asked her former boss why she hadn't been paid her super, she was told "not to worry, it's paid quarterly". But as time went by, and with red flags flying ominously, she felt helpless. Despite months of enquiries and reassurances that payment would come, her worst fears were realised when her employer went into liquidation. This left her and colleagues without thousands of dollars in super payments they had earned and were legally owed. Almost every week we hear similar stories to Coco's. Many follow a similar pattern, where a lack of awareness and assumed trust, combined with an out-of-date obligation on employers to only pay super every three months, allows unpaid super to flourish. Analysis by the Super Members Council of unpaid super in Australia shows around 3.3 million people miss out on $5.7 billion a year in retirement savings. That's $110 million a week going unpaid. Over nine years, that has, cost Australians a shocking $47 billion. The average affected worker misses out on $1730 in super in a year. Women, people in insecure jobs, and young workers are most at risk. This adds up - making workers up to $30,000 worse off at retirement. While these numbers are bleak, there is a solution. One that will create a more simplified system for workers and employers than the current legal requirement for super to be paid only once a quarter, while protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Many businesses already do this. Payday super laws - which will see super paid at the same time as wages, making it easier for workers to monitor payments and levelling the playing field for employers, are due to come into effect on July 1, 2026. But legislation to make this happen still needs to be passed by Parliament. While there have been recent calls by one or two voices to delay the reforms, each week they are delayed, one quarter of Australia's workforce is a combined $110 million poorer. And that means less money to pay the bills in retirement after a lifetime of hard work. Australians cannot afford to wait a day longer. To smooth the transition for employers, we've proposed a couple of practical ideas to help. These include having super land in workers accounts within seven business days of paydays. We've also proposed a phased approach to ATO enforcement in the early stages to give comfort to employers genuinely trying to do the right thing. Finally, we've called for employers to be able to validate a worker's correct super account details in real time to help eliminate processing errors when super is paid. Each of these will help to secure this crucial reform. Implementing the laws as planned next year has strong community support. A new survey for the Super Members Council finds more than 70 per cent of Australians want these laws to start on July 1, 2026. Fewer than one in 10 people think the reforms should be delayed. We have a sensible timeline and public goodwill to implement these historic laws. And what a powerful legacy they will be for the government and the Parliament. All that's missing now is a sense of urgency to pass the legislation, so millions of Australians don't live a story like Coco's. So, let's get on with it - and get them paid.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Why RBA put shock hold on rates
A stronger than expected job market stopped the RBA pulling the trigger on a July rate cut, leaving struggling homeowners to wait a little longer for rate relief. The central bank released its meeting minutes on Tuesday, showing the board decided to hold the cash rate despite inflation sitting within its target range. 'Recent monthly CPI indicator data – which can be volatile and do not cover all items in the CPI – were broadly consistent with this expectation,' the RBA board said. But with more Australians currently in work, the RBA was wary the strong employment figures could lead to an increase in inflation. 'The labour market was assessed to have remained tight, with measures of labour utilisation little changed over the prior year,' it said. 'Growth in private demand had begun to recover, but was still subdued.' The board voted 6-3 in favour of holding the cash rate. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia The RBA had to work with May's unemployment figures, which showed just 4.1 per cent of eligible Australians were out of work. When the June figures were released after the RBA meeting, it showed unemployment had jumped to 4.3 per cent, with 34,000 Aussies losing their jobs. But households may not have to wait long for interest rate relief, with the RBA's meeting minutes seemingly clearing the way for further rate cuts. 'All members agreed that, based on the information currently available, the outlook was for underlying inflation to decline further in year-ended terms, warranting some additional reduction in interest rates over time,' the RBA minutes said. RBA governor Michele Bullock fronted a press conference after holding the cash rate at 3.85 per cent. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia A cautious RBA monetary board held the official cash rate at 3.85 per cent following its July meeting, with the shock move defying expert commentators and predictions from the money markets. The board voted 6-3 in favour of the hold. 'A minority of members judged that there was a case to lower the cash rate target at this meeting,' the board said. 'These members placed more weight on downside risks to the economic outlook – stemming from a likely slowing in growth abroad and from the subdued pace of GDP growth in Australia.' Australia's Cash Rate 2022 Critics say the board is unlikely to learn anything by holding interest rates for a further five weeks. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Fronting the media after the decision, Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock said the votes were 'unattributed' and declined repeatedly to reveal her position. She said the board wanted to wait for the full quarterly data to be released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. 'By then we will know what the June quarter CPI is and if it comes in as we think it will – a little bit at the margin, we're a little bit worried about – but if it comes in as we think it will, continue to decline, then that validates our easing path,' she said. Opinion remains divided as to whether the hold was the right decision. Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis, who worked for the RBA for 15 years, says the central bank might have chosen to 'assert its independence' by bucking expectations of a rate cut. 'There was no real economic benefit to waiting five more weeks,' Ms Ellis wrote in an economic note released last week. While the decision may have left homeowners frustrated, Ms Ellis said it was a low-risk decision for the central bank from a broader economic perspective. 'The dirty little secret of monetary policy is that small differences in the level of interest rates or the timing of changes make essentially no difference for inflation outcomes,' Ms Ellis said. 'If holding the cash rate 100 basis points lower for a year only boosts inflation by 0.2 per cent or so – broadly the result from the RBA's main model – then 25bp higher for five weeks is not even a rounding error.' The RBA will next meet on August 12, with money markets widely forecasting a rate cut.
Canberra Times
3 hours ago
- Canberra Times
How we can stop people getting ripped off from employers
While these numbers are bleak, there is a solution. One that will create a more simplified system for workers and employers than the current legal requirement for super to be paid only once a quarter, while protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Many businesses already do this.
