Gardaí must learn from shortfalls in Hawe case investigation, head of policing body says
THE HEAD OF the State's policing oversight body has said that gardaí must learn from questions raised about the investigation into the murder suicide of a Cavan family.
Dr Elaine Byrne made the comments as part of an interview with
The Journal
this week about her role with the
Policing and Community Safety Authority (PCSA)
which she chairs. The body has replaced the Policing Authority and Garda Inspectorate.
In August 2016 Alan Hawe, a vice-principal, killed himself after murdering his 39-year-old wife Clodagh and their sons, Liam, 13, Niall, 11, and Ryan, six, at their home near Ballyjamesduff, Co Cavan.
Now Clodagh's sister Jacqueline Connolly has said a review of the Clodagh Hawe case should be published to provide a greater awareness of the behaviours of 'family annihilators'.
She has written a memoir called Deadly Silence to raise awareness of what happened. She claimed that the deaths were not initially investigated thoroughly by gardaí and she wants this approach changed.
She has said that there was not adequate collection of CCTV and digital evidence as well as follow up interviews with 20 key witnesses.
Byrne said that the PCSA has been focused intensely on a review of homicide investigations – which has been ongoing for a period of time.
'The Commissioner did initiate a homicide review where it showed that there were lapses in the investigation of a number of homicides.
Advertisement
'But that is a constant focus for us, and it's on our agenda, and we will be asking the Commissioner [Drew Harris] more questions,' she said.
Dr Elaine Byrne of the Policing and Community Safety Authority.
Niall O'Connor / The Journal
Niall O'Connor / The Journal / The Journal
Byrne paid tribute to Connolly for documenting what happened to the Hawe family.
'I think that Clodagh's sister Jaqueline, she's done a public service in allowing the public inside that very tragic event, moment by moment, and I think society will learn something from it, and the guards must learn something from it as well.
'I have read everything, all those extracts of her book, and it is something that we will be bringing those issues that she's outlined are issues broadly match our concerns in general, around the homicide review that the Commissioner initiated, and one that we will have a constant focus on,' she added.
Jacqueline Connolly, whose has written about the murder of her sister and her family by her husband Alan Hawe.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
Last week, in an interview on RTE radio, Connolly said that a second investigation carried out by the serious crime review team, authorised by Garda Commissioner Drew Harris in 2019, highlighted what was missed in the first investigation.
This included CCTV that had not been examined, digital evidence that was overlooked, and 20 key witnesses who needed to be re-interviewed using different techniques.
Connolly said she has been told gardaí in training will be advised to gather evidence in murder-suicides as though it is a case that will be prosecuted, but she said she wants that rolled out to all rural garda stations because officers were not prepared to 'find Clodagh and the boys like that'.
She called on Harris to release the findings of the serious crime review, for which Connolly has seen a summary, because she said it was important that the recommendations are seen by domestic violence institutions.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
8 hours ago
- The Journal
Richard Satchwell to be sentenced later for murder of wife Tina Satchwell in 2017
RICHARD SATCHWELL IS due to be sentenced later today after being found guilty of murdering his wife Tina Satchwell in 2017. The 12 jurors took nine hours and 28 minutes over four days to convict Satchwell, a British national born on 16 June 1966 who is soon to turn 59. The unanimous jury verdict last week was met with sobs from members of Tina's family, who hugged and comforted one another at the back of the courtroom. Advertisement Satchwell had pleaded not guilty to murdering 45-year-old Tina Satchwell – nee Dingivan – at their home address at Grattan Street, Youghal, Co Cork between 19 and 20 March 2017, both dates inclusive. File image of Tina Satchwell Satchwell had claimed that his wife Tina had launched an attack on him with a chisel and died during a struggle in which he either lacked the intent to kill her or was acting in self-defence. However, the jury unanimously rejected his defence and agreed with the State's case that Satchwell was a 'cunning' murderer whose claims were 'nonsense' and had hidden his wife's body to ensure a cause of death would not be available. Satchwell formally reported Tina missing on 11 May, 2017, but her body was not discovered for over six years, when gardaí in October 2023 conducted a second, invasive search of the Satchwell home and found her decomposed remains in a grave dug underneath the stairs. Related Reads Years of lies, a secret burial, and a chilling confession: The Richard Satchwell murder trial Tina Satchwell's family pay tribute to 'loving and gentle soul' and say trial 'did not portray who she was' Richard Satchwell found guilty of the murder of his wife Tina Satchwell in 2017 The judge will hand down the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment to Satchwell today, and Satchwell has been remanded in custody since the jury found him guilty of murder on 30 May. The Dingivan family will have an opportunity to make a statement to the court about the impact Tina's death has had on their lives after sentencing. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
17 hours ago
- The Journal
'Remigration': The far right's plan to expel non-white people from Europe
WHITE NATIONALISTS ACROSS Europe have for more than a decade promoted a policy called 'remigration', which despite its innocuous-sounding name is a plan to expel non-white people from the continent. Now, far-right activists and fringe political parties in Ireland are joining that chorus of extremists. In doing so, they are continuing to take inspiration from anti-immigration movements abroad and attempting to introduce their talking points into Irish politics. On 17 May, members of the far-right National Party attended a 'Remigration Summit' in Italy, and at an anti-immigration rally in Dublin city centre on 26 April, they marched down O'Connell Street chanting: 'Save the nation, remigration!' The National Party's only elected representative, Patrick Quinlan of Fingal County Council, repeated the call in a speech he made at the Customs House on the same day. 'Ireland belongs to the Irish people. We must start a policy of mass remigration,' Quinlan told a crowd of thousands gathered along the quays who chanted: 'Get them out! Get them out!' 'We'll shut the borders, we'll house the people, we'll rekindle our ancestors' divine fire,' Quinlan said. The party's youth wing also turned up selling the same message – the mass expulsion of immigrants and those who do not fit their definition of Irishness. Quinlan is not the only Irish politician to call for 'remigration'. Dublin City Councillor Gavin Pepper did so last year on social media , while complaining about crimes committed by Muslims in Ireland. Gavin Pepper and Patrick Quinlan were contacted by The Journal and offered an opportunity to respond. And at the summit in Italy, National Party member John McLoughlin said that while his party does not advocate violence, when 'our people reach breaking point, you most certainly won't be able to depend on the likes of me or any other political leaders here to hold them back'. Opponents of 'remigration', he said, should think twice because 'it's not our last hope to save ourselves, it's their last hope'. The Journal sought to contact John McLoughlin via social media and the National Party, but received no response by the time of publication. Those on the far-right fringe in Ireland are following the lead of more established anti-immigration parties (and right-wing extremist groups) elsewhere in Europe, who have made mainstreaming 'remigration' their goal. In the last year or so, they've begun to see some success. It's great to have young men stepping up, Fair play John and well done on representing the party. — Cllr. Patrick Quinlan (@PQuinlanNP) May 25, 2025 What does 'remigration' mean? Those who call for 'remigration' want to see non-white people expelled from Europe en masse, regardless of their citizenship, legal status or place of birth. This, according to those who support the idea, can be done forcibly or through incentivising people to leave a country voluntarily. The term 'remigration' has long been used in academia to describe people returning to their countries of origin voluntarily, like refugees returning to their home countries after World War II, for example. More recently, the word has been hijacked by supporters of Identitarianism - a pan-European, ethnonationalist movement that began in France in the 2000s. Remigration is the only ticket to make Europe European again! 👉🏻 Get yours now (in the comments below) and join us in that fight on Saturday the 17th of May in Milano, 🇮🇹 Let's make history together ✈️ ! — Remigration Summit 26 (@resum25) March 24, 2025 Identitarians are racial segregationists. They oppose multiculturalism, globalisation and immigration in general, all of which they see as existential threats to the white populations and national cultures of Europe. Like other far-right groups, they are particularly concerned with demonising Muslims and often try to stoke fears of 'Islamisation'. In a 2019 report , the Institute for Strategic Dialogue – a think tank focused on combatting extremist ideologies – described 'remigration' as 'essentially a non-violent form of ethnic cleansing'. A general election poster erected by a grouping of far-right parties, including the National Party Telegram - The irish People Telegram - The irish People If 'remigration' is the goal of white nationalists, the animating fear behind it is the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory , which casts foreigners – especially Arabs – as an invading force marshalled by global elites whose objective is to wipe out white people. The 'Great Replacement' theory featured on general election posters erected last year by a grouping of far-right Irish parties that included the National Party, the Irish People party and Ireland First. It also came up in the speech delivered by the Nationals Party's John McLoughlin in Italy, when he talked about 'ethnic replacement', casting out 'the invader' and referred to asylum seeker accommodation buildings as 'plantation centres'. He compared British control of the six counties in the north to how 'Germany lost Frankfurt to Turkey, or France lost Paris to Algeria'. As is typical with proponents of the theory, which originated in France, McLoughlin inverted the real history of the French invading and colonising Algeria. He also said those who oppose 'remigration' aim to deny its supporters 'the very heritage of our ancestors, carved in stone and soil'. During the speech, McLoughlin made repeated references to soil, and the phrase 'stone and soil' has echoes of the Nazi slogan 'blood and soil'. He also said the National Party stands for 'excellence over equality'. National Party members represented Ireland today at the Remigration Summit 2025 in Milan. Many thanks to the conference organisers for hosting such a thoroughly well-run event despite interference from multiple state governments and their leftist foot soldiers. Remigration is… — The National Party | An Páirtí Náisiúnta (@NationalPartyIE) May 17, 2025 As Quinlan and McLoughlin did in their speeches, Irish adherents to the theory cast their project as one of liberation, and resistance to the 'invasion' and 'plantation' of Ireland. They do so using language that invokes the Irish struggle against British rule and colonialism. Quinlan said in his speech that Ireland has lost 'that holy fire that blazed in our patriot dead'. Advertisement 'They were able to conquer tyranny because of that fire,' he said. Elsewhere in Europe, white nationalists call for a new 'Reconquista', a reference to the campaign by Christian kingdoms to retake land conquered by Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula centuries ago. Anti-immigration protesters gather at the Customs House in Dublin. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Who has called for 'remigration'? 'Remigration' has been promoted by far-right political parties and extremist groups in a number of European countries over the last ten years or so. More recently, it's found expression in Canada, Australia and, most notably, in the United States. Those who promote the idea aim to bring it into mainstream political discourse, which was the purpose of the ' Remigration Summit' that took place in Italy on 17 May. In 2024 the vision of Remigration became the hope of our entire continent. In 2025 we will organize the first Remigration Summit: in May we will gather activists, journalists and politicians to unite our ideas, reach and influence. If we work together, Remigration is inevitable. — Remigration Summit 26 (@resum25) January 1, 2025 The most prominent exponent of the idea in the European context has been the far-right German political party Alternative for Germany (AfD), which came second in this year's federal election with just over 20% of the vote. The AfD has been officially labelled a right-wing extremist group by Germany's domestic intelligence agency (BfV) and one of its members has been convicted for using banned Nazi-era slogans . The party also has documented ties with neo-Nazi groups. The BfV said the AfD aims 'to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society, subject them to unconstitutional discrimination, and thus assign them a legally devalued status'. Ahead of this year's election, AfD leader Alice Weidel endorsed the idea of 'remigration' at a party conference, where she talked about 'large-scale repatriations'. 'And I have to be honest with you, if it's going to be called remigration, then that's what it's going to be: remigration,' she said, making a U-turn on a topic that had brought intense scrutiny upon her party only a year previous. AfD leader Alice Weidel gives a speech at a party conference in Riesa, Germany. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo In 2024, the policy was deemed too extreme by another major player in far-right European politics, Marine Le Pen's National Rally party in France, after a report by Correctiv exposed a secret meeting between AfD members, neo-Nazis and like-minded businesspeople, at which 'remigration' was the main talking point. Reports of the meeting led to massive demonstrations across Germany. National Rally, which itself has Nazi-sympathising roots , and the AfD have since broken off their alliance in the EU Parliament. Another far-right French politician, Éric Zemmour, has called for a ministry of 'remigration' to be established. In Austria, the idea has been promoted by the leader of the Freedom Party (FPO), Herbert Kickl. The party laid out plans to create 'Fortress Austria' ahead of parliamentary elections in 2024, in which it won around 29% of the vote. The FPO has also called for the EU to have a 'remigration commissioner' . FPO leader Herbert Kickl at a party meeting in Vosendorf, Austria. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo In Sweden, 'remigration' is government policy, although it does not involve forcing people to leave the country. Sweden does not strip people of their citizenship or refugee status, unlike the more extreme ideas promoted elsewhere in Europe. The Swedish government incentivises people to leave voluntarily by offering them money, something Denmark also does. And then there is the case of the United States since Donald Trump won the presidency for a second time. There, the term has become more common since the 2024 election campaign, when Trump himself used it in a Truth Social post attacking his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris. Trump wrote: 'As President I will immediately end the migrant invasion of America. We will stop all migrant flights, end all illegal entries, terminate the Kamala phone app for smuggling illegals (CBP One App), revoke deportation immunity, suspend refugee resettlement, and return Kamala's illegal migrants to their home countries (also known as remigration).' US President Donald Trump's Truth Social post about immigration Source: Truth Social While Trump did effectively freeze all refugee resettlement on his first day in office, he also signed an executive order intended to provide white South Africans asylum status. He has also said white people in South Africa are being subjected to 'genocide', a common myth among white nationalists. Since coming to power, the Trump administration has been expelling people from the US under dubious pretexts, some of whom have a right to reside in the country and others who are in fact American citizens . The US president's use of the term 'remigration' was celebrated by those in Europe who have sought to mainstream it, including the well-known Austrian white nationalist Martin Sellner , who hailed it as a 'victory'. 'Remigration has had a massive conceptual career,' Sellner wrote on X. 'Born in France, popularised in German-speaking countries, and now a buzzword from Sweden to the USA!' Last week, the US State Department sent a plan to congress that would transform the government agency that oversees immigration into an 'Office of Remigration'. Implementing 'remigration' as envisioned by extremists like Martin Sellner would involve a state either revoking or breaking its own laws around citizenship. It would also mean withdrawing from international treaties that guarantee people the right to seek asylum. This is why Germany's AfD has been labeled a right-wing extremist organisation, because its intention is to violate the country's constitution and deny citizens their most fundamental rights. Need more clarity and context on how migration is being discussed in Ireland? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Transparency or 'cover-up': Gardaí face Sophie's Choice when tackling fake news online
This is a preview of this month's edition of The Journal's monthly FactCheck newsletter, which looks at what misinformation is being shared right now and points at trends in factchecking. Find out more and sign up here or at the bottom of the page. THE FIGHT AGAINST misinformation can sometimes be Sophie's Choice. Police reactions to separate incidents in Carlow and Liverpool over the past week have shown that quashing false rumours can be made so much easier with transparency. But the ability of bad-faith actors on social media to twist the facts means that providing more information about the perpetrators of attacks on the public mean that more traps may lie in wait in future. At around 6.15pm on Sunday evening, 22-year-old Evan Fitzgerald opened fire at Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow before he inflicted fatal injuries on himself. It was a shocking, unprecedented incident by the standards of Ireland in 2025 – but also one which saw a bleakly familiar response take shape on social media within minutes of the first reports of a shooting emerging. Before anyone knew what had happened, there was a surge of misinformation, including claims that: seven people had been shot ; a 9-year-old girl had been shot in the leg ; the gunman was shot dead by gardaí ; he had an explosive device strapped to his leg ; and that he was an Islamic terrorist . But what happened next was a bit more unorthodox. The Garda Press Office issued four press releases over the next 24 hours which provided a full picture of what happened , including a precise timeline of events, the extent of injuries (including to a young girl), and – most notably – a description of the perpetrator as a 'white adult Irish male' on Sunday night. It was unusually direct by the standards of the Garda press office, which tends only to offer the most basic details around crimes, in part out of sensitivity towards victims and their families. The decision followed a similar move by police in Merseyside less than a week previously, after a man drove into a crowd of football fans celebrating Liverpool's Premier League title win in the city. Advertisement The incident in Liverpool saw the same kind of misinformation spread as in Carlow , with false claims that the ramming was a terrorist attack and that the suspect was a person of colour being shared on social media. As happened in the aftermath of the shooting in Carlow, the police moved quickly and said the suspect was a 53-year-old white man from the Liverpool area. In both instances, the change in tactics appears to derive from almost identical hard lessons from recent history. The Dublin riots in November 2023 were fuelled by a deluge of speculation about the identity and motive of the man who carried out a knife attack at a school near Parnell Square. The Southport riots last year in England followed the same grim pattern, when far-right groups seized on speculation about the identity and motive of the man who fatally stabbed three children. Both instances were preceded by hours of silence from police and officialdom, which created an information vacuum in which speculation and conspiracy theories were able to take hold. On each occasion, speculation dampened much more quickly after both police forces provided additional information about the background of the perpetrators. Not only did this have the effect of preventing information contagion around one of the biggest news events of the year, it also made bad actors on social media look like fools for speculating so freely. The strategy denied bad actors the ability to hijack the narrative and acknowledged a basic truth about modern social media: in the absence of facts, fiction will flourish. But although it worked this time around, it's a tricky strategy that's not without its downsides. Several far-right accounts online accused Gardaí and Merseyside Police of being 'too quick' to say that the suspects in Carlow and Liverpool were white locals, with the implication that this was an act of political messaging rather than public clarity. The next time a similar major incident occurs and Gardaí or British police don't — or can't — release identifying information about the suspect(s), it's easy to see how the decision not to do so will be seized upon. The public may take the lack of information as confirmation that the suspect is foreign or non-white, and may end up believing bad actors or others who are speculating about what has happened. Related Reads Man who fired shots in Carlow shopping centre named locally as 22-year-old Evan Fitzgerald Former head of Counter Terrorism for the UK, Neil Basu told the News Agents podcast that transparency is needed for police to respond in the age of social media. 'The best position policing can come to is a standard position where they give the maximum amount of information they can,' he said. 'I think what was more important in Southport was the allegations of cover-up, as though people were trying to suppress something.' This is exactly what played out in Carlow before gardaí issued their series of statements: people online suggested that the gunman's body was being covered for nefarious reasons, rather than the operational issues that are usually present in such cases. At its core, the issue is more of a problem with online platforms than with the police. Gardaí and police in the UK are simply reacting to the situation created by social media companies, who allow false claims to spread unchecked in the moments after a crisis. Large social media platforms, not police, are ultimately responsible for hosting unreliable accounts that can present themselves as media outlets or pay for verification on a platform like X, which enables them to appear more credible than they are. It is easy to see how misinformation takes hold when paid-for but unreliable accounts frame speculation and misinformation through the language of legitimate journalists, claiming they have received 'tips', 'unconfirmed reports' or information from 'sources'. It's a process that works for both bad-faith actors and social media companies themselves: they get the engagement through outrage and amplification, but if they're wrong, they can simply say they were 'just sharing' what they heard. As real events become overlaid with imaginary details, the truth has to play a constant game of catch-up. For police and state bodies, the problem is a difficult choice: leave the void that bad actors will inevitably fill, or provide information early and risk politicising every statement. That choice will continue until social media platforms are forced to reckon with the role they play — and until meaningful disincentives exist for those who weaponise misinformation. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
