logo
Can Gen Z's Nostalgia Save Chain Restaurants?

Can Gen Z's Nostalgia Save Chain Restaurants?

New York Times01-06-2025

When you walk into a chain restaurant, time stands still. For some young people, that's the whole point.
Ana Babic Rosario, a professor of marketing at the University of Denver, calls this 'emotional time travel.'
With the country in an unstable economic time, potentially edging toward recession, those memories become more potent, Dr. Babic Rosario said. 'We tend to crave some of those nostalgic moments because we think they're more stable,' she said. 'That's how our mind tends to remember the past — more rosy than it really was.'
That's true for Bea Benares, 27, who said she looked forward to meals at Outback Steakhouse and 'eating the bread and sitting down with my family.'
'Now with fast causal, you may not sit down and you go your separate ways afterward,' Ms. Benares said, referring to eateries catering to office workers, like Sweetgreen and Cava. 'It sounds kind of funny, but you lose a sense of community. It's kind of sad.'
That missing sense of community may be why 10,000 people, mostly in their 20s, traveled to Randall's Island in New York last fall to attend Chain Fest, a food festival started by the 'Office' actor B.J. Novak that served 'exclusive gourmet versions' of classic chain restaurant dishes from Red Robin, Cracker Barrel and others. The festival's Los Angeles version had a 25,000-person wait list.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides

By Dietrich Knauth (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures waver as US-China trade talks progress, inflation print looms
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures waver as US-China trade talks progress, inflation print looms

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures waver as US-China trade talks progress, inflation print looms

US stock futures wavered as Wall Street digested the progress on US-China trade negotiations and braced for the release of the May inflation report. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) hovered just below baseline. Meanwhile, on Tuesday in London, representatives from the US and China reached an agreement on a framework and implementation plan to ease trade tensions between the two countries. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. The commerce secretary indicated that the deal should resolve issues between the two countries on rare earths and magnets. Representatives will now take the proposal to their respective leaders for approval. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs When the two countries struck a temporary trade agreement in Geneva in May, stocks surged. Since then, though, relations between the US and China deteriorated as both sides accused each other of violating the deal. The latest plan to resolve trade disputes followed two days of renewed trade talks in London. Nevertheless, the upbeat tone surrounding the meetings has helped lift market sentiment. Stocks edged higher on Tuesday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq now within striking distance of their all-time closing highs. Meanwhile, the May Consumer Price Index (CPI) report is set for release on Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. ET. Analysts expect to see that inflation increased slightly in the month that followed President Trump's introduction of higher tariff rates. With the Federal Reserve's next policy meeting next week, investors will be wary of any signs that costs associated with tariffs are being passed onto the consumer.

Republican senators mystified by $1 billion added to their megabill
Republican senators mystified by $1 billion added to their megabill

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican senators mystified by $1 billion added to their megabill

A mysterious $1 billion for a law that lets the president mobilize certain industrial sectors during an emergency is tucked into the Senate's version of President Donald Trump's megabill. And Republicans told Semafor they aren't sure what the Defense Production Act money is for. The funding has become something of a mystery among Banking Committee Republicans, who said in interviews this week that they are trying to figure out what the cash is intended to do before they vote on the bill. But as one Republican senator said about the Trump administration: 'They won't tell us.' 'It's hard to be supportive of it if we don't know what it's for,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said. 'It's uncomfortable, for sure. A billion dollars is a billion dollars. And it would be nice if we knew what it was specifically aiming at.' Some GOP aides suspect the money could be tied to Trump's recent use of the Defense Production Act to boost US production of critical minerals, like aluminum and coal, in order to reduce reliance on supplies from less-friendly nations like China and Russia. The president signed an executive order invoking the law in March and issued a waiver of key legal requirements — including some congressional approvals — last month. A White House official said in an interview that the administration is looking at using the funding to use subsidies, grants and loan guarantees to support 'critical energy projects that have a defense nexus.' That could include shaping the production and refinement of critical minerals, boosting the US coal industry and helping develop more domestic LNG. Promoting 'private-sector activity in order to make the nation more secure and the grid more reliable, is, I think, the name of the game here,' the official said. A spokesperson for Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., pointed to a hearing the committee held on the Defense Production Act in May, where witnesses testified on China's use of critical-minerals exports as leverage and the need to revamp the law. Congress will need to reauthorize the statute later this year. 'As Chairman Scott has stated, the Defense Production Act plays an important role in strengthening supply lines critical to our national defense and emergency preparedness,' the spokesperson said in a statement.'The Banking Committee's provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill will provide important funding to bolster domestic production of key national security components.' Some Republicans didn't even know the $1 billion provision was in there. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said she 'would have had a duck fit' had she known about it earlier. 'I've asked the same question; I don't have an answer yet,' Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., told Semafor. 'If you want a billion dollars, I want to know what it's being used for.' The White House official acknowledged that there's probably 'a little bit of work to do' in educating Republican lawmakers about the request: 'We want to make sure that we're clear and transparent with our colleagues on the Hill about the priorities that we're seeking.' The Defense Production Act has been used regularly since its passage, including to boost production of goods to fight the coronavirus pandemic. The then-Democratic Congress passed a provision in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act directing $500 million to increase production of energy technologies. That was in response to a Biden administration request; indeed, a Senate Banking Committee press release on its reconciliation text describes the provision as 'a priority of President Trump.' The questions around the DPA provision are just one hangup for the Banking Committee's proposed section of the megabill. Panel Republicans leaving a Thursday briefing expressed skepticism that some of Scott's proposed changes to the House bill would survive the Senate's strict budgetary rules. 'There was some weird stuff that happened on Thursday,' Lummis said. Given the stakes of the larger bill, $1 billion won't make or break its passage, but it's unusual for senators from the president's party to not know what money in their legislation is for and say they can't get answers about it. Democratic senators are, understandably, highlighting that uncertainty as they push for a hearing on the legislation. 'I have no idea' what the money is for, said the Banking Committee's top Democrat, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. 'Have you asked them? Do any of them know?' 'There's been no hearing. No briefing. Nothing,' Warren added. The Trump administration is waiving some requirements under the Defense Production Act, Reuters reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store