logo
DoorDash has captured underpenetrated markets through attractive pricing for couriers

DoorDash has captured underpenetrated markets through attractive pricing for couriers

Yahoo13-05-2025

Introduction
DoorDash is an e-delivery marketplace that links couriers, restaurants/grocers, and consumers. Uber is the only competitor that can match Dash's scale, and its success is mostly due to network effects and intangible assets. DoorDash's network effect as a moat source is facilitated by its exceptional customer engagement. For Dash to sustain returns over time above its cost of capital, the strength of its network effect and intangible assets is essential.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with DASH.
Market Assessment
From 39 orders per user in 2020 to 62 orders per user in 2024, Dash, a food delivery platform, grew by 10% annually, surpassing both Uber's 3% and Grubhub/JustEatTakeaway's 1% growth. Dash is quickly growing user engagement and is poised to overtake Uber in terms of trips or orders per user, despite its primary focus on food delivery. Larger basket sizes give Instacart, a grocery-focused company, a GOV ($33 billion projected in 2024) because they offer advantageous operating leverage. To help compete with supermarket behemoths like Walmart and Costco, grocery delivery service Dash has been growing in the market and partnering with Albertson's. Compared to other e-food competitors, this entry into grocery stores should present chances for additional margin growth.
Bull Case
One way to conceptualize the network effect is as "supply informing demand and demand informing supply." Eaters are the demand, and couriers and restaurants/grocers are the supply. By facilitating an online presence and connecting with millions of customers, food marketplace companies such as Dash encourage restaurants to become part of the network. While the food marketplace offers eaters an on-demand service, couriers gain from the establishment of a marketplace where they can receive compensation and work at their own pace. Dash serves as an aggregator in the network created by combining supply and demand.
Dash needs enough eaters, Dashers, and restaurants to reach and sustain critical mass so that everyone wins. This starts a positive feedback loop in which more orders lead to more data and better algorithms, which enhances the application's comprehension of human behavior and improves performance while attracting new users. High engagement makes it possible for DoorDash to gather more data, which improves its value proposition to eateries by giving them insights into the trends and ordering patterns of its customers. Additionally, it improves supply-side stickiness by expanding delivery opportunities, which directly benefits Dashers.
In 2024, Dash fulfilled 2.5 billion orders, surpassing rivals JET/Grubhub and Instacart. Its order volume increased by 26% yearly, while JET's was 1% and Instacart's was 3%. This leads to a top-of-class scale, with a gross order value (GOV) of $80 billion, compared to $75 billion for Uber Eats. Dash's higher growth rates show that it has been more successful than Uber at entering suburban markets. Dash essentially subsidizes its supply-side costs by charging customers a delivery and service fee, restaurants a fee or commission, and a suggested tip payment in order to generate revenue. Restaurant fee caps of 15%20% of total order value are still in place in New York City and San Francisco, but they might be lifted to allow for further margin growth.
Dash's experience with "ghost kitchens," which enable restaurants to expand without significant costs like real estate, is a last growth strategy that enables the reinforcement of network effects. In the end, this idea can sustain the positive feedback loop where supply reinforces demand and vice versa, giving Dashers more revenue opportunities and consumers more options.
Bear Case
Customers are drawn to Uber or Dash for market share and engagement in network effect industries, which frequently produce a winner-take-all atmosphere. Uber sets itself apart from Dash's platform with its own value proposition, which includes ridesharing and food delivery. Switching costs are minimal, though, and customers might favor more affordably priced goods with shorter wait times and a larger selection. In this computation, loyalty programs are important. It is appealing that Dash specializes in food delivery and prioritizes customer satisfaction.
Recently, Dash and Alphabet Wing teamed up to offer drone delivery services in Texas and Virginia. Dash's growth prospects could be jeopardized if drone companies transition from an upstream role to a vertically integrated offering with demand aggregation software and apps. Dash has a lower cost structure because its business model is based on categorizing couriers as part-time gig workers. Dash has, however, incurred legal costs and fought this issue through California's Proposition 22, which may result in other jurisdictions contesting the platform's classification of part-time employees.
Margin Assessment
During the forecast period, Dash, a rapidly expanding technology, is anticipated to hold onto its 2530% market share in the global food delivery industry. However, prolonged market capture will be thwarted by intense competition from Uber and other competitors. With prospects for expansion in grocery delivery and global expansion via its global Wolt platform, Dash has been broadening its geographic revenue sources. As e-grocery catalog sizes increase, consumers are anticipated to favor convenience. Dash is concentrating its growth efforts on suburban markets, where the financial and technological effects will be most noticeable. It is anticipated that revenue growth will surpass significant costs, including those related to onboarding merchants and placing orders with non-partner merchants. By running micro-fulfillment logistics facilities that require little onboarding expertise from merchants, ventures like DashMart increase efficiency.
Increased order batching and better route density should be possible thanks to Dash's continuously evolving machine learning algorithms, which will also increase cost effectiveness per order. The downward trend in sales and marketing costs suggests that network effects have reached a critical mass where they can sustain themselves. Dash is striking a balance between this dynamic and the necessity of entering new markets as it grows. Dash recorded its fourth consecutive GAAP profitable quarter as of March 2025. With an adjusted operating margin of 3.7% in 2025 and a steady increase to 12.4% by 2028, the company is expected to continue to turn a profit in every quarter going forward.
Hedge Fund Bets
On the surface, it may seem like are offloading Dash's shares in cohort but assuming that would be incredibly wrong. Most of these Gurus are single-manager hedge funds who often times need to realize some gains in order to facilitate their LPs get access to their returns. This gets eve clearer when we look at the average buying price of these Gurus who have sold shares of DoorDash. For instance, Aspex, who sold a third of its DASH's holdings had realized a gain of 126% on this stock.
Final Thoughts
To increase its worldwide footprint, restaurant delivery service DoorDash has made a number of calculated acquisitions. It expanded its restaurant portfolio in 2019 when it paid $410 million to acquire a rival restaurant, Caviar. For $8.1 billion in 2022, it purchased the Finnish online delivery service Wolt. It intends to pay EUR 2.4 billion in 2025 to acquire the UK-based food delivery service Deliveroo. DoorDash has been able to reach 26 countries thanks to these acquisitions. Through the proposed $1.2 billion acquisition of SevenRooms, a hospitality technology company, the company will be able to expand its value proposition to restaurants and monetize consumer behavior data. Dash may be able to pursue more significant strategic acquisitions, like Lyft, thanks to its solid financial position and balance sheet. This would enable Dash to compete with Uber as a super-app and diversify its sources of income. By combining the two platforms, the combined entity's appeal would be increased for customers looking for a comprehensive convenience service on a single application.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IPTV: Revolutionizing the Future of Television
IPTV: Revolutionizing the Future of Television

Time Business News

time2 hours ago

  • Time Business News

IPTV: Revolutionizing the Future of Television

In a world where streaming dominates entertainment, traditional TV formats are rapidly becoming obsolete. Viewers are no longer confined to rigid broadcast schedules or expensive cable packages. The modern consumer demands on-demand access, personalized content, and the freedom to stream from any device, anywhere in the world. This is where IPTV, or Internet Protocol Television, steps in as a groundbreaking technology reshaping how we consume media. Whether you're a sports enthusiast, a cinema lover, or someone who enjoys international programming, IPTV offers a versatile and cost-effective alternative to conventional television. This article dives deep into the world of IPTV, explaining what it is, how it works, its benefits, legal considerations, and why it's become the preferred option for millions of users around the globe. IPTV stands for Internet Protocol Television, a system through which television services are delivered using the internet instead of traditional methods like satellite or cable. Unlike broadcast TV, which sends content in real-time via over-the-air signals or cables, IPTV delivers content through packet-based data transfer, enabling on-demand streaming, live TV, and time-shifted media. There are three primary types of IPTV: Live Television : Watching events as they happen (e.g., sports, news). : Watching events as they happen (e.g., sports, news). Time-Shifted TV : Rewinding or pausing live broadcasts (like catch-up TV). : Rewinding or pausing live broadcasts (like catch-up TV). Video on Demand (VOD): Selecting and watching content anytime. Unlike traditional TV that broadcasts the same content to every viewer, IPTV allows for more customized viewing experiences. Here's a simple breakdown of how it works: Content Acquisition: IPTV providers acquire content through licensing or partnerships. Encoding: The content is compressed into a digital format suitable for streaming. Storage & Servers: Files are stored on high-capacity servers accessible via the internet. Streaming Protocols: IPTV uses specialized protocols like HLS, RTSP, or MPEG-DASH to deliver content efficiently. User Interface: Users access content through apps or devices (e.g., Smart TVs, smartphones, MAG boxes). IPTV platforms offer thousands of channels and VOD options spanning genres such as: Sports (live games, commentary) Movies (new releases and classics) TV series (latest episodes and full seasons) Documentaries, music videos, kids' content, and more Whether you're in Europe, Asia, the Americas, or the Middle East, IPTV enables access to global programming from your own location. Most IPTV subscriptions are significantly cheaper than cable TV. No installation fees, dish hardware, or long-term contracts are required. IPTV works seamlessly across multiple devices: Smart TVs (Samsung, LG, Sony) Android and iOS smartphones Streaming devices (Firestick, Roku) Set-top boxes (MAG, Enigma2) Web browsers and desktop apps Watch what you want, when you want it. No need to wait for schedules—IPTV puts control in your hands. Feature IPTV Traditional TV Delivery Via Internet Cable/Satellite Channel Count Thousands (global) Limited (regional) Device Flexibility Phones, tablets, TVs, PCs TV only Interactivity High (pause, rewind, VOD) Low (linear broadcast) Installation Simple (app download or link input) Complex (hardware setup needed) Cost Low High Perfect for watching sports matches, breaking news, or live events. Most IPTV providers offer HD and 4K streams with minimal buffering. VOD libraries are extensive, often rivaling big streaming platforms like Netflix or Prime Video. Expect everything from Hollywood blockbusters to independent films and international series. Some IPTV providers offer access to premium and PPV content at no additional cost—another reason for their growing popularity. Many IPTV platforms cater to specific audiences: Arabic IPTV, Latino IPTV, French IPTV, etc., making it ideal for expatriates or multilingual households. Getting started with IPTV is surprisingly simple. Here's a step-by-step guide: Do your research. Look for positive reviews, service uptime, channel list, and customer support quality. A provider like IPTV is known for its reliability and wide selection. Choose the device you want to watch on—Smart TV, smartphone, tablet, PC, or streaming box. Popular IPTV players include: IPTV Smarters Pro TiviMate XCIPTV GSE Smart IPTV VLC Media Player Once you receive your IPTV subscription (usually an M3U link or Xtream Codes), paste it into your IPTV player. Launch the app and start enjoying live TV, movies, and series instantly. Choosing the right IPTV service is key. Consider the following factors: Look for services with minimal downtime and consistent streaming quality. A good IPTV provider will offer a range of resolutions, including HD, Full HD, and 4K. Ensure it offers channels you actually want—sports, local channels, international content, etc. Reliable customer support is crucial, especially if you encounter technical issues. Features like Electronic Program Guide (EPG) and catch-up TV add immense value to the experience. IPTV exists in both legal and gray-market zones. Legal IPTV providers license the content they stream. However, many services stream pirated content without rights, putting users at risk. To ensure you're on the right side of the law: Use licensed IPTV providers. Avoid providers offering too-good-to-be-true prices. Use a VPN for privacy and data protection. Ask yourself: Do you want to break free from expensive cable? Are you looking for international or hard-to-find content? Do you want streaming flexibility across devices? If the answer is yes, IPTV may be the perfect solution for your entertainment needs. Even the best IPTV services encounter occasional problems. Here's how to troubleshoot common issues: Ensure a stable internet connection (min. 10 Mbps for HD, 25+ Mbps for 4K). Use Ethernet instead of Wi-Fi for better stability. Try switching servers or streams. Reload the playlist or restart your app/device. Contact support for updated server links. Reinstall the app. Make sure your device is updated to the latest OS version. Use a VPN to protect your identity and bypass geo-restrictions. Opt for yearly plans if you find a reliable provider—it's more cost-effective. Keep a backup IPTV app in case one becomes unsupported. Use external players like VLC or MX Player for better performance. Regularly update your playlist or M3U URL to ensure all channels work. With the growth of fiber internet and 5G, IPTV is poised to dominate the entertainment landscape. Expect: Integration with smart home systems AI-powered content recommendations Voice-command functionality Wider adoption of 4K and 8K streams As consumer habits continue to shift towards digital, IPTV will become the primary source of television content globally. IPTV is not just a buzzword—it's a revolutionary approach to how we consume television and media. With its affordability, flexibility, and broad content access, IPTV has become the go-to option for modern viewers who crave freedom and variety. If you're ready to break away from outdated cable plans and experience the next generation of entertainment, explore the possibilities with IPTV today. Whether it's live sports, blockbuster movies, or niche international content, IPTV gives you everything you need—all in one powerful platform. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

You'll Guffaw When You Hear How Much Self-Driving Waymos Cost Compared to Human-Driven Ubers
You'll Guffaw When You Hear How Much Self-Driving Waymos Cost Compared to Human-Driven Ubers

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

You'll Guffaw When You Hear How Much Self-Driving Waymos Cost Compared to Human-Driven Ubers

The whole point of self-driving taxis is, in theory, to save costs on human labor — but Waymo, Google's glitchy robotaxi service, doesn't appear to be any cheaper at all, at least for now. In a report shared with TechCrunch, the ride-hailing data aggregator Obi found that riding with Waymo is pretty much always more expensive than taking a ride with a human-driven Uber or Lyft. For its analysis, Obi analyzed roughly 90,000 records from Uber, Lyft, and Waymo rides between March 25 and April 25 in San Francisco. After comparing estimated arrival times, prices, and routes, the data firm found that Waymo averaged $20.43 per ride, while Uber clocked in at $15.58 and Lyft at $14.44. The increase seems to be worse at peak hours, when a Waymo ride will run consumers $11 more than a Lyft and almost $9.50 more than an Uber, Obi found. What's more, Waymo's pricing model is counterintuitive, making it more expensive for shorter rides and cheaper as the rides get longer. A ride that would be inexpensive on Uber or Lyft would roughly cost, on average, 30 to 40 percent more when taken with Waymo, the analysis found. Still, despite Waymo costing more than a rideshare driven by a human and having a propensity to glitch out and plug up traffic in SF's already-busy streets, people are still uber-excited — pun not intended — to experience the novelty of a robotaxi. "I didn't expect consumers being willing to pay up to $10 more," admitted Ashwini Anburajan, Obi's chief revenue officer, in an interview with TechCrunch. "I think [that] speaks to a real sense of excitement for technology, novelty, and a real preference to sometimes be in the car without a driver." Those don't seem to be one-and-done bucket list experiences for Waymo riders in SF, Los Angeles, and Phoenix. As Obi found, 70 percent of people who had taken a ride with the Google-owned robotaxi service said they prefer driverless rides to ones facilitated by fellow humans. As strange as that preference may seem, the Obi CRO had a few ideas as to why Waymo riders like it so much. "There's something about being in the car alone," Anburajan explained. "It is there for you to, like, kind of live in a little bubble and get from point A to point B, and be very comfortable doing so." More on Waymo: Waymo Hiring For a "Public Affairs Specialist" in Los Angeles While People Are Settings Its Cars on Fire

Uber Technologies Stock Outlook: Strong Fundamentals or Overhyped Ride?
Uber Technologies Stock Outlook: Strong Fundamentals or Overhyped Ride?

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Uber Technologies Stock Outlook: Strong Fundamentals or Overhyped Ride?

Back in 2009, Uber was just an idea in an app tap a button, get a ride. Fast forward 16 years and over 58 billion rides later, and it's turned into something way bigger. Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE: UBER) is now more of a global logistics machine than just a ride-hailing company. They've got their hands in food delivery, freight, maybe even driverless cars down the road. But here's the big question: has all that growth been priced in already? Or is there still room left on the ride? Let's take a look. Uber kicked off 2025 with another strong quarter. In Q1, the company posted $42.8 billion in Gross Bookings, up 14% year-over-year (18% on a constant currency basis). Revenue hit $11.5 billion another 14% jump YoY. Trips rose 18% YoY to 3 billion, supported by a 14% growth in Monthly Active Platform Consumers (MAPCs), now at 170 million. Adjusted EBITDA rose 35% to $1.9 billion, with a margin of 4.4% of Gross Bookings up from 3.7% a year ago. Operating income soared to $1.2 billion, and Uber's free cash flow surged 66% to $2.3 billion, setting a new quarterly record. The company ended the quarter with $6.0 billion in unrestricted cash and short-term investments providing ample capital to continue share repurchases, R&D, and expansion plans. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi noted strong user retention and traction across multiple product lines, with Uber's autonomous efforts gaining visibility through five new AV partnership announcements just in the past week. In short: Uber's top line is growing, profitability is accelerating, and cash generation is robust. But are investors paying a premium? If you dig into Uber's ownership, you'll find all the big names. Vanguard owns around 8.6%, BlackRock's got 7.4%, and when you stack them up with others like Fidelity and Capital Research it's clear this isn't just retail hype. The big guys are in, and they're not known for chasing shiny objects. They're here for the long haul. Now, insiders? They barely show up on the list ownership is under %. Some might side-eye that, but honestly, for a company at this scale, it's not unusual. Founders move on, execs get paid in options, and the rest is in institutional hands. What's important is this: when most of your shareholder base is made up of long-term money, volatility stays in check. It also sends a pretty strong message Wall Street thinks Uber still has legs. As of today (May 27, 2025), Uber's market cap stands at $183.50 billion. With 171 million monthly active users, that means investors are effectively paying around $1,073 per user. This per-user pricing becomes compelling when you consider Uber's brand loyalty and platform utility many users wouldn't give up Uber for $1,000. That says something about stickiness. So how does Uber stack up to competitors? Lyft is cheaper on a sales basis but remains unprofitable. Grab trades at a steep premium despite losses, while Didi is leaner but locked in China. Uber, on the other hand, is the only player posting positive free cash flow, sustainable margins, and global diversification. It trades at just 22x FCF historically low for the company and analysts expect free cash flow to rise over 25% annually. Even modest multiple expansion could lift its valuation significantly. Bottom line: Uber's premium is backed by real cash, real users, and real operating leverage. Here's something most people don't realize Uber still owns a chunk of Didi, around 10%. So even though they're not battling it out in China anymore, they're still along for the ride. And Didi's no slouch. They've got about $7 billion stashed away that's nearly a third of their market cap just sitting in cash, ready to go. Lately, they've been pushing into food delivery too, which could heat things up if Uber ever circles back to that part of the world. What's wild is how the Chinese regulators are actually helping Didi lock things down. They've cleared the field, knocked out rivals, and basically handed them the keys. That kind of home-turf dominance? It makes Didi a serious long-game player and, oddly enough, a pretty strategic card in Uber's back pocket. Then there's Lyft. It's holding on to roughly a third of the U.S. ride-share market. Lately, they've been playing the pricing game slashing fares, making it cheaper for riders, and tougher for Uber to hold onto its margins. Classic race to the bottom stuff. We've seen this before. And you can't ignore Grab. They're a different beast. Not just rides they've got payments, food, and banking all in one place. Kind of like Uber, DoorDash, and your mobile wallet, rolled together. They've locked down Southeast Asia in a big way. All this means Uber's not exactly free to expand wherever it wants. The pressure from competitors doesn't just limit growth it also messes with pricing. If one of these rivals gets leaner or smarter, Uber's lead could start to slip. One useful lens for comparing these platforms is their take rate the slice of gross bookings or merchandise value they convert into revenue. For Uber, the math is straightforward: about $11.5 billion in revenue from $42.8 billion in gross bookings puts the take rate around 27%. That's on the higher end. Grab, by contrast, turned $4.93 billion in GMV into $773 million in revenue, landing at roughly 15.7%. Didi came in at about 18.5% based on its reported RMB19.1 billion in platform sales from RMB103.2 billion in transaction volume. So what does this actually tell us? Simply put, Uber is getting more out of each dollar that moves through its platform. That kind of monetization efficiency can be a real asset especially when you factor in how slim margins can get in competitive pricing environments. A higher take rate often leaves more room to absorb rising driver costs or fund expansion without immediately eating into profits. Uber's Q1 call reiterated confidence but risks still loom. The biggest near-term overhang? The FTC lawsuit. In April, the agency accused Uber of misleading consumers with its Uber One subscription marketing. The company could face civil penalties, refunds, or policy changes that could dampen growth in high-margin subscription revenue. Labor remains a structural threat. New regulatory proposals in the EU and California could reclassify drivers as employees hiking Uber's labor costs significantly. If Prop 22 is overturned, California alone could see a 2030% margin compression. Macroeconomically, things are murky. While management insists there's no change in rider behavior yet, Q1 showed a slight sequential drop in bookings from Q4 mostly due to macro volatility and geopolitical headlines. If recession fears intensify, ride volumes and discretionary delivery could taper. Uber is also spending big on AVs with partnerships across six firms, including Waymo and Volkswagen. But with rising hardware costs and uneven regulatory paths, AV commercialization is still a long game. Put together: Uber's growth is real, but so are the lawsuits, legislative risks, and cyclical pressures. Uber's ride from scrappy startup to global mobility titan is nothing short of remarkable. It's hitting record highs in revenue, profitability, and user engagement. It's also sitting on billions in free cash flow, flexing institutional confidence, and repurchasing shares a sign that even the company believes it's undervalued. But this isn't a carefree cruise. Regulatory risks, pricing pressures, and legal challenges (like the FTC suit) aren't going away. Yet, with stronger-than-ever unit economics, a sticky user base, and real cash flow, Uber seems built for endurance. For investors with a moderate risk appetite and long-term view, Uber may still be a high-conviction bet and the Q1 results reinforce that case. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store