Exclusive: Foxconn sends 97% of India iPhone exports to US as Apple tackles Trump's tariffs
NEW DELHI, June 13 (Reuters) - Nearly all the iPhones exported by Foxconn from India went to the United States between March and May, customs data showed, far above the 2024 average of 50% and a clear sign of Apple's efforts to bypass high U.S. tariffs imposed on China.
The numbers, being reported by Reuters for the first time, show Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the U.S. market, when previously the devices were more widely distributed to countries including the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Britain.
During March-May, Foxconn exported iPhones worth $3.2 billion from India, with an average 97% shipped to the United States, compared to a 2024 average of 50.3%, according to commercially available customs data seen by Reuters.
India iPhone shipments by Foxconn to the United States in May 2025 were worth nearly $1 billion, the second-highest ever after the record $1.3 billion worth of devices shipped in March, the data showed.
Apple and Foxconn did not respond to Reuters requests for comment.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said China will face 55% tariffs after the two countries agreed on a plan, subject to both leaders' approval, to ease levies that had reached triple digits.
India is subject, like most U.S trading partners, to a baseline 10% tariff and is trying to negotiate an agreement to avert a 26% "reciprocal" levy that Trump announced and then paused in April.
Apple's increased production in India drew a strong rebuke from Trump in May. "We are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves, they are doing very well, we want you to build here," Trump recalled telling CEO Tim Cook.
In the first five months of this year, Foxconn has already sent iPhones worth $4.4 billion to the U.S. from India, compared to $3.7 billion in the whole of 2024.
Apple has been taking steps to speed up production from India to bypass tariffs, which would make phones shipped from China to the U.S. much more expensive. In March, it chartered planes to transport iPhone 13, 14, 16 and 16e models worth roughly $2 billion to the United States.
Apple has also lobbied Indian airport authorities to cut the time needed to clear customs at Chennai airport in the southern state of Tamil Nadu from 30 hours to six hours, Reuters has reported. The airport is a key hub for iPhone exports.
"We expect made-in-India iPhones to account for 25% to 30% of global iPhone shipments in 2025, as compared to 18% in 2024," said Prachir Singh, senior analyst at Counterpoint Research.
Tata Electronics, the other smaller Apple iPhone supplier in India, on average shipped nearly 86% of its iPhone production to the U.S. during March and April, customs data showed. Its May data was not available.
The company, part of India's Tata Group, started exporting iPhones only in July 2024, and only 52% of its shipments went to U.S. during 2024, the data showed.
Tata declined to comment on the numbers.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has in recent years promoted India as a smartphone manufacturing hub, but high duties on importing mobile phone components compared to many other countries means it is still expensive to produce the devices in India.
Apple has historically sold more than 60 million iPhones in the U.S. each year, with roughly 80% made in China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump and Japan PM discuss tariffs, Israel's attacks against Iran
WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump held a phone call on Friday in which they discussed tariffs and Israel's attacks against Iran, the Japanese foreign ministry said. Trump has sought to leverage his tariff threats to strike bilateral trade deals with many countries, including U.S. ally Japan. Japan will remain steadfast in its request for a review of U.S. tariffs and would not accept a partial agreement, Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday. On the diplomatic front, the two leaders agreed remain in close communication on Israel's strikes against Iran that began late on Thursday U.S. time and on Friday Middle East and Asia time. Japan has condemned Israel's strikes by calling them escalatory while the U.S. has called those a form of "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved. "Prime Minister Ishiba reiterated Japan's views on the U.S. tariff measures, taking into account the results of the Japan-U.S. Consultations on the U.S. Tariff Measures to date," the Japanese foreign ministry said. It added that the two leaders "concurred to accelerate the consultations between the ministers in charge in order to achieve a mutually beneficial agreement." A White House official confirmed from the U.S. side the call had taken place on Friday. The Japanese foreign ministry added that the two leaders agreed on the importance of peace and stability in the Middle East. Trump and Ishiba are expected to meet in Canada on the sidelines of the Group of Seven meeting next week.
NBC News
30 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we examine how the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran are splitting President Donald Trump's base. Plus, Kristen Welker writes that Trump's showdown with California is testing his political strength on a core issue. And Gordon Lubold answers a reader question on Trump's military parade this weekend. — Adam Wollner Israel-Iran conflict splits Trump's MAGA backers By Jonathan Allen and Henry J. Gomez As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. California standoffs provide pressure test for one of Trump's top issues By Kristen Welker The ongoing protests in Los Angeles and legal standoff over President Donald Trump's decision to federalize California National Guard troops dominated the headlines this week, providing a pressure test for the president on one of his signature issues. Immigration has consistently been one of the bright spots for Trump when it comes to his poll numbers. Even as Americans soured on his handling of the economy and inflation throughout the course of his first 100 days in office, they tended to be split over his handling of immigration. It may still be too soon to gauge how Americans feel about the ramped-up immigration raids and the decision to deploy National Guard troops over Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections, since events are still unfolding. But a new Reuters-Ipsos poll released suggests some cracks may be emerging. Half of Americans surveyed said they do not approve of the president's response to protests in Los Angeles, with 35% approving and 15% saying they were unsure or did not answer. A similar share of Americans (49%) said Trump has gone too far with arrests of immigrants, while 40% did not believe he has gone too far, and 11% unsure or not answering. (The poll was conducted from June 11-12 and has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.) Around half of Americans (48%) said that the president should deploy the military 'to bring order to violent protests,' while 41% say he should not do so, and 11% were unsure or did not answer. California leaders have disputed Trump's claims that the L.A. protests were violent, saying the 'majority' have been peaceful. Surveys conducted as the Los Angeles protests were unfolding had mixed more results. A Quinnipiac University poll, which was in the field June 5-9, found majorities of registered voters disapproving of Trump's handling of deportations (56% disapprove and 40% approve) and immigration broadly (43% approve and 54% disapprove), though immigration was still one of Trump's better-testing issues. (The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 points). An Economist/YouGov survey conducted June 6-9 found Americans gave Trump a net-positive rating on his handling of immigration, with 49% approving and 45% disapproving. That survey, which had a margin of error of +/- 3.5 points, also found varying levels of support for deportations, with less support for deporting those who have not committed violent crimes. And on Sunday, we'll have our own set of numbers. Steve Kornacki will join 'Meet the Press' to unpack our latest NBC News Decision Desk poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, which will look at Americans' views of the Trump presidency, including his handling of immigration and other issues. We'll also discuss the latest in Los Angeles and the future of Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. ✉️ Mailbag: How much will Trump's parade cost? Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question is about this weekend's military parade in Washington, D.C. 'How much is it going to cost? Who approved spending it?' To answer that, we turned to national security reporter Gordon Lubold. Here's his response: The estimated cost for the parade was put at about $45 million by the U.S. Army, which pays for the range of things required to put it on, like transporting the slew of tanks, helicopters and vehicles as well as the roughly 7,000 soldiers brought from around the country to participate and provide support for the big event. The parade is celebrating the Army's 250th birthday, which happens to fall on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. While the parade is the centerpiece event, the Army is planning several other events, including static stations for Americans to see its many vehicles, drones and other things, areas for group workouts, a flyover and even a jump by the Army's Golden Knights demonstration parachute team, weather permitting. The estimated cost includes the $3 million it cost to install large metal plates onto some of the streets in the nation's capital to mitigate damage that the tracks of the tanks was expected to cause. The $45 million also includes a $16 million estimate to repair the streets and other damage to the city following the event, which is expected to draw as many as 200,000 or more people. In an interview with NBC News' 'Meet the Press' last month, Trump said the cost of the parade was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Americans say Trump ‘has gone too far' with immigrant roundups and sending Marines and National Guard to LA
A new survey — conducted after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard and Marine troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against ramped-up immigration enforcement — reveals more Americans do not approve of either move. The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 1,136 American adults on Wednesday and Thursday of this week. And while it found broad support for increasing the pace of deportations for people not in the United States legally, when respondents were asked whether Trump has gone too far with recent efforts to carry out mass arrests of migrants in urban centers, 49 percent agreed that the recent arrests have gone too far, while 40 percent said they had not. Americans surveyed also had a largely negative view of how Trump has responded to the protests with sending in military troops to Los Angeles, the nation's second-largest city, since the stepped-up Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids began last week. The poll showed that 50 percent of American adults do not approve of the administration's response compared with just 35 percent saying they approved. Similarly, 49 percent of respondents said Trump should not push for arrests of local officials who push back against federal immigration enforcement, while 35 percent said the administration should arrest defiant officials. At the same time, the survey revealed that Americans have a dim view of the protests that have spread from Los Angeles to other major cities in response to the anti-immigrant raids, with some degenerating into violence that has seen people injured and property damaged, When asked if the protests have gone too far, 46 percent said yes, compared with just 38 percent who said the protests have not gone too far and 16 percent who offered no opinion either way. But Americans also supported Trump's use of the military to bring order to violent protests by a margin of 48 percent agreeing to 41 percent disagreeing, with 11 percent saying they were unsure. The survey results come just as the first 200 U.S. Marines out of a battalion of 700 arrived in Los Angeles, joining National Guard troops already deployed to the city by the Trump administration. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has sued the administration to block Trump's use of the National Guard, and on Thursday a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that the president had broken the law by bypassing Newsom when calling the guard into federal service. But that ruling is on hold after an appeals court ruled that Donald Trump can retain temporary control of the Guard pending a more comprehensive hearing on the matter this Tuesday. The late-night decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came swiftly after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that Trump's action was 'illegal' and violated the Tenth Amendment, stating that the president must return control of 4,000 troops to Newsom. Additional protests against the ongoing workplace raids have occurred across the nation and are expected to continue through the weekend as part of the 'No Kings' movement, coinciding with the president's birthday parade in Washington, D.C., which celebrates the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army.
