Murray hails ‘brilliant opportunities' of UK Government's industrial strategy
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveiled the document on Monday, pinpointing key industries believed to have the most potential for growth such as artificial intelligence, offshore wind and batteries for electric vehicles.
The 160-page document put Scotland 'at the heart of the UK's energy transition', as well as talking up commitments to a £750 million supercomputer in Edinburgh and £200 million in development funding for the Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire.
The Prime Minister also announced a cut to electricity bills for industrial businesses, £30 million for the video games sector – with a number of high profile developers based in Scotland – and £30 million for research and development for each of the devolved nations.
Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian for the launch of the UK Industrial Strategy today.
Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the 8 growth sectors.
Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills. pic.twitter.com/uLJuRr8zjJ
— Ian Murray MP (@IanMurrayMP) June 23, 2025
In a post on X following a visit to the promote the strategy, the Scottish Secretary said: 'Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian, for the launch of the UK industrial strategy today.
'Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the eight growth sectors.
'Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills.'
The strategy was also praised by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.
'Labour's industrial strategy delivers for Scotland – unlocking economic potential, raising wages, boosting living standards, and delivering the growth we need,' he said.
Asked about his response to the UK Government's announcement on Monday, First Minister John Swinney touted his own Government's work on industry.
'Of course, we have in Scotland our own approach to industrial strategy, which involves working with our universities, with our economic development agencies to ensure that we attract investment and can support development within the economy,' he told the PA news agency.
'Last week, we saw that Scotland, for the 10th year in a row, was the most successful part of the United Kingdom for the attraction of inward investment other than London and the south east.
'So that's an indication that the Scottish Government's got its priorities correct, its focus correct on the attraction of investment, because we're contributing to make Scotland an incredibly successful investment location.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour STILL can't bring themselves to back Donald Trump's strikes after Iran retaliated by launching missile barrage at US airbase in Qatar
Keir Starmer risked being marginalised on the world stage last night after failing to back Donald Trump 's strikes against Iran. As Tehran launched revenge attacks on US bases in the Middle East, the Prime Minister was last night accused of a 'lack of moral clarity' as he refused to take sides in the deepening conflict. British citizens in Qatar were warned to 'shelter in place' last night as Iran fired missiles at America's giant Al Udeid Air Base. Iranian state media said the country's 'mighty and victorious' response to the American assault on its nuclear facilities had begun. Tehran vowed to inflict 'serious, unpredictable consequences' on the US, but, in a sign that it fears further provoking President Trump, it is reported to have warned the Qataris in advance of the attack and focused on a base from which military aircraft had already been removed. Sir Keir was last night facing growing questions about his refusal to support the action taken by America in striking Tehran's nuclear facilities. Yesterday he insisted the UK was 'absolutely focused on de-escalation in the Middle East'. Critics warned that ministers had been left 'paralysed' over the issue after Attorney General Lord Hermer advised that joining Israel 's attacks on Iran, which began 11 days ago, would break international law. Labour's agonies intensified at the weekend following the audacious US assault on the Fordow facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear programme. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs the issue of whether or not Britain supported the attack is not a 'binary question'. And the PM risked diplomatic marginalisation after Nato and Germany backed President Trump's dramatic intervention. Nato chief Mark Rutte said the US bombing raid did not break international law – and said that his 'biggest fear' was that Iran's murderous regime would acquire a nuclear weapon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said there was 'no reason to criticise what America did at the weekend,' adding: 'Yes, it is not without risk. But leaving things as they were was not an option either.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds yesterday acknowledged that the PM's influence on the escalating crisis in the Middle East is now 'not great' with the UK left on the sidelines of the 'special relationship'. Sir Keir emerged from talks with the US President last week to declare Mr Trump would not attack Iran – only to find himself proved wrong days later. Chancellor Rachel Reeves also dodged the question as to whether she backed Washington yesterday. Kemi Badenoch said it was 'quite extraordinary' that ministers were unable to side with the United States against a regime which MI5 says has attempted 20 plots on British soil in the past three years. Mrs Badenoch said Labour's attempt to sit on the fence showed 'a complete absence of moral clarity and, in fact, moral courage'. The Tory leader said she was clear that the US bombing raid was legal, after the shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson advised that aiding Israel was in line with international law because a key ally was facing a 'genocidal threat' from Iran's nuclear programme. During a BBC interview yesterday, Mr Lammy refused eight times to endorse Mr Trump's actions, saying repeatedly that the UK was 'not involved'. In a separate interview with LBC, armed forces minister Luke Pollard failed on seven occasions to back the military action by the US, saying: 'That's not one for me to comment on.' A spokesman for the PM said preventing Iran gaining a nuclear weapon would be a 'good thing'. But he added: 'Our focus is on diplomacy. That is the priority and that is what every member of this government is working towards and that's been the focus of the calls with international partners over the weekend. Iran should take the opportunity presented by the US to re-enter talks.' Sir Keir raised eyebrows yesterday by leaving Mr Lammy to update MPs on the crisis. He missed his weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions last week because of the G7 summit in Canada and is likely to miss it again tomorrow when he is due at the Nato summit. Before and after pictures of Fordow underground complex, taken on June 20 and June 22 'The strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said in a late-night address from the White House No 10 insisted the PM was 'not avoiding Parliament'. Sir Julian Lewis, former chairman of Parliament's intelligence and security committee, said Israel and its allies had a right to defend the country from Iran. He asked Mr Lammy: 'How many times must a terrorist-funding, fanatical regime threaten to wipe another country from the face of the earth before a Government advised by Lord Hermer of Chagos acknowledge that military action to delay and degrade its nuclear weapons programme is both ethically and legally justifiable?' Mr Lammy acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment programme goes far beyond what is needed for civilian energy purposes. 'Britain has long had concerns about Iran's nuclear programme,' he said. 'A nuclear-armed Iran would endanger the immediate region and threaten the global community.' Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin said that Lord Hermer's advice had left ministers 'paralysed and divided'. Former security minister Tom Tugendhat said: 'Labour and the Lib Dems agree they don't want a nuclear Iran and demand only diplomacy – as though no one had thought of that for the past 20 years. 'It's bad enough to look weak. It's worse to advertise irrelevance but the Government has just achieved it.' Human rights lawyer Phillipe Sands, a friend of Lord Hermer and Sir Keir, last night said Israel's attacks on Iran went 'way beyond' what could be justified under international law and that the US was 'not directly threatened at all by Iran'.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Campaigners call for action on reusable packaging and cutting food waste
Reuse experts on Tuesday released research which suggests that adopting reusable packaging for 30% of goods in the UK grocery retail sector could deliver £136 million in annual savings for producers. The packaging extended producer responsibility regulations (Perp), which came into force in January, require producers to pay for the management of packaging waste. The report, commissioned by sustainability consultants GoUnpacked, found that producers could save between £314 million and £577 milllion annually in overall system costs compared to single-use packaging, accounting for the costs of transitioning. It also suggests that shifting to reuse packaging could reduce both the products' carbon emissions and the waste from packaging materials previously used by 95%. The research was developed with input from an advisory panel made up of stakeholders such as the Environment Department (Defra), Biffa, Tesco, the Waste and Resources Action Programme (Wrap), Innovate UK, and WWF. It explored multiple product categories, such as coffee, ready meals and shower gel, using various reuse scenarios to provide an evidence-based picture of the potential impacts of reuse. A 30% reuse target was found to be achievable by converting just 18 priority product categories, using 30 standardised repackaging types. The report also outlined recommendations for industry and the Government to collaborate on a transition plan to reach the target by 2035, by co-ordinating retailers, supply chain logistics, waste management and local authorities. Rob Spencer, Co-Founder of GoUnpackaged, said: 'It's time to move on from debate and focus on the facts: Reuse works. 'Our study shows that switching just 30% of goods to reusable packaging is a huge opportunity for producers and retailers to win – environmentally, financially, and even societally, creating jobs and reducing waste. 'That's why we're calling on the industry and Government to work together and take action to move towards 30% reuse, starting now. There's no excuse to delay tackling the single-use packaging crisis any longer.' In a joint statement, the advisory panel said: 'The modelling results show, for the first time, an evidenced view of reuse working at scale in the UK for grocery retail, enabling industry and government to make insightful decisions about how to move forwards to co-create the necessary transition to reuse in the UK. 'We look forward to bringing the value chain together in June to kick-start the discussion of the next practical steps towards wide-scale reuse in the UK.' It comes after campaign group Wrap and Tesco called for urgent action to reduce global food loss and waste as part of a collaboration to tackle the issue across global supply chains through a series of initiatives. The two organisations cited the World Economic Forum, which estimates that food loss and waste also costs the global economy 936 billion US dollars (£693 billion) a year, when more than 783 million people go hungry every day, and a third of humanity faces food insecurity. Tony McElroy, Tesco's head of circularity campaigns, said: 'We remain focused on driving forward action across our entire supply chain and in collaboration with our key partners as we accelerate progress to halve our food waste.' Catherine David, chief executive of Wrap, said: 'The need to reset our global food system is imperative as our population grows and the climate changes. 'Food security will become a priority for governments as the real impacts of climate change bite harder in coming years, and tackling waste is a key step they must take.' Wrap also warned that governments are falling far short when it comes to outlining their plans to cut emissions in line with UN targets, known as nationally determined contributions. It found that just 12 of the 195 countries to attend the UN Climate Conference, Cop29, in November had committed to reducing food loss and waste in their plans.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Starmer heads to Nato summit with 5% spending pledge
It includes spending 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'. It represents a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election. But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence. Ahead of his trip to the Netherlands, Sir Keir said the increased spending target was 'an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience'. He said: 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe.' The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027. The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies. But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then. Nor would Downing Street say how the increase would be paid for, with a spokesman describing the figure as 'a projected target' that allies would review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment. The Royal United Services Institute has estimated that increasing core defence spending to 3.5% by 2035 would cost £40 billion a year more than keeping the figure at 2.5%. Conservative shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Tories welcomed the higher Nato target, but said the Government's commitment was 'both unfunded and a decade away, when the threat we face is real and imminent'. He said: 'The Chancellor failed to set a path to 3% in the spending review, and this is another announcement without a plan. 'Instead of using smoke and mirrors to inflate defence spending, Labour must get to 3% this Parliament and back our country's defence with a fully funded plan.' The Prime Minister prepared to fly to the Netherlands for the two-day Nato summit against the background of both the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East. Late on Monday, Mr Trump claimed he had secured a ceasefire between Iran and Israel after Tehran retaliated against a US strike on its nuclear facilities. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said Sir Keir would continue to press for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran crisis. He will also urge allies to help secure a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine by showing strength and providing Kyiv with 'the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at 10 Downing Street (Jeff Moore/PA) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council. Ahead of the summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'. But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs. Tuesday will also see the publication of the UK's national security strategy, which is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'. The document will tie together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
