Enbridge says it would pitch new Alberta-B.C. pipeline only under right conditions
CALGARY – Canada's biggest crude oil shipper says a lot needs to happen before it would propose a new pipeline to the West Coast.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has said she wants to see a pipeline running from her province to the Port of Prince Rupert, B.C., so that more oilsands crude can be exported to Asia by tanker.
She told a news conference Tuesday that the province has been in 'active conversations' with pipeline companies and is 'pretty close' to having a one or more come forward with a plan.
Smith has said the West Coast pipeline she envisions would test the Liberal federal government's new process to review projects deemed in the national interest within two years.
Enbridge Inc., which has a massive pipeline network spanning Canada and the United States, says it will always assess market-diversifying projects, provided there is a demand from the producers it serves.
It says in a statement that any new project would require careful consideration and real provincial and federal legislative change around carbon policies, regulatory timelines and Indigenous participation.
'We will be there to build what is needed for our shippers, for Alberta and for Canada — that's our job, our mission as a company — but only when the conditions make sense and the right framework is in place,' Enbridge said.
The CEO of federally owned pipeline operator Trans Mountain Corp. told reporters earlier this month that his company is among those Smith has spoken to about spearheading a new pipeline.
But Mark Maki said 'optimizing the existing kit' is a priority over building something new for now.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Trans Mountain flows to the B.C. Lower Mainland is currently the only way Alberta producers can meaningfully access Asia-Pacific markets.
South Bow Corp., which operates the Keystone pipeline connecting Alberta crude to refineries in the U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast, said in a statement it appreciates provincial and federal recognition of the need for increased pipeline capacity.
'South Bow carefully evaluates all opportunities, especially those that complement our current assets and strengthen our existing corridor.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX: ENB) (TSX: SOBO)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
29 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Enbridge says it would pitch new Alberta-B. C. pipeline only under right conditions
CALGARY — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has expressed confidence one or more private-sector pipeline operators will come forward with a plan to ship oilsands crude to the Port of Prince Rupert and test the federal government's new regime to speed along projects deemed in Canada's national interest. But if pipeline companies are keen on proposing a new West Coast pipeline in the near future, they're not saying so publicly. 'We've been in active conversations with many pipeline companies, and I feel like we're pretty close to having either one or a consortium come forward,' Smith told reporters on Tuesday. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Enbridge Inc. is Canada's biggest shipper of crude oil with a vast cross-border network. It's also the company behind the scrapped Northern Gateway oilsands pipeline to the B.C. port of Kitimat, south of Prince Rupert and further inland. The company said in a written statement Wednesday that it would explore market-diversifying projects, provided the demand is there from customers. It would also take 'real provincial and federal legislative change' around climate policy, regulatory timeliness and Indigenous participation. 'We will be there to build what is needed for our shippers, for Alberta and for Canada — that's our job, our mission as a company — but only when the conditions make sense and the right framework is in place,' Enbridge said. Meanwhile, South Bow Corp. would only say it 'carefully evaluates all opportunities, especially those that complement our current assets and strengthen our existing corridor.' South Bow has no infrastructure in B.C. Its Keystone system serves U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries. The CEO of federally owned pipeline operator Trans Mountain Corp. told reporters earlier this month that his company is among those Smith has spoken to about spearheading a new pipeline. But Mark Maki said 'optimizing the existing kit' is a priority over building something new for now. Trans Mountain flows to the B.C. Lower Mainland is currently the only way Alberta producers can meaningfully access Asia-Pacific markets. The new pipeline Smith envisions would ship one million barrels of oil per day, and would be the 'anchor tenant' on a corridor that houses other infrastructure. B.C. Premier David Eby said Wednesday that the focus should be on shovel-ready projects that are ready to go — in excess of $50-billion worth, by his tally. 'Some of my frustration about this issue is that there is no proponent. There is actually no project here,' Eby said of Smith's B.C. pipeline ambitions. Richard Masson, an executive fellow at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said it's hard to see how Smith can entice a private company to get on board. 'She's pushing to be seen to be doing something and to try and take advantage of the mood in the country,' he said. 'And my concern is that if you only put one option on the table and that option has lots barriers to being realized, you're going to end up with a lot of disappointed people later.' He adds it would take two to three years of engineering, environmental and consultation work before a proposal is ready to be filed. So even if Ottawa's two-year review limit holds, its' five years until shovels hit the ground in a best-case scenario. For Enbridge, Masson said one stumbling block would be how a potential new West Coast system may affect the economics of its Mainline system, which on any given day is the largest-single conduit for Canadian crude flowing by pipeline to the United States. A new pipeline would likely have to be underpinned by decades-long commitments from customers to pay to use it, whereas the Mainline is more flexible, he said. If customers are already locked into paying to use any potential West Coast system, there's more incentive to move crude on that before the Mainline. 'That means volumes that would be going down the Enbridge Mainline get pulled off and put on to the new system,' Masson said. 'So Enbridge seems like an unlikely company unless there is some kind of industry or government support, so that they weren't worse off on the Mainline system.' South Bow, which was spun off last year from TC Energy, is a smaller company and is unlikely to have the capacity for such an undertaking, Masson said. Trans Mountain — a Crown corporation — delivered its expansion last year at a massively higher cost than when it was first proposed. 'So, not easy to see that happening unless the federal government says, 'We want you to do it, so do it,'' Masson said. As for other Canadian energy infrastructure players like Keyera Corp. and Pembina Pipeline Corp., a crude pipeline wouldn't be a fit as they're more geared toward natural gas, he added. 'Their investors would be unhappy if they got into it because it's such a big project compared to the size of the company and it's outside their core expertise.' Another major obstacle is the federal government's tanker ban on the West Coast. During the pitched debate over Northern Gateway, First Nations and environmental groups were vehemently opposed to crude oil tankers sailing along the rugged, island-dotted northern B.C. coast and raised alarm over the ecological damage that could result from a spill. Smith and industry players have been pushing Ottawa to lift the ban, but to date there's no sign the Liberal government will oblige. 'This is simply not an area where we can have a pipeline,' said Anna Barford, oceans campaigner with Stand. Earth in Vancouver. 'When Alberta says pipelines, for us that means tankers.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025. With files from Chuck Chiang in Vancouver
Toronto Sun
40 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Brazeau collapses in Senate, staff says he appears to be recovering
Published Jun 25, 2025 • 1 minute read Sen. Patrick Brazeau speaks to reporters as he arrives at the Senate on Parliament Hill on Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016, in Ottawa. Photo by Justin Tang / THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA — Senate debate on the federal government's major projects bill was briefly suspended after a senator collapsed on the floor of the chamber. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Sen. Patrick Brazeau rose to speak before collapsing sideways onto the floor, though a Senate spokesman said that he appears to be recovering follow an examination by paramedics. Speaker Raymonde Gagne suspended proceedings for roughly half an hour, and many senators left the chamber until she reconvened the debate, and thanked security officials and colleagues for responding quickly. Read More The Canadian Press has reached out to Brazeau's office for comment. The Quebec senator was speaking about Bill C-5, Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial legislation that would grant Ottawa sweeping new powers to fast-track project permits amid a trade war with the U.S. The politically charged legislation has angered Indigenous and environmental groups who argue the legislation does not adequately respect charter rights and should not be fast-tracked through Parliament. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Toronto & GTA NHL Other Sports Music Toronto Maple Leafs
Cision Canada
44 minutes ago
- Cision Canada
Westgold awards underground mining contract at Great Fingall
PERTH, Western Australia, June 26, 2025 /CNW/ - Westgold Resources Limited (ASX: WGX) (TSX: WGX) – (Westgold or the Company) is pleased to announce it has awarded a three-year underground mining contract for its Great Fingall mine near Cue, to global mining contractor, Barminco Limited ( (Barminco). Barminco is an internationally recognised leader in underground hard rock mining. View PDF The award of this term contract for one of Westgold's smaller operations provides Westgold with the opportunity to redeploy its high performing team and equipment currently at Great Fingall to its larger, owner operated mines, including Beta Hunt in the Southern Goldfields and the Bluebird – South Junction mine in the Murchison. Westgold Managing Director and CEO Wayne Bramwell commented: "Westgold continues to focus on increasing mine productivity and further leveraging its extensive capital base. Our inhouse mining team and fleet is best deployed in our larger, strategic assets and this capability gives us the optionality to utilise specialist contractors in our smaller mines. The Great Fingall mine is a smaller mine and as such lends itself to contract mining. It is a high grade, but comparatively simple, operation - with cost efficiency and productivity underpinned by a detailed mine plan, robust drill data, favourable ground conditions and excellent, established mine infrastructure. After a competitive tender process, Barminco was selected as our partner for Great Fingall due to its stand-out safety processes, mining efficiency, and track record of delivery. These qualities reduce the execution risk around Great Fingall for Westgold and will ensure a smooth transition to contract operations in Q1, FY26. With the setup complete, Westgold's high performing team can now be deployed to our larger operating mines, and we expect productivity and operational outputs to lift with their arrival. We look forward to first production from Great Fingall in early FY26 and welcome the Barminco team to Westgold. This announcement is authorised for release to the ASX by the Board. Forward looking statements These materials prepared by Westgold Resources Limited include forward looking statements. Often, but not always, forward looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward looking words such as "may", "will", "expect", "intend", "believe", "forecast", "predict", "plan", "estimate", "anticipate", "continue", and "guidance", or other similar words and may include, without limitation, statements regarding plans, strategies and objectives of management, anticipated production or construction commencement dates and expected costs or production outputs. Forward looking statements inherently involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements. Relevant factors may include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange fluctuations and general economic conditions, increased costs and demand for production inputs, the speculative nature of exploration and project development, including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses and permits and diminishing quantities or grades of reserves, political and social risks, changes to the regulatory framework within which the Company operates or may in the future operate, environmental conditions including extreme weather conditions, recruitment and retention of personnel, industrial relations issues and litigation. Forward looking statements are based on the Company and its management's good faith assumptions relating to the financial, market, regulatory and other relevant environments that will exist and affect the Company's business and operations in the future. The Company does not give any assurance that the assumptions on which forward looking statements are based will prove to be correct, or that the Company's business or operations will not be affected in any material manner by these or other factors not foreseen or foreseeable by the Company or management or beyond the Company's control. Although the Company attempts and has attempted to identify factors that would cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those disclosed in forward looking statements, there may be other factors that could cause actual results, performance, achievements or events not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and many events are beyond the reasonable control of the Company. In addition, the Company's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors outlined in the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's continuous disclosure filings available on SEDAR+ or the ASX, including, in the Company's current annual report, half year report or most recent management discussion and analysis. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Forward looking statements in these materials speak only at the date of issue. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant stock exchange listing rules, in providing this information the Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking statements or to advise of any change in events, conditions or circumstances.
