
Uber Eats Canada is accused of drip pricing practices for food deliveries in proposed class action suit
The statement of claim filed against the food delivery platform with the Ontario Superior Court Justice last month alleges that Uber Eats has been hiding an additional service fee within its overall delivery costs.
Based on the filings, Uber describes this fee as something that fluctuates depending on the customer's order size, which is 'typically 10% of the basket, calculated on the total before any promotions or discounts are applied.'
The filings allege, however, that the service fee is fixed at a minimum of $2 for all food deliveries under $20 and a maximum of $4 for those above $40. The service fee is about 10 per cent of the items' order value for anything in between those price points.
This fee was allegedly tucked underneath the 'Taxes & Other Fees' line item and did not clearly state its existence at any point prior to purchase, like when a user reviews menu prices for example. The documents note this additional cost was only applied to deliveries, not pick-up orders.
Toronto-based law firm Koskie Minsky LLP—the class counsel—says doing this misrepresents the actual cost of app's delivery services, adding that by introducing and charging this fee by the transaction stage is a 'quintessential example of drip pricing practices.'
Here is everything you need to know about the proposed class action lawsuit:
What is drip pricing?
This type of practice is seen when a company adds mandatory fees after advertising low prices to lure in customers, so the advertised prices are not actually attainable, Competition Bureau Canada says. It does not include additional fixed charges like the harmonized sales tax, for example.
There are some telltale signs to look out for, Competition Burau Canada says, like if the price you see does not match up with what you pay or if you have to scroll down or read the fine print to find the actual cost of a product.
How does this impact Uber One users?
Uber One members pay just shy of $10 each month for a variety of perks, including five per cent off on orders and a free delivery fee over a minimum total of $15 from eligible restaurants.
The proposed suit alleges the plaintiff, a Toronto-area woman who was an Uber One member from October 2023 to December 2024, paid a total of $28.50 in service fees across eight delivery orders—despite paying the monthly membership fees.
The filings allege Uber Eats misrepresented the Uber One memberships and the benefits associated with it, saying that the service fee was charged to members every time a delivery order was placed—whether the $15 minimum spend was met or not.
What did Uber say in response to the class action lawsuit?
Uber Eats tells CTV News Toronto it could not comment on the proposed lawsuit, but said it is taking these 'allegations seriously.'
'We are committed to transparency and fairness in our pricing practices,' the statement reads. 'We are reviewing the claims thoroughly and will be defending the lawsuit.'
Am I eligible for the Uber Eats class action lawsuit?
Any Canadian who has placed an order for delivery on Uber Eats on or after May 16, 2023, may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit, as well as Uber One subscribers.
The Toronto-based law firm says people do not need to actively sign up to become involved with the class action—instead, if people qualify under the class action description, they automatically qualify unless they choose to back out from the proceedings.
There is a deadline to opt out of the class action if someone wants to pursue independent legal action, the firm adds.
Koskie Minsky says those who remain in the class action will be notified of their involvement after the statement of claim has been certified.
Do I have to pay legal fees for a class action?
Koskie Minsky says the costs are handled on a 'contingency fee basis'—meaning class counsel will only be paid of the suit is successful at trial or settled.
'In that case, class counsel fees may be paid by the defendants or out of the settlement or judgment proceeds as approved by the court,' the firm says online.
Class action members looking for some financial assistance may be able to look at the Class Proceedings Fund, which can provide support to approved plaintiffs for legal disbursements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Soo Greyhounds won't host 2027 Memorial Cup
Soo Greyhounds won't bid to host 2027 Memorial Cup, citing local economy & tariff concerns. The OHL team says it aims to compete -- but it won't be on home ice.


CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Sheri Willick Realty's pros and cons of condo ownership
Sheri Willick Realty's pros and cons of condo ownership SPONSORED: Sheri Willick has tips on buying and selling condominiums in Saskatchewan

Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
American visitors to Canada outnumber Canadians heading south, data suggests
U.S. President Donald Trump is obsessed with trade deficits. But he may have just wiped out one of the United States' biggest trade surpluses with Canada, in travel services. In June and July, more American residents crossed into this country than Canadian residents who were returning from travel to the U.S. – a sharp reversal after years where the flow of travellers heading south was larger, according to preliminary international arrivals data released by Statistics Canada. The recent shift is the first time that American visitors to Canada outnumbered Canadian visitors to the U.S. since tourism began to normalize from pandemic lockdowns. Prior to 2020, other cross-border travel data published by Statscan shows more Canadians headed south each month since at least 2010. The about-face is the result of Canadians' seven-month long travel boycott of the U.S., which Mr. Trump sparked with his 51st-state rhetoric and tariffs. Some Canadians are also fearful of being detained at the border, following news reports of tourists being arrested. The boycott is leaving its mark. In July, the number of Canadian residents returning from the U.S. via automobile fell by 36.9 per cent compared to the same month last year, with the travel protest picking up speed again after easing in June, according to Statscan. The number of Canadian residents returning by air travel was also down by 25.8 per cent. The Trump slump, as the decline in foreign travel to the U.S. has come to be known, is on full display in tourist-dependent cities like Las Vegas. In June, Air Canada and WestJet carried a combined 32 per cent fewer passengers from Canada to Las Vegas, compared to the same month last year, according to the city's Harry Reid International airport. Canadians have long travelled to the U.S. in much larger numbers than American visits to Canada, so the change in habits could help offset some of the damage caused by Mr. Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods, said Julian Karaguesian, a former adviser to the Department of Finance and a visiting economics lecturer at McGill University. 'Not in a sense that it's boosting our prosperity greatly, but we're keeping more of our national income at home,' he said. 'If that trend continues it should be a positive impulse to our GDP.' Mr. Trump has repeatedly railed against the U.S. trade deficit with Canada when it comes to the flow of goods. However, the U.S. has run an annual trade surplus with Canada in services since at least 1990, according to Statscan, driven mostly by travel. The travel services surplus was a reflection of the larger number of Canadians going to the U.S. and spending more than Americans do during their visits to Canada. The travel boycotts by Canadians and those from other countries are quickly eroding the U.S. travel services surplus, said Dean Baker, senior economist at the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Economic and Policy Research. 'I don't know if Trump doesn't understand services or doesn't care, but it is a very big and rapidly growing part of our trade and it's likely to go into reverse with these current policies,' he said. The number of U.S. residents entering Canada by vehicle in July also declined, but by a much smaller 7.4 per cent from the year before, while air travel by northbound Americans was mostly unchanged from last year. If the boycotts continue and the U.S. travel services surplus dwindles to a deficit, Mr. Karaguesian warned the Trump administration may eventually take notice. 'This is good for us economically as long as it lasts, but it could eventually put us back in the crosshairs,' he said. However, the options for Mr. Trump to retaliate against Canadians for boycotting the U.S. are not obvious. The President could 'try to scare Americans into not coming to Canada' with travel warnings, Mr. Karaguesian said. But to 'pump their travel surplus back up,' the U.S. would not only have to convince Canadians to overcome their anger with Mr. Trump, but 'advertise that the border is easy to cross.' That, of course, would go against Mr. Trump's insistence that the border needs to be tightened to stop the flow of fentanyl entering the U.S., which is his justification for the 35-per-cent tariff on all Canadian goods not compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.