Bulldozer action at Taimoor Nagar: What's the story behind this Delhi locality by the Yamuna?
No one knows who Taimoor Nagar in Delhi is named after.
One could surmise it was a derivation of Turkish-Mongol conqueror Timur or Tamerlane, founder of the Timurid Empire, who invaded India in the 14th Century.
But history records do not confirm this.
Today, Taimoor Nagar is better known as a densely populated locality in Southeast Delhi, near the upscale neighbourhoods of New Friends Colony and Maharani Bagh.
And it found itself in the spotlight this week for all the wrong reasons.
On Monday, illegal structures near the Taimoor Nagar drain — which feeds into the Yamuna and is choked with garbage — were razed. The action was carried out by the Delhi Development Authority on the orders of the Delhi High Court.
The HC Saturday refused to stay the demolition of encroachments around the drain and attributed the flooding in various parts of the Capital — including in South Delhi — last Friday following showers and thunderstorms to the inability of the drain to discharge rainwater downstream due to the encroachments.
The neighbourhood's proximity to the Yamuna has meant the area has often been in the news for encroachments on floodplain land and poor drainage infrastructure.
It has also faced several eviction and demolition drives over the years, particularly those linked to environmental concerns or court orders regarding illegal construction.
The settlement in Taimoor Nagar came up when people were displaced from Rajghat in 1986, said Biswajit Mohanty, Professor of Political Science at Deshbandhu College, Delhi University.
'The people were mostly from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh — three-fourth of the population is Muslim, while the rest are Hindus.'
According to Mohammad Tazeem, who teaches history at the Senior Secondary School in Jamia Millia Islamia, Taimoor Nagar is constructed on the lands of two villages, Kilokari and Khizarabad.
'Kilokari and Khizarabad were established during the Sultanate period, he said. 'Before that, these were small settlements of Gujjars and Ahirs.'
He added, 'Khizarabad is named after the son of Alauddin Khilji — Khizr Khan. As for Kilokari, it is named after Kaikubad, the grandson of Sultan Balban. These villages became populated in the 13th and 14th century.'
Kilokari also has a Sufi connection.
It is also believed that the earliest documented Sufi presence in Delhi can be traced to Khwaja Qutbuddin Bakhtiyar Kaki, the successor of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti of Ajmer, who is believed to have first settled in Kilokari — then a quiet riverside hamlet near the present-day Ashram area.
With the Yamuna flowing beside it, Kilokari offered the solitude and natural setting ideal for a Sufi mystic's meditation and spiritual practice.
British civil servant and historian H C Fanshawe, in his 1902 book, Delhi: Past and Present, described Kilokari as a scenic riverside village that once served as a royal retreat. He noted that it was frequented by Mughal prince Humayun and known for its gardens and proximity to the Yamuna.
Currently, Taimoor Nagar falls under the Okhla Assembly constituency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Trump bans travellers from 12 countries citing national security
Citing national security concerns, President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced that citizens from 12 countries would be banned from entering the United States and those from seven other countries would face restrictions starting Monday. The countries whose citizens have been banned are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Heightened restrictions will be imposed on travellers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The directive is part of an immigration crackdown launched by Trump in his second term. It includes the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans to El Salvador over suspected gang ties, as well as moves to block certain foreign students from enrolling in American educational institutes and deport others. In a video posted on social media on Thursday, Trump said that the 'strength of the restrictions we're applying depends on the severity of the threat posed'. He clarified that the list can be revised if there were perceived improvements while also highlighting that more countries could be added if new threats emerge. Trump has tied the new travel restrictions to the terror attack on Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, where the suspect has been identified by officials as an Egyptian national who had allegedly overstayed his visa. Egypt, however, is not on Trump's restricted list. The White House said some of the countries on the list had 'deficient' screening and vetting processes or 'have also taken advantage of the United States in their exploitation of our visa system and their historic failure to accept back their removable nationals'. The US president said: 'We don't want them.' 'In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies and they were a key part of preventing major terror attacks on American soil,' he said on social media. Trump had signed a similar order in 2017, during his first term in office, that went through several iterations before it was finally upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018, Reuters reported. Back then critics had called the ban a ' Muslim ban ' as the seven countries on the first list were Muslim majority. It was then revised to add two non-Muslim majority countries, North Korea and Venezuela, BBC reported. However, the ban was repealed in 2021 by Joe Biden, the president at the time, deeming it a 'stain on our national conscience'. On Thursday, Trump claimed that the countries were decided based on an analysis by the Department of Homeland Security that considered factors such as 'large-scale presence of terrorists, failure to cooperate on visa security, inability to verify travellers' identities, inadequate record keeping of criminal histories and persistently high rates of illegal visa overstays and other things'. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' White House Spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told CBS News. The proclamation by the White House clarified that exceptions have been made for certain travellers from the list of countries including athletes travelling for major sporting events, such as the 2026 football world cup or the 2028 Summer Olympics, Afghan nationals holding Special Immigrant Visas and any 'lawful permanent resident' of the US. Besides, holders of 'immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran' and persons who have dual citizenship in countries not included in the travel ban will also be exempted. Further, the US secretary of state may grant exemptions to persons on a 'case-by-case' basis, if 'the individual would serve a United States national interest'.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
How 'Madam N' Lured Indian Social Media Influencers To Spy For Pakistan
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Noshaba Shehzad, a Lahore travel agency owner, allegedly aided Indian influencers in espionage for Pakistan's ISI. Known as 'Madam N', she facilitated their travel, established a spy network, and manipulated visa processes, profiting from pilgrimage tours. Srinagar/New Delhi: A businesswoman who runs a 'travel agency' in Pakistan's Lahore has been identified as the person who helped Indian social media influencers travel to her country and set the groundwork for using them as spies, sources have said. Working under Pakistan's espionage agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the businesswoman Noshaba Shehzad who runs the Lahore-based company 'Jaiyana Travel and Tourism', helped Indian social media influencers like Jyoti Malhotra - who was arrested recently - and many others to visit Pakistan, sources said. Known by the codename 'Madam N' by the ISI, Ms Shehzad came into the picture during interrogation of arrested social media influencers in India, sources said, adding she had been working to set up a massive sleeper cell network of at least 500 spies who can hide in plain sight across India. Ms Shehzad's husband is a retired officer of the Pakistani civil services. The Pakistani Army and the ISI sent her instructions on how to set up the sleeper cell network in India, sources said. Sources said the Pakistani businesswoman introduced Indian social media influencers to her country's army and the ISI, and would lure Hindus and Sikhs living in India. She helped nearly 3,000 citizens from India and 1,500 non-resident Indians (NRIs) visit Pakistan in the last six months, sources said. Ms Shehzad's influence reached the visa department of the Pakistani embassy in Delhi. She had been in touch with the First Secretary (visa) Suhail Qamar and Counsellor (trade) Umar Sheryar, which meant that whoever she wanted would get a Pakistani visa immediately, "with a single phone call", sources said. She was also in touch with ISI operative Danish alias Ehsan-ur-Rehman, who worked as a visa officer in the Pakistani embassy in Delhi. Danish was expelled from India in May, after Jyoti Malhotra was exposed. While there is neither any system to send tourists from India to Pakistan nor any process to issue tourist visas to Indian citizens, the Pakistani High Commission had been issuing visitor visas on the recommendation and sponsorship of 'Madam N'. Her connection with the Pakistani Army and the ISI can also be understood from the fact that her company is the only agency that organises Sikh and Hindu pilgrimage to Pakistan, which works in collaboration with the Evacuee Trust Property Board. On the side, Ms Shehzad charged a huge amount of money from Indian pilgrims and used the funds for promoting Pakistani propaganda, sources said. She recently appointed some travel agents in Delhi and other cities, who are now promoting her company on social media.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Late by 6 minutes for test, student's plea fails to convince Delhi HC
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court has refused relief to a student who missed the Common University Entrance Test by six minutes outlining the "sanctity and discipline" of examinations. The 18-year-old candidate claimed on May 13 she reached the exam center at around 8.36 am six minutes beyond the scheduled time of the test but was denied entry. A bench of Justices Prathiba M Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta was hearing her plea against a single judge's order declining to intervene in the matter. The bench observed that the information bulletin of the National Testing Authority and the admit card gave very specific instructions on reaching the centre at around 7 am, two hours prior to the commencement of the examination, as gates would shut at around 8.30 am. The bench said leniency in the conduct of such a large-scale examination would lead to chaos and "discipline of the examination ought to be maintained". "The CUET is an important entrance examination and the discipline in arriving at the examination hall in time, taking the seat in time and being at the center before the gate closing time, are all part of the discipline and ethos of the examination ecosystem which ought not to be relaxed, inasmuch as, the same may lead to huge inequities between similarly placed students," the court held on May 31. The bench dismissed her appeal and said, "One might feel that it was only a matter of six minutes, but the authorities could not be blamed for enforcing the rule of gate closing timings strictly and discrimination was not a valid ground to interfere." Being "extremely conscious" of the negative impact on the student's career, the court said it could not lose sight of the discipline required to be maintained in such examinations. "The CUET UG examination is an exam where more than 13.54 lacs students from across the country appear. If exceptions are made, and discipline is not followed in such an exam, the timely conduct of the exam, the timely announcement of results and timely admission to colleges and Universities is all likely to be jeopardised and there would be a cascading effect. In such matters, the interference by the Court should be the least ," it stated.
