
Your dividend and DRIP questions answered
How do companies and brokers handle dividend payments when stocks are bought or sold between payout cycles? For example, if I sell a stock a week before the payout date, will I lose out on the full value of that dividend payment? Or, conversely, if I purchase a stock just before the payout date, how much of that dividend will I receive?
Depending on when you purchase your shares, you'll either get the full dividend, or no dividend at all. Companies don't prorate the dividend amount based on your purchase date.
To be eligible for the dividend, you will need to own the stock on the record date for the next dividend payment. The best way to illustrate this is with a real-life example.
On May 28, Bank of Montreal declared a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per common share. The record date for the dividend is July 30, and the payment date is Aug. 26.
The payment date is straightforward enough. That's the day the dividend is distributed to shareholders. But the record date requires a bit of an explanation.
You might think that purchasing the shares on the record date of July 30 will entitle you to the next dividend. But that's not the case. Because it takes one business day for a stock trade to settle – that is, for the shares and cash to actually change hands – you would need to purchase your shares no later than July 29. That way, you'll be a shareholder of record on July 30 and receive the dividend to be paid on Aug. 26.
July 30 is also known as the ex-dividend date, because investors who purchase the shares on or after this date will not get the dividend. The record and ex-dividend dates didn't use to fall on the same day. In the past, when the settlement period for stocks was T+3 (the trade date plus three business days), and later shortened to T+2, the ex-dividend date always came before the record date. But when T+1 settlement was adopted a year ago, the record and ex-dividend dates became the same.
With all of that said, it's important to understand that timing your stock purchases in order to receive the next dividend isn't going to put you any further ahead. If you buy before the ex-dividend date, the price you pay will reflect the fact that the dividend is included. If you wait until the ex-dividend date to buy, the price should be lower – all else being equal – because the dividend is no longer included.
The price of a stock rarely drops by the exact amount of the dividend. The price could even rise on the ex-dividend date. That's because stock prices are affected by many other factors – such as analyst reports, economic news, general market sentiment and company-specific announcements – that have nothing to do with the dividend.
Bottom line: If you like a stock, don't worry about whether you'll buy it in time to receive the next dividend.
I am writing to you because this really annoys the stuffing out of me. We have two self-directed accounts, one at TD Direct Investing and the other at RBC Direct Investing. All of our stocks are enrolled in the brokers' respective dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs). Recently, I noticed that the brokers have been reinvesting dividends from the same company at different prices. For example, TD reinvested my Enbridge Inc. dividends at $62.03 a share, and RBC reinvested at a more attractive price of about $61.30. I checked six other examples, and TD reinvested at a higher price in four cases. Should I be concerned?
I don't think so.
Reinvestment prices often differ because not all brokers operate their DRIPs in the same way. Some brokers purchase DRIP shares on the dividend payment date using the cash received from the company. Others may acquire shares in the days leading up to the pay date. In some cases, shares are purchased on the open market, while in others they are issued by the company's treasury, in which case it might take longer for the shares to show up in your account.
When a security is not eligible for a treasury DRIP, 'we purchase shares on the market on the cash dividend payable date. The shares are then posted to your account at the end of the day,' TD Direct Investing explains on its website.
Because share prices are constantly changing, even when two different brokers purchase the same shares on the same day, the price can vary depending on what time the transactions occurred.
In your case, the fact that one broker reinvested dividends at a higher price in five of seven cases doesn't indicate to me that anyone is trying to rip you off. Rather, given the small sample size, this seems to be well within the bounds of chance. I suggest you continue to monitor your DRIPs to see if one broker consistently reinvests at higher prices over a longer period of time. I am skeptical that this will be the case, but if a clear pattern emerges, feel free to get back in touch.
E-mail your questions to jheinzl@globeandmail.com. I'm not able to respond personally to e-mails but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
33 minutes ago
- CBC
$33B in construction spending for Labrador megaprojects is welcome news for industry
While shovels aren't yet in the ground and no labour contracts are signed, billions of dollars in planned construction spending for a new megaproject has many optimistic about the positive impact the new Churchill Falls deal will have on Newfoundland and Labrador. A memorandum of understanding for Churchill Falls hydroelectric plant and other projects was announced in December and is set to be finalized in April 2026. It will require approximately $33 billion in construction contracts between Churchill Falls and Gull Island. "Thirty-three billion [dollars'] worth of construction is significant, no question," Trades N.L. executive director Bob Fiander told reporters while attending Energy N.L.'s annual conference in downtown St. John's earlier this week. Stéphane Jean, a senior director with Hydro-Quebec, says construction on Gull Island's temporary infrastructure, like the work camps and roads, will begin next year, while construction at the Churchill Falls extension will begin in 2029. Fiander says his members need this work. "We're about 70 per cent unemployed," he said. "We're looking forward to getting shovels in the ground and that's important for us because, you know, when our members are not working, they're not getting paid. They're looking elsewhere." While there haven't been any signed labour agreements, he says he's looking forward to what lies ahead. Fiander says he also welcomes the news from Prime Minister Mark Carney on fast-tracking projects deemed "nation-building." "Fortunately for Newfoundland and Labrador, we have a number of projects that could be nation-building projects," said Fiander. 'Optimistic about the future' Energy N.L. CEO Charlene Johnson says the investment will mean a lot of work for her members through construction, environmental work and building transmission lines. "That's very exciting for our members because really we're at a little bit of a lull in the industry now and I'm very optimistic about the future," she said. Johnson added Bay du Nord won't have a decision on its future for some time, making the Churchill Falls deal the next big project in the province. She says Energy N.L. members will have to be ready soon for work on the camp, roads and bridges needed in Labrador. "They said they want to move quickly because all of this has to happen in very short order if they're going to have this power in place within 10 years," she said. Brad Forsey, director of business development for the Cahill Group and vice-chair of Energy N.L. board of directors, says there's going to be a lot of long-term construction work ahead of the sector. "It's a great opportunity for us to be involved from the beginning all the way to the end. We've been involved in similar type projects in this industry and adjacent industries. And we look forward to the opportunities that we have here in front of us," he said. Forsey agreed with Johnson that these projects are important. "There is a bit of a lull right now, but we need to make sure that we're ready and we need to communicate and show to them that we're ready."


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
This AI ETF Could Turn $10,000 Into $40,000 by 2035
There's no denying it -- artificial intelligence (AI) is likely going to have a profound impact on the world over the long term. Entire industries could be altered. It's no wonder management teams are increasingly focused on ways to better position themselves for long-term success. From an investment perspective, perhaps it's starting to make sense that your portfolio should have some exposure to AI. Luckily, investors don't necessarily need to pick individual stocks if they want to benefit from the trend. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » There's one top AI exchange-traded fund (ETF) that could turn $10,000 into $40,000 by 2035. Continue reading to learn more about how to supercharge your portfolio for future success. Looking at the past and future In the last 10 years, the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) has generated a total return of 414% (as of June 3). This means that a $10,000 investment made in June 2015 would be worth $51,400 today. I don't think anyone in their right mind would complain with that kind of fantastic result. Even better, the expense ratio of 0.20% is a minimal cost to bear for that type of gain. There's no guarantee that past returns will repeat themselves going forward. Let's assume that there is a slowdown. Even so, I wouldn't be surprised if investors who put the same $10,000 in this ETF today see a fourfold gain in the next decade, resulting in a 15% annualized return. There's a lot of talk about how the stock market's current valuation is expensive. But consider that this has been the general narrative for a very long time. Yet that hasn't prevented equity markets from marching higher. The rise of passive investing, ongoing economic expansion, and dominance of tech-driven enterprises have all played a part. I'm fairly confident these trends will continue. Diversified exposure to artificial intelligence The Invesco QQQ Trust can be considered a top AI ETF, even though it contains 100 stocks in total. There is heavy concentration among the top positions, many of which have a meaningful AI focus. The so-called hyperscalers, most notably Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, combined represent 18.9% of the Invesco QQQ Trust's asset base. These dominant companies have leading cloud computing platforms that offer a range of AI tools to their customers. They're collectively planning to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on capital expenditures in 2025 in an effort to bolster their technical infrastructure to better position themselves for an AI future. We can't forget about Nvidia, the biggest beneficiary thus far of the AI boom. It provides the graphics-processing units that power AI data centers, posting unbelievable revenue and profit growth. It's the second-largest holding in the Invesco QQQ Trust. Other top positions are Apple, Meta Platforms, Netflix, and Tesla. There's no doubt that AI has and will keep impacting these businesses in some way as well. Play the long game Investing correctly means having patience. While the AI craze has definitely made some investors rich in a short period of time, that's the wrong mindset to have. When buying the Invesco QQQ Trust, it's critical to keep the attention on the next decade and beyond. AI has the ability to revolutionize many parts of our economy, and this will all take time to play out. As of this writing, the Invesco QQQ Trust trades 2% off its peak. It might be tempting to wait for a bigger pullback to put money to work. However, I believe this is a flawed approach. It's a smart idea to invest early and often, letting compounding work its magic. Investing in this top AI ETF could work wonders for your portfolio between now and 2035. Should you invest $1,000 in Invesco QQQ Trust right now? Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Neil Patel has positions in Invesco QQQ Trust. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Ultra-High-Yield Dividend ETF to Buy for Passive Income: Global X SuperDividend ETF or JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF?
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) make it easy to start generating passive income. Several funds invest in income-generating assets or use strategies designed to produce income. Some of those investments can deliver very lucrative income for fund investors. The Global X SuperDividend ETF (NYSEMKT: SDIV) and the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) stand out for their high-income yields. Here's a closer look at the two dividend ETFs, which will help investors decide which is better for them to buy for passive income. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Collecting income from 100 of the highest-yielding dividend stocks The Global X SuperDividend ETF has a very simple strategy. The fund invests in 100 of the highest dividend-yielding securities in the world. Its global strategy opens the door for more high-yielding investment opportunities while helping reduce some risk by increasing the fund's diversification. The ETF distributes dividend income to its investors each month. That income has really added up over the past year as the fund has paid an eye-popping 11.7% yield. At that rate, every $1,000 invested in this ETF would produce about $117 of dividend income each year. However, the fund's distribution payments fluctuate based on the dividends paid by its holdings. Many of its holdings pay variable dividends because of the volatility of their cash flows. Furthermore, many higher-yielding dividend stocks have trouble maintaining their dividend payments due to financial challenges. Because of that, the fund's payments have trended down throughout its 13-year history: SDIV Dividend data by YCharts. Another potential pitfall is that stocks with higher dividend yields don't tend to offer much in the way of price appreciation since the dividend payment typically makes up the bulk of its return. Because of that, the fund has delivered an average annual return of negative 1% since its inception. That lackluster return is because the high-yielding dividends paid by the fund haven't been able to offset the loss in value of the underlying dividend-paying stocks. However, the fund has performed much better in recent years, delivering an 8.2% return over the past year and a 4.5% annualized return over the last five. Cashing in on options The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF has a dual objective. The ETF aims to generate income it can distribute to investors each month and provide equity market exposure with less volatility. It does that through a two-pronged investment strategy: Disciplined options overlay strategy: The fund's managers write out-of-the-money (i.e., above the current market price) call options on the S&P 500 index. By selling or shorting options, the fund collects the option premium (value of the option) as income. It distributes the income produced by this strategy each month. Defensive equity portfolio: The ETF also holds a portfolio of stocks selected by the fund's managers based on fundamental research and its proprietary risk-adjusted stock rankings. The ETF's options-writing strategy can be very lucrative. It has a 7.4% yield based on income distributions paid out over the past 12 months. However, the options income it generates can vary from month to month: JEPI Dividend data by YCharts. In addition to income, the fund strives to provide investors with less volatile exposure to the upside of stocks in the S&P 500. This strategy has enabled it to produce an attractive total return when combining the options income with a rising value in the ETF's price. Since its inception in May 2020, the fund has produced an average annual total return of 11.4%. A better ETF for your money While the Global X SuperDividend ETF provides investors with a higher current income yield, the JPMorgan Equity Premium ETF has a higher total return potential. Because of that, it's a better ETF to buy for passive income. It should supply investors with lucrative distributions each month, while the value of the fund should also rise, helping investors preserve and grow their wealth while they collect income. Should you invest $1,000 in Global X Funds - Global X SuperDividend ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Global X Funds - Global X SuperDividend ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Global X Funds - Global X SuperDividend ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025