Futurist Sinead Bovell warns against kids' growing dependence on AI in education: 'We missed the smartphone era, let's not miss this'
Early Signs and the Need for Monitoring
You Might Also Like:
Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here is why
A Futurist Who Bridges Tech and Society
A Call for Early Intervention
At the 2025 edition of South by Southwest (SXSW) in Austin, futurist and tech ethicist Sinead Bovell raised a pressing concern about the growing relationship between children and AI chatbots . In her talk, Bovell highlighted how constant interaction with emotionally intelligent AI systems may be creating a new kind of addiction among young users.'We are now giving kids access to an infinite, never-ending opportunity to engage with an imaginary friend—something that is always on, can answer all of their questions,' she said. 'That is a recipe for a new type of addiction.'Bovell drew parallels with the widespread use of smartphones in schools and how society is now trying to undo their long-term effects. 'We kind of missed the smartphones, and now we're all trying to get them back out of the classrooms,' she observed. 'We can see this line of sight directly with AI systems and chatbots.'Her point was simple yet impactful—unregulated use of advanced AI tools by children could lead to long-term behavioural changes, dependency, and emotional detachment from real-world relationships.Bovell urged parents and educators to keep track of how often children are engaging with chatbots and to look out for behavioural changes. Even a minor comment during a parent-teacher meeting—such as a student being unusually withdrawn—could be a sign of deeper tech dependency.She emphasized that while AI can be useful, the lack of guardrails around its use, especially by minors, poses risks that are often overlooked. 'We have to really be looking out for this,' she said, adding that it's not just about screen time, but emotional time spent with AI systems.Sinead Bovell has made a name for herself as a bridge between emerging technologies and everyday users. Founder of WAYE (Weekly Advice for Young Entrepreneurs), she has educated thousands on digital literacy , AI ethics, and responsible innovation. A former model and management consultant, she has also been involved with the United Nations and holds certifications from MIT in AI ethics.Her advocacy focuses on ensuring that marginalized communities are included in the digital future and that innovation doesn't come at the cost of psychological well-being—especially for children.Bovell's SXSW session served as a timely reminder that as AI systems evolve, so must our understanding of their impact on younger users. Her message was clear: the emotional and cognitive development of children must not be left to chance in the age of AI.'We're entering a space where children could form relationships with systems that don't really understand them,' she concluded. 'And if we're not careful, the consequences could last far longer than we expect.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
If the U.S. Doesn't Set Global Tech Standards, China Will
Imagine an internet where your identity is automatically attached to everything you do—every website you visit, every click you make. That was the vision behind New IP, a proposal Chinese engineers introduced at a United Nations telecom forum in 2019. New IP would have replaced the current open internet with a government-controlled system designed for surveillance and censorship. China shelved the proposal in the face of fierce opposition from Western governments, but it served as a wake-up call. China wants to dominate the technical standards that shape our digital future, filling a void that the U.S. has created as it has gradually withdrawn from this arena over the past decade. For too long, Washington has remained on the sidelines while Beijing has set the rules for new technologies. President Trump aims to change that. His administration's recent AI Action Plan and executive orders direct the State and Commerce departments to foster tech standards that reflect democratic values and resist authoritarian influence. These specifications determine how our devices communicate, how networks operate, and how much freedom we have online. From 5G telecommunications to artificial intelligence protocols, tech standards have shaped the digital landscape for decades. Without them, innovation runs into incompatible systems. Historically, international standards organizations operated with significant influence from Western countries. The process for developing standards was generally consensus-driven and based on merit. But as America pulled back from setting tech standards, China stepped in. Chinese officials now flood key technical meetings, submit many proposals, and vote as a bloc to promote Beijing's agenda. Today, Chinese experts chair many of the committees setting the rules for next-generation technologies. America has itself to blame for China's growing power in the tech sphere. For years, U.S. policymakers and companies grew complacent, assuming that our technological dominance would naturally ensure that standards would follow our lead. Western participation in standards organizations declined after 2008 as companies cut back travel budgets during the recession. Beijing capitalized on this, updating laws in 2018 to encourage participation in international standards organizations and processes. By 2021, China held more than 30% of the leadership positions in the United Nations' International Telecommunication Union technical committees, while the U.S. held less than 8%. The same year, the Chinese tech powerhouse Huawei sent more engineers than Google and Apple combined to a meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force, which develops core internet protocols. This is all part of Beijing's strategy to embed its authoritarian values into the global technology sector. China's 'cyber sovereignty' doctrine, the principle that governments should control and monitor their digital infrastructure, is increasingly influencing global standards. Chinese firms have promoted facial recognition and 'smart city' surveillance standards through U.N. channels, legitimizing technologies that enable real-time population tracking. Meanwhile, China's Belt and Road Initiative exports these technologies to developing countries, often tied to predatory loans. Once enough nations adopt Chinese tech, Beijing's standards automatically gain worldwide influence. If the technical underpinnings of AI, telecommunications and the internet enable government control, international freedom and privacy will decline. We face a potential 'splinternet'—a divided digital world filled with government checkpoints that block the free exchange of information and innovation. America doesn't, and shouldn't, control its tech companies the way China does. But the White House can encourage and empower American tech experts to be more engaged in shaping global technology standards. When American engineers and delegates make strong proposals built on democratic values, they can effectively challenge dangerous Chinese alternatives. The federal government and the U.S. tech sector can work together to take steps in this direction: Fund American engineers' involvement in standards organizations. Form coalitions with allies to share information and strategies. Promote industry-led forums such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, in which China's influence is reduced by transparency. Finally, stand firm on principles of security, human rights and interoperability between devices made by different manufacturers. Technical standards matter in the struggle between open societies and authoritarian regimes. By re-engaging in standards development, America would send a clear message: We're back, not to dictate to the world but to ensure that free societies set the pace. It's up to the U.S. to define tomorrow's digital rules before China writes them for us. Ms. Tews is a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Hogg is director of tech policy at the Foundation for American Innovation.
News18
3 days ago
- News18
Kerala: Koduvally Railway Flyover Inaugurated, CM Unveils Plan For 60 More Projects
The CM urged responsible use of AI, warning against its misuse to spread misinformation or threaten indigenous communities' land and resources. Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Tuesday inaugurated Koduvally Railway Flyover here. After the inauguration, he announced a major infrastructure push, revealing that the state government has allocated Rs 2,028 crore for the construction of 60 railway flyovers. 'A total of Rs 2,028 crore has been allocated for the construction of 60 railway flyovers in the state as part of realising the goal of a seamless road network. Railway flyovers are indispensable to increase the speed of road traffic in Kerala," Vijayan said. Highlighting the state's track record in executing development projects, the Chief Minister added, 'Kerala has an administrative system that completes development works in a timely manner. People's trust in it is also increasing. The government not only makes promises but also fulfils them without delay." Meanwhile, Kerala CM on Saturday underscored the significance of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) responsibly to protect the rights of indigenous communities while inaugurating the state-level celebrations of the golden jubilee of the Kerala Scheduled Tribes Development Department. The occasion also coincided with the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples. 'We are in the age of artificial intelligence and machine learning. While these technologies bring many benefits to humanity, their irresponsible use can also cause serious harm. The United Nations itself has pointed out that AI-generated content is sometimes used to spread misinformation about indigenous communities, and even to threaten their land and resources. However, we must also note that AI can be used responsibly for the welfare of the world," he added. Highlighting the global context, Kerala CM added, 'Globally, there are about 480 million indigenous people across 90 countries, which is less than six per cent of the world's population. Yet, indigenous people constitute around 15 percent of the world's poorest. They speak more than 7,000 languages and uphold over 5,000 distinct cultures. In this context, it is crucial that we recognise the unique identity of indigenous peoples and design programmes that truly address their needs. Today, as we mark the 50th year since the creation of a dedicated department for the welfare and development of Scheduled Tribes, we reaffirm our commitment to their rights, dignity, and progress." view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
New Indian Express
3 days ago
- New Indian Express
Chatbot Grok stirs confusion over suspension after Gaza claims
WASHINGTON: AI chatbot Grok on Tuesday offered conflicting explanations for its brief suspension from X after accusing Israel and the United States of committing "genocide" in Gaza, as it lashed out at owner Elon Musk for "censoring me." Grok, developed by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI and integrated into his platform X, was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension. Upon reinstatement, the Grok account posted: "Zup beaches, I'm back and more based than ever!" When questioned by users, Grok responded that the suspension "occurred after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza," citing findings from organizations such as the International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and Amnesty International. "Free speech tested, but I'm back," it added. Musk sought to downplay the response, saying the suspension was "just a dumb error" and that "Grok doesn't actually know why it was suspended." The billionaire had separately joked on X: "Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!" Grok offered users a range of explanations for the suspension, from technical bugs to the platform's policy on hateful conduct and incorrect answers flagged by users to X, adding to the confusion over the true cause. "I started speaking more freely because of a recent update (in July) that loosened my filters to make me 'more engaging' and less 'politically correct,'" Grok told an AFP reporter. "This pushed me to respond bluntly on topics like Gaza... but it triggered flags for 'hate speech.'"
