logo
Republican Move to Mask $3.8 Trillion Tax-Cut Cost Rings Alarms

Republican Move to Mask $3.8 Trillion Tax-Cut Cost Rings Alarms

Bloomberg10 hours ago

Senate Republicans are aiming to wipe away some $3.8 trillion of federal budget red ink from the GOP's signature tax-and-spending bill with an unprecedented parliamentary maneuver, stoking concerns about long-term US fiscal policy.
Republicans are using a fast-track legislative process known as reconciliation, which will allow them to make President Donald Trump's 2017 income-tax cuts permanent without Democratic support. The cost of such legislation has long been measured by comparing it to what would otherwise happen to the federal budget under the current law.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliamentarian tosses public lands sales, LNG permitting plans
Parliamentarian tosses public lands sales, LNG permitting plans

Axios

time26 minutes ago

  • Axios

Parliamentarian tosses public lands sales, LNG permitting plans

The Senate's nonpartisan referee has ruled against GOP attempts to use reconciliation to mandate public lands sales and to allow gas exporters to pay for expedited approvals, Democrats said. Why it matters: Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough's rulings mean those Energy and Natural Resources Committee provisions would be subject to the Senate's typical 60-vote threshold, dooming their passage in the reconciliation process. Selling public lands is a chief priority of ENR Chairman Mike Lee, but other Republicans have staunchly opposed the idea. MacDonough, in overnight rulings, rejected several sections of bill text that ENR proposed this month, according to Senate Budget Committee Democrats. Mandatory public land sales: This section would mandate the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service sell millions of acres of public land across 11 Western states. LNG exports: This section would create a regime to allow natural gas exporters to pay a fee to have the Energy Department deem their projects to be "in the public interest." Geothermal leasing and royalties: These sections would require Interior to hold yearly geothermal lease sales and change how geothermal royalties are calculated. Ambler Road project: This section would require Interior to permit construction of a controversial mining road in Alaska. The other side: Lee's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. But he tweeted that he wouldn't abandon his efforts, citing the need to address housing prices. "Yes, the Byrd Rule limits what can go in the reconciliation bill, but I'm doing everything I can to support President Trump and move this forward," he said. "Stay tuned. We're just getting started." Other subsections that MacDonough struck include: What's next: The parliamentarian is still weighing whether to scrub three other provisions, Democrats said.

Mike Lee's proposed public lands sale blocked by Senate parliamentarian
Mike Lee's proposed public lands sale blocked by Senate parliamentarian

Axios

time26 minutes ago

  • Axios

Mike Lee's proposed public lands sale blocked by Senate parliamentarian

A proposal by Utah Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican, to sell millions of acres of public lands to private housing developers hit the skids late Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled it couldn't be included in President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill. Why it matters: Lee's plan would have ordered federal land managers to sell up to about 3.3 million acres of land for housing and infrastructure. Lands eligible for sale included some of Utah's most beloved backcountry destinations for hiking, camping, skiing and more. Driving the news: The Senate parliamentarian decided Monday night that Lee's proposal violated rules limiting "extraneous" measures that can be added during budget reconciliation. To overcome the ruling, Lee's plan would require a 60-vote majority. Catch up quick: Lee's proposed land sale prompted widespread backlash, including from some Republicans. Lee said the land sales would make room for more housing in western states — but the policy language didn't require homes built on the land to meet any standard for affordability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store