logo
Israeli officials see "significant" damage to Iran's nuclear facilities

Israeli officials see "significant" damage to Iran's nuclear facilities

Axios5 hours ago

Israeli intelligence services believe U.S. and Israeli strikes caused "very significant" damage to Iran's nuclear facilities, with some officials perplexed by a leaked U.S. intelligence report that suggested otherwise.
Like the U.S., Israel has not produced a final assessment on how far back the bombing campaign has set Iran's nuclear program, three officials told Axios.
Why it matters: The emerging Israeli assessment presents a far more optimistic view of the operation than a preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, which assessed the strikes may have set Iran back only a few months.
President Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program has been "obliterated" came under scrutiny Tuesday after the DIA report was leaked to CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post and multiple other outlets.
The leak infuriated the White House, which rejected the findings as "fake news" and accused anonymous officials of seeking to undermine Trump.
The big picture: Israel, which initiated the war and faces a far more direct threat from Iran than the U.S., is largely satisfied with the early results from Trump's military strike on Saturday.
"A professional battle damage assessment takes time," an Israeli official stressed, suggesting it was far too soon to draw the kinds of conclusions included in the DIA report.
"Israeli intelligence services haven't arrived at any bottom lines for now," the official added. "But we don't think there was any bug in the operation, and we have no indications the bunker-buster bombs didn't work. Nobody here is disappointed."
Between the lines: The classified DIA report was based on early intelligence from just one agency, and the overall picture remains muddled — especially with Iran itself still assessing the damage and weighing its next moves.
Still, the existence of the report — paired with the abrupt postponement of congressional briefings on Tuesday — has ignited deep frustration among Democrats over Trump's cavalier approach to sensitive intelligence.
"I'm very concerned about [Trump] distorting, manipulating and even lying about intelligence," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told Axios. "We've been here before. We went to war in Iraq under false pretenses."
The other side: Trump and his aides have doubled down on the success of the B-2 bombing operation and lashed out at the media for reporting on the early intelligence assessment.
"Leaking that type of information — whatever the information, whatever side it comes out on — is outrageous. It's treasonous," White House envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News.
"We put 12 bunker-buster bombs on Fordow," Witkoff continued, referring to Iran's most fortified underground nuclear site. "There's no doubt that it breached the canopy … and there's no doubt that it was obliterated."
Behind the scenes: Israeli officials said the Iranian government has been engaged in its own battle damage assessment to determine the state of its nuclear program.
An Israeli official with direct knowledge of intelligence on Iran told Axios that intercepted communications suggest Iranian military officials have been giving false situation reports to the country's political leadership — downplaying the extent of the damage.
"The Iranians themselves still don't even have a clear idea what happened to some of their nuclear facilities," a second Israeli official said.
Zoom in: Israeli officials said the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan — the three sites targeted in the U.S. strike on Saturday — is "very significant."
At Natanz, the above-ground enrichment facility was completely destroyed, and signs point to the collapse of its underground infrastructure, an Israeli official said.
At Fordow, the U.S. military's 30,000-pound bunker-busters inflicted major damage on the facility — though Israeli officials say it remains unclear whether the underground areas suffered full structural collapse.
At Isfahan, Israeli officials said the uranium reprocessing facility — which produces the uranium metal used in bomb-making — was destroyed. Isfahan's underground tunnels were also damaged, but the full scope is still being assessed.
"We doubt that these facilities can be activated any time in the near future," an Israeli official said.
The intrigue: Two Israeli officials also claimed that intelligence shows Iran's stockpile of 60% and 20% enriched uranium is now buried beneath rubble at Isfahan and Fordow — and it's unclear whether Iran will be able to recover it in the near future.
Zoom out: Beyond the direct damage to Iran's nuclear facilities, Israeli officials say the broader war effort dealt a crippling blow to Iran's long-term nuclear capabilities.
Israel assassinated dozens of A-list and B-list nuclear scientists — key figures with both institutional memory and hands-on expertise — during the 12-day conflict.
Several of Iran's centrifuge production lines were destroyed, significantly limiting the country's ability to replace the thousands of centrifuges lost in the Israeli and U.S. airstrikes.
The IDF also destroyed labs and testing facilities that housed scientific equipment critical to Iran's nuclear weapons research and development, according to an Israeli official.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Point
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Point

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Point

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several polls show that Trump's approval rating has fallen to an all-time low for his second term. The latest Gallup poll, conducted between June 2-19 among 1,000 adults, shows that Trump's net approval rating stands at -17 points, with 40 percent approving and 57 percent disapproving. That is done from -10 points in May, the previous lowest result recorded by Gallup. The poll had a margin of error of ± 4 percent. Meanwhile, the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between June 20-23 among 1,590 adults, shows Trump with a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent approving and 54 percent disapproving—down slightly from -13 last week. The poll had a margin of error of ± 3.5 percent. Similarly, a new Bullfinch Group poll, conducted between June 17-20 among 1,006 registered voters, puts his net approval at -13 points, with 41 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval. That marks a sharp drop from -5 in May. The poll's margin of error was ± 3.1 percent. Why It Matters The drop comes amid a broader downward trend in Trump's approval rating, which was particularly pronounced after his "Liberation Day" tariffs. But the question of direct U.S. involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran has visibly contributed to the drop as polls have shown the majority of voters do not support it. Trump ordered airstrikes against three key Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Washington. Evan Vucci/AP What To Know The latest Ipsos/Reuters, American Research Group polls also show Trump's net approval rating at record lows for his second term. In the Ipsos/Reuters poll, conducted between June 21-23 among 1,139 registered voters, Trump's net approval rating stood at -16 points, with 41 percent approving and 57 percent disapproving. That is down from a previous low of net approval of -12 points in last week's poll. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Similarly, in the latest American Research Group poll, conducted June 17-20 among 1,100 adults, Trump's net approval rating hit -21 points, with 38 percent approving and 59 percent disapproving, down from a low of -14 points in the previous poll conducted in May. The latest Morning Consult poll, conducted between June 20-22 among 2,205 registered voters, did not show Trump's approval rating at an all-time low. But it did show a notable decline in Trump's approval rating, with 45 percent approving and 53 percent disapproving, giving him a net approval rating of -8 points. That is down from a -6 net approval rating in the previous poll. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 points. Other polls have shown a downward trend in Trump's approval rating in recent days. In the latest J.L. Partners poll, conducted on June 16-17, Trump's approval held steady at 48 percent. But disapproval was up 11 points to 51 percent since the last poll in February. Still, a handful of polls recorded slight gains for Trump, though largely within the margin of error. In the latest Echelon Insights poll (June 17-18), Trump's approval rating was up 2 points at -4, while disapproval was down by 1 point compared to last month. Poll Date Approve Disapprove YouGov/Economist June 20-23 40 54 Ipsos/Reuters June 21-23 41 57 Morning Consult June20-22 45 53 Bullfinch Group June 17-20 41 54 American Research Group June 17-20 38 59 Trafalgar Group June 18-20 54 45 RMG Research June 11-19 53 46 Gallup June 2-19 40 57 Echelon Insights June 17-18 48 52 J.L. Partners June 16-17 46 51 And the most recent RMG Research poll, conducted between June 11-19, put his approval rating up one to 53 points, while his disapproval rating remained the same at 46 points. In the latest Trafalgar Group poll, conducted between June 18-20, 54 percent approved of Trump's job performance, while 45 percent disapproved, giving him a net approval of +9 points. That is up from +8 in last month's poll, when 54 percent approved and 46 percent disapproved. What Happens Next Trump's approval rating could fluctuate in the coming weeks, depending on the outcome of key events.

Inside 'Pickaxe Mountain': Iran's underground fortress — that may be stashing uranium
Inside 'Pickaxe Mountain': Iran's underground fortress — that may be stashing uranium

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Inside 'Pickaxe Mountain': Iran's underground fortress — that may be stashing uranium

An under construction hidden fortress in Iran — known as 'Pickaxe Mountain' — may potentially be housing any uranium stockpiles that Tehran managed to smuggle out before the US bombed its nuclear sites. The deeply buried installation, which is just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility — one of the three sites struck over the weekend, has been quietly reinforced in recent years. Multiple reports have now suggested that Pickaxe could be the perfect hiding place for uranium — as speculation mounted that Iran may have been able to remove its cache before the attacks unfolded over the weekend. Advertisement 3 Satellite image of the Natanz uranium enrichment site construction area in Iran. DigitalGlobe/Getty Images Open-source satellite images taken Thursday and Friday showed scores of cargo-style trucks lined up outside of Fordow, arousing suspicion that the theocratic regime could have moved its stockpile of enriched uranium. Almost 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity has been unaccounted for since the Israeli airstrikes began on June 13. Meanwhile, Iran has been cagey about the Pickaxe Mountain site after satellite imagery emerged earlier this year showing a new deeply buried tunnel and security perimeter close to the existing Natanz site. Advertisement The director general of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency asked Tehran in April about what was going on there — but got a blunt response. 'Since it is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the program are taking place, we're asking them, what is this for? They are telling us, it's none of your business,' Rafael Grossi, the director general, said at the time. He added that it 'cannot be excluded' the tunnels would store undeclared material but said he didn't want to speculate on intentions. Advertisement 3 Images released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies showed more than a dozen trucks lined up outside Iran's Fordow nuclear facility just days before the US carried out its large-scale airstrikes. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images 'I've been raising this issue repeatedly, and I will continue to do so,' Grossi said. It wasn't immediately clear if Pickaxe suffered any damage during the latest strikes that targeted Natanz, as well as the Fordow and Isfahan nuclear facilities. President Trump, for his part, has insisted Iran wouldn't have been able to remove any uranium being enriched at the sites before the attacks. Advertisement 3 The deeply buried installation is just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility. DigitalGlobe/Getty Images 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast,' Trump said Wednesday. 'It would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it.' Trump, too, has insisted his attacks 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program and the White House has dismissed a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran could salvage it within months.

US, Iran talks ‘promising': Trump envoy
US, Iran talks ‘promising': Trump envoy

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

US, Iran talks ‘promising': Trump envoy

Steve Witkoff, U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, said Tuesday that talks with Tehran for a long-term peace agreement are 'promising' — a day after President Trump announced a temporary ceasefire agreement after 12 days of conflict between Iran and Israel. In an interview on Fox News Channel's 'The Ingraham Angle,' Witkoff said discussions with Iranian officials were already underway, as the fragile U.S.-brokered ceasefire appears to be holding. 'The president has said unequivocally that he wants to see — and he's hopeful for — a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire,' Witkoff told host Laura Ingraham. 'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' he continued. 'I think that the conversations are promising.' The envoy, who has participated in negotiations with Iran on the Trump administration's behalf, said he's 'confident' about the prospects for a deal, which he said would ensure 'long-term prosperity' for Iran. 'We're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement that resurrects Iran, that brings it into the League of Nations, that creates long-term prosperity for Iran and, most importantly, allows for the GCC to grow economically,' Witkoff said, using an acronym for the Gulf Cooperation Council. He also touted Trump's authorization of U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, saying, 'Eliminating this risk was crucial to the economic future and prosperity of the entire Gulf region.' 'And we've achieved that,' Witkoff continued. 'So, I think now it's time for us to sit down with the Iranians and get to a comprehensive peace agreement.' He added, 'And I'm very confident that we're going to achieve that.' Ingraham then asked Witkoff whether a potential deal with Iran would allow for any uranium enrichment. 'No,' Witkoff said, without hesitation. 'They don't need it,' the special envoy, who has also been instrumental in Russia-Ukraine peace talks, continued. 'What they need is a civil, non-enrichment program, just like Abu Dhabi has. They're running a reactor like that, called Bushehr, where they don't have enrichment, and they're getting fuel from the outside. And we're going to work with them on this. But what they don't need is enrichment.' His comments come as multiple outlets reported that Saturday's strikes likely only set Tehran's nuclear program back by a few months. The administration has vowed to investigate the reports, which contrast Trump's rhetoric that the attacks 'destroyed' Iran's nuclear capabilities. Witkoff and others have called the leaks 'treasonous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store