Kalispell Council appears likely to adopt hazard mitigation plan
Jun. 11—Kalispell City Council appeared in favor of adopting a regional hazard mitigation plan after Monday night's work session.
The 2024 Western Montana Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan is meant to serve as a policy and program blueprint and "identify and reduce long-term risks from disasters or natural events" across Montana, according to city officials.
Development of the Flathead County portion of the plan began in 2022 and was approved by the state and Federal Emergency Management Agency earlier this year.
But to the frustration of Mayor Mark Johnson, Flathead County, Columbia Falls and Whitefish adopted the plan before it was ever brought before Kalispell City Council.
Johnson called the move a missed opportunity to bring the neighboring municipalities to the table to mull over the plan together.
"Because one of the biggest complaints I get is there's no regional planning," Johnson said. "This is really kind of self-reflection on the process, because we also missed the opportunity."
Councilor Ryan Hunter also pointed out some typos he requested to be fixed before adoption.
When the plan first came before the Council in April, Councilor Sid Daoud successfully passed a motion to delay voting until he and his colleagues had enough time to read through the 500-page document.
On Monday night, Daoud expressed reservations about some of the automatic actions in the plan that would bypass the city and state and go straight to the federal level.
Adopting the plan would open up grant opportunities for hazard mitigation projects in 2025.
Reporter Jack Underhill may be reached at 758-4407 or junderhill@dailyinterlake.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Thursday said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) should be censured after he tried to approach and question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles, prompting federal agents to forcibly remove him from the room and handcuff him. Video of the altercation — captured by reporters on the scene — sent shockwaves through the Capitol, with Democrats slamming the way law enforcement personnel handled Padilla, and Republicans condemning the senator's conduct at the media availability. Pressed on whether Padilla should face consequences, Johnson initially demurred — 'it's not my decision to make, I'm not in that chamber' — before endorsing censure for the California Democrat. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' 'We're not gonna have branches fighting physically and having senators charging Cabinet secretaries,' he added. 'We got to do better and I hope that we will.' The comments came during a press availability in the Capitol after House Republicans narrowly passed a bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Johnson staged the gaggle to discuss the legislation, but was swarmed with questions about the altercation in Los Angeles. 'I saw the same video, a very brief video, that I think many people did — I think the senator's actions, my view, is it was wildly inappropriate,' he said. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary, and everybody can draw their own conclusions, you can see it's a heated debate here.' As he delivered those remarks, a long line of House Democrats — including many in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and from the California delegation — walked behind the Speaker and heckled him and he spoke. Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif), who represents the San Francisco bay area, shouted 'Mike, that's absurd.' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) yelled 'why don't you stand up for Congress?' Another House Democrat exclaimed 'that's a lie.' Asked if he would respond to some of the comments, Johnson declined. 'I'm not gonna respond to that,' the Speaker said. 'I think the American people can draw their own conclusions. They saw a senator acting like a, wildly inappropriate, I'll leave it at that.' 'What I saw was agents asking him to quiet down so that the secretary could continue her press conference. He refused to do so. What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaging in that kind of behavior. They moved him out of the room,' Johnson later added. 'A sitting member of Congress should not act like that, it is beneath a member of Congress, it is beneath a U.S. senator. They are supposed to lead by example and that is not a good example.' Earlier on Thursday, Padilla interrupted a press conference Noem was holding in Los Angeles amid widespread protests against the Trump administration's deportation efforts and against Trump mobilizing the National Guard and Marines to protect agents. Multiple men forcibly removed him from the room and handcuffed him. 'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla is heard saying as he struggled with officers holding him back. As he was aggressively moved out two double doors the senator can be heard saying 'Hands off!' 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California,' Padilla's office said in a statement immediately after the altercation. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed. He is not currently detained, and we are working to get additional information.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump ally bids for £170m Crystal Palace stake
John Textor is considering three offers for his stake in Crystal Palace – including one from Donald Trump ally Woody Johnson. A quick sale could rescue the Premier League side from the threat of expulsion from the Europa League. Advertisement Telegraph Sport understands Johnson, the New York Jets owner, tabled a 43 per cent purchase proposal, marginally less in overall value than two others being discussed. Raine Group, the New York broker which secured sales for Chelsea and Manchester United, had been in discussion with parties on behalf of Textor since last year. However, the American is conscious of the club's need to now secure a quick transaction to guarantee European competition next season. A rapid sale for as little as £170 million has been mooted for Eagle Football Holdings' 43 per cent stake as Textor's ownership of Lyon leaves Palace facing the threat of being barred from Europe's second tier. Johnson with Donald Trump in 2011 - Getty Images/Al Pereira Industry insiders believe a purchase of Textor's shares by the current co-owners, Josh Harris and David Blitzer, is the most likely outcome this summer. However, options include at least two other proposals from the US, one of which has been established for months. A deal with Johnson, 78, is viewed as an outside shot. He is a controversial figure in US sport, with the New York Jets facing scrutiny last year following reports of 'controversial and dysfunctional practices' under his watch. Advertisement Johnson bought the New York Jets in 2000, with the NFL franchise now estimated to be worth around $6.9 billion. The Jets' $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium will host next year's World Cup final. Johnson is also well-known in UK politics. The long-time Republican Party donor was appointed as US ambassador to the UK during Trump's first term. His brother, Christopher, took over Jets operations during his post. The American businessman has long been interested in buying a Premier League club, having approached Raine about Chelsea in 2022. Johnson (far left) and his wife Suzanne Ircha (far right) host the then Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall along with Donald and Melania Trump at the US ambassador's residence in London in 2019 - Getty Images/Chris Jackson Other suitors for Palace, meanwhile, are believed to include NBA star Jimmy Butler, part of a consortium of sport and entertainment executives that is expected to make an offer. That separate proposal was first reported by The Athletic on Wednesday night. Another international consortium advised by the veteran football financier Keith Harris also previously expressed interest. Mr Harris's group would probably execute its deal through the recently incorporated Sportbank vehicle. The Sportsbank consortium – worth upwards of £200 million – is said to be made up of a collection of investors from North America, Europe and the Gulf. Advertisement Textor, who previously expressed interest in buying Everton, is willing to find another club as soon as possible. Textor acquired his holding in Palace in 2021 for about £90 million. His multi-club network Eagle Football also includes French club Lyon, Rio-based Botafogo and RWD Molenbeek in Belgium. His priority is to pursue a club which can accept players across the group. Crystal Palace's overall value is said to be about £500 million – around the same price that Everton were valued at, minus debt, during Farhad Moshiri's protracted sale. Stanley Tang, of the US-based food delivery company DoorDash, denied suggestions that he was also in discussions to buy Textor's stake. Chairman Steve Parish, Textor and his fellow US businessmen Harris and Blitzer oversee the running of the Selhurst Park club as general partners. However, Textor has repeatedly hinted at frustrations that he does not exert as much control as he would like. Crystal Palace co-owner John Textor (left) and chairman Steve Parish (right) celebrate the club's FA Cup win - AP/Dave Shopland Uefa is set to inform Palace whether they are in breach of its multi-club ownership rules by June 30 – although the matter may then be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) which would delay a final verdict. Advertisement The FA Cup winners met Uefa officials last week in a two-hour meeting in an attempt to avoid being barred. Palace insist there is no sharing of information or staff or facilities with the French side. The club argue that despite Textor's shareholding, he has no say in the day-to-day running and has just 25 per cent of voting rights. Nottingham Forest have written a letter to Uefa expressing their position and asking for clarification over whether Palace will be involved. Forest could be moved up from the Europa Conference League to the Europa League if Palace are disqualified. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
House clears $9.4B in funding clawbacks requested by White House
House Republicans have narrowly advanced a request from the White House to claw back $9.4 billion that lawmakers have already approved for public media and more than a dozen accounts across the State Department focused on foreign assistance. The 214-212 vote is a major victory for President Donald Trump, who had been lobbying hard for lawmakers to pass the legislation, including in a social media post shortly before members went to the floor. 'For decades, Republicans have promised to cut NPR, but have never done it, until now,' Trump said, in part. 'The Rescissions Bill is a NO BRAINER, and every single Republican in Congress should vote, 'YES.' MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' It's also a huge relief for Speaker Mike Johnson, who hours earlier was projecting cautious optimism that the package of funding cuts would pass despite knowing his margins were exceedingly narrow. 'We think we have the votes. We're going ahead with it,' Johnson told reporters Thursday afternoon. One 'yes' vote: Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who is known to frequently break with his party. 'First time I've ever seen us cut spending in my life. I would be 'yea' all day long,' Massie said in a brief interview earlier this week, previewing his support. The legislation would revoke $8.3 billion in foreign aid and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. It faced opposition from some Republican lawmakers concerned about slashing the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, and how emergency alerts could be impacted by the public media cuts. House Republican leadership and White House officials spent days trying to assuage the concerns of lawmakers worried that the clawbacks would hurt their local public broadcasting stations, emergency alert systems and efforts to prevent AIDS around the world. The fight to convince House Republicans continued up until the final gavel on Thursday. Johnson and Whip Tom Emmer huddled with the holdouts on the House floor during the vote to try to sway them in favor of the measure after they had already voted against the measure. At one point, as many as six Republicans were recorded as voting "no" — enough to tank the bill. Two of those holdouts, Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Nick LaLota of New York, flipped to yes, handing Johnson — and Trump — the win. GOP Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Mike Turner of Ohio opposed the bill. In defense of cuts to public broadcasting, senior GOP lawmakers argued that the local PBS affiliates in their home states do good work but that those in some other states air inappropriate programming. "These stations are some of the most partisan stations out there. Can you imagine if a conservative station was funded? The left would have screamed, vilified and exterminated it a long while ago," said Rep. Dan Meuser (R-Pa.), during floor debate. Democrats countered that's a lie. 'That's BS. It's total BS,' Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the House's top Democratic appropriator, said in a brief interview. 'These comments that it's 'woke' in this state or that — what the hell do you know? Nothing.' Still, there are discussions underway among many appropriators that they could try to offset some of these slashes in upcoming spending bills, since the funding cuts won't impact accounts until after the new fiscal year kicks in come October 1. 'I am concerned about the future of trying to do away with public television. I'm a supporter of public television in Idaho, they do a fantastic job,' said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, who ultimately voted in favor of the bill. The package now heads to the Senate, where Republicans are discussing whether they can amend it – despite the complicated mechanics for doing so. The rescissions process was created under the decades-old law enacted to block presidents from withholding federal cash Congress has already approved. The Senate also has the option to approve sections of the package piecemeal and reject others. That's what Congress did back in 1995 when the House and Senate approved a rescissions package that clawed back less funding than then-President Bill Clinton had requested to cut. But doing that would send it back to the House, where passage a second time may not be guaranteed. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the package 'could be' changed in the Senate. 'We'll see,' he told reporters Thursday. 'I would expect that rescissions package probably will be a July timeframe," Thune said. Congress has until midnight on July 18 to act on the legislation, otherwise the proposal will expire and the White House is required to spend the money as lawmakers intended. Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.
