
Manager pulls last-minute stunt to extend notice period on employee's final working day; Reddit explodes with advice and outrage
Picture this: you've slogged through a
90-day notice period
, fulfilled every responsibility despite health issues, and finally packed up your work laptop to drop it off on your last working day. Relief is just a few hours away. But at 8 p.m. on the Friday before your exit, you receive a jarring email from your manager—your notice period has been
extended
. Why? Because 'knowledge transfer (KT) is incomplete.'
This exact scenario played out for a
Redditor
on the r/developersIndia subreddit. In a detailed and emotionally charged post, the soon-to-be ex-employee shared their ordeal of being held back just before the finish line, despite already having a confirmed last working day and a resignation portal indicating a completed separation process.
A Trap Disguised as 'Transition': The KT Excuse
The Redditor had already communicated health concerns, even requesting an early release. However, the company refused. They diligently served the full notice period. But as they geared up to return office assets and bid goodbye, the manager insisted KT was pending and thus refused to clear them for exit.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
by Taboola
by Taboola
Worse still, no replacement had been hired, and the manager used this failure as a reason to keep the Redditor on indefinite hold. The employee was left in limbo: contractually done, but unofficially shackled.
The Internet Reacts: 'You're Being Ghosted, Not Managed'
Redditors swiftly jumped in with sympathy and sharp advice. Most pointed out the clear illegality and unprofessionalism of the manager's last-minute move. 'Loop in HR and the reporting manager. You don't need permission—you're notifying them,' said one commenter. Another added, 'They won't give early release but have the audacity to extend your stay. This is a bluff—don't fall for it.'
Some shared personal anecdotes of similar situations. One noted that in large firms often backs employees in such cases, especially when managers attempt to overstep. Others emphasized that a notice period is a contractual grace period for the company to hire replacements—not a leash to bind employees indefinitely.
Red Flags and Legal Grey Zones
This incident has opened up broader conversations around employer overreach, especially in the tech sector. While employment contracts typically define the terms of resignation, many Indian employees report facing undue pressure during exits, including guilt-tripping, sudden demands, or radio silence from HR.
What makes this case particularly galling is the timing and informality. The manager's email came after working hours, right before a weekend, and clashed with all prior formal communication confirming the employee's last working day.
The Bottom Line: Know Your Rights, and Stand Your Ground
As one Redditor aptly put it: 'KT is
their
responsibility. If it wasn't done during the notice period, that's on them, not you.' The key takeaway for employees is to document every interaction, stick to the terms of their offer letter, and escalate quickly through official channels when managers attempt such power plays.
And if a manager sends a dubious email outside work hours on a Friday? One Redditor had the perfect reply: 'You never saw it. You already submitted your laptop. You're out.'
This viral incident stands as a cautionary tale and a rallying cry: in the war of attrition between employees and
corporate overreach
, the internet might just be your strongest ally.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
EV makers Tata, Mahindra seek to block hybrids in govt fleets, documents show
India's biggest automakers are seeking to block a pollution management body's attempts to promote hybrid vehicles in government fleets in and around New Delhi, saying it will disrupt adoption of cleaner battery electric cars and hit investments, documents show. Companies, including Mahindra & Mahindra and Tata Motors , are lobbying the ministry of heavy industries to overturn an attempt to equate hybrids with EVs and ensure incentives for all government programmes are restricted to electric models, five company letters seen by Reuters show. In a May 2 advisory, the Commission for Air Quality Management, tasked with fixing severe air pollution levels in India's capital region, categorised strong hybrids as "cleaner vehicles" recommending their use in government fleets, a move that caught carmakers by surprise. Given the "ultra-high density" of vehicular traffic in New Delhi and nearby areas, there is a need to move away from "polluting vehicles, dependent purely on fossil fuels like diesel and petrol", the commission said. Automakers, however, argue that hybrids - which use a battery and combustion engine - are reliant on fossil fuels whereas EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, making them an effective solution for the urban air pollution crisis. "Our plea is for government policy and incentives to stay firmly focused only on EVs," Mahindra said in its May 15 letter to the heavy industries ministry. Along with Tata and Mahindra, JSW MG Motor , Hyundai Motor and Kia Corp have also written to the ministry in support of electric cars, rekindling their face-off with hybrid proponents like Toyota Motor and Maruti Suzuki. Tata, Mahindra, JSW MG Motor, Hyundai , Kia Corp and the ministry of heavy industries did not respond to requests for comment. Policy uncertainty The potential opportunity is huge - of the 847,544 vehicles in use by government agencies across India in 2022, only 5,384 were EVs - less than 1%, official data showed. A major concern for EV makers is that support for hybrids dilutes the Indian government's own policy which incentivises only EVs in its production-linked schemes and other programmes. It will also create confusion among car buyers, companies and investors, hurting EV sales at a time when their growth is already slowing due to inadequate charging infrastructure and high upfront vehicle costs. "The lack of a consistent and predictable policy environment may deter long-term investors ... particularly in high-capex, technology-intensive sectors like EV," said Tata, which has raised $1 billion from private equity firm TPG for its EV push. Tata in its May 15 letter said, the commission's move will undermine current and proposed EV investments, impact India's global image as an investor friendly destination and send mixed signals to international stakeholders. Carmakers in India are expected to invest over $10 billion through 2030 to manufacture lithium-ion cells, EVs and batteries, ratings agency Moody's said in a report, adding EV adoption rates in India are still low versus China, Europe and the U.S. Mahindra's EV unit counts Singapore's Temasek and British International Investment among investors while Hyundai plans to invest over $500 million in EVs in India.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meet the Indian couple whose baraat shut down Wall Street: All you need to know about them
Image credits: X/@NELiveTV Recently, videos of a baraat shutting down the streets of the New York Stock Exchange went viral on the internet from people across the world being shocked by the typically bustling streets of NYC being filled with 400 people dressed in Indian attires dancing to music. The video of the crowd grooving outside Cipriani Wall Street was shared by DJ AJ on his Instagram account. "We shut down Wall Street for a 400-person Baraat. Who would've ever thought?!" While people were surprised to see the entire scene, what they were more intrigued about were the couple whose wedding procession took over the NYC- who they were and how rich they would be to block down blocks of the city for their wedding baraat? Here's all you need to know about the Indian couple whose baraat 'shut down' Wall Street. The couple who were deemed to be some sort of 'millionaires' by half the people viewing the videos of their wedding baraat were identified as Varun Navani, CEO of enterprise AI platform Rolai and Amanda Soll, director of legal compliance and risk management, according to their LinkedIn pages. Additionally, the NYPost confirmed their identities by their wedding page on The Knot, which had details of their four-day wedding celebration. While the high-power couple hails from Boston, Massachusetts, they decided to tie the knot in NYC not only breaking the internet but most probably also their bank. As per the city records viewed by The Post, Navani and Soll filed 28 permits for their wedding day, thus spending somewhere between $25,000 and $66,000 per location to shut down the streets of the Financial District. The street events are classified by the Mayor's Office on the basis of the area they take over-curbs, sidewalks and roads and by size and impact. While "large" events require full block closure and extensive setup, "extra-large" events need even more space, permits and NYPD coordination. Navani and Soll's wedding festivities began on May 23rd, with breakfast and afternoon tea at the Conrad Hotel and a sangeet at The Glasshouse. On the 24th, the day began with brunch and tea at the Conrad, before the baraat started off at 3:30 pm, followed by a reception at the Cipriani Wall Street that had guests dancing from 5:30 pm to 2 am. That's not all, on the 25th, the couple had another wedding, this time a Jewish one, at Cipriani and an after-party at Slate that was going on till 4 am. Lastly, on the 26th, they wrapped up the festivities with a post-wedding brunch and lunch at Conrad. The couple's wedding surely had been grasping their chains on its expenditure and others relishing in the fun of two people joining hands forever.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wall Street slips as tariff concerns weigh on earnings, inflation data in focus
US stocks slipped in early trading Friday, giving back some of their recent gains as investors weighed a mixed batch of earnings reports, inflation data and ongoing uncertainty over the future of tariffs imposed under President Donald Trump. The S&P 500 fell 0.3% shortly after the opening bell, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 158 points, also 0.3%. The Nasdaq Composite declined by a similar margin. Leading the market lower was Gap Inc., whose shares tumbled after the retailer warned that tariffs on imports from China and other countries could increase its costs by as much as $300 million this fiscal year. This warning overshadowed its stronger-than-expected quarterly results. Meanwhile, Ulta Beauty rose 8% in early trading after reporting earnings and revenue that topped Wall Street forecasts, along with an upbeat full-year outlook. Investors also had an eye on Alphabet, parent company of Google, whose shares remained flat ahead of closing arguments in a landmark antitrust case that could result in major changes for the tech giant, which was previously ruled an illegal monopoly by a federal judge. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Markets have been particularly sensitive to trade developments this week. Hopes were briefly lifted after a ruling from the US Court of International Trade determined that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, used by Trump to justify sweeping tariffs, did not grant such authority. However, those tariffs remain in effect for now as the White House appeals the decision, leaving the ultimate resolution uncertain. The focus now shifts to the Commerce Department's April report on consumer spending, due later Friday. The release includes the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure, which analysts believe moved closer to the central bank's 2% target. With the Fed keeping interest rates unchanged for three consecutive meetings amid inflation and trade concerns, investors will be listening closely to public remarks from three Fed officials scheduled for later in the day. Global markets showed mixed movement. In Europe, France's CAC 40 rose 0.3%, Germany's DAX climbed 0.8%, and the UK's FTSE 100 added 0.6%. In Asia, Japan's Nikkei 225 dropped 1.2% to 37,965.10 after inflation data from Tokyo showed core prices rising faster than expected, fueling speculation that the Bank of Japan may raise interest rates. Australia's ASX 200 gained 0.3%, while South Korea's Kospi slipped 0.8% ahead of next week's presidential election. Hong Kong's Hang Seng lost 1.2% and China's Shanghai Composite shed 0.5%. The trade court's ruling applies only to some tariffs, leaving those on steel, aluminum, and automobiles—enacted under a different law—unaffected. On Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the president to continue collecting the contested tariffs temporarily while the case proceeds. In energy markets, US crude dipped 7 cents to $60.87 per barrel, while Brent crude fell 10 cents to $63.25. In currency trading, the US dollar weakened to 143.68 yen from 144.12 yen, and the euro edged down to $1.1344 from $1.1367. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now